13 Fights at UFC 99: New Trends in UFC Event Planning and Roster Management
Promoted from the FanPosts by Kid Nate.
With news of the Rousimar Palhares-Alessio Sakara fight breaking today, the card for June's UFC 99 in Cologne, Germany has now grown to a staggering thirteen bouts, which makes it the largest card in UFC history.
The current rumored card includes:
MAIN CARD
- Rich Franklin vs. Wanderlei Silva
- Ben Saunders vs. Mike Swick
- Marcus Davis vs. Dan Hardy
- Spencer Fisher vs. Caol Uno
- Heath Herring vs. Cain Velasquez
PRELIMINARY CARD
- Dale Hartt vs. Denis Siver
- Rousimar Palhares vs. Alessio Sakara
- Denis Stojnic vs. Stefan Struve
- Peter Sobotta vs. Paul Taylor
- John Hathaway vs. Rick Story
- Justin Buchholz vs. Terry Etim
- Mustapha al Turk vs. Todd Duffee
- Roli Delgado vs. Paul Kelly
Now obviously the UFC was looking to stack their initial foray into mainland Europe with as much European and international talent as possible, but thirteen fights on a UFC card is truly mind-boggling, and it's part of a trend among recent UFC events. Wednesday's UFC Fight Night 18 card and UFC 97 later in the month will both feature 12 bouts each.
I briefly calculated the average number of fights-per-card for major UFC pay-per-view events since UFC 50, and found the following:
UFC 50-60: 8.2 fights per card
UFC 61-70: 9.0 fights per card
UFC 71-80: 9.0 fights per card
UFC 81-90: 10.1 fights per card
UFC 91-99: 10.6 fights per card
Clearly, events with title fights will usually see fewer bouts than those with non-title main events. And the rare events with multiple title fights will see significantly smaller cards, but nonetheless, the UFC has been steadily increasing the size of its cards.
The European events tend to be larger than US-based events, as the UFC is trying to showcase their international talent in markets where they'll have the biggest appeal, as opposed to trying market the Paul Taylors, Terry Etims, and Dennis Sivers of the world in the U.S. Thus, many of these international fighters see action only on the European cards, and these events end up featuring more fights since there are many foreign fighters "on deck", waiting for the call.
This still doesn't explain Wednesday's Fight Night card with its 13 fights, and the UFC 97 card in Montreal with its 12. The Montreal event is loaded with Canadian talent for sure, but many of those fighters have also seen significant action on events that took place in the U.S. (e.g. Jason MacDonald, Sam Stout, Mark Bocek).
My theory is based on the fluid nature of the UFC's roster. Currently, there are approximately 210 active (my definition: they've fought within the last full year) fighters on the UFC's roster, based on the official listings at UFC.com (which also contains a few legends and retired fighters that I had to adjust for). Over the past year or so, roster cuts have become a big news item following poor performances or repeated losses, and with more light being shed on the details of UFC contracts and their various clauses, it's now quite commonplace for MMA bloggers and writers to discuss upcoming fights as "lose and you're out" situations for certain fighters.
Based on various interviews and rumors, it's become common knowledge that matchmaker Joe Silva and the UFC brass want to keep the active roster around 180 or so, and that it is for this reason that we've been seeing more and more roster cuts and little contractual mercy shown to losing fighters in recent events. I believe this is also the explanation for the growing numbers of fights-per-card we've seen on recent and upcoming events. Despite my belief that the UFC wants to shrink its roster, we've certainly seen more and more new signings in recent months, but some of these fighters have been signed for "win your first fight or go home"-type deals, and the firing rate is still eclipsing the hiring rate.
Although certain "poster-boy" (or "yes men" depending on who you ask) fighters are nearly assured job security, despite their results in the Octagon (i.e. Forrest Griffin, Rich Franklin, Kenny Florian, Georges St. Pierre, Chuck Liddell), recent situations with Roger Huerta and Jon Fitch have shown that even ultra-popular fighters and title contenders are not safe from being let go, or at least punished for displaying their public disapproval of the UFC's fighter-relations strategies.
For the rest of the roster, the UFC is sending a message with these larger cards. Dana White, Joe Silva, and Lorenzo Fertitta are giving the lower and mid-tier fighters more and more opportunities to show their stuff, and if they don't, they're gone... it's as simple as that. Putting 12-13 fights on a card as opposed to 8-9, is a much more efficient method for not only trimming your roster, but also for clarifying the food chains within each weight class.
Of course it remains to be seen if the UFC will actually get the roster down to 180, and if that number will remain static if it gets there, but for the meantime, I will certainly be enjoying the 12 and 13-fight cards, because if UFC 95 showed us anything, even a prelim fight between two British guys that you've never heard of can provide a hell of a lot of action and entertainment.
The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.
21 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Rec’d – the more work for fighters, the better.
by Derek Suboticki on Mar 31, 2009 1:52 AM EDT reply actions
There`s another angle to it also. What I would want if I was Joe Silva, would be a roster where virtually everyone was a “star”. As it is, they can make enough fights happen, but they still have some trouble filling the main events. By adding fights to each card, you have a better opportunity to boost that particular fighters star-quality.
It doesn`t even really matter if its a quick finish or a drawn out bore-fest. In effect, even top conteneters fight on undercards in order to bolster their record. (I give you Fitch-Gono, Okami-Lister, Palhares-vs Poor Italian guy as examples) In the long run this gives the UFC the oppourtunity to expand even further and host even more events without diluting the “quality” of the show.
"They called him the axe-murderer because he was murdering chumps. They should have been calling him the chump-murderer..." Rampage Jackson (commentating on the fighting abilities of Wanderlei "F#ck Chuck" Silva.)
by BlueberryMuffin on Mar 31, 2009 2:06 AM EDT reply actions
not really
the fights you mention were made out of necessity for the more popular fighter i.e. FITCH vs gono or OKAMI vs lister. undercards are a place where you get a rebirth or a death rattle, its not a place fighters choose to be.
Fitch v Gono is a prime example of why undercard fights sometimes have big names – Fitch can only lose there. If he wins, he’s the same guy he was before GSP tooled him, but if he loses, it’s about him and not Gono. If it’s a brutal quick KO either way, they’ll elevate it regardless of who’s on the receiving end – but when a name can only lose face, they bury it. It makes sense to me.
by Derek Suboticki on Mar 31, 2009 3:11 AM EDT up reply actions
subo gets it, georgehouse doesn`t.
when a name can only lose face, they bury it.My point exactly.
If you wanna over-analyze you may even look at what kind of fighter they give them… Gono is a warrior, but he won`t finish Fitch and he will definately NOT win a decision. Lister would never win a decision and a submission didn`t seem likely. Sakara is a boxer, but is not known for brutal one-punch-KO`s.
In short, IF the fight goes the distance you will likely have the marketable fighter as a winner and the chances of an upset KO or submission are slim. Patt vs Vera is another example come to think of it.
"They called him the axe-murderer because he was murdering chumps. They should have been calling him the chump-murderer..." Rampage Jackson (commentating on the fighting abilities of Wanderlei "F#ck Chuck" Silva.)
by BlueberryMuffin on Mar 31, 2009 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Another factor not taken into account: the more prelim fights, the more options to fill time on the main card. With 4 prelim fights, there is a very real chance of all fights going to decision, being boring, or too short to fill the dead air on the live card.
And since therè`s still just one knock-out bonus, UFC gets some extra for free.
"They called him the axe-murderer because he was murdering chumps. They should have been calling him the chump-murderer..." Rampage Jackson (commentating on the fighting abilities of Wanderlei "F#ck Chuck" Silva.)
by BlueberryMuffin on Mar 31, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Fun Fact
Akihiro Gono – cut by the UFC
Roli Delgado – gainfully employed by the UFC
I guess that fight’s happening at 155lbs. and I know Delgado is fighting for peanuts, but still, that is certainly…something.
"BJ on the BE" - Kierkegaard
don’t worry, Delgado will be out of the UFC soon enough. The UFC had to hire someone to welcome Paul Kelly to the lightweight ranks (as some UK fighters with wins are needed). Don’t confuse underperforming main carders (who still require getting paid a decent rate in order to sign a new contract) with transient hires as prelim card cans. There are tiers to the UFC roster and having such tiers serves a purpose.
by undrafted on Mar 31, 2009 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Underperforming Main Carders
Akihiro Gono fought three times for the UFC, and each fight was a preliminary match.
So, who are we talking about when you mention confusing underperforming main carders with transient hires as prelim card cans?
"BJ on the BE" - Kierkegaard
good point, I was technically incorrect for sure but I think the gist of my point still stands. I think the intent in signing Gono was to sign a contender. Fitch isn’t exactly a prelim guy. Swing bouts at PPV’s and prelim fights on the TUF Finale aren’t exactly the same. I was talking more about status and intent than a literal definition of “main carder”. Gono’s last 2 fights after his win were “headlining the prelim card”. He was paid a main carder salary and expected to produce at such a level.
I’ll agree that losing to Fitch is an unfair way to go out but losing to Hardy and likely being on the tail end of his original contract are some valid reasons to let a guy go. Gono apparently wasn’t cut immediately after his fight since guys like Wellisch and Arroyo were removed from the ufc.com roster a while back (and Gono wasn’t). That tells me that this move had something to do with negotiations over what’s next, not a flippant cutting the guy because he lost 2. Signing Akiyama may have lessened the UFC’s desire to have Gono on the roster. What’s the point in paying Gono 30k for another fight if he would be a free agent afterwards? The UFC smartly avoids letting guys leave on a winning streak whenever possible. I’m sure if Gono would take 12k for several future fights (like Delgado likely has in his contract) to fight early on the prelim card, the UFC probably would have retained his services. Gono really doesn’t have much name value outside the hardcore fans. He probably belongs in Japan right now to help build up Sengoku.
One major reason there are more fights: The UFC wants to keep fighters active.
Bringing new guys in gives Zuffa and co a chance to see how they perform on the big stage. If they lose, they go back to the smaller shows. If they win, they get a chance to continue in the UFC.
Also, many have their theories as to why bouts like Fitch/Gono was a prelim, but there is one reason that has been ignored: It was likely to go the distance and thus take longer than other pos fights.
And that is exactly what it did: It went the distance.
And why is Roli still in the UFC? Very simple: He won his first bout. Almost every TUF guy gets one bout. If he wins, he gets a second. It has been that way since season one.
Another reason there are more fights: Nobody grapples anymore.
I kid, of course, but the proliferation of early KOs in the last handful of PPVs have seen a couple of events show nearly every fight on PPV, including a couple of yawners.
So until guys get back to the ground and look for submissions, the UFC is smart to drop maybe $40k on lining up four or five underbelly prospect fights that they can pick through for solid TV fill.
As for Roli, it’s not just that every TUF guy gets one bout, the standard UFC deal for a non-star is they get three fights to prove themselves. If they win the first two, they’re in. If they lose one, they have another couple to save face.
When Roli drops his fight against Kelly, it’ll put him into the path of the scythe, but for now he’s on a ‘win streak’.
If you see Mark Coleman in person, drop $5 on the floor and watch the fun as he tries in vain to bend down and pick it up.
So What Happened to the Tickets to UFC99?
So the UFC has taken UFC off of their tickets page, they also have taken it off of their Events page….I was able to find tickets still available through the german venue site, but their English site isnt showing any UFC event. Whats goin on? Cancelled? After this article I would assume no, but odd that it was pulled from these sites the last few days…Im planning on going, so lets hope its just bad webmaster mojo…
I think the best thing about this
Is that they are able to plan for some good main event type fights… and if they end too soon, they have a bigger pool of possibly good fights to show inbetween.

by 























