Is Bad Kickboxing the Future of MMA?
Perhaps it's too soon to call it a trend, but the lack of submissions during UFC 96 is worth discussing. Saturday's card in Columbus marked the third event in the organization's last six that failed to produce a submission (tapout to choke or joint lock).
Prior to UFC 96, 94 and 92, the last time a UFC card finished submission-less was February 2007, at UFC 67 -- a span of 36 events. Over the course of 94 Zuffa-era UFC events, only eight have failed to yield some sort of submission. That three of those cards took place in the past four months is at a minimum noteworthy, at worst disconcerting.
Just once has the UFC come up short on submissions in consecutive events. Way back when, in 1996, UFC 9 and 10 saw plenty of finishes, just not a tap from a rear-naked choke, triangle, armbar or countless other ways to end a fight via lock or choke. Understandably, that was an entirely different era.
I've been concerned that MMA is becoming too unbalanced and the disturbing trend that Gross points out does nothing to reassure me.
Ideally, MMA should be a blend of the three phase of fighting -- range fighting, the clinch and ground fighting -- with plenty of dynamic transitions from phase to phase.
I'm not saying there's anything wrong with a good stand-up war, but I do worry that MMA is degenerating into bad kickboxing.
And you don't have to be a smarty pants MMA fan to notice. From the Columbus Dispatch:
A friend who attended his first Ultimate Fighting Championship event Saturday night in Nationwide Arena wasn't impressed with the brawling ("90 percent of it is boxing, and they're bad boxers") and said it will never go mainstream unless they clean it up. That works for me. I'm not sure we want head kicks in the mainstream. It moves us that much closer to Rollerball.
HT FightOpinion
2 recs |
124 comments
|
Comments
Once upon a time, wrestlers owned the cage. I think some day, someone somewhere will come up with a grappling game that starts killing the strikers.
by lhasafi on Mar 10, 2009 12:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know if shitty kickboxing is the future of MMA on the whole, but it’s certainly the future (or present, as it seems) of mid-level UFC guys headhunting for bonuses.
Contributor Emeritus - BloodyElbow.com
by Chris Nelson on Mar 10, 2009 12:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This.
There is a movement afoot of fighters that are less concerned about title shots and more concerned about earning “fight of the night” and “knockout of the night” bonuses. Chris Lytle is the perfect example.
However, I don’t know what can be done about it. They could change the bonus amounts give out to inspire people to want to win by submission, but that is far to close to fight fixing for my taste.
Frankly, I think its just part of the eb and flow of the competition. Let someone like Maia win a belt and perhaps we will see submisisons on the rise.
Oh, and it looks like bad kickboxing for the same reason MMA fighters are incorrectly often labeled as having bad boxing skills…because they need to work on a greater range of skills and fight with more threats to defend from.
by Razreshat on Mar 10, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
That has some merit to it. It wasn’t until Gracie started whipin ass that people stood up and took notice about BJJ, then a similar trend after hughes. But then we had the Liddel era at 205 and no one has really stood out since. Maybe lesnar will help, despite most people hatred for him, he might do some good.
by proflex on Mar 10, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think we can keep saying that the fight of the night and ko of the night are the reasons. They give the same amount for submission of the night and fight of the night could easily go to an interesting ground game, in my opinion.
by Wookalarman on Mar 10, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah but its a lot easier to just swing for the fences and hope to land a KO punch or kick on someone than it is to catch someone in a sub, that takes a lot of training and work to perfect.
by ufc4 on Mar 10, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But isn’t that the whole point of all of this. To find the best fighter from all styles?
by Wookalarman on Mar 10, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
if you have bad range your a bad boxer
by lcollins1 on Mar 10, 2009 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is until a few figure this out and realize it is easier to get sub of the night awards due to less competition.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Mar 10, 2009 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is exactly right.
More people who want to be MMA fighters, less Marcus Davis’.
by Simco on Mar 10, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Funny thing is, over half of his wins are by submission.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Mar 10, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I guess if he
labels this as bad kickboxing then yes I would rather watch bad kickboxing over regular kickboxing/K-1/Boxing.
Mike Goldberg: "You know Joe, When Matt and his brother Mark Hughes were growing up, they would pound each other behind the barn."
by xFenixKnightx on Mar 10, 2009 12:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh noes!
A print journalist doesn’t want us to go mainstream! And those guys are doing so well! None of them are going out of business! They totally have their finger on the pulse of America!
Although detractors decry (MMA) as a brutal, bloody form of human cockfighting, aficionados know it is a brutal, bloody, totally fucking awesome form of human cockfighting. -The Onion
by The Kittitas Kid on Mar 10, 2009 12:57 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
This.
You guys think I should ever sell the NYTimes their building back?
by Riney on Mar 10, 2009 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Simple solution
Maia fights on every card
"Japan is half-Machida" - iiowyn
by Day Man on Mar 10, 2009 12:58 PM EDT reply actions 6 recs
lol
Brilliant!
Mike Goldberg: "You know Joe, When Matt and his brother Mark Hughes were growing up, they would pound each other behind the barn."
by xFenixKnightx on Mar 10, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and throw Hazelett in there for good measure…
by cauliflower_ears on Mar 10, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They have fought together on one card…and guess who got sub of the night? =)
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Mar 10, 2009 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand the concern, but I agree with the others who say that this is part of the evolution in styles. Right now, enough people at the elite levels have learned enough defensive grappling maneuvers to largely mitigate grappling from most folks.
Additionally, I very much worry about changing rules or any other conceivable method of getting the “perfect” ratio of fight outcomes, which I don’t think is a good goal anyway.
There is one caveat in this position: If this trend is because of greasing, this shit needs to get worked out now. I’m okay with the sport organically evolving in one direction, but not with subverting the notion of sport.
"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito on Belfort at Affliction:DOR
by Rundownloser on Mar 10, 2009 1:05 PM EDT reply actions 8 recs
I would like to take this time to second everything he just said. Well stated.
by Wookalarman on Mar 10, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Same for me. I agree with all that as well.
by mattman73 on Mar 10, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
use the rec button
click actions and recommend
"the spirit of your average dumbass with more overblown rhetoric" OR "the self-appointed savior of MMA"
by Kid Nate on Mar 10, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it also has to do with everyone practicing BJJ. I’m sure it’s a lot harder to submit guys now than it was ever 2-3 years ago.
by RollinOnShabbos on Mar 10, 2009 1:06 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Mainstream media or not, he has a point
It has never been as clear as it was for the Kimbo/Petruzelli debacle, but there is a clear trend of eschewing the ground game, unless it’s a wrestler ground and pounding. The fact is that fighters hear the crowd, and their popularity effects their sponsorship dollars. When the morons in attendance boo when a fight hits the mat, it has a psychological effect. I tend to think that outlawing elbows to the head on the ground would be of help, but let’s not start that again.
There are no hard and fast rules of how many KOs/Decisions/Submissions there should be, but I think most of us can agree that some sort of balance is what keeps MMA so exciting.
There's a WAMMA belt in my Cracker Jacks!
by Drewplata on Mar 10, 2009 1:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Atleast give a little bit of credit to Anderson Silva and Chuck Liddell. Two of the most dominant champs killed guys with great defense and perfectly-timed hands.
Bonus strategy is also a big problem and certainly worth reiteration.
by Heenan on Mar 10, 2009 1:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Lack of submissions due to card?
The 96 card seems lacking in fighters with submission prowess. Sure there was Jim Miller and Gonzaga on the card, but both were shut down, leaving mostly wrestlers and strikers for the rest of the card. I while striking seems to be a trend in the mid-level fighters, I think the lack of submissions on this card has more to do with the card itself, rather than a trend…just a statistic anomoly.
by Dabashire on Mar 10, 2009 1:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That’s what I was thinking, it’s about matchups.
Looking at the fighters from 96 Patt has lots of submission wins, but Vera is a lot better than him, and a kickboxer, so Vera tried to keep that one off the ground. McCrory tried for some submissions but couldn’t get one to stick. Maynard looked like he was purposely staying off of the ground to not get submitted by Miller, Matt Brown didn’t really get a chance to submit Sell, and I don’t think anyone expected Jardine or Rampage to tap the other guy.
It’s just that these cards haven’t had people that are excellent at submissions. And when only one of them is in a fight, and the opponent knows that, they are doing a better job of keeping from getting submission.
Also, a fight like Carwin/Gonzaga could have ended in a submission if they didn’t get dropped the way they did.
I can’t criticize a fight for not ending in submission when someone gets rocked from the feet and it leads to a KO. That happened a lot at 96
by Phildo on Mar 10, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
So..
from what I’ve read so far, in most peoples opinion, this is Joe Silvas fault ;) Seriously though, if the cards are not geared toward fights ending up on the mat, then yes we will continue to see “bad boxing” type matches. Until Joe or maybe even Dana to a certain degree, step up and get some more great BJJ guys in the ring, then this is pretty much what we will expect to see for the immediate future. I know Gonzaga was on the last card, but he either didn’t bring his a game that night, or just got beat by the better fighter.
by proflex on Mar 10, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s not anyone’s fault. It’s just the way it is.
There weren’t a lot of submission specialists on the card, and when there was one, circumstances lead to the fight ending differently.
Most submissions come from Takedowns as opposed to knockdowns. If you knock a guy down and he’s rocked, it makes sense to jump on the guy and try to finish quickly, it’s a lot faster to go for the TKO than to get down on the ground and try for a submission (unless the guy goes down in such a way that he can easily get the guy’s back)
by Phildo on Mar 10, 2009 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is hard to get “great BJJ guys in the ring” because they would most likely have to learn the other aspects of MMA unless you get more Maia’s or Aoki’s. Fighters that were highly decorated BJJ practitioners like Alberto Crane or Vinnie Magalhaes did not cut it in the UFC. Unless you are as good as Maia or Aoki at BJJ, then it would be extremely difficult to advance in the UFC being one-dimensional. As shown with fights like Palhares vs Henderson, it is difficult for the BJJ fighter to take down the wrestler to the ground. However, looking at the last Fight Night, we had Lauzon, Neer, and Miller get submission victories. All is not hopeless because there are submission specialists in the UFC. Obviously, you will get two grapplers like Sanchez and Stevenson who decide to stand.
by chrisbboy82 on Mar 10, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It seems that the smaller the fighters are the less likely there will be enough power to knock someone out, and thus submissions are the most effective way to finish a fight. Not researched, just how it has felt to me.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Mar 10, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
did Vinny M get cut?
"the spirit of your average dumbass with more overblown rhetoric" OR "the self-appointed savior of MMA"
by Kid Nate on Mar 10, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s also due to guys like Gonzaga having sloppy striking defense. His jiu-jitsu is good against other jiu-jitsu players, but against a wrestler? BJJ has always struggled to stay dominant over wrestlers.
Originally it was Luta Livre/strong-style luchadores but now its greco/freestylers. We’ve seen them develop BJJ-defense, and now bjj has to train for counter-bjj-counters. Its a constant evolution. But during that evolution bjj players have a huge disadvantage to wrasslers: Wrestlers train for total-body power in a way most BJJ trainers don’t teach. When wrestlers start to throw, they default to power levels most guys can’t compare to. Kos, Brock, Carwin, Evans, Rampage, Chuck, etc.
Oy, that doesn’t even factor into the article’s original issue, which I think is due to gusy A) wanting fan support, and B) fighters needing live-fire experience at striking to improve. The latter is making me wonder if we need to actually baby guys like boxers to build-up reflexes and competence in striking before putting them up on the ULTIMATE stage to represent the sport.
by asa on Mar 11, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Evolution of the sport
This is just the evolution of the sport. Fighters are learning enough defensive grappling to negate weak submission threats which may have once worked. Submissions are being stymied, and weak jiu-jitsu players are being forced to strike it out. The sport is still evolving, and will continue to evolve.
by Meeaaat on Mar 10, 2009 1:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think things should be left to turn out the way they turn out. Isn’t that the whole point?
by Wookalarman on Mar 10, 2009 1:12 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
It is just the continuing evolution of the sport.
LOTS and LOTS of these guys are wrestlers or have good wrestling. Wrestlers, even good ones, are not going to go to the ground with a BJJ guys. Look at Maynard.. he has shown dominant top position wrestling. What did he do against Miller? used his wrestling to keep the fight standing. What happened the one time he did take Miller down? He almost got put into a ankle/knee lock.
This card had what… 2 good BJJ guys. Gonzaga and miller? already talked about Miller… and gonzaga got knocked out in the first round.
For UFC 95, the BJJ guys were Thiago, Maia, Marquedt, and maybe stevenson and diego. Diego had a huge advantage on the feet and kept it standing. Marquedt had a huge advantage striking and kept it standing. Maia pwned Sonnen. Koscheck kept the fight standing against Thiago as he was the dominant wrestler.
UFC 94 had Penn, machida is a black belt I think but never uses it, and nate diaz. Diaz got out wrestled by guida, machida prefers to stand and KO’s silva in the first round, Penn got out wrestled and out muscled.
UFC 93 i didn’t watch, but palhares is the only submission guy I see
UFC 92 had Lister, nog/mir. Mir didn’t take the fight to the ground from memory… and who blames him when he was winning on the feet and who wants to be in nogs guard? lister got out wrestled.
To me… they seems to be a lack of GREAT bjj black belts in the UFC. The average or good black belts are simply getting outwrestled. Right now it seems MMA has evolved past the basic BJJ… it is going to take someone like Maia to bring it back IMO. Dominant wrestling + striking seems to be the formula now. BJJ guys with no wrestling are essentially worthless.
by dbcb on Mar 10, 2009 1:14 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I could be wrong, not too fimilar with some of the fighters, but isn’t Machida a black belt in karate? Karate isn’t very good at the submission game.
by proflex on Mar 10, 2009 1:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Machida is a black belt in bjj.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Mar 10, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Machida is a black belt in multiple arts.
by who me on Mar 10, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
don't forget sumo
"the spirit of your average dumbass with more overblown rhetoric" OR "the self-appointed savior of MMA"
by Kid Nate on Mar 10, 2009 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think this might be under appreciated, how much does his sumo experience help his fight game. Correct me if I am wrong, but isn’t Sumo all about body positioning, leverage and proper use of force? Seems pretty good for clinching situations.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Mar 10, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When You Don't Swing For The Fences In The UFC...
Or sub every guy you fight, you become “boring”, “elusive”, and “unmarketable”.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Mar 10, 2009 1:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
After 2 or 3 promises of being “in line for the title shot” are broken due to you being “boring”, “elusive”, and “unmarketable”.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Mar 10, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
when has he ever been in line for a title shot???
okami? yes, but he HAD a title shot before he got hurt.
Machida has never been promised shit until now
by dbcb on Mar 10, 2009 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And if rampage accepted the fight, he would have been pushed back yet again.
Basically, when they run out of options, they will have Machida fight Evans.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Mar 10, 2009 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So he either has the title shot or fights the winner, how horrible for him.
Just because fans have been saying he needs a title shot for a long time doesn’t mean that he was ever actually offered one, close to one or even deserved one yet in Joe Silva’s eyes. Lets not act like poor Machida is getting screwed now that he is finally going to get a title shot.
by who me on Mar 10, 2009 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The problem is, Rampage deserves a shot more than Machida.
That’s just the way it is. Whine all you want about how evil Dana is, it doesn’t change the fact that Rampage deserves it more.
by Phildo on Mar 11, 2009 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Exactly. Although Machida is deserving of a shot, he isn’t as deserving as Jackson. I don’t get why people can’t understand this.
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Mar 11, 2009 1:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am a HUGE Rampage fan, but he beat Wandy and Jardine.
1) Forrest beats Rampage and Evans beats Forrest.
2) Wandy’s biggest win was against Jardine.
3) Jardine lost against Wandy, Houston, and now Rampage.
I don’t see how you can say that Rampage is MORE deserving of a shot.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Mar 11, 2009 2:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rampage is a former champ that lost a very very close decision, who has since slayed his former tormenter and beat a guy that finished Forrest.
Machida (who I love) beat Thiago Silva.
by subo on Mar 11, 2009 2:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Former champ that beat 2 top 10 fighters > guy who beat Tito and 1 top ten fighter.
by Phildo on Mar 11, 2009 3:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jardine and Silva are top ten fighters and Jackson is a former champion who lost a decision many feel he should have won.
Machida has one win over a top ten fighter.
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Mar 11, 2009 3:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jorge Gurgel’s submission skills are second to none but did he ever use them? Serra’s jitz is awesome as well yet he seems reluctant to stay on the ground too long.
Just because the audience want a stand up war doesn’t mean you entertain them at the cost of the very essence of the sport. We’ll always have those neanderthals waiting for someone’s head to fly into the stands. MMA needs to be appreciated in its purest form.
Submissions are an art form are far more satisfying for me than a flurry of poorly timed bombs at the end of which one guy slumps against the cage. Thats not what the UFC should stand for.
God knows I love a good KO but theres a difference between someone like Anderson Silva KO’ing someone and say someone like Leben.
by cauliflower_ears on Mar 10, 2009 1:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It’s a matter of matchmaking and less so a matter of how the sport is evolving.
The randomness of striking (throw vs landing) and sheer volume of attempts (at throwing a strike) means statistically you’re going to get a lot more finishes that way.
Everyone is training BJJ now so catching and finishing people with consistency is a LOT more harder.
If anything it makes me love submissions even more because I know how absolutely difficult they are to get considering the competition at the elite level.
My only concern is giving out FOTN often times for the fights that deteriorate to kickboxing matches especially for those fighters who do have a ground game (Davis/Lytle). They need to try and give out FOTN to those matches that mix everything and when they don’t have an event with that then divvy out that bonus to all the fighters and remind them that this is MMA not kickboxing.
by pr0cs on Mar 10, 2009 1:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Finally!
A revolt against the awful wrestlers mucking up North American MMA! Straight out of their college wrestling programs with 6-8 months of poor muay thai training and they get thrust into the cage. Just ruins an otherwise beautiful sport, in my opinion.
And that’s to say nothing of the rampant douchebaggery seemingly ingrained in 3 out of every 4 TUF generation fighters.
As for a solution? There really isn’t one. The direction of the sport can’t be forced, otherwise it will fall apart. Unfortunately, this means I’ll have to put up with these boring, ogreish kickboxing wrestlers.
I’ll just cling that much harder to the Fedor’s, Anderson’s, Big Nog’s, and Maia’s of the world.
by a tommy point on Mar 10, 2009 1:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah, lets blame the wrestlers for being good at what they do…
why don’t we blame the BJJ for not evolving with the sport????
by dbcb on Mar 10, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
WHERE ARE THE THAI AND BURMESE
My question is how come every MMA school teaches some form of Muay Thai or kick boxing but rarely are they true Muay thai ,Pradal serey, or lethwei fighters. Where are these guys and why are they not fighting MMA. There is a lot of tying up and closes range fighting in these fights. If this is the best style accordingly where are the coaches and fighters. A true Brazilian jujitsu champ vs a true Muay champ would make for a true mma fight. I would love to see that match up over johnny straight out of D-1 wresting fight another former D-1 who now thinks he’s a knock out artist. Styles make fights
by son of miss the mark on Mar 10, 2009 1:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The afore mentioned wrestlers probably dump them on their asses and grind them out. There is also probably size and economic issues as well.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Mar 10, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it seems like the american fighters(mostly wrestlers) have so far been a bit quicker to adapt and fill in the holes in their game in order to keep the fight where they want it.
Its much more common to see a BBJ guy with no striking/wrestling than a wrestler that can’t at least defend bbj
by MonkeyCHops on Mar 10, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ramba “M-16” Somdet and Mongkhon “Malaipet” Wiwasuk are the harbingers of things to come.
"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito on Belfort at Affliction:DOR
by Rundownloser on Mar 10, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Malaipet vs. David Douglas was one of my favorite fights of 2008.
Contributor Emeritus - BloodyElbow.com
by Chris Nelson on Mar 10, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Totally. It really sucked that it really flew under the radar.
"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito on Belfort at Affliction:DOR
by Rundownloser on Mar 10, 2009 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Malaipets kicks are insane crazy. I walked with a limp after watching his fights.
by Riney on Mar 10, 2009 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that fight was a great example of why a company should offer submission bonuses if they also give ko bonuses. Douglas clearly could have subbed malaipet easily but wanted the knockout.
The fight that you think was so great is an example of festering corruption that threatens to destroy MMA’s integrity. It’s just a good thing that EXC went under.
by pumaman on Mar 11, 2009 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or, you are not really aware that Douglas likes to brawl.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Mar 11, 2009 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or, you are not really aware that ground and pounding is not “brawling”
by pumaman on Mar 11, 2009 5:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Abso-freaking-lutely.
You should do a whole tribute post on that fight.
Throw a little Reis vs Cullum in there as well.
:)
by MMASuPreMaCy on Mar 11, 2009 2:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think its a UFC problem rather than an MMA problem. At the top of the heap there are still plenty of exciting fighters who can pull a sweet submission. I would like to see stats on the % of submissions on the top 3 fights on a card.
The problem is that the type of fighters that the UFC continues to keep at the lower skill levels. I thought the Chris Lytle/Marcus Davis fight is a prime example.
There are tons of copies of these guys. "loves to bang’ etc.
Poor boxers, worse kickboxers, just enough wrestling to keep most fights standing.
These fights often make for decent openning fights provided that the rest of the fights show off a bit more skill.
by MonkeyCHops on Mar 10, 2009 1:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Both Chris Lytle and Marcus Davis have the majority of their wins by submission(18 of Lytle’s 26 wins are by submission). It’s not a problem with the guys they are keeping it seems to be a problem with the mindset of the guys they are keeping. Jorge Gurgel syndrome seems to be very prevalent in the lower ranks.
by who me on Mar 10, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The reason Lytle v Davis is brought up
is that Lytle has all but said (and actually maybe even said it somewhere) that he is no longer looking to be a contender and simply fighting to fight, which lately has largely been transforming into a “banger”.
In their fight, Davis basically went into the fight laying out a strategy for them to have a pure banger fight with the goal of getting the FOTN bonus.
by Razreshat on Mar 10, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes it’s a mindset issue. Of course lets not forget that both Lytle and Davis were also professional boxers, that was one of the resons they both wanted that fight to start with. Jorge Gurgel is a much better example of this problem, he’s a submission specialist(every single win pre-UFC by submission) that decided sloppy kickboxing was the way to go once he got in the UFC. Hard to fault two professional boxers wanting to box it out with each other but why the heck would a submission specialist ignore the strongest part of his game for 7 straight fights? It’s that mindset that seems to be setting in that is sort of scary for the sport.
by who me on Mar 10, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
its true that jurgel is probably a better example but I am pretty sure that even if davis and lytle have the majority of their wins by submission overall, in the UFC this is not true. These guys are both more than happy to go to a decision after a full fight of loading up and trying to knock the other guy out. This was a problem with both of them before they brought it up as well.
by MonkeyCHops on Mar 10, 2009 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chris Lytle has been around forever (his first UFC fight was UFC 28). Marcus Davis UFC fights have been 4 submission wins, 3 decisions(one a loss) and 2 KOs so even in his UFC time he has had more submissions. Both of thes guys do seem to be bonus hunters(9 fight bonuses between the two of them since the internet started keeping up with that) but both also have won submission of the night before too so it’s not like they are focusing on one specific bonus type. They get tossed into this because of Marcus Davis silly deal to have his fight with Lytle as a “stand up” fight not because of what their actual histories are.
by who me on Mar 10, 2009 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think there are some inherent problems with the Fight of the Night Bonus, because it tends to be awarded for back and forth standup fighting. I’d rather the UFC just increase the submission and KO bonuses or make it one large finishing bonus. Alternatively, the UFC could award any fighter who finished their opponent something if they want to increase the incentive for decisive vitories . With that said, the UFC did not create this phenomenon. Though I believe changing the bonus structure would help, I don’t believe it’s the fix or the bulk of the problem.
Standup fighting is already rewarded, because the fan base tends to favor it – like it or not. There’s really not much that can be done about that from the outside. Dynamic submission fighters could bring people around. I don’t like the thought of modifying rules much, though.
by Cannon Jacques on Mar 10, 2009 2:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Didn’t they offer bonus money for finishes at 94?
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Mar 10, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To me, this argument is analagous to saying chicks w/ big boobs are better/worse than chicks w/ a great ass.
Over the decades there has been an ebb and flow of what is currently considered most beautiful or ideal. Some may argue for boobs, others for ass, others for a perfect blend of the two. Generally, society will have a consensus on the subject and it manifests itself in what pictures get displayed in playboy or what bathing suits are sold, etc
These trends also vary from country to country.
Let’s not lose sight of what is most important: That we should be grateful that today there is more access to tits & ass than ever before. Can’t we all agree to this?
by Headkick on Mar 10, 2009 2:03 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
thats true but horses still like oats
by MonkeyCHops on Mar 10, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats also true,
no one likes a ponderous ass
by MonkeyCHops on Mar 10, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So wait, is Chris Leben a boob or an ass?
Contributor Emeritus - BloodyElbow.com
by Chris Nelson on Mar 10, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it’s hard to say, but matt hughes is definitely an ass, and since leben is stylistic opposite, that’d make him a boob.
by Headkick on Mar 10, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Awesome.
"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito on Belfort at Affliction:DOR
by Rundownloser on Mar 10, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’d agree that it has been a lot of bad boxing or bad kick boxing in the last little while, but I think it’s all a part of the evolution of MMA. I still don’t think we’ve seen the best possible MMA fighter out there (GSP and Machida are examples of where MMA is going). It’s all growing pains. The sport is still so young. Boxing today looks nothing like it did in the early years. Given time, the MMA fighter will be seen as the utlimate combat sport fighter. I honestly think it will take a full on generation at least for MMA to be truly accepted. And by that, I mean the dinosours of boxing will have to die out (literally).
by pud333 on Mar 10, 2009 2:04 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
No submission this time, just get over it. And why are we reporting words from mma noobs now? Of course it’s bad boxing, it’s mma, you got to defend take down and shit, that’s why you can’t… float like a butterfly and sting like a bee. A non issue.
by spectaa on Mar 10, 2009 2:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I assume you’re referring to the excerpt from the Columbus Dispatch and not Josh Gross. I believe Nate threw it in there to draw an objection in the comments, and it worked. Maybe, he just wanted give a layman’s take on the issue. Whatever the case, I don’t believe the presence of the excerpt in question minimizes the concerns, as stated by Gross and Kid, in a material way.
by Cannon Jacques on Mar 10, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why BAD kickboxing?
Seems to me MMA guys can hold their own with the supposed best kickboxers in the world. So maybe just “kickboxing” is a more appropriate label.
by pumaman on Mar 10, 2009 2:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It’s sort of a catch 22 here.
The kickboxing is “bad” because fighters don’t want to be taken down. You can’t use straight up kickboxing or MT because you need to defend the takedown.
So in a way, the fact that the kickboxing is “bad” shows that submissions and ground work are still there. You just have to be good enough to use it.
by Phildo on Mar 10, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would understand an uninformed viewer thinking that and being fooled… but you would hope people like Josh Gross would know better.
by pumaman on Mar 10, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
^ this, this and this.
Kuwabara Kuwabara
by J. B. Maddox on Mar 10, 2009 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he is mostly talking about the UFC being bad kick boxing. DREAM apparently has good MMA kick boxing with Kawajiri, Mousasi, and Overeem making their poitns in NYE. You also have to understand that Overeem and Mousasi have a great Dutch Kickboxing background.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Mar 10, 2009 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And chuck liddell beat Overeem, so I’d say that speaks highly of MMA in general.
by pumaman on Mar 10, 2009 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was years ago...
A fight between Overeem and Liddell, Alistair wipes the floor with Chuck. Have you seen what that dude looks like lately? A monster.
by Akorn on Mar 10, 2009 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chuck’s been passing drug tests since then.
by subo on Mar 10, 2009 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That has more to do with chuck sliding than overeem improving. Oh and overeem’s flintstones vitamins.
I still say mtop ma fighters skills across the board are comparable to k1 kickboxers. More so when they are primary strikers, obviously.
by pumaman on Mar 11, 2009 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember
Nate calling for Aoki pants as a way to prevent this so called “bad kickboxing”. No mention of them in here so far..
Kuwabara Kuwabara
by J. B. Maddox on Mar 10, 2009 2:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I was wondering if someone should ask
I resisted the temptation to call for Aoki pants, largely because I didn’t have much time to work on this post.
"the spirit of your average dumbass with more overblown rhetoric" OR "the self-appointed savior of MMA"
by Kid Nate on Mar 10, 2009 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Better post without pants, that probably would have split the discussion up.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Mar 10, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
fine but I still don’t see how that works.
Kuwabara Kuwabara
by J. B. Maddox on Mar 10, 2009 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the pants make it easier
for (some) grapplers to land submissions, particularly leg locks, triangles and gogoplatas!
"the spirit of your average dumbass with more overblown rhetoric" OR "the self-appointed savior of MMA"
by Kid Nate on Mar 10, 2009 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The future of MMA is good kickboxing with submissions being negated because of how often people are training, probably stalling out on the ground, with the best passing the less schooled peoples guard and subbing them with ease.
People act like the evolution of MMA is a negative thing when it comes to being striking based, it is probably more likely that the more people know about BJJ and wrestling the less finishes and ground game there will be.
A guy like Marquardt who is very established on the ground can display great striking prowess, he can use his ground game as a threat to maintain a stand up fight, if it suits him.
The evolution of MMA is not going to become bad kickboxing, it will become a tactical striking match with the ground being an option if you are losing the battle on the feet, the only problem comes in if both guys are great wrestlers and submission artists and the guy losing the striking match cant take them down.
The only reason striking is becoming so prevalent is because you can KO somebody with a punch they dont see coming, or a “lucky” (see: accurate and 1 hit) punch/kick. With a ground game you arent going to take somebody down and accidentally roll into a submission, there is far more ways to defend, and the defence of the ground game is the evolution that is creating the “bad kickboxing”.
by DirtyML on Mar 10, 2009 2:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know about all of that. The recent emphasis on rubber guard and other no-gi focused grappling is indicative of a new flourishing of ground techniques. And not only submissions, but more importantly, innovative and unconventional takedowns. It’s a lot easier to get an x-guard or kneebar sweep than a double-leg on a D-1 wrestler. Any general stylistic advantage is ephemeral.
"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito on Belfort at Affliction:DOR
by Rundownloser on Mar 10, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
we’ll see. I think submissions to finish an opponent who’s been stunned on the feet will continue to be a big factor.
"the spirit of your average dumbass with more overblown rhetoric" OR "the self-appointed savior of MMA"
by Kid Nate on Mar 10, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
as well as the next generation
of grappling ideas mentioned above.
"the spirit of your average dumbass with more overblown rhetoric" OR "the self-appointed savior of MMA"
by Kid Nate on Mar 10, 2009 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem (for people that want more submissions) is that it is so much easier to get a TKO/KO when you rock somebody standing.
This is because of a change in the rules (that refs are more willing to stop a fight before someone is officially "out") but we can’t really complain about that change because it’s about fighter safety.
Really, when you rock someone standing, unless they go down in a way that you can get the back, it’s much easier to jump on top and start pounding them than to get in and submit them before they get back to 100%.
by Phildo on Mar 11, 2009 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
part of the reality that with good submission defense, many guys are reticent to give up top position when going for a submission….it’s also part of the scoring: for so long the “top position” has allowed the lay n’ pray guy to win….so the game has adjusted to give more credence/points/dominance to position, rather than the guy on bottom who goes for submission after submission. dream was a great example of submission attempts etc.
Gatti.
Dekkers.
Pele.
Tadahiro Nomura.
Hidehiko Yoshida.
Aoki.
Kang.
Vanderlei.
by theworldsoldestsport on Mar 10, 2009 2:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think to say MMA is just "Bad Kickboxings" over simplifies the sport.....
MMA isn’t kick boxing. The fact that they can take the other man down, punch him in the head if/when they knock him down, among other things makes MMA striking DIFFERENT than other forms of combat.
You have the smarty pants quoted from the Columbus paper talking about how bad their boxing technique is, and the fact is you can’t box like a boxer if your opponent has the option to take you down.
The way fighters are paid is going to effect the way they fight, but at the end of the day there is submission of the night bonuses to be had, and 1/2 of your pay is winning for nearly every fighter. So they are going to give it their all and do what they do best.
by Dexerion on Mar 10, 2009 4:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dumbass quote of the year.....
wasn’t impressed with the brawling (“90 percent of it is boxing, and they’re bad boxers”) and said it will never go mainstream unless they clean it up
Again, 2 things. This isn’t boxing, so of course the fighters boxing technique isn’t going to look the best. It’s like someone going to a cricket match and criticizing the pitching in comparison to baseball. 2nd, it’s already mainstream.
by Dexerion on Mar 10, 2009 4:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I like subs as much as the next guy
But grappling ins’t all about submissions. People are crying about how MMA is becoming kickboxing and MMA being dominated by wrestlers at the same time.. Can you see a problem here?
Besides if the fighters aren’t submitting, it’s they’re own fault. Ask Maia how he thinks teh jits is ineffective.
Kuwabara Kuwabara
by J. B. Maddox on Mar 10, 2009 5:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Its definitely their fault and it makes it a less entertaining product IMO.
I don’t really have a problem with a card that has no submissions, that is bound to happen sometimes.
Its when they book fights where everyone knows there is little to no chance of a submission.
We often see unexpected, even impressive knockouts from BJJ guys or wrestlers but rarely if ever do you see a slick submission from someone unexpected.
by MonkeyCHops on Mar 10, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tito almost ^^;
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Mar 10, 2009 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“That three of those cards took place in the past four months is at a minimum noteworthy, at worst disconcerting.”
The stats above leave out the fact that 20% of all MMA events ever were held in the last 4 months. Honestly, I saw one in a public restroom the other day.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones
by jemaleddin on Mar 10, 2009 6:17 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
ah jemaleddin!
where have you been? we miss you!
"the spirit of your average dumbass with more overblown rhetoric" OR "the self-appointed savior of MMA"
by Kid Nate on Mar 10, 2009 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll bet the bastard found something productive to do instead of commenting here. Good to see he’s back where he belongs now.
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Mar 11, 2009 1:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Productive? It is to laugh.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones
by jemaleddin on Mar 11, 2009 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nothing to say! You guys need to get more shit-talking started around here – does it have to be me every time?
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones
by jemaleddin on Mar 11, 2009 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I saw one in a public restroom
EliteXC resurfaces?
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Mar 11, 2009 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The fighters are too similiar...
Except for a couple of fighters (you know who they are) most MMA fighters train the same and have the same background. Alot of wrestlers and BJJ. And as mentioned before, everyone trains in mt, bjj, boxing and wrestling making subs much more difficult to pull off. I agree this is just part of the evolution of the sport.
by Akorn on Mar 10, 2009 6:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The rules and regulations make it more difficult for a submission specialist. Also, the majority of fans just want to see someone get knocked out. Boxing and kick-boxing matches are much more popular than judo or submission grappling matches. The reason MMA is gaining in popularity over boxing — 4 ounce gloves.
I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.
by mma_dude on Mar 10, 2009 11:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














