Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Gift Of The 2003 Tigers

Labor Politics Keeping MMA Out of New York

Adam Swift has a great piece on labor efforts to keep MMA out of New York.  It is pretty clear at this point that despite public denials, labor issues in Nevada are at the heart of the legalization fight in New York:

The UFC has chosen to ignore the labor angle in its public efforts thus far, perhaps hoping to avoid confronting the issue all together, but has it becomes increasingly clear that its opponents are more committed than previously believed to delaying/defeating the legalization of MMA in New York. As this reality becomes clearer, the time is coming when the UFC may need to call a spade a spade. The current strategy is allowing the opposition to drive the debate without exposing their true motives which gives their arguments undeserved credibility.

He also cites the following information on the "poll" cited by Bob Reilly:

Gramercy Communications is a communications firm based in Downtown Albany that specializes in public relations, marketing, and public affairs. Founder & Principal Tom Nardacci earned his master’s degree in strategic communications from Columbia University, and his bachelor’s in history from Syracuse University.

Tom has over a decade of experience as a public relations strategist, senior public affairs advisor and communications manager.

 

Tom previously directed public relations for the Alliance for Downtown New York, lower Manhattan’s business improvement district, and he formerly managed communications and organizing for the 40,000 member retiree division of 1199 SEIU, New York State’s largest private sector labor union. Tom has served in leadership and consulting roles on dozens of federal, state and regional political campaigns, including as a field coordinator in Iowa for a United States Presidential Candidate. 

Adam suggested making the union angle public.  I'd be interested to hear if readers here think that would be a wise move, or if the UFC should keep fighting that battle in the shadows.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

So, the question becomes whether UNITE HERE should be exposed as to being historically… thorns in the ass of Zuffa because of a labor dispute in Las Vegas years ago. Also, it seems they’ve donated more money to the Democrats, were able to dispense complete crap information to politicians at the assembly, and do all sorts of other BS like make up fake polls.

My question is… what the hell is Zuffa doing? This all seems like little nitpicking PR stunts that are actually working. According to Payout, they donated $130k. What’s stopping Zuffa from throwing $500k at the Democrats to get this thing passed?

Ok, maybe that’s a step beyond what they should do, but I think taking this public will be exactly what UNITE HERE wants. Regardless of what Zuffa wants, UNITE HERE will paint a picture of Big Business vs. the Little Guy, even though it absolutely has NOTHING to do with MMA in general.

Editor-in-chief of MMA-Analyst.com

by Leland Roling on Feb 24, 2009 3:33 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah, if this becomes a public battle, I can totally see Zuffa getting dragged through the mud for their rigidly anti-union sentiments. It could lead to unwanted scrutiny of the UFC’s own employment structure.

by smoogy on Feb 24, 2009 4:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I cited this a couple weeks ago when I posted a clip of John McCarthy talking about the legalization process. It’s all about Zuffa’s non-union casinos and nothing to do with MMA in NY.

http://www.f4wonline.com/content/view/8199/

by bignerd on Feb 24, 2009 3:56 PM EST reply actions  

now would be the time if there is one

with the public getting sick of goverment bailouts and the UAW recieving a fair share of blame for the auto industry mess.

but then you get in a war against unions in genreal and that would be zuffa biting off more then they can chew…

by nk on Feb 24, 2009 5:23 PM EST reply actions  

I would take the stance of exposing it. Only about 7% of the population actually works for an union. The rest do not. Look at the 3 of the biggest union industries education, auto, and airlines. Most Americans can look at these industries and come to the conclusion that none of those industries would be what they would call perfectly functioning or want to model business decisions (or anything) after them.

I would also put out there that looking at the election can clearly shows what happens when you don’t discuss the unions. Republicans chose not to point out union donations to demopcrats or address the Employee Free Choice Act in the campaigns (which passed the house right along a party line vote). What did it get them? They lost. Zuffa should expose this as an union dispute and put it on the table that they understand the union donated money but they are confident that as elected legislators they would do what is right.

by rtwil on Feb 25, 2009 9:49 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Predicting A Collegiate Wrestler’s Development
Shogun_logo_small
UFC’s Hopes For A Stadium Show In Sao Paulo Appear To Be Dead
Small
The Downfall of Diego Sanchez
Small
The time is right for a superfight, and it doesn't involve Anderson
391807_10150399618817701_750257700_8470850_1424416169_n_small
1 in about 7 billion!  :D

Recent FanPosts

Skittles_small
Off topic- watch me sing!
26759_511613730864_104300343_30384429_7437048_n_small
UFC Undisputed 3: BE Fight Camp?
Small
Yuki Kondo
Img_0019_small
Training Progress
Small
Muay Thai camps in Thailand
Blav_small
OT: Help out my short film
Badr_hari3_small
War Machine explains what happenned and asks for support

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings