Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Report: UFC 97 to Stay in Montreal

Ufc49_chuck_liddell_015_1_medium

According to this Canadian radio report (in French) and a couple of emails from sources, UFC 97 is back on in Canada.  They came perilously close to the brink, and when they started moving the show to Vegas the commission caved.

Note:  I do not speak French, but people that do have told me the report confirms the good news.

UPDATE [from Luke Thomas]: More from the FanPosts:

http://www.corussports.com/divers/exclusif_ufc_97-20090218-1423043.html

I'll summarize for those who don't know French:

- Lorenzo Fertita & Marc Ratner met with Richard Renault (RACJ head of combat sports) and Denis Racicot (RACJ president) Tuesday evening before flying to Europe later that night.

- The event will take place as scheduled under the usual UFC rules except for foot stomps being disallowed.

- RACJ will hold a press conference (no details specified) explaining the decision.

Comment 53 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

No foot stomps, huh? If that’s the only compromise that Zuffa made, that’s pretty good. But on the flip side to the commission: Really? Foot stomps? Why not just let the show go on as is instead of making this kind of a fuss over rules that were never really enforced in the first place? I suppose I’ll have to wait for the full RACJ press conference. I figure there must be more to this cause frankly it seems kind of weird.

by pud333 on Feb 18, 2009 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

It’s not entirely unfathomable that the ‘no foot stomps’ rule is just a token, face saving gesture.

by -Sam on Feb 18, 2009 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Given the way the RACJ has handled the situation up to this point, I think the token, face-saving gesture is the most plausible explanation.

by thepenismightier on Feb 18, 2009 1:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Which is probably a dumb move on their part. They should have fallen on their sword, completely and utterly.

by Michaelthebox on Feb 18, 2009 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I can hear the Chuck or Shogun apologists now:

“He’d have won if foot stomps had been allowed!”

Although detractors decry (MMA) as a brutal, bloody form of human cockfighting, aficionados know it is a brutal, bloody, totally fucking awesome form of human cockfighting. -The Onion

by The Kittitas Kid on Feb 18, 2009 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Shogun wouldn’t win this fight if it was fought under Pride rules so I don’t think it really matters.

by ufc4 on Feb 18, 2009 7:08 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s good.

I wonder if the commission will comment on whether or not they are going to change the actual laws, or if this is a one time thing.

by Phildo on Feb 18, 2009 12:48 PM EST reply actions  

I’ve read the laws, and it doesn’t look like they actually have to change them; they just have to put a policy on the books the clarifies the stance of the government.

"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."

by AJB on Feb 18, 2009 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I know I’m getting ahead of myself. But has Alves ever come in at less than 170 lbs? ‘Cause he’s gonna have to in a title fight. But, if he comes in at 170.5, will St Pierre still accept a fight with him? Better stay in shape BJ. Just a thought.

by bubbafat on Feb 18, 2009 12:57 PM EST reply actions  

He won’t have to come in at less than 170. He can come in at 170, 170.5 or 171 and still be good to compete for the welterweight title as far as I know.

by thepenismightier on Feb 18, 2009 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Nope. There’s no one pound grace for title fights. It’s 170 or bust.

"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."

by AJB on Feb 18, 2009 1:13 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Beat me to it nut puncher. choi’d for quickness.

by szucconi on Feb 18, 2009 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

My keyboard-fu and lack of an engaging job are unbeatable!

"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."

by AJB on Feb 18, 2009 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

So has he ever actually made 170?

by bubbafat on Feb 18, 2009 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Here are his weights for his last few fights

UFC 90- 171
UFC 85- 174
Fight Night 13- 171
UFC 78- 171
Fight Night 11- 171
UFC 66- 170

So the last time he actually made the weight that he will have to make in July was December of 2006. I hope he plans to walk around a few pounds lighter than he normally does leading up to this fight because he can’t come up with some BS excuse like he did for the Hughes fight, a title fight is a title fight and you can’t fuck it up. He says he walks around at 205 so I hope he is gonna keep off a few extra pounds this time just to be safe.

by ufc4 on Feb 18, 2009 7:21 PM EST up reply actions  

And stupid me, I forgot to mention that back at UFC 66 when he actually made 170 was when he was suspended for 8 months for using a diuretic to make weight so I guess you could say he actually didn’t make weight then either. And in case you were wondering, the fight before that he weighed 171.

by ufc4 on Feb 18, 2009 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

You don’t get a pound when you are fighting for a title.

by szucconi on Feb 18, 2009 1:13 PM EST up reply actions  

My bad. Still don’t think Alves’ll have a problem making 170 despite his troubles making weight in the past.

by thepenismightier on Feb 18, 2009 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

He will get stuck in Lutter-land if he misses weight for a title fight. It is always a shitstorm.

by szucconi on Feb 18, 2009 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Foot stomp…foot stomp to the foot never endangered anyone’s life lol.

ps: “le vrai propriétaire de l’ufc” he just said lorenzo was the true owner of ufc. Is that correct _?
ps2: “on a perdu un combatant avec ça au Quebec” Did he just said they loosed someone with a stomp to the foot??

by spectaa on Feb 18, 2009 12:58 PM EST reply actions  

They “lost” sorry.

by spectaa on Feb 18, 2009 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

correct

he make a quick mention that Dana only has 10% of the UFC and that Lorenzo is the man. Like all of us, the guy on the phone makes fun of the foot stump rules. Said that this was a concession that the UFC agreed on really fast.
The guy on the radio said the commission probably did that just to look good and show that they had their way.

Let the elbows drop and the knees fly. This is gonna be a blast and I’m glad I got my ticket.

by DrTopo on Feb 18, 2009 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

What he said. Including the last part. THough I can only wish I had a ticket.

"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."

by AJB on Feb 18, 2009 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

On the first: “Vrai” doesn’t have to mean “true” in that sense. It can also mean right, appropriate, acceptable, and a number of other variations. In that particular sentence, I think he’s referring to someone with authority in the company, rather than just a lawyer or some such.

I got nothin’ on the foot stomp.

"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."

by AJB on Feb 18, 2009 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he means vrai=>true. I’m french actually, I was more confused on the idea of having a “true” owner in fertita.

by spectaa on Feb 18, 2009 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

so they will allow elbows to the face but not foot stomps. OK!

by Bigperm on Feb 18, 2009 12:58 PM EST reply actions  

breaking the tiny bones in your foot is probably worse than a cut to the face.

by Phildo on Feb 18, 2009 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I sincerely doubt it. Elbows that hit the head/face? I’ll take a broken foot anyday.

by Bigperm on Feb 18, 2009 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Not me man...

dull thudding to my face and head (yeah, they hurt but in a fight they don’t really hurt) and maybe some swelling and a cut is MUCH better than a broken foot. I’ve dealt with broken bones in my foot before, it hurts like hell until it heals and if you don’t go in a cast (or at least off the foot) for a few weeks it takes forever to heal.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

by Brent Brookhouse on Feb 18, 2009 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m talking about longterm damage. A foot can heal, your face or head? Not always.

by Bigperm on Feb 18, 2009 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

But an elbow doesn’t do that much damage to the face or head.

The main problem with elbows is cuts. Cuts are not nearly as troublesome as a broken foot.

If you’re going to take the long term head injury angle, you’d be better off arguing against punches or knees than elbows.

by Phildo on Feb 18, 2009 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

So, can a fighter loose points or be disqualified for an errant foot stomp? What about if he accidentally steps on the guys toe?

by The_Vig on Feb 18, 2009 1:02 PM EST reply actions  

I’m pretty sure there’s a difference between a foot stomp and accidentally stepping on a guy’s foot! ;)

by Michael Hatamoto on Feb 18, 2009 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Depends on the weight class.

by The_Vig on Feb 18, 2009 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

=> No contest. No one should have to live the trauma of being stomped right on the toe. And I don’t mean to stress it, but if I understood well, they lost one dude due to foot stomp, that’s serious busyness.

by spectaa on Feb 18, 2009 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Im soo happy!
As much as I paid, this was a charge I did not want reimbursed to my credit card!

by Evil-Uncle on Feb 18, 2009 1:04 PM EST reply actions  

Man, I love being right all the time.

by Derek Suboticki on Feb 18, 2009 1:10 PM EST reply actions  

Wait?

Didn’t mmalogic say there was a 99% chance of it moving to Las Vegas last night?

99% the montreal show is being moved to Las Vegas.

by mmalogic on Feb 17, 2009 9:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by MMASuPreMaCy on Feb 18, 2009 1:23 PM EST reply actions  

They started to move it and the AC caved. It was what is called a bluff. They already sold tickets. Not impossible to refund them, but really a last resort.

by szucconi on Feb 18, 2009 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

99% is not, in fact, 100%.

"BJ on the BE" - Kierkegaard

by Brett Jones on Feb 18, 2009 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

99% is very darn close to 100%.

by MMASuPreMaCy on Feb 18, 2009 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure, but it’s not like this sport isn’t without its fair share of monumental upsets.

Perhaps we can add this turn of events to that list.

"BJ on the BE" - Kierkegaard

by Brett Jones on Feb 18, 2009 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

It was dead last night. They caved late when the UFC actually followed through on their threat to move it to Vegas. It was a game of chicken, the commission lost. Mmalogic i see also had a post on their reversal of position before the news came out.

by Michael Rome on Feb 18, 2009 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

And it was very darn close to being moved, in fact Dana had put things in motion to go ahead and move it until the commision caved at the last minute.

by ufc4 on Feb 18, 2009 7:27 PM EST up reply actions  

He posted this morning in a different thread that the Commission caved when the UFC started the actual process of moving to Vegas. That seems to fit the odds; the UFC wouldn’t spend money and risk bad press doing that unless they were pretty sure the deal with Montreal was going nowhere. Not defending mmalogic – he’s quite capable of doing that himself – but just pointing out the events aren’t inconsistent with his posts.

"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."

by AJB on Feb 18, 2009 1:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I always thought foot stomps were stupid looking. I still laugh when somebody does it.

by BadB on Feb 18, 2009 1:26 PM EST reply actions  

I love foot stomps. No quicker way to get a dude to stop hugging you than breaking his toe.

by Derek Suboticki on Feb 18, 2009 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

When you are there live, the crowd goes nuts for foot stomps.

by szucconi on Feb 18, 2009 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

- The event will take place as scheduled under the usual UFC rules except for foot stomps being disallowed.

I imagine the negotiating of rules went like this:

RACJ: No knees or elbows
UFC: Unified rules as usual
RACJ: Ok, how about just no elbows?
UFC: How about no foot stomps?
RACJ: ….deal!

"BJ on the BE" - Kierkegaard

by Brett Jones on Feb 18, 2009 1:34 PM EST reply actions  

I laughed, seriously.

by pr0cs on Feb 18, 2009 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

The Quebec commission

doesn’t know much about the UFC if they really thought Dana and Co. were going to cave and change the rules for just one show. Jesus, how long have those guys been fighting to get the unified rules accepted everywhere?

Although detractors decry (MMA) as a brutal, bloody form of human cockfighting, aficionados know it is a brutal, bloody, totally fucking awesome form of human cockfighting. -The Onion

by The Kittitas Kid on Feb 18, 2009 2:18 PM EST reply actions  

Wow!

I didn’t believe they would do it honestly. I was sure it was kinda of a politicaly correct plot against violence in sports. Politics sucks so bad in Quebec, you have no idea! I can’t wait to move to California. When a local boxing champ is fighting, all the media are talking about it and they have problems finding 5000 people to go watch it. UFC come and they sold out the 22 000 tickets like nothing and not a word of it in the media.

Well I’M glad I’ll be able to enjoy my 225$ ticket and see a Chuck fight! :)

by Matman on Feb 18, 2009 2:57 PM EST reply actions  

Translated in full...

The RAJC have recieved permission to discuss the rules that will be used in the fights. They have finally come to the understanding to use the rules that have been instated by the UFC, including knee and elbow strikes.

However, the UFC has accepted to not allow foot stomps, with the intent to do damage to their opponent,

The main event at UFC 97 will be a title fight between Anderson Silva and Thales Leites.

Also on the card, Quebec native David Loiseau will fight Ed Herman.

From what CKAC has learned, Lorenzo Fertitta and Mark Ratner came to Montreal for the meeting on tuesday at 5pm. At that point, they had already discussed with Richard Renault of the RAJC and Denis Racicot, president of the RAJC.

Fertitta and Ratner had to take off for Europe where a UFC event will take place this weekend and therefore the press conference will be held by the RAJC.

The press conference will assure that the Montreal economy will benifit somewhere in the 12 million dolllar range due to the UFC presence.

There was a very real risk in losing the event in Montreal. The UFC had 2 hotels in Vegas booked, one being the MGM Grand, to cover their ass.

On February 12 the UFC announced that they would cancel UFC 97 in Montreal. The rules, that had never been enforeced, of the RAJC do not allow knee or elbow strikes to the face of an opponent. It was out of the question to modify the rules of the event.

This weekend, in an exclusive interview with CKAC, the president of the UFC, Dana White, confirmed that there was many details to work out but his was confident that UFC 97 would go as planned. Mr. White was never scarred that he would have to cancel the event, and that this type of situation happens alot in the industry. He just had to reason with them and the event will happen with his rules.

White also confirmed for the first time in public that UFC 100 will feature GSP in Vegas.

HOPE THIS HELPS YOU ALL!

by Annie83 on Feb 18, 2009 3:09 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gonzo_fist_small
Random Nick Diaz Shops
My_avy_small
Roger Gracie signs with the UFC
Lebowski_excited_grin_small
The History of Subo: the bans, warnings, and mockings.
Bros
Nick Diaz: Hero to Millions
Favritegotevj9_small
An Open Letter to Nick Diaz

Recent FanPosts

Obp_small
Nick Diaz - The Musical
Small
Pot can be a performance enhancer (serious thread)
Nate-diaz-double-bird_small
How Would Today's Top Kickboxers Do In MMA?
Ri_small
How does the PRIDE compare to present day UFC?
Jerryrice_small
Gratitude: Why no one should still hate the UFC
Shogun_logo_small
UFC’s hope of stadium show in Sao Paulo appears to be dead
Me_small
2012 and Onward: More Free Events, Fewer Pay Per Views Key for UFC Success
Me_2_small
Muay Thai Champion Irshaad Sayed Thinks Win over Jessie Rafols Could Launch his MMA Career

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings