Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Will the Comcast/NBC Deal Give the WEC a Viable Business Model?

Comcastnbc_300_mediumDecember 3rd, 2009 might go down as one of the most important days in mainstream media history as Comcast secured a deal to buy a 51% majority stake in NBC Universal, which means Comcast now has the majority decision-making duties of a media conglomerate that has revenues in the ballpark of $50 billion dollars per year. Fanhouse's Mike Chiapetta mentioned a number of positive effects from the deal as Versus would likely be turned over to NBC and run by NBC Sports' head Dick Ebersol. While Ebersol has historically disliked the idea of mixed martial arts on network television, Chiapetta points out that it is possible a cable television presence might be possible. He also mentions that the subsequent content war could bring the UFC in as a viable option for FOX or ABC.

One of the interesting topics related to the deal is Zuffa's World Extreme Cagefighting (WEC) promotion. The promotion inked a new extension with Versus one day before the majority stake in NBC was sold off to Comcast, securing it as a staple of the Versus network for quite a long time. Interestingly enough, most pundits and analysts believe that Comcast will try to vie for a stake of the mainstream sports market by pushing Versus up against sports' giant ESPN:

But Comcast’s impending acquisition of NBC Universal will certainly set off an effort to turn Versus into a viable alternative, if not a full-fledged competitor, to ESPN, The New York Times’s Richard Sandomir writes. Under Comcast’s ownership, Versus has transformed from the Outdoor Life Network to OLN, then, in 2006, into its current incarnation.

What does this mean for the WEC? Firstly, the WEC did produce some of the best ratings for Versus. Secondly, Zuffa did manage to secure a deal with Versus before the buyout, although I'm fairly positive that NBC executives were likely in on that deal. Hopefully, that means they have an invested interest in promoting the WEC within the new scheme.

The positives are that the WEC could be one of the hot commodities on a newly-launched NBC cable sports channel that will be within most families' basic cable package versus the extended sports package that it currently resides on in Comcast's line-up. While the WEC will be one of the better options in the first couple of years, there is no doubt that NBC Sports will use their $50 billion in revenue to attract bigger fish to replace Bull Riding and the Tour de France. Depending on where the WEC would be slotted, it could benefit from the constant viewership in terms of putting its advertising in front of its demographic or attract outliers from the 18-34 demographic.

Of course, there are plenty of negatives that I feel have been overlooked. Ebersol hasn't been a fan of MMA, and while NBC has slotted Strikeforce in late night slots with success and now Bellator... are they ready to take it under the wing of NBC Sports? With such a large bankroll, a new cable channel would likely vie for more NFL games and MLB coverage, two sports that would likely gain a priority over the WEC.

Star-divide

The WEC's current business model and demographic might fit perfectly into this scenario though. One thing many fans overlook is the WEC's model for success, which is mapped along the same course of what the UFC has done over the course of its existence. The UFC progressively won fans, media, and even politicians over a lengthy period of time, and Zuffa likely feels that it will take time to build the WEC. If we really look at it with that expectation, the WEC is fitting that exact mold. The real problem comes when we look at the present heading into the future.

The major problem on the horizon is the WEC's entry into the PPV market. We heard from multiple sources that the WEC would enter the PPV market last year, but an event never came to fruition on PPV due to what many believe was the DirecTV-Comcast debacle over Versus and the loss of ways to promote the card. Interestingly enough, MMAWeekly.com is reporting that Reed Harris has stated that a PPV is "definite" in 2010 and the DirecTV dispute could be resolved as soon as the end of the year:

Talking with MMAWeekly Radio on Monday night, Harris said all signs are pointing to satellite subscribers getting their WEC fights back sooner rather than later.

"The last thing I heard a couple weeks ago is they were both talking and they had both come back to the table to discuss it, and I had heard that maybe we would be back on by Dec. 19, so that's what I'm hoping for," Harris commented.

The promotion’s next event is WEC 45: Cerrone vs. Ratcliff on that date in Las Vegas.

The other confirmation Harris disclosed is that the WEC will absolutely be on pay-per-view by the end of 2010, but once again, sooner may be the call rather than later.

During The Ultimate Fighter Finale on Saturday night, Josh Gross tweeted an interesting question. Would you buy a PPV that featured Frankie Edgar at 145 vs. Jose Aldo for the title with possibly another division title up for grabs. Throw on either Torres or Faber for more draw, price it around $40. Would you buy that card?

Most answers were likely on the negative side of the fence due to the $40 price tag, but that type of card might be considered a success if it pulled in somewhere in the neighborhood of 150k - 200k in PPV buys. Considering Brown vs. Aldo produced 400,000 viewers and Faber vs. Pulver produced 1.5 million viewers, there is a market there to make some money on PPV.

The mistake would be to work in too many PPVs over the course of the year, and my major argument against the PPV revenue way of business was that the new Comcast/NBC could potentially be a way to ramp up revenues and viewership for the WEC. As Gross pointed out to me, rights fees would have had to increase incredibly with the new deal, and we aren't privy to the exact details of the deal. Of course, a new network with the NBC name would help with the task of selling more PPVs along with advertising spread across Comcast's entire network and NBC-owned channels.

There are obviously some incredible dangers to wading in the PPV market. Most fans and writers believe the WEC is selling themselves too high right now in believing they can pull substantial numbers. This isn't the UFC though. They work on smaller venues, less expenses, and they don't require over 400,000 buys to be considered a huge success. 100,000 might actually be a starting point for them, and I think they might be able to actually break that with enough names.

Ultimately, the Comcast/NBC deal combined with WEC's ambitious PPV plans could be the perfect business model for the promotion to move forward. Putting a majority of the WEC events on the new Versus/NBC cable channel with the prospect of a reality series to build some newer stars, more events, and advertising throughout the NBC network of channels should bring in more viewers. While they won't make incredible money with their current rights fee deal, it will feed their new PPV model. We're not talking 9 or 10 PPVs a year though. Start out small, build the fanbase. Two or three a year at the most.

Sure, it'll take some time for the WEC to truly see some great numbers in the PPV market, especially with the UFC's saturation, but it's a much better option than the current option... continually riding out year after year on the same network that has poor ratings and the PBL, the UFL, and the Tour De France to help support it. I've given up on merger thoughts right now, but I still see it as a great option the UFC is missing out on. For now, the Comcast/NBC deal should help the WEC progress into the future, and it's likely why Zuffa signed the extension. Now it's up to NBC Sports and Comcast to figure out exactly what they'll do with Versus.

Poll
How much would you pay for a WEC PPV card featuring Urijah Faber, Miguel Torres, Jose Aldo, Brian Bowles, possibly Frankie Edgar?
$40
483 votes
$30
403 votes
$25
416 votes
$20
425 votes
$10
232 votes
Not worth any amount.
485 votes

2444 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 36 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

1 PPV/month is enough, 2 is pushing it. They would be robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Keep firing Assholes!

Fedor has accomplished nothing until he fights Kimbo.

by Ubernoober on Dec 8, 2009 12:26 PM EST reply actions  

1 PPV a month? That’s way too many. Or are you talking about combined between both the UFC and WEC?

WEC should do roughly 2 or 3 a year tops at this point.

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

by Leland Roling on Dec 8, 2009 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I mean the UFC runs 1 PPV a month, and the WEC would be putting their 2-3 a year. All that would do is have people say “I’m not buying the WEC, I’m buying my monthly UFC”.

The WEC would just be better off adding 135 and 145 titles to the UFC and becoming a talent development pool where people like Sadollah and Rosholt can develop in peace.

Keep firing Assholes!

Fedor has accomplished nothing until he fights Kimbo.

by Ubernoober on Dec 8, 2009 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

It would be better for the fighters to add those divisions to the UFC, and it would give the UFC options if situations in which multiple title holders are out. It would give them some exciting fights as well. I agree, and I think everyone here knows my stance on a merger. But it isn’t happening. The extension solidified their place on Versus, and they are going into the PPV market for sure.

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

by Leland Roling on Dec 8, 2009 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

That's exactly what I think

Guys like Rosholt & Hendricks both came to the WEC as highly touted prospects w/ serious wrestling backgrounds, and when WW+ got folded in the WEC, they both got thrown into the deep end. Johnny was lucky to have done succeeded, Rosholt… not so much. Giving a guy Miller, Leben, and Grove right in a row just isn’t a smart way to develop what could’ve been (and what could still be) a tremendous prospect.

If Rosholt had gone to Strikeforce, they’d be grooming him correctly, giving him difficult but manageable fights that would challenge him & let him grow as a fighter, and in the event he lost, they’d give him a proper bounce- back fight.

I’m right there with you regarding the BW & FW ranks joining the UFC, to be honest it makes so much sense. The UFC has had a ton of trouble filling out it’s cards due to the slew of recent injuries of it’s stars, and if they just marketed guys like Varner, Aldo & Bowles, and marketed the other stars (guys like Faber, Torres, Razor Rob, Bendo, Cerrone), they could easily have stars that could step up to fill out a card. And to accomodate the new arrivals, just increase the amount of UFN’s. IMO the WEC has served it’s purpose wonderfully- by increasing the visibility of these lighter weight fighters.

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA. Xtreme Couture FTMFW.

'09 is the year of the FW's.

by ElliotMatheny on Dec 8, 2009 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

tour de france

hey jerk some of u slike watching that race

by bearcox13 on Dec 8, 2009 12:34 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

Not enough people for it to be viable competitor to MLB or the NFL.

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

by Leland Roling on Dec 8, 2009 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

The new conglomerate is going to replace the Tour De France probably, or have a smaller network that isn’t Versus take over those deals.

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

by Leland Roling on Dec 8, 2009 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t see why, the TDF is from 8am to noon for 2 weeks in july.

What else are they going to air? Even if they create a show that could compete with sportcenter, sportscenter goes off the air for the world cup and other sporting events that take place in that time frame. It’s not like their competing for time or a lot of money.

by Phildo on Dec 8, 2009 12:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Depends what they do. Nobody really knows for sure. I suppose keeping it wouldn’t be a bad idea.

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

by Leland Roling on Dec 8, 2009 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Versus actually covers most of the major cycling races during the year not just the TdF, which is only 3 weeks in July. The cool thing from a programming standpoint is that most races take place in Europe, so the majority of North American fans already watch a tape-delayed version of the races.

That’s programming gold:
1. Loyal fan base
2. Hours and hours of material
3. Pre-taped coverage can be aired around other sports without complaint from fans

Though cycling, bull riding, bass fishing, and quad racing have smaller fan bases, to dump them all to chase ESPN certainly would not be the most organic way of growing the channel.

by casey manrique on Dec 8, 2009 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Understandable… but dumping them… then buying NFL games, building NFL coverage from the current NBC stable of analysts into new shows and replacing the name Versus with NBC Cable Sports Network or something else would gain more eyes than all four combined.

Of course, keeping those sports and airing them in non-primetime slots would be ideal.

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

by Leland Roling on Dec 8, 2009 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

…if they’re cheap enough.

by casey manrique on Dec 8, 2009 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Not interested in paying for WEC on PPV. Just have the UFC absorb it already!

I love me some Sexyama!

by pud333 on Dec 8, 2009 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

^^^ THIS

or at least package the WEC PPV with a UFC one that you buy. They take almost $60 from us every month (HD), those that don’t stream anyway, so make a WEC PPV a package deal with a UFC PPV. Two events for just about the price of one might create more of an incentive to buy.

"Death, so called, is a thing which makes men weep, And yet a third of life is passed in sleep."
- Lord Byron

by MyFightWiffaCheeto on Dec 8, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Thats a really good idea actually.
They should do some 2 for 1 events. That would expose more people the the WEC

I dislike Matt Hughes. Shogun beat him like a dirty horse.

by MonkeyCHops on Dec 8, 2009 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

But then you’ll have to pay to see the WEC stars on UFC PPV. But at least said fighters would be getting a pay raise (Hopefully).

by dv8shun on Dec 8, 2009 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

That wouldn't suck...

I mean do you regularly watch WEC? Their free events are just about 100% more exciting than anything SF or UFC typically offers up. The little guys throwdown… it would just allow for some more stars to potentially break out and the guys who are already stars (Torres, Brown, Faber) to explode more

"Death, so called, is a thing which makes men weep, And yet a third of life is passed in sleep."
- Lord Byron

by MyFightWiffaCheeto on Dec 8, 2009 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

The divisions sell themselves IMO. If you can get more viewers in front of the WEC, they should gain more buys because the fights are insane.

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

by Leland Roling on Dec 8, 2009 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

If WEC 46

were PPV, with Benderson vs. Varner and Faber vs. Assuncao, I guess I’d pay for that. WEC 45: Cerrone vs. Ratcliff, not so much. I hate to admit it, but the top end of the card is really the deciding factor for me here, and although the WEC put on some dynamite fights, I’m looking at the sharp end of the spear to see if it’s worth my money.

by rzor on Dec 8, 2009 12:56 PM EST reply actions  

It is really hard to get people to pay for something that they have already been getting for free. I love the WEC but I don’t know if I want to pay for it now.

"Stop smiling you are about to be punched in the face !"

by Warhand on Dec 8, 2009 1:01 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

This is my issue

I love watching the WEC and I’m really upset I can’t now that Versus is off DirectTV, but I can’t seem to pay for a product I’m used to getting for free.

by Chris Barton on Dec 8, 2009 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ll be beyond pissed if I can’t watch cycling any more…

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // "I win again. Engrish is my bitch." - Steven Zucconi

by Richard Wade on Dec 8, 2009 1:04 PM EST reply actions  

All I know is that the “Huntley Way” got cancelled.

by John Nash on Dec 8, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d be more than willing to part with Sports Soup.

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

by Leland Roling on Dec 8, 2009 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

YOU TAKE THAT BACK!

by woooburn on Dec 8, 2009 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Is that show still on?

Bolts from the Blue // "I have got to be the most boring GM in the league." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // "I win again. Engrish is my bitch." - Steven Zucconi

by Richard Wade on Dec 8, 2009 9:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Sadly... yes.

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

by Leland Roling on Dec 9, 2009 9:35 AM EST up reply actions  

I wouldn’t be happy paying for something I can see for free now, but for those guys on one card, I think you’re shitting yourself as an MMA fan if you’re saying you wouldn’t (perhaps begrudgingly) pony up $40 to watch, if that was the only option other than a crappy internet stream.

It’s a better card than 106, 108, and 109.

by kid_eh on Dec 8, 2009 1:19 PM EST reply actions  

WEC PPVs will probably be $29.95 and they could have those the 2-3 months of the year the UFC has a free card.

by swells2048 on Dec 8, 2009 2:55 PM EST reply actions  

does the color of the cage bother anyone… it’s just way too blue, kind of hard on the eyes.

it’s really tough to convince customers to pay for something that has been free for years

by kanodogg on Dec 8, 2009 8:01 PM EST reply actions  

150k-200k PPV buys?

Holy smoke! The WEC is a billion dollar entity now? UFC averages about 50k-75k buys per event. The numbers out there all false rumors leaked by the UFC. The UFC doesn’t have to release the figures because they are a private company and can lie all they want. The UFC is about a $200M to $250M annual promotion. If we all agree on this point, and there is no reason not to given this makes them as big as the WWE, then they average about 50k-75k buys. If you put this card out there, it gets maybe 10K buy purely from hardcore fans only.

by aggieheaven on Dec 8, 2009 10:21 PM EST reply actions  

...

wow @ all the ‘not worth any amount’ votes. I guess people just don’t like watching top level fighters.

I wonder how many ‘not worth any amount’ votes we’d get if the poll question was about Brock Lesnar’s PPV value…

by moreofmyself on Dec 9, 2009 12:28 AM EST reply actions  

LOL @ the idea of Edgar in the WEC

The WEC pays its champions half of what Edgar makes now in the UFC and a pittance compared to what he’d make if he ever wins a title. The FoTN award, which he’s won 3 times in the UFC, would net him less than half as much in the WEC.

He’s now 6-1 in one of the deepest divisions in MMA, with his only loss being against a guy who should be the #1 contender. In under a year, he could have a shot at the title, potentially earning six figures per fight.

There’s no way in hell he’s going to ditch that any time soon.

by George Lucas on Dec 9, 2009 4:59 AM EST reply actions  

The problem is that as he gets higher in the bracket of the lightweight division, he’ll get beat against bigger guys. There are so many bigger 155’ers, and that’s why a lot of writers make the case that Edgar will eventually drop to 145. He says he won’t, but I bet he will down the road.

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

by Leland Roling on Dec 9, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gonzo_fist_small
Random Nick Diaz Shops
My_avy_small
Roger Gracie signs with the UFC
Lebowski_excited_grin_small
The History of Subo: the bans, warnings, and mockings.
Bros
Nick Diaz: Hero to Millions
Favritegotevj9_small
An Open Letter to Nick Diaz

Recent FanPosts

Obp_small
Nick Diaz - The Musical
Small
Pot can be a performance enhancer (serious thread)
Nate-diaz-double-bird_small
How Would Today's Top Kickboxers Do In MMA?
Ri_small
How does the PRIDE compare to present day UFC?
Jerryrice_small
Gratitude: Why no one should still hate the UFC
Shogun_logo_small
UFC’s hope of stadium show in Sao Paulo appears to be dead
Me_small
2012 and Onward: More Free Events, Fewer Pay Per Views Key for UFC Success
Me_2_small
Muay Thai Champion Irshaad Sayed Thinks Win over Jessie Rafols Could Launch his MMA Career

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings