Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Where Do You Rank BJ Penn Amongst the Best Ever?


Over at Heavy.com, E. Spencer Kyte tosses BJ Penn's name into the discussion of the best ever in advance of his UFC 107 title defense against Diego Sanchez.

As much as it pains me to say this, B.J. Penn might be the best ever.

Before my fellow Canadians begin cursing me en francais and demanding I be deported, and MMA fans the world over start shouting about their favorite fighter and some of the legends of days gone by, hear me out.

And remember, I said might be...

Love him or hate him, Penn's accomplishments in the sport are numerous, and they are well-detailed in the piece. Kyte offers up a great deal of respect for "The Prodigy's" numerous fights outside of his 155-pound comfort zone, while leaving the ultimate decision a personal one:

While the results haven’t always been favourable, few fighters have even shown the willingness to risk a loss for the sake of a challenge and that is part of what makes BJ Penn so special.

Whether that makes him the best ever is for you to decide.

Let the debating begin...

Poll
Where Does BJ Penn Rank All-Time?
Numero Uno
42 votes
Top 3
122 votes
Top 5
162 votes
Top 10
92 votes
Top 20
26 votes

444 votes | Poll has closed

The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.

Comment 114 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

All throughout the entire universe for the rest of time and all the past, I don’t think BJ cracks the top 47.829 trillion to be honest.

Keep firing Assholes!

In Idaho, it's illegal to f--- a porcupine. You know why? Because someone tried it.

by Ubernoober on Dec 3, 2009 8:36 PM EST reply actions  

Latter part of top 5, maybe 5

by Meshuggeth on Dec 3, 2009 8:45 PM EST reply actions  

Towards the top of Top 10

Top 5 had he not been torched by GSP. But that’s either a testament to just how good GSP is. Or maybe how overrated Machida is.

"Mindwarp earthlings seek to change our path" - Nick Blinko

by Skoobs on Dec 3, 2009 8:52 PM EST reply actions  

Number one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BJ! BJ! BJ!

Disclosure: Have I mentioned I live in Hawaii?

by MauiPimpin on Dec 3, 2009 8:54 PM EST reply actions  

When you're 0-2 against someone else in the discussion

It’s just not possible to be the best ever.

by Trysdor on Dec 3, 2009 9:41 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

I don’t think i can consider BJ the best ever. But he is definetly top 5. Also I don’t know how much people hate BJ too consider all what he did inside the cage and ring and vote for him to be in the top 20.

by bigislandboi808 on Dec 3, 2009 9:54 PM EST reply actions  

Over at Heavy.com, E. Spencer Kyte tosses BJ Penn’s name

Like I mentioned in the other post, just say “Over at Heavy.com, I wrote…”!

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Dec 3, 2009 10:00 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Like I said in the other post, using saying “I wrote” sounds even more self-promotional and self-praising…

by E. Spencer Kyte on Dec 3, 2009 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Speaking in third person is not a good look.

"I’m sorry. I didn’t drink last night, so I’m not funny today."
-Sakuraba

by Blackout612 on Dec 3, 2009 10:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Wait...

So Tyron Woodley is the guy to beat GSP in a year and BJ Penn is above him on the GOAT list.

Noticing a bit of a pattern here.

by SpaceSoap on Dec 3, 2009 10:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I never said either of the two… Woodley as a future opponent is interesting to me and BJ is easy Top 10, probably Top 5 on my list.

by E. Spencer Kyte on Dec 4, 2009 12:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Top 5 sounds about right to me

And my comment was meant to be more of a tongue and cheek ribbing, but reading it again now it doesn’t really come across that way, more like an accusation. If there was a misunderstanding, sorry for that.

by SpaceSoap on Dec 4, 2009 3:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Like I said in the other post, using saying "I wrote" sounds even more self-promotional and self-praising…

It really doesn’t.

by JRN on Dec 4, 2009 1:05 AM EST up reply actions  

It really, really doesn’t.

by Barry619 on Dec 4, 2009 2:09 AM EST up reply actions  

your stuff is a nice read

it’s just that beginning gives me weird feelings (what?)

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Dec 4, 2009 6:15 AM EST up reply actions  

also didn’t see that you responded in the other post, figured you’d ignore it

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Dec 4, 2009 6:25 AM EST up reply actions  

BJ is easily the best lightweight fighter in the history of MMA, and one of the most interesting characters in the sport.

by MMAEruption on Dec 3, 2009 10:09 PM EST reply actions  

Holy Normal Distribution, Batman!

I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.

by Llewdor on Dec 3, 2009 10:27 PM EST reply actions  

Looks like a big middle finger.

Keep firing Assholes!

More pale flesh hit the ice than that time they gutted a seal on APTN.

by Ubernoober on Dec 3, 2009 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

MAYBE Top 10

Not sure how he gets #1 at Lightweight over Gomi when he spent nearly half his bouts putzing around at higher weights.

Creator of the FightMatrix rating system.

by JCS_FM on Dec 3, 2009 10:42 PM EST reply actions  

That automatically makes him better at Lightweight?

Creator of the FightMatrix rating system.

by JCS_FM on Dec 3, 2009 10:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I want to see what color this changes to when everyone recs this.

Twitter @brettcjones
"BJ on the BE" - Kierkegaard

by Brett Jones on Dec 4, 2009 11:22 AM EST up reply actions  

So..

Ray Mercer is a better career heavyweight than Tim Sylvia?

Creator of the FightMatrix rating system.

by JCS_FM on Dec 4, 2009 5:55 PM EST up reply actions  

In his combat sports career Mercer has 1 more loss and 12 more wins than Sylvia so yes, he is a better career HW.

by ufc4 on Dec 4, 2009 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Nikolay Valuev #1 all-time?

Creator of the FightMatrix rating system.

by JCS_FM on Dec 4, 2009 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I was referring to CAREER lightweight status BTW.

Sorry if I didnt make that clear..

Creator of the FightMatrix rating system.

by JCS_FM on Dec 4, 2009 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

You’ll need to explain yourself here. It’s like gomi was the only guy BJ ever beat either. How beating a guy fair & square doesn’t mean you’re stronger than him?

10/24

by spectaa on Dec 4, 2009 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Bj is easilly top 3 for me.

One of the best to ever fight. BJ is a lightweight who has fought the two best WWs ever and been able to hold his own (even tho the 2nd GSP fight was a route). Skill wise I think he even trumps GSP, although athletically he isn’t as dominant.

I'm like PacMan fightin you silly kids... throw ya Hatton the ring, and get knocked outlike Ricky did.
lol.

by Loot on Dec 3, 2009 11:34 PM EST reply actions  

You forgot the “not in the top 20” option.

by ufc4 on Dec 3, 2009 11:52 PM EST reply actions  

That is absolutely insane.

"I’m sorry. I didn’t drink last night, so I’m not funny today."
-Sakuraba

by Blackout612 on Dec 4, 2009 12:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I never said that would be my vote, but the option should be there.

by ufc4 on Dec 4, 2009 12:11 AM EST up reply actions  

It really shouldn’t.

"I’m sorry. I didn’t drink last night, so I’m not funny today."
-Sakuraba

by Blackout612 on Dec 4, 2009 12:36 AM EST up reply actions  

He’s kind of a borderline case. Tons of potential, fewer accomplishments.

by Jonathan Snowden on Dec 4, 2009 12:59 AM EST up reply actions  

*internet high five

Cue the cheesy 80s song

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Dec 4, 2009 6:23 AM EST up reply actions  

You're the best... around

NOTHING’S EVER GONNA KEEP YOU DOWN!

"I’m sorry. I didn’t drink last night, so I’m not funny today."
-Sakuraba

by Blackout612 on Dec 4, 2009 2:28 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

His accomplishments are limited, his historical significance almost nil, and his talent and abilities are only relevant based on how they were used to achieve success in the cage.

I’m not saying he’s not a great fighter. But his career has been a huge disappointment, even he admits that he could have been so much more than he was.

I mean, you’ve made it much easier for someone to make a list with those criteria. If you had said “I challenge anyone to name 19 more talented fighters” it would have been nearly impossible.

by Jonathan Snowden on Dec 4, 2009 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Talent alone isn't what we're arguing

And honestly, I’m shocked at your assessment. His historical significance is almost nil? That’s comedy gold. Certainly, you relegate such esteem to the likes of Ken Shamrock and Sakuraba, but your criteria isn’t universal. Talent and abilities are not purely applicable to achieving success. His boxing is among the best in MMA, his BJJ needs no explanation and his athleticism has been displayed on too many occasions to note. If you’re telling me you honestly only award a fighter credit for his talents if he wins a fight, you’re a very American MMA fan.

"I’m sorry. I didn’t drink last night, so I’m not funny today."
-Sakuraba

by Blackout612 on Dec 4, 2009 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

BJ Penn is a great fighter. I love watching him and I’ve enjoyed talking to him. I just don’t think he approaches the top fighters in history. I personally award fighters tons of credit for technique, for entertaining me, for making fights interesting….but that all goes away when you are arguing all time best.

Penn didn’t have the discipline to make himself one of the best. Maybe he will now. But you can’t ignore that he spent his prime overeating, not trainign hard, and losing to most of the top guys he fought.

by Jonathan Snowden on Dec 4, 2009 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

By my count, he’s 4-5 against elite fighters (champs or champs-in-waiting), with four of those five loses coming above his natural weightclass. Two of those four were close decisions. I hate splitting hairs like this but record doesn’t tell the story for a lot of fighters (see Couture, Randy).

Will your stance change if he knocks off a few more lightweights with ease?

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Dec 4, 2009 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I still think he beat GSP

in the 1st fight. I would pay $100 for GSP vs Penn III

by Riney on Dec 4, 2009 4:58 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

As do I. “I went to the bar, he went to the hospital.”

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Dec 4, 2009 5:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Losing to most of the top guys he fought??

I concede. Maybe we’re talking about different BJ Penn’s. You’re free to your opinion, no doubt— but I, too, would absolutely love to see the 19 guys you put over him. For the sake of curiosity.

"I’m sorry. I didn’t drink last night, so I’m not funny today."
-Sakuraba

by Blackout612 on Dec 4, 2009 6:17 PM EST up reply actions  

History is Written

He DID lose to the top level guys he fought. That’s just a fact. He started strong, beating a good fighter in Din Thomas and one of the best in the world in Caol Uno. Next time out he lost to Jens Pulver.

Record: 1-1

He went on to draw Uno in a rematch.

Record: 1-1-1

He beat Matt Hughes. Tremendous.

Record: 2-1-1

He beat Gomi, but no one really considered Gomi the best in that class. He had just lost to Hansen and his best win was over a small Dokojanuse Mishima and a smaller Rumina Sato. So, it is a good win, but not an elite win to me. Renzo had lost 5 of 6. Not an elite win. Won’t count the Machida loss against him. Not fair.

Lost to St. Pierre. Lost to Hughes.

Record: 2-3-1

Beat Sean Sherk. Nice win. Sherk was the champion in his division, a good historically important win.

3-3-1

Lost to St. Pierre

3-4-1

So, yeah. I’d say he lost to more of the top of the heap fighters than he beat. If you want to grant Gomi that status, Then he’s .500. The best fighter of all time isn’t .500 against top level opponents.

As for ranking 19 above him? I didn’t say I would. But I could see the case made. What are the criteria?

by Jonathan Snowden on Dec 4, 2009 6:50 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL at Gomi not being an elite win

But GSP at the time being a loss to an elite fighter. Remove one, remove both.

"I’m sorry. I didn’t drink last night, so I’m not funny today."
-Sakuraba

by Blackout612 on Dec 4, 2009 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Who had Gomi beaten at the time to be an elite fighter? Who has he beaten now? An old Ralph Gracie? And old Sakurai? Kawajiri I’ll grant you. But at the time, and I was around at the time, Gomi was just a prospect with potential. I would call that a quality win, not an elite win.

by Jonathan Snowden on Dec 4, 2009 7:49 PM EST up reply actions  

How is it discrediting anything at all? Gomi was a good young prospect. He was not an elite fighter yet. It is arguable he never became one. That’s fine. It doesn’t mean he’s not or was not wildly entertaining and very, very good.

by Jonathan Snowden on Dec 4, 2009 8:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Also

I’m not going to define criteria or anything, it just seems a tall task to put 19 guys over him given almost any criteria for GOAT. You didn’t have to play devil’s advocate, but if you are, then play it well. Just because he could have been better doesn’t mean he wasn’t great. Michael Irvin is in the NFL Hall of Fame. Should they have stopped him at the door and said “Mike, you did a lot of coke, drank a lot, self-admittedly didn’t always take your play seriously, and once attacked a teammate with a pair of scissors— you’re not allowed in the HOF.”

"I’m sorry. I didn’t drink last night, so I’m not funny today."
-Sakuraba

by Blackout612 on Dec 4, 2009 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

He was undeniably great. But 14 wins is not a lot to show for eight years of fighting. No one is denying BJ Penn is a super fighter. That he had potential to be the best. Frank Shamrock was telling people at the time of his debut that he was among the best already. But I think I demonstrated pretty clearly that BJ didn’t shine against the best. I don’t see how you can say he’s the best of all time.

Looking at it, he’s pretty safe to make the top 20. But throwing historical significance into the melting pot doesn’t help him much. It would depend quite a bit on what the standards were.

by Jonathan Snowden on Dec 4, 2009 7:54 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re right.

He should’ve padded his record with cans to make you happy.

by MickDawg on Dec 5, 2009 6:20 PM EST up reply actions  

You had something here.

And then you said that Gomi isn’t an elite win. That statement makes your argument an elite fail.

by MauiPimpin on Dec 4, 2009 7:22 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

What were Gomi’s credentials then? What are they now? He’s a good win. He was not elite.

by Jonathan Snowden on Dec 4, 2009 7:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, Gomi was coming off a loss to Hansen when he faced BJ

but before that he was undefeated. After that he went undefeated for more than two years, straight to the LW Pride GP championship. He’s about as elite as a LW fighter can get.

To be honest, I wanted to use “elite fail” a lot more than I wanted to discuss Takanori Gomi.

by MauiPimpin on Dec 4, 2009 8:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Not really. He was propped up by fighting subpar competition in many cases. He’s a good fighter. I don’t think he qualifies as an elite fighter. That’s not an insult.

by Jonathan Snowden on Dec 4, 2009 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Bottom line: Too soon to tell.

"In Russia, Hell goes to you!"

by actionbastard on Dec 4, 2009 12:18 AM EST reply actions  

Hey Tito,

why are you talking about yourself in the third person? ;P

by Anton Tabuena on Dec 4, 2009 2:51 AM EST reply actions  

Because I think I won that fight.

by dancingChicken on Dec 4, 2009 5:25 AM EST up reply actions  

7 people must really hate BJ

Top 20 – 7 votes

"Like a ballet of violence clothed in fine Brazilian silk." ~ MMASuPreMaCy

by Benicio on Dec 4, 2009 4:20 AM EST reply actions  

Sad stuff

I think he’s kind of annoying at times (the whole GSP thing has become a Mir/BROCKLESNAR-esque obsession) and can be pretty self-important, but one cannot deny his accomplishments and phenomenal talent. I don’t like Hughes either (and a lot less), but come on— top five all time.

"I’m sorry. I didn’t drink last night, so I’m not funny today."
-Sakuraba

by Blackout612 on Dec 4, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions  

BJ was obsessed with GSP before Mir was obsessed with Lesnar.

Guillotine.

by iiowyn on Dec 5, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Top of ALL TIME?

Definitely not. There seems to be a serious case of historical ignorance going on here.

I think best of all time right now has to be between Fedor, Sakuraba and Royce. Nog is close as well.

BJ – not there yet. If he eventually beats GSP or conquers the light weight division for 10 defences or something then maybe he’ll be in the top 3.

by rainmaker6 on Dec 4, 2009 5:52 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

I don’t like BJ much at all myself, but I still gave him a top 5 vote. Can’t really fault him for some of his losses coming from guys in a bigger weight class. No doubt he’s a great fighter!

by soadtrails on Dec 4, 2009 7:16 AM EST reply actions  

Where Do I Rank BJ Penn Amongst The Best?

Very, Very, Very High.

You start the list with Fedor. That’s inarguable.

BJ is probably next. Probably. I kind of obsess over these things, and I’m saying this without the proper level of obsession, so I could be wrong.

But I’m probably not. BJ is amazing. He’s beaten every person he’s faced at Lightweight. He beat the greatest Welterweight of all time (and lost to him, then twice to his successor). He beat Renzo Gracie at, what, 185lbs.? He went to a decision with Lyoto Machida. I know it’s silly to give someone credit for not winning a fight, but come on, a natural 155lbs. fighter went the distance with Lyoto Machida? Some measure of respect is due.

Miguel Torres is sort of underrated in these discussions. I wouldn’t even qualify that statement had he beaten Brian Bowles, but he didn’t. If he avenges that loss, Torres is right back in the mix with Fedor, BJ, Anderson Silva, Matt Hughes, and maybe KID. Probably in that order, too.

But again, I haven’t obsessed over this nearly enough.

Twitter @brettcjones
"BJ on the BE" - Kierkegaard

by Brett Jones on Dec 4, 2009 9:14 AM EST reply actions  

I think it goes Fedor, Hughes, Wanderlei. I mean, I’d have to give it deeper thought to mean it, but that’s how I feel on a whim.

"I’m sorry. I didn’t drink last night, so I’m not funny today."
-Sakuraba

by Blackout612 on Dec 4, 2009 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Wanderlei is interesting. Off hand I’d say he’s in the mix.

Chuck should probably be in the discussion as well, come to think of it.

Twitter @brettcjones
"BJ on the BE" - Kierkegaard

by Brett Jones on Dec 4, 2009 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

It’s pretty tight up top.

"I’m sorry. I didn’t drink last night, so I’m not funny today."
-Sakuraba

by Blackout612 on Dec 4, 2009 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I dislike BJ a little, I admit, I even always bet against him (wich coast me a lot in fake money).
I could rank him Top 5, behind Fedor (legendary+), Silva (legendary) and GSP. But the “all time” makes me want to make him top 3 over GSP, since he started kicking asses so soon.

10/24

by spectaa on Dec 4, 2009 11:52 AM EST reply actions  

He’s at the bottom of the Top 5. There’s no argument for him to be higher than Fedor, GSP, or Anderson.

by Hardcharger on Dec 4, 2009 12:23 PM EST reply actions  

Fedor, probably not

But GSP and Anderson? They’ve got some things to accomplish for it to not be arguable (though, it is).

"I’m sorry. I didn’t drink last night, so I’m not funny today."
-Sakuraba

by Blackout612 on Dec 4, 2009 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

There’s not an argument for Penn to be ranked above GSP or Anderson. GSP has faced the toughest competition of any fighter ever, and has a better record in doing so than Penn.

Anderson has 4 losses, but has been untouchable the last 3+ years.

Penn is the best LW in the world, but his overall accomplishments aren’t quite on that level. his willingness to fight anyone is fantastic, but that hasn’t always led to victories.

by Hardcharger on Dec 4, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Please stop

Florian, Sherk, Stevenson, Pulver, Renzo & Rodrigo Gracie, Bang, Hughes, Gomi, Serra, Uno, Din— almost all in the heart of their prime? I’m not saying he’s above them, I’m saying you’re crazy to say it’s inarguable. It absolutely, positively is arguable. His losses are to Hughes, GSP, Lyoto and Jens in his prime. GSP got knocked out by Serra two years ago. When all is said and done, GSP will almost no doubt be ranked above BJ, but you can’t say that it’s so cut and dry today.

"I’m sorry. I didn’t drink last night, so I’m not funny today."
-Sakuraba

by Blackout612 on Dec 4, 2009 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, there is an argument for him to be higher than GSP and Anderson. He has spent the majority of his career fighting guys significantly larger than he is. BJ is on the smaler side of lightweight and could conceivably cut down to 145, unlike GSP and Anderson, who are both large for their respective weight classes.

I personally think it goes Fedor, GSP, Anderson and BJ at #4, but the gap between GSP, Anderson and BJ is razor-thin.

by Niles on Dec 4, 2009 2:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Each group in no particular order

Rough GOAT list.
Top five: Fedor, Wanderlei, Hughes, Sakuraba, Royce.

5-10: Anderson, Big Nog, GSP, Chuck, BJ

11-15: Couture, Tito, Coleman, Pulver, Gomi

Others that come to mind: Cro Cop, Mach Sakurai, Josh Barnett, Ken Shamrock, Frank Shamrock, Bas Rutten, Tim Sylvia, Shogun.

It’s really hard to factor in historical significance, skill, relevance to one division, dominance… too many criteria to weigh accurately. This was a quick off the cuff list, didn’t think too much, hoping to expand conversation though.

by pdl on Dec 4, 2009 3:59 PM EST reply actions  

Why does everyone have Wanderlei above Chuck?

by An0nymous on Dec 4, 2009 4:13 PM EST reply actions  

During his prime

he was actually the “Axe Murderer”. As good and nasty as Chuck was, Wandy was twice as nasty. In their prime Chuck would KO you, Wandy would hurt,ruin,steal your soul then KO you.

by Riney on Dec 4, 2009 5:04 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

This, plus...

Wanderlei had a 20 fight unbeaten streak that was only snapped by fighting a much bigger Mark Hunt. He held the PRIDE 205lbs belt for about 6 years. He defined the Chute Boxe style which changed the direction that MMA skill sets would have to go. His influence is key in the way Shogun, Ninja, Andre Dida, Thiago Silva, and Cyborg. It partially colors the career of Anderson Silva.

Chuck had a strong era in the UFC. He forced the division to be more well rounded by wrecking the grapplers. He’s a major player historically, but not the same way Wanderlei was.

by pdl on Dec 4, 2009 6:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Wanderlei had a 20 fight unbeaten streak

Which included wins against such elite level competition as: Alexander Otsuka (career record 5-13), Shungo Oyama (7-12), Todd Medina (10-9), Hiromitsu Kanehara (25-24-2), and Tatsuya Iwasaki (0-1). In his prime Silva was no doubt a great fighter but please don’t hold up this 20 fight unbeaten streak as evidence why when he faced cans almost as many times as he faced guys who were actually dangerous.

by ufc4 on Dec 4, 2009 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

And the top guys he beat were all undersized. Sakuraba and Dan Henderson were tiny little guys, as was Kiyoshi Tamura.

by Jonathan Snowden on Dec 4, 2009 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

He was a very entertaining fighter. But I think most people in the know were pretty confident the UFC had the best fighters in the division. What had changed about him since the Tito fight besides what he put in his body?

by Jonathan Snowden on Dec 5, 2009 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, there was Arona, but they went 1-1.

by JRN on Dec 5, 2009 1:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Not the biggest BJ fan

I’d say he ranks in the top 5-10 simply because I can’t think of a better lightweight fighter. I feel the love for BJ on this board although I’m always a bit baffled by BJ fans. BJ fans in general seem to view Penn’s career much like overly religious athletes view “god” — god gets all of the praise when things go well, but his failure to bring about a good result is excused away, or simply not addressed, when things go badly. To many, Penn is the most talented fighter in the world, but that talent is evident only in his victories. In his defeats he simply didn’t train hard enough or he was giving away too much weight., or he was too green, etc. In the eyes of the true believers (who would preposterously suggest with a straight face that BJ should be potentially considered the GOAT), it’s as if those losses never occurred, their existence having been banished to the deepest recesses of their minds.

To be fair to Penn, I can see explaining away the Machida loss. Machida was a lot bigger than Penn, but that’s not the whole story. He’s not just bigger he’s also probably a fair amount better on his feet than Penn (Freddy Roach’s assessment of his boxing be damned). Penn was also out- struck, wrestled and grappled by GSP. Regardless of the size differential, BJ was getting dominated in all phases of the game in the second fight (and the first fight as well, with the exception of an eye poke / scratch and clipping GSP’s nose in the first round). He also lost to Matt Hughes whose career is coming under much more careful scrutiny these days; in his peak years he just wasn’t quite the world beater we remember him to be but rather a decent wrestler with a good gas tank and decent BJJ but who faced limited top level competition when he was on top. And everyone has off nights but how do you explain the draw against Caol Uno? And can anyone honestly say that BJ Penn would be a betting favorite against any of the top 4 welterweights?

All of the above is just to say that BJ is not and will likely never be the best. His record is far too spotty to warrant such talk. Nevertheless he has the best top game in the business, his boxing is good but his striking for MMA is hardly multifaceted, his chin is exceptional and his takedown defense in the first couple rounds is outstanding. His victories against Sherk and Florian were impressive. Let’s see what he does against Diego. I can’t predict how he’ll do but I can predict that win or lose talk of BJ Penn’s being the GOAT at LW or any weight will persist among the true believers.

by The Darkness on Dec 4, 2009 4:29 PM EST reply actions  

Hilarious

I just read the Kyte article. He couldn’t have illustrated by point about true believers better than he did here:

“While the sheer volume of wins pales in comparison to the 31 wins put forth by Fedor and there has been no extended winning streak like the ones current put forth by both St-Pierre and Anderson Silva, four of Penn’s five losses come outside of his natural weight class.

Without those ticks in the loss column, BJ Penn is 14-1-1 and few could argue with the impressiveness of those kinds of numbers."

LMAO. BJ Penn is not 14-1-1 however he’s 14-5-1. If you subtract a bunch of losses off a fighter’s record he always looks more impressive.

Too little is being made of Penn’s losses outside MW. Others have moved up and had success. For instance, Jake Shields has beaten two consensus (at the time he fought them) top ten MWs and he’s clearly a natural welterweight (and he just beat a top 15 MW in Miller). Maybe he should be considered GOAT?? I’m only kidding but people are way too quick to explain away BJ’s losses. He’s not top 5. Somewhere between 5-10 all time sounds about right at this point. If he loses to Sanchez you could make a case for putting him somewhere between 10th and 20th IMO.

by The Darkness on Dec 4, 2009 4:46 PM EST up reply actions  

If the first round of GSP’s first fight against Hughes was 10 seconds shorter and the UFC never did a season of TUF with UFC veterans then GSP might be undefeated.

by ufc4 on Dec 4, 2009 6:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Shields isn't comprable

Lastly, why do people conflate “well-rounded” w/ “all-time great”? I don’t give a tinker’s damn if Anderson Silva never takes anyone down. He destroys them on the feet, and hasn’t been beaten on the ground since his DQ. Silva is definitely obviously w/o a shadow of a doubt the greatest MW thus far. Similarly, who cares if BJ throws kicks, or is technical at all? So far, at LW he has been very dominant standing up.

by jhf884 on Dec 4, 2009 6:14 PM EST reply actions  

Ugh!

meant to post:
Mayhem Miller was a consensus 10 ten fighter? Really? I don’t think he has ever been higher than 23. And the consensus rankings do have their flaws – like ranking Lawlor at #4 ahead of Henderson at #5 back in April of 09 (or anytime ever for that matter). Am I missing someone? What other “top 10” MW’s has Shields fought? The Shields analogy isn’t comparable.

Also, how has Hughes’ run become less impressive w/ time? If you are saying fighters tend to be more well-rounded now, and even in his prime he wouldn’t be as dominant – then, yes obviously. But that is even more true of Wandy, didn’t face UFC competition during his pride run (the inverse of course could be said of Chuck or Tito) and who lost to both Tito – pre-pride – and Chuck – though he had declined at that point.

by jhf884 on Dec 4, 2009 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

And the consensus rankings do have their flaws – like ranking Lawlor at #4 ahead of Henderson at #5 back in April of 09

that’s not the fault of the consensus rankings.. that’s the fault of the crazy sites who did it.

by Anton Tabuena on Dec 4, 2009 8:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair enough

But I think you are splitting hairs. Obviously, the consensus rankings are simply just that – a reflection of the aggregate opinion of the MMA community at the time (at least, if I understand them correctly). By nature, they are no better or worse than the rankings which they aggregate. Thus, when I say they are “flawed”, obviously I simply mean that the consensus opinion isn’t always right, and is sometimes clearly wrong.

Also, to be clear, I like the consensus rankings. I think they are a very useful tool. But sometimes, for whatever reason, the consensus opinion is just plain off (imo, but I don’t think Lawlor as a top 5 MW is terribly credible!)

by jhf884 on Dec 4, 2009 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Whoops!

Good catch! Yeah, Lawler is bad enough — Lawlor as top 5 MW would be even worse!

by jhf884 on Dec 5, 2009 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m probably one of the biggest BJ nuthuggers around. It would be great if he were actually the best ever. But he’s not. He might be the most interesting ever, the most unique ever, the most entertaining in fights ever though.

He’s never really in a borring fight. His fights are chock full of high light moments, his oppenents are often badly hurting after win or lose.

I think he get’s a lot of his props, at least the props I give him for just being such an entertaining fighter.

I’d give him a solid top 5 rating.

War Penn.

Forward Ever, Backward Never...

by Tony NJ on Dec 4, 2009 7:24 PM EST reply actions  

I have all the great fighters in one great basket. I don’t play that silly game of revisionism.

by dancingChicken on Dec 5, 2009 12:22 PM EST reply actions  

Sakuraba

Is the best ever. But BJ has to be in the discussion for top 5

by Chris Barton on Dec 5, 2009 7:01 PM EST reply actions  

Somewhere between 5 – 10 for me……currently. He simply hasnt won enough fights and has lost too many to go right into the top 5. By the time his career is said and done, maybe he will be higher but not at the moment imo.

by GeeDub on Dec 5, 2009 8:17 PM EST reply actions  

Where’s the love for all the old schoolers like Frank Shamrock who held title in 4 major fighting organizations, or Bas Rutten, the most dominant fighter of Pancrase? Or Kazushi Sakarabu who was unstoppable in the early PRIDE years and still continues to win today? Matt Hughes anyone? Top 5 fighter on anyone’s list.

Just because past fighters aren’t relevant today doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have their hard-fought (pun intended) place in history.

That being said BJ is a top 10 of all time with the potential to be top 5 with a couple more title defences.

by lateralus08 on Dec 6, 2009 8:57 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

391807_10150399618817701_750257700_8470850_1424416169_n_small
1 in about 7 billion!  :D
Gonzo_fist_small
Random Nick Diaz Shops
My_avy_small
Roger Gracie signs with the UFC
Lebowski_excited_grin_small
The History of Subo: the bans, warnings, and mockings.
Bros
Nick Diaz: Hero to Millions

Recent FanPosts

Warrior_small
MMA Transaction Wire: February 4-10
Bv_small
BE Trivia Night
Small
The time is right for a superfight, and it doesn't involve Anderson
Obp_small
Nick Diaz - The Musical
Small
Pot can be a performance enhancer (serious thread)
Nate-diaz-double-bird_small
How Would Today's Top Kickboxers Do In MMA?
Ri_small
How does the PRIDE compare to present day UFC?
Jerryrice_small
Gratitude: Why no one should still hate the UFC

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings