Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Fighters React to Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

Quote of the Day: NSAC's Keith Kizer Talks About the Return of Big John McCarthy

Photo

"We have him and about 40 other people pending. It's just a matter of when there's the next opening and then we look at the applications and go from there.

"There could be an opening in a month; there could be an opening in about three years."

Nevada State Athletic Commission Chair Keith Kizer channels Franz Kafka while discussing the possible return of Big John McCarthy with Ariel Helwani.

It's not like there's any reason to want better referees than we currently have in Nevada. Steve Mazzagatti is doing just great, ask Jon Jones.

Comment 88 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Such a copout.

"My diet is like Atkins, but with the carbs." - BJ Penn

by Tim Burke on Dec 15, 2009 2:01 PM EST reply actions  

I second that, when it looked like jones had the w I was thinking WTF, how can you tko a guy with an illegal strike and not be dq’d

by kanodogg on Dec 15, 2009 2:05 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

mazzagati asked a deaf man (with his eyes closed) if he could continue, when he got no response, he called the fight. how did hammil even know mazzagati was talking to him?

I'm old school hating Lesnar, I've been hating Lesnar since '08

by MicahW on Dec 15, 2009 2:40 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

well reasonably what was mazagatti supposed to do when hamill was defending himself.. perhaps used a braille tablet?

by kanodogg on Dec 15, 2009 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Talk to his cornermen

who can hear and sign maybe? Let the blood be cleared from his eyes, then let Matt read his lips? Maybe use a little common sense, I don’t know.

I can die happy now that I've been to a UFC event. 107 rocked

by slapjaw ackrite on Dec 15, 2009 3:07 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

It’s kind of weird how people take as a negative the fact that Mazagatti knew from looking at him that Hamill was seriously hurt and could not continue the fight. What difference would it have made if he had gone and talked to the corner, realized “yes indeed, what I thought 60 seconds ago was correct!” and then called it?

I bet that would make everybody on the internet raise up and celebrate the stoppage.

by Stanlee on Dec 15, 2009 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

So that's why he yelled, asking if he could continue?

What difference would it have made if he knew Matt couldn’t continue due to a shoulder injury that was completely unrelated to a downward elbow? Probably a big one, you know, like a different appearance on two fighter’s win/loss records, bank accounts, etc…

I can die happy now that I've been to a UFC event. 107 rocked

by slapjaw ackrite on Dec 15, 2009 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

People are really caught up on the fact he verbally asked a question he was trained to ask to ask any fighter in that situation. Being trained and accustomed to asking an injured fighter if they can continue is a very good thing… as is seeing in his physical comportment that he’s not going to be able to continue. He asked out of habit then realized the answer even if Hamill wasn’t involved in the dialog. It was obvious to everyone watching that he wasn’t going to be allowed to continue.

If you want to rip on the guys ability to discern when internal injuries happen from watching the replay… ok, godspeed. But unless he could see the moment it popped, and Hamill admitted through an interpreter that the shoulder was the only reason he couldn’t continue… Jones gets justifiably DQ’d.

by Stanlee on Dec 15, 2009 8:14 PM EST up reply actions  

isn’t it possible that hamill can read lips? just sayin’

by woooburn on Dec 15, 2009 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

he can blood in his eyes would be an obsticle tho

by Riley_96 on Dec 15, 2009 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, that seems like a weird one to pinpoint as evidence of Mazzgatti being a bad ref.

by JRN on Dec 15, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Bad Ref

Yes Hamill can read lips, when his eyes are functioning. The strange thing is that Massagatti is usually criticized for stopping fights too early, here he was way too late.

by b_radical on Dec 15, 2009 8:28 PM EST up reply actions  

No, no he didn’t. The right call would have been actually finding out why the fighter wanted to stop.

by Chris Barton on Dec 15, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

From now on they should assign a ref fluent in ASL.

by John Nash on Dec 15, 2009 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Rec

For making me laugh out loud at work

by Chris Barton on Dec 15, 2009 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Hamill was getting killed but he was still defending himself. More importantly he was intelligently defending himself. So unless Hamill verbally submits there is not much for Steve to do, unless you want the refs to start stepping in because a fighter is completely outclassed. In which case they should have stopped BJ and DIego at the end of round 1.

by John Nash on Dec 15, 2009 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

If a fighter is “getting killed” the fight should be stopped whether he is able to lift his arms to stop some of the punches/elbows or not.

The only thing Jon Jones does better than Matt Hamill is hear.
(And smash faces)

by ufc4 on Dec 15, 2009 2:20 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Then the ref should have called the “Rumble in the Jungle” in the 4th round because Ali was getting killed.

by John Nash on Dec 15, 2009 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

rec’d for simply being fact.

I'm old school hating Lesnar, I've been hating Lesnar since '08

by MicahW on Dec 15, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

If anything he wasn’t yelling loud enough.

Keep firing Assholes!

Fedor has accomplished nothing until he fights Kimbo.

by Ubernoober on Dec 15, 2009 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL

I work at a hospital and just had a deaf patient. I must have looked like a fool because I found myself yelling words at her like that’s going to help! Sometimes you just aren’t thinking. I’m one for bringing Big John back. He may not be the best in the biz, but he is def top tier.

by SHOGUNROBBERY on Dec 15, 2009 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

No, that’s just the definition of obtuse.

by John Nash on Dec 15, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Standard operating procedure for Americans. If someone doesn’t speak English well…or are deaf…it just means that you need to be louder.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Dec 15, 2009 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I find its better safe than sorry

I yell at anyone who might for any reason not understand me.
Old people, minorities, the deaf and blind, men wearing scarves.

I dislike Matt Hughes. Shogun beat him like a dirty horse.

by MonkeyCHops on Dec 15, 2009 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Do not forget to also speak slower.

by Ramblin'man on Dec 15, 2009 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Which would probably help Matt actually.

Guillotine.

by iiowyn on Dec 15, 2009 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

eeeeeeeeeeeNUN!ciiiaaaaaaaaaaate.

Keep firing Assholes!

Fedor has accomplished nothing until he fights Kimbo.

by Ubernoober on Dec 15, 2009 3:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes asking a deaf person with blood in their eyes is the right call. Cmon man for real?

by bigc4277 on Dec 15, 2009 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

The fight needed to be stopped earlier. Hammil was injured. It may or may not have been possible to tell this by seeing him.
Regardless when the fight was stopped to take away a point for the illegal blow he should have found out why Hammill couldn’t continue. They went to the trouble of checking the instant replay to see if that blow ended the fight but never bothered to ask the fighter why he couldn’t continue.
This fight would have been a TKO with a more competent ref.

I dislike Matt Hughes. Shogun beat him like a dirty horse.

by MonkeyCHops on Dec 15, 2009 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

if it made it to the end of the round it would have been. The action was stopped due to the elbows and thus it was ruled a DQ.

by Riley_96 on Dec 15, 2009 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

srsly!

"He will lie between resentment and regret. He shed his grace. As certain as a snake sheds its skin. Laid waste to a wealth of talent--his curse being blessed with treasures that just were not gold enough"

by ProfessorBLove on Dec 15, 2009 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

The best available ref made money for a year by blasting the UFC. He made his bed.

by argyle on Dec 15, 2009 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

So what?

I’m not sure why that would preclude him from being a ref for the NSAC. Rampage made money for years in PRIDE while shit talking the UFC but they gave him a job.

by Chris Barton on Dec 15, 2009 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

When has Big John ever had any bias as a ref? Never. It’s inane to suggest that he would start now.

by Chris Barton on Dec 15, 2009 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Fighters and Refs are held to different standards for impartiality.

Keep firing Assholes!

Fedor has accomplished nothing until he fights Kimbo.

by Ubernoober on Dec 15, 2009 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

And has Big John ever shown ANY indication that he would be anything other than impartial while reffing a fight?

No

by Chris Barton on Dec 15, 2009 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

He hasn’t but your comparison of the shit talking of Rampage and Big John is not sensible.

Keep firing Assholes!

Fedor has accomplished nothing until he fights Kimbo.

by Ubernoober on Dec 15, 2009 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

the problem is, he already bailed on them once.

If they fire someone to hire him, then he comes back, then he jumps at another opportunity (which he’s already done), now they are in a worse spot than they are right now, because whoever they fire today, but then rehire after he bails will be less experienced on that day then he would be if they never hired him.

I’m not 100% against BJM coming back, but I can see where the NSAC is coming from.

by Phildo on Dec 15, 2009 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Bring back Big John already…please!

"Der freie Mensch ist Krieger" -- Nietzsche

by teestroyer on Dec 15, 2009 2:13 PM EST reply actions  

Why did Big John lose his license to begin with?

Just when I thought I could not like Machida any less....UFC 104

by beery_pbr on Dec 15, 2009 2:21 PM EST reply actions  

he got uppity

and spoke truth to power.
from Sherdog:

“I had a criticism toward people being put into place as far as officiating. I have a problem when you have an official who is put into place to have an impact on the sport I love when they don’t understand the sport, when they don’t understand what the fighters are doing. They understand someone getting hit in the face. They don’t understand the manipulations of the ground game and who is winning the fight. I probably should’ve shut my mouth because I’ve got a big mouth, and it’s got me in a lot of trouble, but it’s the truth. I want everyone to understand what is really happening in the sport so they can make educated decisions and judgments.”

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Kid Nate on Dec 15, 2009 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks Nate. That seems remarkably petty and does nothing to help the reputation of state athletic commissions. I am just mentally picturing Cheetch Marin’s character from “The Great White Hype” sitting in his office.

“He said what? Well than take away his licence!”

Just when I thought I could not like Machida any less....UFC 104

by beery_pbr on Dec 15, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Nate didn’t actually answer your question. BJM didn’t have his license taken away or lost due to any comments or ‘speaking truth to power.’

BJM lost his license because he quit. He retired from reffing after the TUF 6 finale. Because of that, he presmably either voluntarily withdrew his license or did not get it renewed (I can’t see the NSAC renewing the license of a retiree).

 His present difficulty is getting a new license to ref in Nevada. However, Nevada seems to only carry around 6-7 MMA referees (IIRC, could be more or less) and they replaced him with two new referees when he retired (Rosenthal and the female ref). So they’ve already filled their quota of referees and BJM is relegated to the waiting list if he wants a new license.

by ilostmydog on Dec 15, 2009 3:40 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

That you believe in the mythical rigid hierarchy of this alleged “waiting list” is hilarious.

by Luke Thomas on Dec 16, 2009 12:03 AM EST up reply actions  

No.

He quit, and he took a job that precluded him from being a ref. He lost his license because he threw it away.

And the reason he’s not getting it back is the same reason that if you quit your job at the Tasty-Freeze you won’t get it back: even if you were the best cashier in the history of the franchise, they have 3 dozen other people who are willing to work and not PROVEN to quit on you.

I love Big John, but he’s in the position he is because of his own actions: he wanted to chase the big bucks, and now he’s not happy with how that ended. Boohoo.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.

by jemaleddin on Dec 15, 2009 5:35 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I’d say the difference is that there’s more danger in MMA than Tasty-Freeze, and you want people who know how to minimize it.

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Dec 15, 2009 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

But that doesn't address the point of my analogy.

Try this one: A doctor who storms out of a hospital to take a job as the new Sanjay Gupta on CNN doesn’t get his job back just because he realizes that CNN won’t pay him what he wants. Right? Certainly not at the hospital that he quit at.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.

by jemaleddin on Dec 16, 2009 6:22 AM EST up reply actions  

unlike TastyFreeze

Big John performs a very skilled function that entails men putting their life in his hands. He’s also universally acclaimed as the best to ever perform that job while others who have the job are widely decried as incompetent.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Kid Nate on Dec 15, 2009 6:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I would say that a lot of people romanticize him because he was away for so long. I think he is probably the best or close to that, but people talk about him like he is god of refs.

Guillotine.

by iiowyn on Dec 15, 2009 9:24 PM EST up reply actions  

So do doctors and EMTs and a million other people in this country.

And if they storm out in a huff, who wants them back?

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.

by jemaleddin on Dec 16, 2009 6:23 AM EST up reply actions  

My biggest issue with mma referee's is it's too inconsistent

Why is it that a ref like Mazagatti will stand up and take away a point from fighters for an “illegal hit” without warning but then others will sit there and warn fighters repeatedly.
“Watch the back of the head”.

The other problem is there is no way to determine what is accidental and what is on purpose but the NSAC and others think they can. How can anyone know that Jon Jones puposely knew that 12-6 elbows were illegal and still threw it? And how can you tell that a groin shot isnt inntentional. What because they act sorry afterwards?

MMA still has a long way to go. I literally cringed when I saw Mazagatti ref’ing the Aldo/Brown fight because I feared he would mess it up and that is a bad sign for mma. I am all for enforcing the rules of mma but I think there has to be more consistency.

by bigdmmafan on Dec 15, 2009 2:23 PM EST reply actions  

This
I literally cringed when I saw Mazagatti ref’ing

I have that happen every time I see him in the ring and that is never a good sign.

by Chris Barton on Dec 15, 2009 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree he is a shitty ref (see ben rothwell/ Cain) and people shit all over him for that. The Hammill fight the guy was on bottom but doing a pretty good job of deflecting elbows and defending.
As for the 12-6 elbows come on man. Alot of groin shots are hard to tell if they are intended or not due to the fact they are thrown as leg kicks alot. Kongo on the other hand seems to land knees to the balls quite a bit. There is no way to throw an accidental 12-6, there is no other technique that requires the same type of upward and downward movement of the elbow.

by Riley_96 on Dec 15, 2009 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Accidental vs. intentional is different from intentional vs. ignorant

It doesn’t matter if Jones knew they were illegal or not. Honestly that is 100000% on Jones. He has fought enough to have taken the time to learn the rules. Ignorance is not an excuse for a foul.

And yes, there is a bit of gray area where refs have to be able to try to interpret behavior. 90% of the time you can tell when a headbutt was thrown intentionally vs. a clash of heads. Groin knee shots are a bit more difficult to tell than a punch to the groin (in attempting a body punch) just because of the knees to the thighs. Honestly, I’d be 100% okay with outlawing knees to the thighs from the clinch.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Dec 15, 2009 3:23 PM EST up reply actions  

How many times did Steve say “watch the back of the head Georges” in GSP’s third fight with Hughes? I could go back tonight and watch it to be sure, it was at least 4 or 5. How
many times did he tell Brock in his first fight with Mir? Maybe once? I don’t have that DVD but if someone does or has it on their computer please check. It’s that kind of inconsistency that is so annoying/frustrating.

The only thing Jon Jones does better than Matt Hamill is hear.
(And smash faces)

by ufc4 on Dec 15, 2009 4:07 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I always love watching that fight, I will check right now.

I dislike Matt Hughes. Shogun beat him like a dirty horse.

by MonkeyCHops on Dec 15, 2009 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

3 warnings. He really did hit him in the back of the hear a lot though.
I find it really stupid when fighters turn the back of their head into a punch.

I dislike Matt Hughes. Shogun beat him like a dirty horse.

by MonkeyCHops on Dec 15, 2009 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

whether he knew they were illegal or not… This is an easy one its the reason rules are written down just like the law. If i break the law and get ticketed but dont know its against the law i still get punished. Thats why they write them down maybe he should know the rules if he is gonna fight.

by jks9202 on Dec 15, 2009 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

i still see the conflict of interest with big john

big john mccarthy has become his own brand, and i personally dont like him reffing any fights. i think he is above calling a fight for any personal gain, but i think the precedent that is set doesnt take into consideration any future persons morals. precedents like this should have no basis on an individuals moral compass. (now you may flame me)

I'm old school hating Lesnar, I've been hating Lesnar since '08

by MicahW on Dec 15, 2009 2:44 PM EST reply actions  

It’s kinda hard to flame a statement that makes absolutely no sense. What precedent are you even talking about?

by JRN on Dec 15, 2009 4:28 PM EST up reply actions  

If BJM gets hired...

I’m assuming all the bad blood/conflict will get squashed.

There won’t be any conflict.

And BJM will not sacrifice his reputation like that.

by MickDawg on Dec 15, 2009 5:36 PM EST up reply actions  

this is off topic but i just noticed the side bar and are you fucking serious T. SIlva is hurt now?

by Riley_96 on Dec 15, 2009 2:47 PM EST reply actions  

We bitch and moan (with reason) about shitty officiating.
THE BEST ref in the sport is currently sitting on the bench.

Highly illogical, captain.

by Monday Morning Martial Artist on Dec 15, 2009 2:54 PM EST reply actions  

Take that up with him.

Guillotine.

by iiowyn on Dec 15, 2009 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Leave it up to the government to fuck shit up.....

I swear, every thing the government touches becomes corrupt. Little squabbles like this shit is the reason fight sport is so fucked up. Regulators need to have some sort of motivation (I have no clue what that could be) to have their organization be as high functioning as possible. When you have government appointed people in jobs they just do whatever they want. When there is no profit motive ppl can just blackball guys like Big John and not care.

by Dexerion on Dec 15, 2009 3:31 PM EST reply actions  

Right...

Because local businesses don’t get a huge boom from MMA events. And if they did, none of it would be taxed.

by pdl on Dec 15, 2009 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, man, the FDA has been totally useless...

"(Brock Lesnar) is never in good spirits and he's not in good spirits now." - Dana White

by duck on Dec 15, 2009 6:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

When he refs...

He’ll get a better reception then Lesner-Couture 2
Fertita, Dana, lets make it happen!

by Krimson on Dec 15, 2009 5:25 PM EST reply actions  

Mazz made a good call.

Not the best call, but I don’t see any of you armchair refs doing a better job.

Being a ref is hard.

You can say that he should have stopped it earlier, but that’s a judgement. Matt may not have been improving his position, but he wasn’t out. And Jones may not like it, but he knew the fucking rules before he went in the cage.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.

by jemaleddin on Dec 15, 2009 5:39 PM EST reply actions  

I like Mazzagatti as a ref.

Really, I do.

I particularly vicious illegal blow warrants immediate sanction.

Grabbing the fence probably warrants sanction only if it’s flagrant despite warnings, or if it has a significant impact on the events of the fight (like Rashad-Tito).

I have no complaints with Mazzagatti’s reffing.

I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.

by Llewdor on Dec 15, 2009 5:43 PM EST reply actions  

Not going to be liked but agreed.

If he did stop it before the illegal strikes you know that we would all be here calling him out for stopping it too early, now Dana doesnt like him, that means a whole load of grief either way, the guy is pretty much screwed.

by Chrisapalooza on Dec 15, 2009 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Favritegotevj9_small
An Open Letter to Nick Diaz
Tatum_small
Aristotle Knows Nick Diaz Didn't Cheat
Walshrun_small
5 Reasons I Hate MMA
Royce_09_small
Call To Nominate New Bloody Elbow Moderators
Obp_small
The Official BE UFC Drinking Game

Recent FanPosts

Logo_d__small
Roll a phat one for Nick Diaz
Cg_small
Perceptions Regarding Diaz v. Condit Decision Distorted by the Judging Chameleon
Cf_small
George Rush St. Pierre BJJ Coach Renzon Gracie Black belt John Danaher
Jules-winfield-7_small
In Defense of Nick Diaz
208730_10150164903466743_503301742_7348043_3232767_n_small
Top Five: Fights To Look Forward To
Bruce-lee-lats_small
Calling for Nick Diaz to be released makes no sense.
Afro_small
The UFC Has Been Spared Once Again...This Time by Carlos Condit

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings