Bloody Elbow: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: UNC 77, Ohio State 73

Using UFC to Promote Fedor Emelianenko, Strikeforce

I've been talking with other journalists and analysts in the sport about how Strikeforce should be and isn't promoting Fedor properly. During these talks, our own Michael Rome had an interesting idea: why not use the UFC's popularity against itself? In other words, promote Fedor by having the cavalcade of UFC fighters who've given endorsements in the past about the Russian and his abilities rather than other MMA journalists no one knows. It's a smart idea. Use their existing appeal and cosigning to give the recommendations about Fedor real heft and gravity. Joe Rogan and BJ Penn do so here and here, respectively.

But why stop there? I also believe Strikeforce can use the failed negotiations between Emelianenko/M-1 with the UFC this past summer to demonstrate their clout as a real competitor to Zuffa. And as you can see, the press is naturally drawn to the storyline of that now famous rift:

Emelianenko is one of the few big names in MMA to operate outside of the Ultimate Fighting Championship. Many of his critics believe he cannot be the true No. 1 unless he fights the best competition, which they say reside in the UFC. In 2006, after the UFC bought Pride FC, where Emelianenko was the heavyweight champion, many of its fighters signed with the UFC, but not him.

For years, fans have clamored to have the UFC sign him and it almost happened in August. Emelianenko became a free agent after Affliction got out of the fight promotion business.

Emelianenko's management company, M-1 Global, held talks with the UFC. Huge salary numbers were tossed around, but the main issue was co-promotion. M-1 wanted to co-promote Emelianenko's fights with the UFC. The UFC has never done that and said they never will. The talks deadlocked.

Strikeforce was willing to accept M-1's co-promotion terms. It already has a co-promotion deal with DREAM, a Japanese MMA company. So it was Strikeforce that signed Emelianenko to a four-fight contract.

UFC president Dana White was furious with Emelianenko, M-1, and Strikeforce. Fans were teased by the tantalizing thought of a match with Emelianenko against the UFC's dominating heavyweight Brock Lesnar. But this week Emelianenko didn't seem to worry about fan backlash.

''I think it would be good if they would understand that I could not sign a one-sided contract with the UFC,'' Emelianenko said. ''Vadim [Finkelchtein], my manager he considered that we deserve a little bit more.''

If you can't beat the UFC, use them. It won't solve all of your problems, but it's far better than swimming upstream. MMA is the UFC's show. One might as well borrow some of their glow.

Strikeforce_emelianenko_vs_rogers_medium 

0 recs  |  Comment 45 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I think this harkens back to Rome’s point right after Fedor signed, they should be doing this card the same day as a UFC show.

Fedor and Strikeforce get the most attention when Dana is talking about them. once the decision was made to be on CBS, they should have stopped being scared of the UFC counter programming, they should have used it to their advantage to get people (and in particular Dana) talking about the card in public. Having the show a week that Dana has no reason to talk to anyone is a mistake I think.

by Phildo on Nov 4, 2009 11:06 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Ii thought Fedors deal was for three fights.

by ufc4 on Nov 4, 2009 11:13 AM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

strikeforce acting like 1 guy will make them a threat to the ufc

is like if the xfl trying to take on the nfl by getting 1 guy like dan marino. its a joke.
also, fedor is like number 5 at best, he fights guys minowa can beat. whoopdy shit.

by masteroftheflyingguillotine on Nov 4, 2009 11:15 AM EST reply actions   2 recs

brock lesnar

nogeria, coture, mir ,carwin. and personally i think if the fight between fedor and monson had gone down, fedor would have had about a 50 50 chance on that. possibly rizzo, barnett, but i know better than to argue with those who worship fedor. i know how you guys think so let me redo my list. 1. thor 2.oden 3.hercules 4.an abrahms tank.

by masteroftheflyingguillotine on Nov 4, 2009 11:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Your joking right? I mean you have to be a troll.

You have the worst list Ive ever seen, Rizzo who is 1-2 is his last three, Monson who is always good but can never beat top competition, Nog and Mir who have one loss in there last two, Couture??? A case can be made for Brock if he beats Carwin and then Nog.

The fact that you would put Carwin over Fedor really makes me feel that you have never watched MMA or have very limited knowledge about it.

Here are the fighters who can possibly be ahead of Fedor in P4P
Anderson Silva andGSP, mayyybe B.J. Penn and Machida.

by Pennywise on Nov 4, 2009 12:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

we werent talking p4p

and like i said, there is no point in arguing with you fedor nut-huggers. any body can have a winning record when they fight nobodys and guys who are past their prime. name somebody fedor has fought in the last 2 years that make him the god of mma you think he is. also, if you think b.j. penn is maybe better p4p, you should go back to watching “pro-wrestling” because you dont know shit.

by masteroftheflyingguillotine on Nov 4, 2009 12:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

everybody on my list

would have the same record as fedor over the last few years if they had fought the same people.

by masteroftheflyingguillotine on Nov 4, 2009 12:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow just wow man

1. I am a Fedor nut-hugger because of what i said was true? I never said he was the “God of MMA” but he is clearly the best HW. Sylvia Lindland and AA are better that what most of the guys you mentioned have fought in the last two years, who the hell has Carwin Rizzo and Monson fought?

2. Zulu and Choi are the only “cans” he has fought in the last 5 years.

3. I was talking about P4P because there is NO HW higher than Fedor.

4. B.J. Penn should be on everyone’s P4P list.

5. If your going to be a troll you have to be better than this, pro-wrestling comments? really? you can do better than that.

by Pennywise on Nov 4, 2009 1:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I stopped reading when you listed Nogueira,

who hasn’t beat Fedor in 3 tries..

credebility fail..

are you gonna call me a Fedor nuthugger now? okay. hahaha. :)

by Anton Tabuena on Nov 4, 2009 2:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Solve for the inequality

FEDOR + x > UFC

for all intents and purposes, just consider all my posts as works of satire.

by Bandaka on Nov 4, 2009 11:19 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Huh?

So X > UFC – Fedor? :P

AWmusic - mp3 blog.
http://twitter.com/awmusicblog

by achengy on Nov 4, 2009 11:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

hmm i like the rhyme at the end.

by pop_gun_war on Nov 4, 2009 11:21 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Can they use clips of UFC fighters in their commercials without the UFC’s permission?

by Shaun32887 on Nov 4, 2009 11:37 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

No, that’s why Dana made a big deal about obtaining Pride and later Affliction’s video library. (I think Zuffa got the Affliction library, I could be wrong.) The purpose was not because old footage are cash cows in the DVD and on-demand market, but to prevent any rival promotion from using them.

by pwrcartel on Nov 4, 2009 11:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not correct. They don’t own footage shot by some guy who then uploaded it to YouTube. That footage and the images contained therein belong to that person or the media entity they represent. The UFC owns the library of fights from PRIDE, which is a completely separate entity.

by Luke Thomas on Nov 4, 2009 11:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It still doesn’t seem like Strikeforce could just legally pull videos off youtube or from other sources and use UFC fighters likeness to promote their product.

by Dropkick434 on Nov 4, 2009 12:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You’re right. They couldn’t. They’d have to get permission from the owners of the videos, be they individuals or the media entities. But provided the owners of the footage ok’d it, it’s theirs to use.

by Luke Thomas on Nov 4, 2009 12:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i dont think they can

any ufc video put on youtube is there illegally, whether it was taken from a dvd and posted, or personally taped at an event without permission, theyre both illegal.

by masteroftheflyingguillotine on Nov 4, 2009 12:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i was referring solely to fight footage.

by masteroftheflyingguillotine on Nov 4, 2009 1:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

See the type of stuff you can learn on BE on a daily basis

rec’d

Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/ultmma

by ultmma on Nov 4, 2009 1:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It seems like their is a difference between using someones likeness in an endorsement or commercial and using a clip on a news show. I have never seen a commercial other than a political ad, take footage of a person inadvertantly endorsing a product and using it without consent of the party. Why wouldn’t pepsi just find a video of a star drinking a pepsi and plaster it on an advertisement?

by Dropkick434 on Nov 4, 2009 3:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I understand what you are saying about media outlet or individual owning the footage of the interview, I just find it hard to believe that anyone would have the right to use the footage in as an endorsement in a comercial without paying the individual for using their likeness to promote your product.

by Dropkick434 on Nov 4, 2009 3:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

When did you interview BJ Penn? Are you going to post an article on it?

by ufc4 on Nov 4, 2009 11:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Everyone is counting on Fedor winning his fight against Rogers, have to remind everyone that we have seen stranger things happen.

by thesource on Nov 4, 2009 11:39 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Strikeforce should focus more on promoting Rogers right now.

He’s charismatic, he’s scary-looking, he’s got a great backstory, and he already speaks English. Throw in the fact that he’s fighting in his hometown, and he’s a ready-made superstar for Strikeforce.

Think about it. If Rogers pulls off the upset (and it’s only an upset in the minds of devoted MMA fans) then they have a huge new star for hardcore fans, and a pretty badass guy for casual fans to latch on to.

If Fedor wins, then it’s no big deal for us, but to the casual fan, it’s pretty amazing to see the doughy Russian guy put a beatdown on the ginormous black dude. Promoting Fedor too heavily is throwing money down the crapper right now. Rogers is a workhorse, and can get the job done.

by CaptnAmerca on Nov 4, 2009 11:46 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

yeah

it would be wise to build the other people in that promotion up as stars in their own right, as opposed to making them all just faceless challengers trying to take down fedor. its almost got like an old school “enter the beast” vibe. and by building other people up, when fedor does lose, they will have built other stars to rely on.

by masteroftheflyingguillotine on Nov 4, 2009 12:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

They should harness Fedor's Anonymity/Enigma

Strikeforce shouldn’t try to cover up the fact Fedor’s a relative unknown in the States. Rather, they should drop just enough hints — fighter endorsements, brief fight footage, etc. — that he’s the real deal, while playing up his generally benign, friendly looks. Show him in his sweater, eating ice cream, coupled with the caption “See the world’s most dangerous man in action” — stuff like that.

It would be provocative — dare I say viral.

by superflat on Nov 4, 2009 12:50 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think it’s a terrible idea. It’s sad and pathetic when a company thinks they need to try and use another company to gain relevance. They should just do the best they can to promote based on their product and not go bandying the UFC’s name. It only validates the UFC as the king, and is an admission that Strikeforce is a cheap ugly stepsister that’s holed up in her cave in the woods behind the house.

by Dooda on Nov 4, 2009 1:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

It’s sad and pathetic, yet it works.

Would the Mac vs PC commercials still be airing if they didn’t work?

They need to do whatever they need to do to get some relevance.

by Phildo on Nov 4, 2009 1:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Are they working? Did the Taco Bell chihuahua work? Nope. Did that stop them from using it to high heaven? Nope. Did the Apple ads work once? Maybe. Do they work right now? I doubt it. Bottom line is, Apples work because of the product that they’ve refined, and not how cute the commercials are (and they’ve gone from pre-pubescent toddler-like cute to teenager post-pubescent ugliness). Those ads are a pathetic waste of money at this point. No one even smiles at them anymore, and there’s no evidence that they sell more apples when it does make someone smile. But the fact is, the apple ads have a shred of truth to them. Using Fedor to claim relevancy with respect to the UFC is sheer lunatardosity and any informed or casual fan would see right through it.

Strikeforce’s best bet is to use the growing appeal of MMA, show lots of clips of Fedor’s best fights (if they’re allowed) build him on his own merits, as an exciting fighter, and take it from there. If it makes sense to name-drop the UFC, then do it, but don’t make it a point. People now days see right through that stuff. Clever is not good enough anymore. Honesty is the only thing that sells.

by Dooda on Nov 4, 2009 7:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

"All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it." -- H.L. Mencken
Start posting on Bloody Elbow »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Nav-logo-hover_small
UFC 106: Pro's Pick Forrest Griffin and Tito Ortiz fights
Awesomeness_small
Antonio Rogerio Nogueira: "Rodrigo Will Return to Training in a Few Weeks"
Venum2_small
Painkiller Addiction to Blame for Karo Pulling Out
Awesomeness_small
UFC 106 Preview: A Statistical Breakdown of Tito Ortiz vs Forrest Griffin 2
Img_8375_small
Heavyweight Tournament Kills Two Birds with One Stone

Recent FanPosts

Small
Behind the Fighters
Grizzly_bear-larry_small
Shooto Brazil 14 Fight Card
Img_0641_small
Dan Hardy A Bad Challenger at a Good Time
U-faber_small
UFC 106: Ortiz vs. Griffin 2 Pre-Fight Interviews (Part 2)
Tracy_lee_martin_mcneil_small
UFC 105 Medical Suspensions
N46600342_991_small
Hard-nosed wrestlers
Blue2_small
Bloody Elbow Betting Game: UFC 106 Ortiz vs. Griffin II

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings