Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Raiders' GM Begins The Purge

Brock Larson Cut by UFC; Blames Undercard Status for Performances

Photo

MMAJunkie.com with the report:

With a TKO loss to Brian Foster at this past weekend's UFC 106 event, UFC welterweight Brock Larson will now look for work outside the organization.

The veteran fighter today confirmed with MMAjunkie.com he was cut from the UFC's roster following the Nov. 21 defeat.

Larson leaves the organization with a 26-4 record, which included a 3-3 mark in the UFC and a 4-1 record in the WEC.

"It's probably a good thing," Larson stated via text message. "I was having a hard time getting motivated for my last two fights. I needed a change. The undercards just didn't do it for me."

Far be it from me to question the motivations of a professional athlete but the idea that Larson was unable to get motivated by being on the undercard seems like a cheap excuse.  The idea that he was so upset by being on the undercard that he couldn't focus would seem to fly in the face of the logic that suggests "put on a show and give them a reason to move you to the main card."

Getting beat by Mike Pierce wasn't going to move him up to the main card.  If rebounding from the loss and proving himself wasn't enough to motivate Larson than I have some serious questions about how successful he will be in the future.  Instead, Larson was dominated in every aspect of the game by a heavy underdog in Brian Foster.

The truth is, most fights on UFC shows make the air these days.  Is fighting for Strikeforce, DREAM or WVR really going to provide enough "visibility" to motivate him that much more?

Comment 50 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

A lot of people saw his last fight.

Keep firing Assholes!

In Idaho, it's illegal to f--- a porcupine. You know why? Because someone tried it.

by Ubernoober on Nov 25, 2009 4:03 PM EST reply actions  

That's exactly it...

now with the UFC regularly having a 4 hour broadcast (1 on spike, 3 on PPV) unless a card is a decisionfest most of the event is going to get shown

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Nov 25, 2009 4:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe that he really wasn’t motivated.

But that’s nobody’s fault but his own.

And that’s not a smart way to look at things.

by MickDawg on Nov 25, 2009 4:05 PM EST reply actions  

I honestly felt that after Larson’s submission win over Pyle that Larson was on his way to be a top Welterweight. He really doesn’t seem motivated, which is ridiculous and as shown with his fight against Foster, extremely dangerous to his health.

by chrisbboy82 on Nov 25, 2009 8:26 PM EST up reply actions  

i'm sure larson will be real motivated once he gets into king of the cage. lol

yes i am obsessive, obnoxious, in your face and all about covering the spread. those are my good qualities.

by wolfmanshowlforever on Nov 25, 2009 11:49 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

lack of Motivation, Bad luck twice or just better oppostion Hey call it what you will but the bottom line is those 2 L’s to Pierce and Foster were just embarassing and devastating for him and his career. Larson looked horrible in bolth fights and pretty much got dominated and manhandled.

by Shocbomb on Nov 25, 2009 8:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Strikeforce will

He is guarenteed to be on Showtime where with the UFC it was maybe the fight will air maybe not.

Plus now that he’s outside the UFC he is sure to win a few matches and shoot up the rankings ala a Jorge Santiago.

by bigdmmafan on Nov 25, 2009 4:08 PM EST reply actions  

Yup.

Cuz winning a few fights outside of the UFC will show how much he’s “improved” lol.

by MickDawg on Nov 25, 2009 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Jorge just lost to Khalidov in Sengoku, so even outside of the UFC, you have to beat good competition and keep on winning.

by MMASuPreMaCy on Nov 25, 2009 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

But before that he did shoot up the rankings

I forget where but 1 site had him at #3 before this loss and yeah where he might have been winning and beating ok competetion he did not deserve the #3 spot in the mw rankings.

by bigdmmafan on Nov 25, 2009 4:28 PM EST up reply actions  

  1. or #7 is has high as I saw him go. Not sure but if he was as high as #3, then it prob wasn’t a site people go for to see rankings anyways. =)

by MMASuPreMaCy on Nov 25, 2009 4:34 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s going to be harder to rack up easy wins in a place like Strikeforce. Take MWs for example: they are signing up a lot of decent MW – Matt Lindland, Jacare, Jason Miller, Robbie Lawler, Jake Shields (now that he’s fighting at MW), Cung Le, and Tim Kennedy. They also have guy like Frank Shamrock, Scott Smith, and Benji Raddah. who are not world beaters by any stretch of the imagination but not cans either. Throw in Dream guys like Paulo Filho (if he can fight), Karl Amoussou Melvin Manhoef, and the occasional Hector Lombard, Misaki, and Santiago and you can no longer take it for granted you’ll get 2 or 3 easy victories for every tough fight. Sure it’s not like facing Silva, Nate, or Hendo (at least not yet) in the UFC, but you’d still have to face their Belchers, Bispings, and Sonnens.

by John Nash on Nov 25, 2009 5:27 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Yeah, but we’re talking about WW here. There’s a steep decline between Jay Hieron, Jake Shields (if he goes back down), and the rest of the WWs in Strikeforce. I can’t event think of who the top guy beneath those two would be. Joe Riggs maybe?

by ilostmydog on Nov 25, 2009 5:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Ever heard of Diaz, Galvao, Whitemare, or Woodley?
=)

by MMASuPreMaCy on Nov 25, 2009 5:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Why Galvao and Woodley?
They’re still just prospects.

Who’s Whitemare?

Diaz is top 10 and an exciting fighter, but I won’t drink his kool-aid until he beats a great wrestler.
Maybe that’s why he’s better off in Strikeforce.

by MickDawg on Nov 25, 2009 6:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Marius “The Whitemare” Zaromskis, better known as the DREAM WW Champ.
=)

by MMASuPreMaCy on Nov 25, 2009 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Diaz is top 10

No he’s not.

by ufc4 on Nov 25, 2009 10:56 PM EST up reply actions  

The UFC has definitely got the top talent of the WW and LHW division basically locked up. But if you look at the Strikeforce/Dream stable:
Jake Shields, Jay Heiron, Evangelista Santos, Nick Diaz, Marius Zaromskis, Hayato Sakurai, Joe Riggs, and maybe Cung Le if he starts to cut plus prospects like Tyron Woodley and Andre Galvao these are of the same level as the guys Larson has already been fighting in the UFC. Going to Strikeforce won’t be a noticeable drop from Jesse Sanders, Mike Pyle, Mike Pierce, and Brian Foster. He just won’t have to worry about facing a GSP, Fitch, or Koscheck when he gets to main card status. Although, as much as it pains me to say it, Jake Shields might be there with those guys.

by John Nash on Nov 25, 2009 7:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Seriously?

You think Shields is on the same level as GSP? I dont even think he is on the same level as Fitch or Alves but there is zero chance of him being on the same level as GSP.

by bigdmmafan on Nov 25, 2009 7:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I meant I’d put him up with the elite of the WWs. I’d still pick GSP over him. But you got to hand it to the guy, he’s got 13 straight wins over quality opponents. He beat Condit and Daley who are both talked as potential contenders in the UFC. And he’s beaten three pretty good MW in Miller, Lawler, and Okami. Hard to name another WW (outside of GSP) with currently a better resume.

by John Nash on Nov 25, 2009 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I have him ranked 4th overall

I like him. I do but I think GSP, Fitch, and Alves are better right now.

I will wait to see how Alves does in his next fight but Fitch to me is a guy who can beat everyone except for GSP.

by bigdmmafan on Nov 25, 2009 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Shields would get mopped up in the UFC his last fight was one dimesional and lack luster at best. I think he would suffer a terrible fate in the UFC the same as perhaps Thales leites.

by nsiegel on Nov 25, 2009 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Really? He’d get mopped up even though he’s already beaten 3 UFC WWs in Mike Pyle, Carlos Condit, and Paul Daley, and a UFC MW, Yushin Okami. I think the record shows he’d do pretty good.

by John Nash on Nov 25, 2009 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Guys like Kos, Fitch, and, from what i have seen recently Hardy whould tool Shields pretty good. Work on getting back to standing from the ground and shields will get destroyed. Also he does not have the power to keep a guy like Fitch cautious on the ground.

by Riley_96 on Nov 25, 2009 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

That Okaami fight was far from a dominating win. The fight could easily of been scored for Okami sence he dominated the last half of the 2nd and the whole 3rd round. If those 2 fought again my $$$ is on Okami this time around. And Shields was lucky to walk out of the Daley fight.. I myself don’t see Shields having much success in the UFC’s WW devision at all.

by Shocbomb on Nov 25, 2009 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually I had Okami winning that fight, but you got to give Shields some credit for keeping it so close. Okami just dwarfed him. As for Daley and other strikers, I thought the same thing when he fought Lawler and he shut me up. He’s got terriible standup and yet he’s beaten Daley, Lawler, Miller, and Thompson. He may win ugly and seems lucky but he keeps winning, and not against stiffs either. That’s got to mean something.

by John Nash on Nov 25, 2009 9:02 PM EST up reply actions  

True in my mind there is nodout he is a top 10 fighter at ww and mw now. Top 5 or 3 I just don’t ever see. There are alot of bad match ups for him at bolth weight classes he has never fought because 99% are in the UFC. Bottom line is Shields needs sometime in the future to move to the UFC WW devision.

by Shocbomb on Nov 25, 2009 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Missing the glory days when he and Condit ruled the WEC…the bright lights, the epic crowds…eh. This is pretty surprising from Brock. He never seemed like a guy who lacked fire.

by Kwisatz Haderach on Nov 25, 2009 4:16 PM EST reply actions  

Was his name too similar to Lesnar’s or something? The only letter in his last name not in Brock’s is the O.

by MMAInFeRioRiTy on Nov 25, 2009 4:26 PM EST reply actions  

Getting beat by Mike Pierce wasn’t going to move him up to the main card.

No, but subbing his first 2 opponents after coming back to the UFC and earning a Sub of the Night to boot should be enough to earn a main card spot. (Not to mention a fight against Mike Pierce, who hadn’t even fought in the UFC at the time.) I think he got the short end of the stick in the end, despite his negative attitude, which I do not agree with.

by TDITZ on Nov 25, 2009 4:29 PM EST reply actions  

*instead of a fight with Mike Pierce

by TDITZ on Nov 25, 2009 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

You might be able to argue that he should have made 106 instead of Thiago/Volkmann

but the reason he didnt make UFN 19 is because that was a great card. Literally who would you have kicked off that card to make room for Brock?

by bigdmmafan on Nov 25, 2009 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Not shocking, given his last two outings, but kind of shocking given the hype he had 8 months ago. What a quick fall.

by Cory Braiterman on Nov 25, 2009 4:29 PM EST reply actions  

Brock Larson
Is fighting for Strikeforce, DREAM or WVR really going to provide enough “visibility” to motivate him that much more?

Only a bit more visibility than WEC provided, and he seemed to do just fine there.

A lame excuse. Nothing more.

...Behold, a pale horse. The man that sat upon it was Wieters, and hell followed with him.

"BJ on the BE" - Kierkegaard

by Brett Jones on Nov 25, 2009 4:37 PM EST reply actions  

Don’t want to fight on undercards? win your fights against undercard talent.

"Frank Mir had a horseshoe up his ass. I told him a year ago. I pulled it out of him and I beat him over the head with it." Brock Lesnar

by pitbull187 on Nov 25, 2009 4:41 PM EST reply actions  

From the UG:

Nice excuses. More like Larson was having a hard time dealing with tougher competition. I always liked Larson but the truth is he’s always struggled against good competition. He’s sort of the 170 version of Denis Kang.

by Nick Thomas on Nov 25, 2009 4:48 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Larson could have fought Pierce and Foster outside of the UFC a long time ago. I don’t buy this. He beat Alessio, Prater, Nakamura, and Pyle (which was easy competition) but when he stepped up to the likes of Pierce and Foster, he couldn’t win? Whut? =)

by MMASuPreMaCy on Nov 25, 2009 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

When you are in the public eye, and you get fired.....

…. you’d say nearly anything to save face. He’s probably embarrassed, he had to say SOMETHING.

by Dexerion on Nov 25, 2009 5:53 PM EST reply actions  

How about this

“I am definitely disappointed in my performance the last couple times out. I just gotta go back to the drawing board, figure out what I’m doing wrong, and work hard to get back. I know I’m good enough to be here and it’s nobody’s fault but my own that I’m in this position so I’m just gonna give it my all and I think I’ll be back in the UFC sooner rather than later.”

by ufc4 on Nov 25, 2009 11:02 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s fine, it just might not be the smartest career move.

by ufc4 on Nov 26, 2009 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Sounds like a famous case of sour grapes

I can’t imagine that he actually thinks anyone will buy it though.

I was shocked by his last 2 outings. He just did not look like the Brock Larson of the wec. Tentative, scared, no explosiveness. Maybe just a big fish/small pond phenomena.

by SimplePsych on Nov 25, 2009 6:16 PM EST reply actions  

The undercards just didn't do it for me

????
you can’t get excited for being on the undercard of the biggest show on the planet at the moment? You know that the undercard on a UFC event is seen by more people then almost all of the other main events held in the same month right. Brock Larson, my god man, pull your head out of your ass, you just blew what is quite possibly the biggest chance of your life.

by proflex on Nov 25, 2009 9:53 PM EST reply actions  

Taking a Text out of Context?

Okay pretty much everybody including Brent seem to jumping down his throat for a simple text message.

Calm down folks! This just might be a simple case of nothing to see here.

Let me break it down a different way.

"It’s probably a good thing (How dare he stay positive about the future, UFC or bust!), I was having a hard time getting motivated for my last two fights (Sure looked like it!). I needed a change (Fighters that don’t change lose). The undercards just didn’t do it for me.(Did he blame the UFC for putting him on the undercard?)

Fighting in a mostly empty stadium probably isn’t all that motivating. Maybe it would be courteous to give the guy the benefit of the doubt for a bit.

by natyong on Nov 26, 2009 4:43 AM EST reply actions  

I really dislike people that reply to there own comments, so if I’m bugging you sorry.

As Joe Rogan has said recently on Josh Gross’s webcast that UFC is a business that has to make exciting fights. It biggest focus isn’t about the sport of MMA no matter what Dana tells you. It’s about making money. Ask the other Brock, Vitor Belfort, Tito, or many of the PPV percentage fighters and the many injuries between them.

Some fighters crave sporting competition more than they crave the money and I believe Brock Larson is one of them. Jeremy Horn is another. They have no place in the UFC.

Anderson Silva is looking hard toward retirement, Rampage did Randy did, Tim Silvia, and AA . UFC contracts are slave contracts and some people just don’t want to perform under them. A UFC contract is very effective in controlling a fighters earnings. They HAVE to fight to get paid. It’s a big change of from, “hey I get paid to fight!” Sure being a star in the UFC pays very well, but being owned as a fighter is contrary to many peoples base motivation for fighting.

Good luck Rampage & AA I hope the movies do relatively well.

by natyong on Nov 26, 2009 5:16 AM EST up reply actions  

They HAVE to fight to get paid

Well duh, just like I have to show up to my job everyday to get paid. Do you not have to fight in Strikeforce to get paid? Or DREAM? If these guys crave sporting competition like you say then they should be able to get up for a fight no matter how many people are watching right? This whole argument is ridiculous. Anderson Silva is looking towards retirement because that’s his leverage to get a bigger contract. Randy Couture retired- then came back, FOR MORE MONEY. Tim Sylvia left and then got a raise of 800%. These guys don’t care what the contract says, they just care about the numbers that come after the $. Dan Henderson was making $50,000 a fight in PRIDE 2 years ago, now he’s turning down contracts that would pay him 5-10 times that amount. It’s all about the benjamins for the UFC, that’s true, but it’s the same with the fighters, they are no better or worse.

by ufc4 on Nov 26, 2009 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

It’s all about the benjamins for the UFC, that’s true, but it’s the same with the fighters, they are no better or worse.

I think your making what I mean is my point. I’m not just “blaming” UFC management. Although the bonus and PPV percentages really sets the tone.

But, no to some of your other points, you don’t have to fight in Strikeforce to get paid. You can likely go to Japan if they aren’t offering a good opportunity.

As for jobs no I can go to another similar job somewhere else. Yes there are non compete clauses, but they are most often limited in time and distance to be legal. Even if they aren’t you could still do other things in a similar industry that you have some qualifications in such as boxing.

Your money figures mean nothing to me really. I don’t comprehend numbers like that well. The culture has been make culture where fighters are shown respect in “extra” money. I have not problem with them then asking for “their share” of the money. Yah, the paydays are exploding, BUT so is the UFC and other promotions paydays and opportunities. They are also 5-10 times larger than they were 2 years ago and the future isn’t so unstable. If your going to require fighters to have exclusivity in the future then you should expect to pay FUTURE prices.

by natyong on Nov 27, 2009 8:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Favritegotevj9_small
An Open Letter to Nick Diaz
Tatum_small
Aristotle Knows Nick Diaz Didn't Cheat
Walshrun_small
5 Reasons I Hate MMA
Royce_09_small
Call To Nominate New Bloody Elbow Moderators
Obp_small
The Official BE UFC Drinking Game

Recent FanPosts

Logo_d__small
Roll a phat one for Nick Diaz
Cg_small
Perceptions Regarding Diaz v. Condit Decision Distorted by the Judging Chameleon
Cf_small
George Rush St. Pierre BJJ Coach Renzon Gracie Black belt John Danaher
Jules-winfield-7_small
In Defense of Nick Diaz
208730_10150164903466743_503301742_7348043_3232767_n_small
Top Five: Fights To Look Forward To
Bruce-lee-lats_small
Calling for Nick Diaz to be released makes no sense.
Afro_small
The UFC Has Been Spared Once Again...This Time by Carlos Condit

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings