UFC 105 Results: Randy Couture Takes Questionable Decision Over Brandon Vera
It wasn't pretty, but "The Natural" got it done. Or did he?
Randy Couture took a unanimous decision over Brandon "The Truth" Vera in the main event of UFC 105, but many in the commentating booth and audience felt the decision may have been unfair.
The first round saw Couture dictating most of the offense or at least the aggression, working for takedowns even while Vera deftly defended them. It was much of a stalemate, but Vera spent the vast majority of the round on the defensive.
Here's where things get sketchy.
Couture finished the second round nicely with dirty boxing, but only after a vicious knee from Vera folded the UFC Hall of Famer. Vera followed up the crumpled Couture, but did very little damage until the referee stood the two up.
Round three saw the two fight gritty clinch battles where both scored with knees and punches. Vera stopped Couture's takedowns attempts and eventually landed a crisp knee tap of his own against the former Olympic wrestling alternate. Vera initially moved right to mount, but not before Couture could reverse the position and escape.
So how was the fight scored? Most saw rounds two and three as Vera's. Most, of course, except the judges.
Will Randy Couture get a title shot against Machida? Maybe, but it's hard to see Couture taking the title from the light heavyweight division's top contenders.
As for Vera, he looked clearly dejected after the fight. This was a major opportunity that was arguably taken from him. A case can be made that Vera has let too many fights go the distance since returning to the UFC after his year long layoff, but nevertheless, the judging in this fight is certainly suspect.
Randy Couture defeats Brandon Vera 29-28 on all three judges' scorecards.
76 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nothing questionable about the decision, I think.
"You guys are jerking eachother off with some pseudo deep bullshit." - Kid Nate
by Kaleb Kelchner on Nov 14, 2009 11:01 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
^^ I agree
Couture did just enough to win the “fight”.
"Why am I here? Why does my mind have wings? Why do blue midgets hit me with fish?!" - The Tick
Vera made it competitive, he’s young, still has room to grow…I’m not gonna count him out yet…when Randy wants to hug you, he wants to hug you.
"You guys are jerking eachother off with some pseudo deep bullshit." - Kid Nate
by Kaleb Kelchner on Nov 14, 2009 11:47 PM EST up reply actions
I dunno. Vera with a knockdown in the 2nd clearly gives him that round, considering the little damage Randy did. In the 3rd, Vera had the takedown and mount, not to mention the only clean and damaging standup. I’m sort of at a loss as to what Couture did besides drive him into the fence?
"clean[...]standup"
If you were trying to make a play on dirty boxing, bravo.
If not, to answer your question, dirty boxing. Maybe I’m weird, but I was a little taken aback when Joe asked him if he was surprised by the decision. Until he said that, I didn’t think anyone would doubt who won.
A lot of people think Couture won & alot think Vera won
that’s not a robbery. Is it controversial? Sure but it’s not like Vera was completely screwed.
Now as for the decision. Almost everybody had Randy winning 1 and Vera winning 2 so it came down to round 3 and by letting it go to the judges they risked not getting the victory.
We saw so called “bad judging” in the Cerrone-Henderson fight and the Machida-Shogun fight so if you wanted a “no doubt win” you dont let it get to the judges and you finish fights.
I understand where you are coming from. I’m just sick of everyone saying you don’t let it go to the judges. That’s a cop out for bad judging if you ask me.
by TruthSeeker1223 on Nov 14, 2009 11:09 PM EST up reply actions
It's not bad judging though different people see fights different ways
That’s why half the people think Couture won and half think Vera won.Judges are no different from you and me and they grade the fight as they see it.
Now you dont know how the judge is gonna score something like Octagon Control and so thats why I say you dont let it go to a decision especially in a close fight like that.
Randy did nothing!
Look, I like Randy but holding someone up against the cage doesn’t get you points. Well apparently it does. I understand having control is an issue. To me he tried to take Vera down the whole fight and couldn’t therefore it should reward Vera if anything. Vera took him down and knocked him down. I don’t get it. I’m sick of these effin judges!
by TruthSeeker1223 on Nov 14, 2009 11:08 PM EST reply actions
It's called Octagon Control
and if you see the rules before the fight it is one of the things the judges award points on.
Should he have done more? Yes but octagon control counts and Randy had it.
Agree
Randy set the pace for the fight and he decided where the fight took place. Vera clearly took round 2 no doubt but the take down in the third he couldent get any thing done and randy got back up, also randy landed more strikes in the third round.
I understand that as well…… I really can’t argue cause I see these situations in both views. I just felt that Randy was struggling to take him down so to me it made Randy not look good. I don’t know….. I really thought Vera won. Maybe I need to watch it again.
by TruthSeeker1223 on Nov 14, 2009 11:14 PM EST up reply actions
Maybe I need to watch it again.
You do that.. I’m gonna go watch my lawn grow. In Autumn.
"Why am I here? Why does my mind have wings? Why do blue midgets hit me with fish?!" - The Tick
My money is on Autumn.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Nov 15, 2009 12:04 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed.
But I won’t complain excessively about the decision. I think it’s incorrect, but mostly a testament to the fact that judges are effing unpredictable. That fight could have been justifiably scored for either fighter. Randy for “octagon control” or Vera for “effective offense.” It comes down to what each judge values and what they physically can see.
There wasn’t much offense offered by Couture at all. I do not see him able able to KO or submit a single 205er in the UFC.
I think in fights where its too close to call, they should just play “Shot-for-Shot” ( alternatively punching each other in the shoulder) until one of them gives up, a la high school to settle the final decision
I guess these three judges felt octagon control was better than the damaging shots that Vera was hitting him with. He hit him hard early in the first, midway through the second and again in the third. Couture had very little overall offense and never looked like he was threatening.
by Cory Braiterman on Nov 14, 2009 11:16 PM EST reply actions
Dan Hardy vs GSP
is anyone excited for this fight?
by TruthSeeker1223 on Nov 14, 2009 11:19 PM EST reply actions
not really
I see Hardy getting ragdolled by takedown after takedown while eating ground and pound. Swick has decent BJJ and overall skills, but he’s nowhere near GSP’s level of takedown offense.
by Cory Braiterman on Nov 14, 2009 11:20 PM EST up reply actions
I was so disappointed in Vera when he hurt Randy bad and then sat in his guard. The guy has NO killer instinct.
This is the only bad decision I can think of that I’ve actually been happy about.
I like Vera but I just feel he’s not living up to his potential. I do think he could have done more when he hurt Randy but maybe he didn’t want to get in Randy’s guard or something. Hell, I don’t know.
by TruthSeeker1223 on Nov 14, 2009 11:23 PM EST up reply actions
Exactly.
The guy likes to skate to a decision, then he deserves lose the fight. He had every chance to take round 2 and 3, but he didn’t.
That fight was so bad, I didn’t really cared who won.
yeah, Randy is going to be known as a boring fighter if he keeps that up.
by TruthSeeker1223 on Nov 14, 2009 11:29 PM EST up reply actions
yeah I don’t think either one of them stand a chance with GSP. Dan’s hands looked really good though. He also has a good chin and was hard to take down. I think GSP could get cought on the feet but he’ll definitely take Hardy down.
by TruthSeeker1223 on Nov 14, 2009 11:22 PM EST reply actions
Overall
I think it was a good night of fights. Lots of good battles and knock outs. Who do you think gets fight of the night and knock out of the night?
by TruthSeeker1223 on Nov 14, 2009 11:25 PM EST reply actions
nevermind... BE already has it up.... man they are quick
by TruthSeeker1223 on Nov 14, 2009 11:27 PM EST up reply actions
Randy won close decison
It was very close decision, but i believe Randy won round 1 an 3. 3rd round was close but Randy landed some good combinations. Vera got that takedown, but didnt do much with it except lay there and Randy got back up and they slugged out the last 15 seconds! As far as someone said Randy couldnt beat anyone else at 205 cause he didnt look perfect tonight… Randy hasnt cut weight in 3 years (since his last fight with Chuck in ’06) so getting used to that again, possibly being jet lagged it could take alot of out him. Lets see how he does his next fight. I bet he looks alot better!!
by BAESLINGER on Nov 14, 2009 11:25 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I agree with Luke
But let’s talk a bit about GSP. He was very polite and respectful when he took the mic, he didn’t step too much in the octagon not to spoil hardy’s moment, classy as always.
Still not impressed though. Hardy’s gonna fly up in the air and get pinned to the ground, there GSP will apply his GnP 2.0 and … the end.
10/24
Very True
GSP is without a doubt the classiest man in MMA. He gives his opponents all the respect in the world and then proceeds to take them to school!! Hardy got a little win tonight, but against GSP he is going to get hurt!
GSP is metrosexual as hell
I’ve rolled my eyes at the criticism of GSP being a UFC goody-goody, walking and talking the company line, but did his little speech sound as tailored as his suit to anyone else?
I don’t see how this decison was cotroversial at all Randy controlled the first round, Vera landed big shots to take the second and Randy did his best work in the third with his dirty boxing to win the fight. Randy won the fight it wasn’t his greatest performance ever but it was pretty clear cut hell when I logged on and was checking out headlines for UFC 105 I was shocked anyone was complaining about it.
absolutely
There wasn’t a shadow of a doubt in my mind ’til Rogan brought it up.
I think Vera knows he could’ve won that fight he did more damage clearly. This just goes to how much octagon control counts when scoring the fight. Randy controlled the fight but only by holding him against the cage. He did not get the takedowns he wanted and he did not stay busy enough for the ref to leave him alone.
Couture controlled most of the fight – now Vera had him wounded many, many times (notably in the 2nd), but never capitalized on it – that body (liver?) kick was nasty.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on Nov 15, 2009 12:05 AM EST reply actions
this is all bull, randy won rounds three and one ,and he was wining 2 until that shot at the end
by littlenicky2355 on Nov 15, 2009 2:02 AM EST reply actions
Vera has no excuse
Randy fought like shit, didn’t even dirty box until halfway through. That’s the reason he gets TDs is by roughing people up first.
Vera needs to finish fights. For all the talk about how “good” he looks now at LHW I fail to see it. Brandon was 10x more fun to watch at HW where he had a distinct speed advantage.
I disagree.
The lack of dirty boxing was a result of two talented greco wrestlers. You risk position every time you attempt offense (submission or strikes) and each of them respected the others ability to capitalize on that. I believe the slow pace of the fight was a testament to Vera’s wrestling.
For me
Round one of this fight was to cage grapping as round one of Bisping-Kang was to jiu-jitsu, I thoroughly enjoyed both. I was angry at the crowd for booing halfwas through the latter, but I knew round one would get BO-RING stamped on it by the general populous.
I kinda expected more from Bloody Elbow, though. The fight is fifteen freakin’ minutes long, it is not unreasonable to use some of that time to try to wear a guy out. If this was the UFC that didn’t have rounds or resets, Couture would’ve left Vera a bloody smear in the corner.
Kang/bisping was fun but I can’t believe how bad Kang gassed, that was pretty sad.
by xbuckeyex05 on Nov 15, 2009 10:19 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Kang gassed?
"Why am I here? Why does my mind have wings? Why do blue midgets hit me with fish?!" - The Tick
Aye
But he didn’t gas.
"Why am I here? Why does my mind have wings? Why do blue midgets hit me with fish?!" - The Tick
Wow. Interesting.
I got on this morning fully expecting to see a pretty one-sided discussion of how Vera was robbed and how, as much as people love Randy, him getting this decision seemed way more about it being Randy than about it being earned. Instead, it’s a fairly evenly split discussion. I expected much the same thing after Machida/Shogun. Just goes to show you, I suppose, that fights that aren’t ended are really hard to score and people really do see different things.
I didn’t see Randy do much of anything to win this fight, myself. I understand that “octagon control” is a component of the scoring, and I understand that he clinched Vera and got his back to the cage for long stretches. But I also saw Vera effectively clinching Randy at the same time and preventing Randy from doing much of anything with that control — Randy wasn’t able to get the takedown, wasn’t able to do much dirty boxing, wasn’t able to throw elbows or punches or knees from the clinch effectively, etc. I always find it interesting when people sometimes value takedowns immensely and other times say, “he got the takedown but didn’t do much with it.” In my mind, Couture’s octagon control was pretty similar in this fight — he got the clinch and got Vera to the cage, but didn’t do much of anything with it — and in the third round, Vera even reversed it and got a takedown of his own.
I actually scored the first round a draw on my card because neither guy did much of significance. They each landed a few strikes, Randy got Vera to the cage, Vera defended the takedown and prevented Randy from being able to do anything offensively. I actually thought Vera landed the crisper strikes during separations, etc., but not so much that he won the round. But Randy didn’t do anything at all with his “octagon control,” either. There seems to be almost no debate that Vera won the second round. He landed the most effective striking in the fight, dropped Randy, landed some ground striking, etc. The third round really seems to be the point of debate for most people, and I again thought Vera landed the far more effective strikes. Again, Randy had some of that “octagon control,” but he didn’t land significant striking as a result and did not land any more effective strikes than those Vera did. And then, late in the round when close rounds usually get “taken” by someone, Vera got a takedown. He didn’t do anything with it — but he got it. And Randy didn’t do anything with his “control,” either. So I gave that round to Vera.
I was surprised to see several people writing online that it never crossed their mind until Rogan said something that Couture might not have won. I thought Randy himself did seem surprised by the result, and his reaction to that question seemed to me to further that.
Regardless of whether you think Randy won clearly, Vera won clearly, or it was just too close to call, it’s another great exhibit for the pile of evidence that you should do everything in your power to prevent fights from going to the judges. You just never know what observers, including the judges, are going to see or how they are going to value those various aspects of scoring.
I scored it a draw. Neither guy went balls out for the win so why does either one of them deserve a W? It was just to close to call………again.
"I will do nothing lightly. When I walk, I will walk heavily. When I fight, I will fight with conviction. When I speak, I will speak strongly. When I love, I will love with everything"
My opinion about the decision:
I don’t care.
Neither guy was impressive, the “fight” was barely a fight. I would say that the only clear losers were those of us who watched, but hell – it was free so no complaints.
And besides, the rest of the night was great.
"Why am I here? Why does my mind have wings? Why do blue midgets hit me with fish?!" - The Tick
I think calling the first round 5 minutes of nothing is objectively wrong. What it was was Randy going for a bunch of different greco positions for takedowns and Vera stopping them. I’ve heard judges explain this to me that the guy going for the takedown over and over is “winning” because he is the guy on offense and the other fighter is just reacting and trying to stay at even.
Round 2 was clearly Vera.
I think round 3 was a fairly clear Couture round. I look forward to seeing some of the striking statistics, I thought he was easily on his way to victory with the dirty boxing, and then Vera got the takedown and mount, but didn’t do anything with it.
But what about failed submission attempts?
I understand the logic and am not calling it incorrect based on the rules, but if working for a takedown unsuccessfully is considered “winning” then do they also score failed submissions highly?
Because it’s the same thing? Working for offense, trying to win vs. defense, trying not to lose?
"Why am I here? Why does my mind have wings? Why do blue midgets hit me with fish?!" - The Tick
I think you misread my post.
I was asking IF they value failed submission attempts, not asking WHY. Seeing decisions like Curran-Mizugaki or people making arguments for Guida over Diego don’t make sense on the basis of what Rome is describing. If attempting to put an opponent on their back and failing is valuable offense, then how do vicious strikes from the bottom or actively setting up submissions not win fights? Or at least get considered neutral positions? I was asking if he had heard anything which could clarify that point.
It’s all relative. For example, if from clinch position randy spent 5 minutes trying for guillotines, kimuras, other subs from clinch but none of them ever landed, and Vera simply defended, Randy would have taken the round.
It’s all comparative. Trying and failing to take someone down is only winning compared to someone doing nothing. Vera probably could have won the round if he finished strong.
by Michael Rome on Nov 15, 2009 4:51 PM EST up reply actions
ah ok, my bad
"Why am I here? Why does my mind have wings? Why do blue midgets hit me with fish?!" - The Tick
Couture didn't win. Vera Lost
Randy had a very few good flurries.
Vera had one good kick, or punch and no follow up but no combinations.
Randy held Vera against the cage doing nothing and even got restarted for it a few times.
Vera Knocked Randy down with a kick
Vera later had a sloppy take down and got the mount. did nothing with it but let Randy escape.
Randy Lost. So did Vera. They had to give it to someone and Randy is old.
Once again, I’m glad I didn’t pay $50 for this.
Bisping looked good
Hardy looks great.
jiMMAy

by 



























