Do we really want TMMA (Traditional Mixed Martial Arts)
If you go to any MMA gym here in the states or pretty much anywhere on the western part of the world you will find a gym that practices three diciplines, Muay Thai, Wrestling and BJJ. I understand that in MMA a person must have a stand up base, some sort of wrestling base and some submission skills, but why must it be the EXACT SAME $H*T everywhere? There is no reason that our quality Traditional Martial Art Schools cannot add some type of wrestling (sumo etc) and bjj to their already effective stand up art whether it be Taekwondo, Capoeira, Wing Chun or Karate...
Was the UFC not started by people who watched Bloodsport and wanted to see how it would look in real life? Didn’t the fans want to watch DIFFERENT styles compete against each other to know what style is most effective? If the answer is yes then why are we developing a style that makes each person know exactly what to expect from the other and in essence everybody fight the exact same and use the exact same techniques? That’s not what i signed up for when i became an MMA fan in the 90’s.
Forrest Griffin is an example of a complete TMMA, he has good Muay Thai, BJJ, and Wrestling. However because he doesn’t have a primary art that he is great at I do not think he will ever have the Championship Belt again.
Fighters like Fedor Emelianenko, Anderson Silva, and Lyoto Machida bring the Mixed to MMA. Each of these fighters are masters in their own discipline but have added other arts only to use their art more effectively and to then force their primary art onto others who do not know how to defend against it because if they are not facing this Western TMMA.
Thank you to Kid Nate for introducing the word or idea of TMMA
Lyoto Machida is a harbinger of fighters successfully applying exotic martial arts techniques to MMA and I would argue that the key is his mastery of disciplines like jiu jitsu, Muay Thai and wrestling -- the traditional base of MMA fighters.
Honorable Mention: The guy who used Capoeira in MMA. This is what I signed up for when i heard about the UFC in the 90’s
via i41.tinypic.com
The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.
8 recs |
161 comments
Comments
The UFC was started to serve as an advertisement for Gracie Jiu Jitsu.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Oct 9, 2009 8:23 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
True but more so to see if Gracie could beat all the other Martial Arts. So i think one could argue that it was there to see which Martial Art is the best.
Which i think it still should and not just everybody use TMMA
by AfroSamurai on Oct 9, 2009 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That kicked was so damn obvious – it shouldn’t have been that hard to defend, but the guy had his arms completely stretched out.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by themachiavellian on Oct 9, 2009 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, my old teacher used to wreck the TKD guys when they tried their spin kicks
He’d just rush them when he saw the spin start up. They’re HIGHLY off balance at that point.
by Shaun32887 on Oct 9, 2009 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was obvious as hell but because the other dude hasn’t trained against it he’s had to stop and think, and thats why he got KTFO…
by Gentleman on Oct 10, 2009 7:46 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I love seeing capoeira work
Mestre Hulk was one of my favorite old school foils of BJJ.
Leland did a nice piece on Andre Gusmao, a promising IFL fighter (5-0) who washed out in the UFC (0-2). Gusmao had me pumped because he managed to incorporate some capoeira techniques into a pretty solid Muay Thai and BJJ game.
Shogun Rua has also unleashed some capoeria techniques in his day.
I’m toying with the idea that if Shogun has a chance against Machida it involves using capoeira to catch Machida off guard — show him something he hasn’t seen and be able to score from a range even further outside than Machida’s preferred attack range.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 9, 2009 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, Gusmao tends to use some techniques… like you’ll see him use the Ginga movement sometimes in his fights, and some of his kicks come off of basic Capoeira techniques.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Oct 9, 2009 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t get me wrong. I understand that Capoeira has its benefits and that a lot of currently and previously successful fighters are grounded in it. I just think that people shouldn’t expound it’s glory because of a few videos that surface of some clown getting knocked out by a flying kick. If the guy had his hands near his chin he would have been fine. The scope of muay thai just makes it better for MMA and fighting in general than capoeira.
And I’ve said this before about Machida: people think it’s the karate that makes him good. But it’s not – it’s the Machida. He’s just fucking good just like a lot of other guys are good. GSP could be world class muay thai fighter if that is what he put his time into. It’s about the individual and what he does with the infinite variety of tools available to them. If people get stuck fighting a “capoeira” style, they are going to lose.
by Ahhhoki on Oct 9, 2009 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ah you're off a bit there
Machida IMO isn’t as great an athlete as some of his competitors, but he’s using a system they don’t understand while he has a near mastery of theirs.
The shotokan based system the Machidas have invented allow Lyoto to strike while staying outside the range of the muay thai and kickboxing practictioners he faces (god help the boxers). The fact that he kicks with his feet rather than his shins is part of it. The lunge punches are part of it.
I think that Machida is very lucky he’s not up against a wave of similarly athletic athletes similarly grounded in wrestling/bjj/muay thai who also have mastered WuShu (SanShou) or TKD.
He wouldn’t be able to strike from afar against someone like that.
What I’m thinking is there will be a gold rush among MMA fighters searching for novel techniques they can incorporate into their games to give them an edge against others whose games are well known and understood.
GSP makes excellent use of TKD techniques — the spinning back kicks can be beautiful in the right setting done by the right athlete.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 10, 2009 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crow vs. McCarthy

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by themachiavellian on Oct 10, 2009 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Holy crap! That looks like it could have broken his ribs!
Whats really cool is that it looks like Crow was settting up for a spinning backfist after the kick.
for all intents and purposes, just consider all my posts as works of satire.
by Bandaka on Oct 11, 2009 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, it was a nasty kick
If I remember the fight correctly, the Crow got the TKO about 7 seconds later
by Shaun32887 on Oct 11, 2009 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Followed with a flying knee & GnP.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by themachiavellian on Oct 11, 2009 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Machida is a great athlete
I agree on the merits of his style. It makes him much harder to deal with.
We say he isn’t super athletic basically because he isn’t as ripped as some other guys, but what leads us to believe he isn’t? In his last 5 or so fights I haven’t seen him out classed in any area: GNP, Back, Clinch or Standing. Granted we only catch glimpses in those areas because his striking from the outside is soo good.
He has also shown some serious power in his last two fights.
Also while other people could learn different styles, i think Machida’s body is well suited to kicks from range. I’m not sure rampage Jackson ever could have been great at Karate regardless of how much he trained.
Who exactly are these far better athletes he faces too…I’m not really sold on the uber athleticism of Thiago Silva, Rashad Evans, Tito, Rich Franklin, etc.
BJ penn is probably the only guy that is really a freak athletically, but there is a serious size differential there.
by SES 84 on Oct 10, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
have to differ
but it’s all speculation.
My impression is that Tito and Rashad are far more powerful athletes with quicker reactions than Machida but I have no firm evidence to back that up.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 10, 2009 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You may be right but most fighters will tell you that fighting is more mental than physical anyway.
by Ahhhoki on Oct 11, 2009 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
GSP doesn't use TKD techniques
Kyokushin also teaches spinning back kicks and the like. But yeah, GSP’s an animal
Supporting all Las Vegas MMA. Xtreme Couture FTMFW.
'09 is the year of the FW's.
by ElliotMatheny on Oct 12, 2009 3:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree....
I know Machida has mixed in BJJ and Sumo but his Shotokan technique is world class and that’s not something you just pick up and add to your arsenal in a couple years.
Sometimes watching fights it’s tough to tell how technically skilled a fighter is. After watching Machida perform some katas, I can assure you that he has put in a lifetime worth of training to perfect his Shotokan technique. I’d say his dedication to karate is precisely what makes him good.
by Daveyboy on Oct 10, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Completely Agree
This is the reason i find it hard to believe that his techniques will simply be added to a fighters catalogue…
These techniques come with time and a concentration on the art as a whole and not just certain moves extracted from the art.
Therefore Artist will have to focus on a primary Martial art, In Machidas case Karate and add BJJ and Sumo to it only to neutralize others BJJ and wrestling to make his Karate work.
Which is why the focus of Jack of all Trades or TMMA style for MMA may be effective now but if we ever get an influx of Artist who’s primary art is something unfamiliar the TMMAist will be beat.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You think Machida has never seen Capoeira?
I mean maybe its such a hopeless endeavor against Machida that you should try anything, but Machida grew up in Brazil and seemingly practiced just about every style I can think of. Growing up in Brazil I’m sure he’s seen it. Trying to “surprise” an experienced and composed fighter with a proven bad style is not a recipe for success.
by SES 84 on Oct 10, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you got a better idea?
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 10, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not really
Shogun has no chance.
Actually I think trying to be super aggressive right from the bell and hope to overwhelm him with strikes. I think i using Muy Thai is the better option. As I said I guess you could try anything, but its not why I would suggest if I was in his corner.
by SES 84 on Oct 10, 2009 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks man
dug the post.
I added a link to the post back to my post that you quoted (got to link to your sources).
I agree very much that the appeal of the early UFC’s to me was to find out what worked and one of the great joys over the years has been seeing new techniques be successfully added to the mix.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 9, 2009 8:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No Problem
Along with finding out what works in these years i think that we have also seen that depending on the talent and proficiency of the individual with the art…that most arts can be successful in MMA.
Nobody thought Karate would work in early UFC’s.
I thought Sambo wasn’t as useful after seeing Oleg Taktarov.
But Lyoto And Fedor shut critics up
I think it’d be very likely that we see somebody of some other art come in with the same domination one because their talent and skill and two because people won’t be familiar about how to defend against it.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 9, 2009 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hey no need to dis Oleg!
He won a UFC tourny and got his share of honors back in the day.
The biggest problem with sambo as far as applying it directly to MMA was twofold:
1 — no chokes
2 — you had to get a submission in some insane short period of time, like thirty seconds. So you saw all the sambo guys diving for ankle locks and leaving themselves exposed.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 9, 2009 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL No Dis
He did win but all I was saying is his application of Sambo to MMA was mediocre compared to Fedors
by AfroSamurai on Oct 9, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sure
but I would consider Fedor more of an MMA master with a sambo base than a pure sambo stylist like Oleg. Did you ever see Mikhail Ilioukhine in the old Russian tournaments? He applied some straight up sambo. Won tons of matches with leg locks. Loved him.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 10, 2009 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No I’ve never seen or heard of him but exactly what Traditional MMA techniques do you think Fedor is a master of… No dis to Fedor of course but i sure wouldn’t peg him as a great Muay Thai guy or Wrestler but more combat Sambo practitioner at the highest of levels.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
his punching style
is derived from Igor Vovchanchyn’s punching style which he brought from kickboxing. Definitely not something we saw from Volk Han, Oleg Taktarov, or Mikhail Ilioukhine back in the day.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 10, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
read this to learn more about the first wave of Russians in MMA
(except Volk Han who I’ll catch up with later).
Kid Nate’s MMA History VII: From Russia With Leglocks
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 10, 2009 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Illoukhine also used the good ole'
chin-in-the-eye to sub Vovchanchyn if I remember correctly.
by Scott Haber on Oct 10, 2009 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I also remember Illoukhine for getting kneed to death
by Rampage in Pride.
by Scott Haber on Oct 10, 2009 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Vicious knee to the body from side control.
This shirt is "dry clean only", which means it's dirty.
by SamCupitt on Oct 10, 2009 1:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To a great extent, it’s not a matter of what we want, it’s a matter of what works. People find the BJJ-and-wrestling-and-muay Thai/boxing/kickboxing effective, and so they gravitate towards it. It will only change when somebody comes along and shows that some other approach can be more successful, which we do sometimes see: Fedor (sambo + weird Russian punching style), Imanari (crazy leglocks), Machida, Katsunori Kikuno, etc.
The other good news is that it’s always beautiful to watch someone who really excels at one of MMA’s primary disciplines. OK, maybe not always wrestling. But just think of those GSP takedowns on Thiago Alves. Niiiice.
So the real enemy to me is not the existence of primary styles, but the trend towards Jack of All Trades, Master of None type guys, of which Forrest Griffin is sadly one.
by JRN on Oct 9, 2009 8:59 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
I agree its a matter of what works and whats available to the average person. TMMA is effective so I understand the gravitation but i think out of fear sometimes people don’t experiment with other arts.
Jon Jones is a good example of someone who incorporates whatever art he finds useful. Although he’s expressed his interest in Muay Thai i think he will be someone who incorporates whatever works
It may be too early to tell but i think Vitor Belfort is a good example of a MMAist attempting to broaden his horizons as well. Esp. if he went to another art after he got his black belt in Karate.
LOL at watching the people who excel at wrestling. No hate i do appreciate those people but I’ll probably appreciate Brocks more even though i’m sure i’ll get hate for that lol.
I don’t think the existence of primary styles is the enemy but rather the existence of a fear of trying different arts to use in MMA, with the result being all MMA matches looking like two fighters mirroring each other. And your jack of all trades forrest lol
by AfroSamurai on Oct 9, 2009 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is truth to much of what you say. My old BJJ coach bemoaned that many people now were just training “MMA” and that it hurt their overall performance. His training method was to train intensely in separate disciplines and only combine them into a single practice when you were gameplanning for a fight. Now, by “separate disciplines”, he meant grappling, striking, and transitions – he combined elements of catch wrestling and BJJ together, elements of judo and freestyle wrestling together, and elements of MT and boxing together, but it was done intelligently and in a focused fashion.
I actually was standing around waiting for a prescription recently and picked up a copy of “Black Belt” Magazine, which is kind of the standard bearer for TMMAs. There was an article saying “thank you!” to MMA for reminding people that a lot of elements in TMMAs only work when you KNOW that the opponent is using the same/a similar style of fighting; they are dependent on a certain set of actions and reactions. That’s not to say that many PRINCIPLES of TMMA can’t be translated over, that some individual moves won’t work, but it is to say that just training in that art doesn’t necessarily mean it will work in MMA.
"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."
by AJB on Oct 10, 2009 6:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My old trainers would train the same way my only gripe with it was that it was still only the typical and expected muay thia, BJJ, and wrestling. I always thought if i ever do get a fight i want to come in and suprise the guy not fight his fight.
I think your confusing TMA (Traditional Martial Arts or Eastern Martial Arts like Karate Kung Fu etc) with TMMA (Traditional Mixed Martial Arts or Muay Thai, Wrestling, and BJJ). TMA is not very commonly used in MMA but TMMA is most commonly practiced in MMA and is very successful but takes a lot of the diversity of Mixed Martial Arts out. But i can’t deny that everything in TMMA is effective.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not confusing, just mistyping. It was early in the morning.
And there are a lot of different ways to surprise someone.
"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."
by AJB on Oct 10, 2009 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
please clarify
which you meant in your comment — TMA or TMMA? It seemed like some of the references were to TMMA and some were to TMA.
Maybe instead of traditional mixed martial arts (TMMA) I should have said standard mixed martial arts (SMM).
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 10, 2009 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’ll retype without acronyms to clarify:
I actually was standing around waiting for a prescription recently and picked up a copy of "Black Belt" Magazine, which is kind of the standard bearer for traditional martial arts. There was an article saying "thank you!" to the sport of mixed martial arts for reminding people that a lot of elements in traditional martial arts only work when you KNOW that the opponent is using the same/a similar style of fighting; they are dependent on a certain set of actions and reactions, like gambits in chess. That’s not to say that many PRINCIPLES of traditional martial arts can’t be translated over, that some individual moves won’t work, but it is to say that just training in that art doesn’t necessarily mean it will work in MMA.
It’s not a particularly insightful comment; like I said, I was sleepy. Sorry for all the confusion.
"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."
by AJB on Oct 10, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lol no problem i figured thats what you meant
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really don’t get what you’re trying to say with this post.
Of course fighters are going to get more well-rounded. Thats just the nature of the beast. Guys like Machida and Belfort are simply more well-rounded than everybody else, because they already have effective boxing, clinch, and grappling games. Pretty soon other guys will follow their lead, and somebody new will come up with something else. By 2020 most of the top fighters will be skilled at kickboxing, wrestling, jiu jitsu, judo, karate, capoeira, drunken tae kwon do, and half a dozen other skills.
I just don’t get your argument. Why are WE developing a style? WE aren’t doing nothing. Fighters are developing that style because thats what works.
by Michaelthebox on Oct 9, 2009 10:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Damn double negatives. We aren’t doing anything.
by Michaelthebox on Oct 9, 2009 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m trying to say that the three arts that are being used are getting boring…
I don’t think that by 2020 the top fighters will be skilled at all of these arts i think they will be skill at three arts at most and more skilled at one of the three. And this art will be his “Primary” art.
I also don’t think the success of guys like Machida and Belfort are only attributed to “well roundedness”. I think you can attribute their success to the incorporation of an unfamiliar style combined with their level of talent.
YES TMMA WORKS but that doesn’t mean its the only thing that works
by AfroSamurai on Oct 9, 2009 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the three arts that are being used are getting boring…
And?
We don’t choose the styles, the fighters choose styles that make it easier for them to win.
Machida and Belfort are ridiculously talented, and skilled at more styles than their opponents are. There just isn’t much to this. They’re doing something new while also having the skills to defend against the old stuff. Eventually their opponents will have the skills to defend against Shotokan karate, and somebody else will bring in something new.
by Michaelthebox on Oct 9, 2009 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They’re doing something new while also having the skills to defend against the old stuff.
My point exactly…
Fighters choose the styles but if you look at the opening of my post I’m talking about what the MMA schools are offering…So it makes it less of what the fighters are choosing and more so what Western MMA schools are choosing.
All they offer is Muay Thai, Wrestling, and BJJ that combination is what you will find. And its too expensive to try to go to some great karate school and and great BJJ school.
So what I also said was why don’t the quality TMA schools offer some Wrestling and BJJ or some other combination.
Sure somebody will learn how to defend against them one day…whether it be by fluke or by domination.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 9, 2009 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see what you’re saying now, but I think you’re still kind of railing against something that nobody individually, or maybe even collectively, has much control over.
While western MMA schools do teach a certain set of skills, the elite fighters train at a very few elite camps, with the elite coaches of the world.
But there are very few elite coaches in the world in any discipline, much less coaches who can effectively train their primary skillset in such a way that it will work with MMA. And the plain fact is that its likely that many, perhaps most TMA schools teach junk skills that won’t transfer easily to MMA. Machida for example trains Shotokan karate, which is trained in a vastly different style than most other karate styles. Sure, an MMA school could offer karate. . . but how can THEY tell what karate to teach that will work effectively within MMA? The knowledge isn’t out there yet.
I’ve personally trained at a TMA school that also taught judo and BJJ, so they are out there. But until the skillsets for properly integrating TMA with successful MMA tactics are widespread, it makes more sense for a prospective MMA fighter to train at a set of styles that are proven to work in MMA.
by Michaelthebox on Oct 9, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree that individually most people especially those that want to become Mixed Martial Artist don’t have control over but the schools do.
Western MMA schools teach what is widely known to be effective and many times don’t think outside the box to experience with other arts. Most MMA schools i’ve been to even make fun of TMA and their Kata’s, something that Lyoto says helps him tremendously.
While it may be true that many or even most TMA schools do not teach effective skills I believe that there are some out there that do teach effective TMA.
For those that do i don’t think that it is a matter of the knowledge not being out there yet. I think it is rather a matter of an individual student having the talent to apply it to MMA. Even Machida’s older brother who he claim’s is a better Karateka than he is but for some reason he nor any student has not been to apply it to MMA as Lyoto has.
But yes it does make sense for an potential MMA fighter to go to whatever the closest school that teaches striking, wrestling, and bjj
by AfroSamurai on Oct 9, 2009 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The idea of drunken taekwondo is maybe the greatest thing I’ve ever heard. Dear God, I can imagine it now. Jumping side kick, landing in a faceplant! Low/high double roundhouse to jumping back kick to liver failure! Mark my words, Jose Canseco will learn this for his inevitable fight against one of Herschel Walker’s alternate personalities, and he will WRECK A MOTHERFUCKER. And then promptly pass out in a pool of his own vomit. Yuengling and kimchee do not mix well.
by inadvertentgroinstrike on Oct 10, 2009 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Forrest Griffin is an example of a complete TMMA, he has good Muay Thai, BJJ, and Wrestling. However because he doesn’t have a primary art that he is great at I do not think he will ever have the Championship Belt again.
Regardless of how the rest of Griffin’s mma career goes he’s already made a huge impact on the sport. And even though he doesn’t have a primary discipline that didn’t hurt him when he was chocking out Shogun or kicking the shit out of Rampage to win the belt. People really need to get over him beating their favorite fighters and give him his props the excuses and bs when it comes to the guy is weak and needs to stop.
by Raker on Oct 9, 2009 11:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Forrest is a Great Fighter
Forrest gets all the props from me but facts are facts
- Forrest is Good in all areas of MMA just not great
- I’m not really a fan of Shogun or Rampage so your right it didn’t hurt him… lol
-Forrest COULD come back and win some great fights and continue his legacy but i still don’t think he will ever get the belt back
by AfroSamurai on Oct 9, 2009 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I completely agree with this. Griffin was a UFC Champion, despite not really being a master of any one technique, whilst Andre Gusmao for example washed out of the UFC after 2 losses. Its not a great comparison I’ll admit, but it also illustrates that knowing something different and rare doesn’t mean it is effective at all.
Personally I think guys like Machida, Kikuno are rarities, and every so often such fighters will come along and be successful, but in future well rounded fighters like Griffin, Evans, will still dominate, I don’t see it happening at all where fighters try to learn something new to supplement their game, I feel well rounded athletic fighters will still dominate 90% of MMA in the future, even if they only know the more usual MMA skills. The idea of Brock Lesnar learning TKD intrigues me, and I think it would be very interesting if such things were to become a trend, but I cannot see them happening
by StevenGiles on Oct 11, 2009 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The answer to this is simple. The reason those 3 styles are primarily used is that for most fighters they have proven to be the most effective combination. Thats not to say that other fighters with different styles can’t be effective, but often they aren’t. For example Machida has done a phenominal job of adapting his Karate to MMA, but he is one of few highly successful Karate fighters in MMA. I’m not slamming Karate or any of the less popular styles, but I do think that many people have trouble effectively incorporating them into MMA.
by attgnp on Oct 9, 2009 11:21 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd
Natural selection FTW. By and large, I think we’ve seen the most effective combo of styles in MT & Wrestling. Other styles can succeed when applied well (Machida’s karate, Cung Le’s san shou, etc) and exploring more esoteric martial arts can expand the arsenal of the fighters, but the LCD to compete is kickboxing & wrestling.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by themachiavellian on Oct 9, 2009 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and grappling
you’re leaving 1/3 of the recipe unfilled there. You must have BJJ or catch wrestling or sambo or judo ne waza or you’re going to get tapped out all the time like Melvin Guillard.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 10, 2009 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was just thinking of the smothering ability of many top-level wrestlers, but yes, that utilizes submission defense, so some sort or sub-grappling is needed. Good catch.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by themachiavellian on Oct 10, 2009 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cung Le’s success with San Shou in MMA can largely be attributed to fighting much smaller opponents who have limited grappling ability or otherwise choose to have a kickboxing fight with him. It’s not really the same as Machida, who has used his style effectively against a wide variety of skillsets and quality opponent.
by George Lucas on Oct 12, 2009 2:28 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
BULLSHIT
I am so sick of hearing this crap.
Takedown defense and throws are an integral part of San Shou.
That’s the whole point about being intrigued with San Shou/Wushu as a base art for MMA. Training in SanShou you learn standup striking, throws and takedown defence.
The weak spots are in ground grappling and clinch fighting, not in takedown defence.
Sure Cung Le hasn’t faced a great wrestler yet (and maybe he never will) but this insistence that he is a takedown waiting to happen is just ignorant.
He’s a credentialed college wrestler as well as a San Shou champ.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 12, 2009 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
rec'd for truth!
San Shou is basically unorthodox strikes, and wrestling. A great san shou fighter already has great tools that are handy in MMA..
they’re very dangerous and unpredictable standing and they are very hard to takedown.. add in some jits and you’re good to go..
by Anton Tabuena on Oct 12, 2009 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NOT ACTUALLY BULLSHIT
Who cares if you’re tired of hearing it?
He sure put those fancy wrestling credentials to use when he fought 3 welterweights in a row who kickboxed with him, and then a middleweight who also kickboxed with him.
Truly he is a shining example of the exotic nature of this sport.
by George Lucas on Oct 12, 2009 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
there are other san shou fighters in MMA you know..
If you haven’t seen Cung Le’s wrestling, doesn’t mean san shou isn’t a good base or that he doesn’t have wrestling..
Eduard Folayang for example, in some fights he’s like Cung, overwhelming people with his strikes, but at some fights, he’s the one taking the guys down and pounding him out..
San shou combines striking and wrestling so a great san shou fighter like Cung obviously possesses good wrestling skills.. It’s like saying Lytle doesn’t have a BJJ blackbelt because you haven’t seen him go to the ground.
by Anton Tabuena on Oct 13, 2009 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except no one would ever say that because Lytle has gone to the ground numerous times (sometimes with submission of the night honors), and has fought several quality well rounded opponents in his weight class who did not decide to let him have a one-dimensional exhibition instead of an MMA fight.
by George Lucas on Oct 13, 2009 5:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Funny how you decide to only go for the example and not the main points..
The fact is, wushu/sanshou is really predicated on takedown D, throws, takedowns, and strikes.. just cause you think that no one has forced him to use them much, doesn’t mean it isn’t there.
by Anton Tabuena on Oct 13, 2009 5:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Funny how you decide to make an argument out of something when the whole reason I even posted anything was to say that Cung Le is a bad example.
by George Lucas on Oct 13, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But by all means feel free to keep lecturing me about how awesome wushu is for MMA.
by George Lucas on Oct 13, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
IF someone can get him to the ground
then Cung Le’s major glaring weakness will be exposed and that’s his lack of submission skills. But wrestling is not a weak link in his chain.
He’s a sprawl and brawl fighter like Chuck Liddell who has excellent wrestling and uses it to keep the fight standing.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 13, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
IF he ever fought someone who tried to take him down
then Cung Le could maybe be considered a legitimate mixed martial artist.
by George Lucas on Oct 13, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's just the nature of a chaotic system
It’s something I like about MMA, the dearth of rules when compared to other sports means that the gameplay can follow highly complex, mathematical pattern of evolution. It’s like Go; since there’s very few rules, incredibly complex strategies evolve.
MMA is like that, and in these kinds of systems, we always see an evolution from chaos to order. While the blank board of a new Go game represents almost infinite possibilities (chaos), a developed game has a significantly reduced number of possible moves; it has moved to a more ordered system.
Combine this with natural selection (we don’t continue to do things that don’t work) and you have the basis for the natural evolution of MMA. So from chaos (Art Jimmerson with one glove), MMA is evolving into a seriously complex and exciting sport.
Now for the added fun; there’s a hidden easter egg in the system I just described. As fighters gravitate more and more to what “works,” they lose diversity. What happens to any species when they lose diversity? They optimize for their current environment, but they’re vulnerable, because they all have the same weaknesses. In nature, that means that a single disease or virus can wipe out an entire population. In MMA, it means that every now and then, a fighter will come out that is able to dominate EVERYBODY. I give you, Lyoto Machida.
by Shaun32887 on Oct 10, 2009 12:14 AM EDT reply actions 15 recs
exactly!
really brilliantly stated. This should be its own post.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 10, 2009 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You flatter me sir
Unfortunately, I should be studying right now, so if anyone else wants to write it, feel free to do so and maybe mention my name somewhere. IF it’s not written by next week, I’ll do it.
by Shaun32887 on Oct 10, 2009 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Specialization is for insects."
-Robert A. Heinlein
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by themachiavellian on Oct 10, 2009 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great Analogy and Analysis
This is exactly why I love MMA. It is still in its infancy so while we are all impressed with what we have seen even more impressive techniques and fighters will emerge with time.
The possibilities with the rules and the size of the octagon give fighters a great possibility to bring in many different arts and be effective. Hence why i don’t want a smaller cage but thats another topic.
The question i have for you now though is after this single disease or virus has wiped out an entire population then what? So now that you have Machida you lose this concept of everyone being vulnerable because everyone doesn’t have the same weakness. Are you implying that until everybody uses Machida MMA like Lyoto and the MMA world loses diversity is the only time a disease or virus (new style) can be brought in to wipe out an entire population or as you put it dominate EVERYBODY?
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha
Well, the “everybody” was in the case of a complete lack of diversity. Obviously this hasn’t happened, so it’s not like Machida will be undefeated for the next 30 years. Some people will crumble to him, but there’s others out there who will study him and be able to withstand and defeat him.
It’s like Royce, you didn’t need to become a BJJ black belt to beat him, but understanding how he works and adapting your own game to recognize and defend his attacks would keep you competitive against him. Same will happen to Machida: fighters will diversify in the ways they deal with him. Some will try to become him, some will simply learn how to defend him.
by Shaun32887 on Oct 10, 2009 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn’t mean for the “haha” to appear condescending, I was laughing because you caught me in my own hyperbole
by Shaun32887 on Oct 10, 2009 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no need i knew as soon as I saw the haha lol
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 1:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think Lyoto is exactly the Royce Gracie of Karate only because most expert BJJ practitioners look at what he was doing back then and call it elementary. And for some reason i just don’t see the Karate practitioners of the future doing the same….but who knows im no psychic lol
As for people beating him i’m sure it will happen but the question is will it happen by someone with a better skill set or his reflexes slowing….
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, it’s easy to look back on the founders and say that it’s elementary, I’m not sure that’s fair. Still, I think the idea of injecting a new facet to the game and winning largely due to the opponents lack of experience with that facet is a pretty large similarity.
by Shaun32887 on Oct 10, 2009 1:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was the other BJJ guys who thought Royce was so-so – he was chosen because he was the B student – that way, when he won, the Gracies looked that much more impressive.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by themachiavellian on Oct 10, 2009 1:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought it was because he was so small?
Doesn’t matter, the idea is basically the same
by Shaun32887 on Oct 10, 2009 1:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah from memory it was going to be Rickson but because Rickson was like 200+ lbs it would be less impressive if the 170-180 lbs. Royce was subbing bitches.
This shirt is "dry clean only", which means it's dirty.
by SamCupitt on Oct 10, 2009 1:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rickson was only about 185
but he was ripped and very athletic. He tended to get top position and win that way so it wasn’t as counter-intuitive or dramatic as Royce’s system.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 10, 2009 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not any kind of BJJ expert so no i don’t think it’s fair either
But yes i do agree it is similar, and also that adding this facet or Karate with a wide stance and their timing makes me very excited about the future of MMA if Lyoto is like you say the Royce of Karate…
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t have much else to say other than that was a great post.
by attgnp on Oct 10, 2009 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I applaud this.
Quite possibly one of the best comments I’ve read since being on here.
Yep, I have Twitter too. Follow me @deowade
by Deo Wade on Oct 10, 2009 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One of the best comments I’ve read on this site.
"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito Ortiz on Vitor Belfort at Affliction:DOR
by Rundownloser on Oct 11, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
actually...
God created MMA as we know it.
by ryanwk628 on Oct 12, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about vitor's karaxing? Boxrate?
by Anton Tabuena on Oct 10, 2009 2:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i like Jiu Box-arate
"If you don’t think one (punch) can land with a meow, punch a kitten...."
by themachiavellian on Sep 20, 2009 8:47 PM PDT
by ironic sumo on Oct 10, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
People tend to think that fighters well versed in the usual combo of muaythai wrestling jits are the most evolved types of mma fighters, but there’s so much room for improvement that it’s scary.. Even in striking, there’s so much that people can add or improve on.
If more people improve on boxing, or incorporate karate in their game, like what belfort is trying to do, and if the Chinese mma market explodes and tons of sanshou guys take it up, we could be seeing a new breed of evolved strikers. Fighters who control the range and timing well, who uses more body shots and kicks, better jabs, and more unorthodox strikes..
When lots of people incorporate the advantages of more styles like karate/wushu etc into the usual muaythai/wrestling/jiujitsu combo. When more and more people bring Out the art in martial arts,As a fan, it would be something that I would love to witness.
by Anton Tabuena on Oct 10, 2009 4:01 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I like the idea of incorporating karate and other striking styles to MMA (like Spider does), but it’s not the only way to improve striking in MMA. So called Muay Thai in MMA is practically nonexistent, it’s more like kickboxing, it has little to do with MT. There aren’t many fighters that use weapons that MT has to offer.
I don’t like when people say that MT has become boring, because there are few people in MMA that had explored that beautiful art.
by dancingChicken on Oct 10, 2009 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd
This is why i hate to hear on most UFC events "now he is a complete Mixed Martial Artist when speaking about certain fighters…
I want to see more arts being applied. I believe it was either Anderson or Jon Jones who said it best “if you train it than it will work” and thats how one of them pulled of that upward elbow or the spinning back elbow.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was Spider who said it. He trained this elbow at home with his wife holding pads, because his trainers said that this is stupid and wont work.
This technique is used in Muay Thai, but it’s very hard to knock somebody out with it, so you don’t see it often.
But then again, Anderson is a very unusual specimen. Lots of MMA fighters have problems with basic striking techniques, they’re learning only what’s necessary.
It takes time and passion to explore martial arts, I don’t think there are a lot of fighters who are looking forward to train kata the whole day.
by dancingChicken on Oct 10, 2009 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember that fight from Cage Rage, I believe, when he KOed a guy with an elbow strke to head while standing. Been wanting to see someone do that again forever.
by black dragon on Oct 12, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tony Fryklund, right?
Wow, looking back, Cage Rage was pretty fuckin legit. Bisping fought there, Ninja Rua, Lee Murray. Lee Murray was really the last guy I can recall that gave A. Silva anything worth tasting (no, I’m not overlooking Ryo’s submission), before he decided to become Danny Ocean.
We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.
by Robert Downey Sr. on Oct 12, 2009 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can't remember who said it, Rumble, or Bones Jones, But
One of them recently said that he’ll go online on Youtube, watch a particular highlight of a particular move, and try and incorporate it into his training. I’m thinking it was Bones Jones who said it, after watching him throw Bonner all over the Octagon, I believe he really does this.
I think it’s awesome that some of the newer fighters are taking this approach to training. One thing, it makes training that much less repetitive and boring, and your opponent doesn’t know what to expect when you are known as a fighter that can look up underutilized moves and pull them out during a fight. The opponent might have a game plan for the TMMA aspect of your game, but to be able to do things that are completely unexpected and out of the ordinary, In my opinion, is what will be the next evolution in MMA.
The worst part about that is the fact that it’s an evolutionary step that MMA should have already taken and almost did, but didn’t capitalize on. If every fighter comes out with some combination of Wrestling, Muay Tai, and BJJ, in no particular order, then every fighter becomes predictable, and in a sense they’ve taken themselves from being a 3 dimensional fighter to being a one dimensional fighter. I would love to see and certainly hope that in the future, with a new wave of younger mixed martial artists, that there will be a revolution of fighters who will be extremely hard to come up with a gameplan for, at least not as easy as it is today. Add that little bit extra unpredictable fighting style or move(s) into your game and watch the traditional fighters fall.
"Pure as we begin
Here we have a stone
Throw to stay the stranger
Swore to crush his bones
Move by will alone "
by mr.bungle on Oct 10, 2009 8:14 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
It was Jonny
and for me, it wasn’t his rape of Bonnar that made me realize that (although Goddamn, that German suplex was the exclamation point on my fanboyism) so much as it was that crazy-ass double leg fake to a spinning elbow. It suddenly clicked in my head that I’d seen someone use that basic technique before…

by inadvertentgroinstrike on Oct 10, 2009 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OMG! Jon Jones is Asuka!
for all intents and purposes, just consider all my posts as works of satire.
by Bandaka on Oct 12, 2009 2:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd
It definitely should have already taken place…But i think either schools or fighters are apprehensive to using different arts and techniques because TMMA has already been proven successful.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
also to be fair
it’s really hard to master any of the major disciplines. mastering wrestling or judo is literally the work of a decade or more, concentrating full time. asking them to pile on more and more techniques is a tall order. for every athlete like GSP or Bones Jones there are a thousand who don’t have the freakish coordination and muscle memory to learn that quickly.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 10, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
True
Which is another reason why i don’t see artist just piling on all these different techniques like Michaelthebox said is realistic
By 2020 most of the top fighters will be skilled at kickboxing, wrestling, jiu jitsu, judo, karate, capoeira, drunken tae kwon do, and half a dozen other skills.
Which is why i think one Primary art will be needed and others added only to negate the use of his opponents.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup, it’s a bit far fetched to assume that they can be a master several techniques, but I think people can incorporate the tiny but important aspects of a different style on top of the standard mma base..
For instance, the way shotokan karate handles the ranges well. or how to use trips. They don’t necessarily have to pile on too much techniques there, but there are a few points and small details that can be added, but can make huge differences.
by Anton Tabuena on Oct 10, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well i definitely think it will be a great thing if these things can be different arts can be extracted.
I guess only time will tell if people can start using what Machida makes work in MMA for their Standard MMA.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One, its a bit early in the history of the sport to start using the phrase “traditional”. I’d prefer standard at this point. And people use the standard because its the most effective foundation for most newbie mma fighters.
At this point in the development of the sport the trinity of bjj mt and wrestling is what works. Machida & co. are exposing the holes in that trinity and the sport will continue to evolve. The standard trinity may be quite different 10 years from now.
by toxic on Oct 10, 2009 12:54 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Agree Also lol
Well Kid Nate looks like i’ll have to quote him the next time i make an argument for TMMA or should i say SMMA
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hopefully in the future there is not a “standard” of sorts in the future…
In the future i hope to see MMAist with a primary art whether it be wing chun, karate or san shou and learning BJJ and whatever their native wrestling style to use their art effectively.
This way it won’t be a standard and rather people pitting different arts against each other in the ocagon.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
I was just about to Edit my original post to inform people of Standard MMA when i realized that Traditional MMA is a perfect name for the combination of Muay Thai, BJJ and Wrestling because we are very early in the history in the sport
For the reason that this is the first trio that has proven to be effective in MMA it has earned the title of Traditional. If we were to change it to Standard i think it would confuse readers in the future considering the fact that the standard trio then may be a completely different set of Martial Arts.
So while this is also the current standard for Mixed Martial Arts it is also the first truly effective base the mass of people who wish to enter MMA.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 11, 2009 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The post before mine hit it on the head.
by Jason Rhino on Oct 10, 2009 1:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
use the reply button
otherwise it becomes impossible to tell which post you’re referring to.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 10, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the stuff in TMMA was never bad….it was the training to use it in real-time, specifically lack thereof that hurt them when the octagon came about.
Gatti. Dekkers. Pele. Aoki. Kang. Vanderlei.
http://theworldsoldestsport.blogspot.com/
by theworldsoldestsport on Oct 10, 2009 8:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I guess i have confused some people in my many acronyms but Traditional MMA or TMMA means typical combination we see in UFC now being Muay Thai, Wrestling and BJJ
Although i’m sure you were talking about TMA Traditional Martial Arts like Karate Kung Fu etc i agree its not bad
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice post
The most successful fighters have always been the ones skilled in one discipline, who then diversified into others. Big Nog in BJJ and boxing for example.
You’re right. I’ve seen MMA McDojos that advertise the BJJ, muay thai combination, which only serves to produce guys with diluted skills in each discipline.
by cyke on Oct 10, 2009 9:42 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
You may have something with the MMA McDojos lol
Not sure if i’d call them MMA Mcdojos because i consider most TMA Mcdojos like the karate schools we all see as schools that teach things that aren’t practical and Muay Thai, BJJ, Wrestling combination is practical and effective.
However they are all teaching the same thing and will look very McDojo ish if more Machida’s , and Anderson Silva’s keep coming out of the woodworks destroying them.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 10, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Places that used to be Karate or TKD schools now advertise themselves as MMA schools that teach kickboxing and bjj. I doubt graduates of these schools will be skilled enough in any one discipline to be effectively dominant.
by cyke on Oct 11, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But I think there's a difference
The amateur shows are different. It’s not like karate, where you’re in a highly structured point system that doesn’t reward damage at all, it’s a freakin cage fight. If your school can’t teach you well, you’ll be destroyed, and the school will have a very short list of students they can point to who have done well. That alone should limit the success of the McDojos.
by Shaun32887 on Oct 11, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have yet to see one of these schools…but because BJJ is not as old as karate the legitimacy of the teachers can be questioned and easily found out by looking for the lineage.
Therefore if the school is JKA certified (Japanese Karate Association) and has a BJJ instructor from a legitimate Black Belt i don’t know why the graduate could not be skilled enough at one of the arts.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 11, 2009 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
GSP debunks your case
and the youngers fighters are when they start training the more of them will be well-rounded with mastery of multiple disciplines. GSP’s ability to pick up wrestling as an add on to his skill set and become the best wrestler in MMA is just amazing.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 11, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But GSP was primarily a kyokushin fighter before adding wrestling to his skillset. Remember, GSP is a dangerous striker too.
That’s different from learning small amounts of each discipline and therefore not being much of a threat in any area.
There are more ways to fight than just the BJJ and MT combo.
by cyke on Oct 11, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
very true
you have to really master a discipline to be able to apply it at a high level — or be a real freak of athleticism like Dave Herman or Jon Jones, both of whom have incorporated some wild kicking and spinning attacks from watching martial arts movies.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 11, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is he really a dangerous striker?
I don’t think he could compete with fighters that come with a Anderson Silva, Lyoto Machida or even a Thiago Alves striking skill set.
Yes he beat Thiago but not by out striking him
by AfroSamurai on Oct 11, 2009 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He outstruck Alves in that fight.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Oct 11, 2009 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will rewatch the fight tommorow and get back to you…but from my understanding it was his takedowns that won the fight, not his striking.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 11, 2009 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And it was his striking that made his takedowns so effective. He had a massive reach advantage over Alves and used it well.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Oct 12, 2009 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
False
he outstruck Thiago because of the constant threat of the takedown. Thiago came out aggressively and looking to implement his dynamic striking game, but GSP took Alves down every time he really started to commit to his strikes, and as a result landed more shots over the course of the fight than Alves did.
In a pure kickboxing match, Thiago would probably win, but even then it wouldn’t be a blowout
Supporting all Las Vegas MMA. Xtreme Couture FTMFW.
'09 is the year of the FW's.
by ElliotMatheny on Oct 12, 2009 3:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He Doesnt
Because even GSP has a primary discipline which is Wrestling he may have picked it up late but it naturally suits him well… So you have to understand Kid Nate that my argument is not that TMMA doesn’t work but that many times fighters who come in with a completely different skill set (3 other arts) like Lyoto Machida 9/10 they will win.
GSP has yet to face and i don’t think will ever face someone that is not a TMMA (Muay Thai, Wrestling and BJJ)
Therefore he will continue to use his wrestling to out wrestle them
by AfroSamurai on Oct 11, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For who ever still wants to see the style versus style matchups (like bood sport), can’t you just watch Japanese MMA?
for all intents and purposes, just consider all my posts as works of satire.
by Bandaka on Oct 11, 2009 8:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Or Watch Anderson Silva or Lyoto Machida....
because they both use Muay Thai and Machida Karate against TMMA
by AfroSamurai on Oct 11, 2009 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anderson Silva's Muay Thai is far from "the same old shit"...
So while I love the post, I think it has more to do with exceptionalism, than with bringing in other fighting styles. A TKD kickboxer could show up in the UFC at any moment, but if he’s not high level, and capable of fighting on the ground, it’s not going to look that much more exciting than another guy’s Muay Thai. I expect we’ll get to find out, as the sport grows, since people with styles we’re not seeing in the Octagon will learn the grappling arts to round themselves out and begin competing in MMA. Cung Le is another obvious example. There’s serious money to be made now, and the stigma MMA had among TMMA’s is breaking down. But as far as how exciting and creative the fighting is, I believe it’s the caliber of athlete training in whichever martial arts, and making it to the UFC, that’s going to revolutionize fighting in the next 5 years. Great post though. You’ve been on a roll lately! Thanks…
by Kwisatz Haderach on Oct 11, 2009 2:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Man Been Lurking for Awhile With These Thoughts...
I agree that the fighter will have to be of a extremely high quality and exceptional. I mean…Even Lyoto’s Machida’s older brother who he claim’s is a better Karateka than he is but for some reason he nor any student has not been to apply it to MMA as Lyoto has.
if a Taekwondo guy attempts to come into MMA, which i would love btw to see all those fancy kicks without hardly any punches. He would need to have great BJJ like Lyoto, and also some tremendous wrestling to avoid the takedowns.
So the main thing that i think is needed is a primary art in your case lets say some authentic Korean Taekwondo, trippled with great BJJ and the traditional sport of Korea Ssireum (their form of wrestling) 
I think this fighter would give TMMA (Muay Thai, BJJ and Western Wrestling) guys a really hard time because it would be something that they could not practice against.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 11, 2009 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
there are several TKD guys in MMA now
although they’ve all got other disciplines going, but Anderson Silva, David Loiseau and Stephan Bonnar have all trained extensively in TKD and have applied many of the techniques — spinning back kicks anyone?
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 11, 2009 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lyoto's brother doesn't do that well in MMA
because of his inadequate ground game…
Well, that’s what happened in his last loss.
by Anton Tabuena on Oct 12, 2009 3:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great spinning back kicks last night at WEC 43
yes they have but I don’t mean people that simply add the techniques into their game but people who come with TKD as their primary art.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 11, 2009 7:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I want to see the secrets of Open Tiger Claw vs. Aboriginal Kangaroo Boxers :)
I love seeing additional traditional styles made practicable in MMA, and there’s obviously a lot of crossover technique. Shotokan seems to employ similar trips and throws to Wushu and some advanced Muay Thai. Judo, Aikido and Hapkido have similarities, and so on. Sometimes the supposed differences between styles is fairly cosmetic. But at the highest level of actual fighting, what interests me most is that it seems similar to the idea that all religious paths lead to same enlightened oneness, in that you start seeing the development of amazing speed, timing, hand-eye coordination, as well as the mental focus and calm needed to think creatively in the midst of the storm of a fight, all being honed to a finer and finer edge by a diversity of fighters like Fedor, Anderson, GSP, Machida and others. I think the traditional martial arts, and the discipline involved, may have their greatest advantages not just in new techniques, or in a different look in the ring/Octagon, but in teaching focus, timing, speed, and clear-mindedness in the context of a real fight. That, coupled with the entrance of a higher natural caliber of athlete, is going to bring a lot of amazing new fighters into the sport in the years to come. Which will, of course, be totally sweet you guys…
by Kwisatz Haderach on Oct 11, 2009 7:21 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Great Post
While taking Hapkido i also noticed a lot of similar wrist manipulation techniques to Aikido and the throws of Judo. While the differences may be sometimes only cosmetic i think you are completely right that the discipline involved of honing the primary art while creating a base in 2/3 other essential arts, whether it be strking/wrestling/bjj is like you said what leads to the advantages you talk about.
BTW i like the religious paths analogy
by AfroSamurai on Oct 11, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hapkido & aikido originated from the same root martial art – the same way many languages derive from Latin.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by themachiavellian on Oct 11, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yup, we're watching the Tower of Martial Babel getting put back together all around us
it’ll turn out okay this time :)
by Kwisatz Haderach on Oct 11, 2009 10:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
but what if
in a couple of generations we evolve a race of super warriors who can challenge the gods themselves? will we not be struck down for our effrontery?
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 11, 2009 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But What If...
I envision a day when all conflicts, from gang fights to wars, are resolved via hand to hand combat, and we put aside cowardly ranged weapons and just throw down. Not exactly the future Lennon imagined, but totally awesome. ( Waits for someone to chime in that Fedor can armbar God already :)
by Kwisatz Haderach on Oct 11, 2009 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
now wait a minute
all we know is that Fedor got lucky and arm-barred God once. If he would ever man up and agree to God’s no-time-limit, gi-wearing allowed, we must fight in the YAMMA-pit rule set — totally reasonable requests on the part of the supreme being — then we’d really see who the best in all time and space really is.
Oh yeah, Rickson by armbar.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Oct 11, 2009 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
No religion talk Nate.. This is your last warning.
by Anton Tabuena on Oct 12, 2009 3:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
God's cornerman is Death...if they're fighting no-time-limit, I think God wins in the championship rounds...
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by themachiavellian on Oct 12, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But what if Dan Miragliotta the devil is the ref?
We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.
by Robert Downey Sr. on Oct 12, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's true, but
prior to that fight, and not too many people have reported on this, showing their bottomless Fedor-nuthuggery, God had staph and was in the hospital with an ACL injury four weeks before the fight, plus the ref stopped it before the tap!
by Kwisatz Haderach on Oct 11, 2009 11:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
SMDH
See what happens Kwisatz Haderach when you bring up religion haha the Fedor fans come out in droves
by AfroSamurai on Oct 11, 2009 11:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Fedor is Religion. Just not for me!
SMDH? Que?
by Kwisatz Haderach on Oct 12, 2009 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shaking my damn head
just shaking my head at the Fedor comments lol
by AfroSamurai on Oct 12, 2009 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only way to respond to this is...
BROCKLESNAR!!!
by Captain7 on Oct 12, 2009 4:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
People use "TMMA" because it works
end thread
he was injured. injured bad.
by troy145 on Oct 13, 2009 1:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and btw
“TMMA” is just a stupid idea. Isn’t it pretty commonly excepted MMA is still an evolving sport? For goodness sakes, wrestling it self is still evolving and its been around for thousands of years. You kids get off my lawn.
he was injured. injured bad.
by troy145 on Oct 13, 2009 2:03 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec’d for “You kids get off my lawn” hahahha. :)
by Anton Tabuena on Oct 13, 2009 3:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very Insightful :/
Wrestling is still evolving the same way boxing is still evolving…
The point of this thread was to point out that Western MMA is only teaching the three same arts in each MMA gym. Slowing the evolution of MMA, not saying that it still wouldn’t evolve but at a much slower pace adding a ceiling to the potential of the fighters game.
btw nobody said it works but fighters in MMA shouldn’t all use the same three disciplines just cause they work. The rules in MMA too broad for people to be that narrow minded.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 13, 2009 7:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
why shouldnt anyone use anything that works for what they want it to do?
no one says man i need to put a nail in this wood, but dammit, there are far too many tools for me to be so narrowminded as to simply us a hammer! I think i’ll use an axe!
he was injured. injured bad.
by troy145 on Oct 14, 2009 2:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
I actually think because MMA is at it’s early stages it is now more like using an Axe to get the job done and people like Lyoto who are coming in showing them how to put the nail in the coffin with ease and efficiency.
by AfroSamurai on Oct 14, 2009 7:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 














