Despite Earlier Statements, Dana White Says UFC Is Not for Sale
Promoted from the FanPosts by Kid Nate.
Bad news for all the MMA fans who were planning to spend millions to buy the UFC -- Dana White said that his statements about selling a small portion of the company were just taken out of context. He spoke to Kevin Iole about it:
"This is [expletive] bad; it’s not what I said. Here’s the bottom line: Basically, it was a longer story and he kept asking if we would sell this thing or not. I kept saying ‘No. No, we won’t sell it,’ and I’d go through this whole [expletive] thing about how we’re all 40 years old and we’re young and we’re the visionaries for this thing. We know where we’re taking this thing. We know where it’s going... We have no interest in selling it. And going public? We don’t need the [expletive] money. You go public when you want to raise cash. You raise capital to do something bigger. We don’t want to do that. We’re not looking to do that."
"He kept [expletive] pushing and pushing. He said, ‘OK, hypothetically speaking, would you ever sell a piece of it?’ I said, ‘I guess we’d sell a tiny little piece. We’d probably sell a tiny little piece.’ But, here’s the thing: I want it to be known that this guy kept pushing me and pushing me. I said ‘No, we wouldn’t go public. No, we wouldn’t sell it.’ At the end of the day, we’re the guys who are driving this thing. We have the vision. We know where we want to take this thing."
"We’re not interested in selling a piece of this to anybody. Me, Frank and Lorenzo are the three owners. We have an awesome relationship. Everything runs smoothly. It’s perfect. And for us to even offer somebody a piece, it would be the biggest compliment in [expletive] history because they’d have to be a serious strategic partner. It’s the only [expletive] way we’d do it."
"Why would we do that? We have this incredibly successful business. We know exactly where we want to go with it. And the only way we would do this, if we did sell a piece of it, it would be with some serious, serious player, a big-time strategic partner. That’s it. So the thing was really taken out of context because the guy was pushing me and pushing me and pushing me about, ‘What do you mean? You’d never sell it? You’d never go public? How about a piece? Would you sell a little piece?’ The guy kept pushing me, you know what I mean, and that was my [expletive] answer."
The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.
0 recs |
30 comments
|
Comments
Ah, now I get it.
Dana White is planning to sell a piece of the UFC to a serious strategic partner.
by rzor on Oct 20, 2009 10:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Uhh...
I don’t get it. Why did people think he was SELLING it? From the quotes, he said they would sell 10% in the company, as in… they’d take a partner.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Oct 20, 2009 10:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
well even if some got that it meant getting a partner, dana says he’s not interested in that either.
as of now.. but hypothetically, or after you ask him 50 times then…..
by Anton Tabuena on Oct 20, 2009 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It says above that he would consider it, and that’s not a bad idea at all really.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Oct 20, 2009 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he meant that 'hypothetically' again.. IF they're gonna sell a piece, it had to be for a strategic partner.. but they're not planning on it..
“We’re not interested in selling a piece of this to anybody. Me, Frank and Lorenzo are the three owners. We have an awesome relationship. Everything runs smoothly. It’s perfect. And for us to even offer somebody a piece, it would be the biggest compliment in [expletive] history because they’d have to be a serious strategic partner. It’s the only [expletive] way we’d do it.”
“Why would we do that? We have this incredibly successful business.
by Anton Tabuena on Oct 20, 2009 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dana would never be able to coexist with a mcmahon
by kanodogg on Oct 20, 2009 10:56 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Dana loves Vince McMahon though.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Oct 20, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure about that? Seems like Dana takes subtle shots at him from time to time.
by kanodogg on Oct 20, 2009 11:37 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Hero worship/time to kill the master.
Keep firing Assholes!
Never trust a man with no shirt on.
by Ubernoober on Oct 20, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shane McMahon???
It all makes perfect sense now!
by Chromium on Oct 21, 2009 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am certain this strategic partner is M-1
"I want to tell me what you see, let's go ahead and see by the fight what you saw, in the ring"
by crinow on Oct 20, 2009 10:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
As long as they take half the losses too. Phew.
by kid_eh on Oct 20, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
dana has every right to be pissed. news organizations will cut and slice whatever bits they want in order to make good tv.
of course, you could say the same thing about the ultimate fighter…
www.tapology.com | twitter.com/tapology
by GregS123 on Oct 20, 2009 11:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
see everyone does it, not just fox news
by YoungGun on Oct 20, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, some different organizations have different standards. Some would take a quote like “There’s no way in the world I am considering selling a 10% share” and quote it as “… I am considering selling a 10% share.”
But I completely understand why bloomberg would do this. Their entire broadcast is based around giving people investment advice… if they do a piece about a company that has no interest in investors, what is the point? Dana should have known better, but coverage is coverage. Now he gets the double exposure of announcing a stake for sale, and then a whole new story that it’s not true. Well played.
by Stanlee on Oct 20, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No fucking deal?
No fucking deal.
Keep firing Assholes!
Never trust a man with no shirt on.
by Ubernoober on Oct 20, 2009 11:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What about your soul Dana?
What would you sell your soul for? Or have you already sold it? Hypothetically, if you were to sell it or if you have sold it, who would or have you sold it to?
"Stop smiling you are about to be punched in the face !"
by Warhand on Oct 20, 2009 11:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
M-1 called and offered Fedor’s little brother for 92.53 . After being cursed out, Finkie said: "ok, then how about 92.52"?
by mmalogic on Oct 20, 2009 11:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Only 5 [expletive]? Dana is really working on toning down his language!
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Oct 20, 2009 12:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
so was he being sarcastic or hypothetical on bloomberg. he did say he would sell a small portion to the someone who would keep their mouth shut. i guess he was being sarcastic.
by bdw on Oct 20, 2009 12:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The way the UFC is doing in this economy it would be akin to selling Broadway and Park place with 4 hotels in exchange for the railroads in Monopoly.
by oasis77 on Oct 20, 2009 12:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How is anyone confused by what he’s saying here? It’s pretty clear.
by Michael Rome on Oct 20, 2009 1:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
lol thank you.
This shirt is "dry clean only", which means it's dirty.
by SamCupitt on Oct 20, 2009 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That guy just F’d his chance to ever get another interview with DW.
by Fight Genius on Oct 20, 2009 1:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mogwai not for sale

Walla walla walla I'm an idiot.
by ufc4 on Oct 20, 2009 2:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















