Bloody Elbow: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Strikeforce and DREAM Lack Champions, Fuels Criticism of Title Unifications

Dream-strike_medium Michael David Smith at MMA Fanhouse reported some interesting quotes that have a few fans asking questions during a conference call on Wednesday. During the call, Strikeforce CEO Scott Coker talked about DREAM and Strikeforce unifying their belts in order to create some "dream" match-ups for the fans along with creating some clear cut divisions with champions. MDS stated that Strikeforce and DREAM should probably make sure they have champions to fight in unification bouts before actually announcing such a plan, but I think the plan will answer some questions that the MMA community has had for quite some time.

While the significant complaint among fans is only the lightweight division has champions in their respective promotions, the division will still draw the eyes of hardcore fans due to the fact that there hasn't been a lot of crossover action among either region's top tier fighters. As everyone knows, the lightweight division rankings on nearly every website and blog on the Internet have a hard time trying to rank anyone in an objective manner because most of the Japanese talent has fought strictly in Japan, and the UFC has a stranglehold on most of the lightweight talent here in the United States.

Shinya Aoki may finally make the trek overseas to the Strikeforce cage against fighters such as Gilbert Melendez or Josh Thomson, but there are a plethora of bouts that I want to see happen besides a title unification bout. DREAM also holds Gesias "JZ" Calvancante, Katsunori Kikuno, Joachim Hansen, and Tatsuya Kawajiri within their ranks, and Strikeforce's top talent could potentially prove North American fighters are superior in this particular division. It also sets up various title fights after the unification that would mix Japanese vs. American fighters, but it could also display some of the epic lightweight fights we've seen in Japan on American television.

Obviously, Strikeforce has yet to delve into the featherweight division, but there may be a chance that DREAM could loan out specific battles to Strikeforce for the excitement factor. DREAM doesn't have a middleweight champion currently, but that doesn't mean there isn't a solid match-up that could act as an unification bout. After all, the only reason DREAM doesn't have a champion in the weight class was due to the no contest between Jason Miller and Ronaldo Souza at DREAM 9. With "Mayhem" Miller taking on Jake Shields for the title in Strikeforce, Ronaldo Souza could be waiting in the wings for a championship bout, and DREAM will likely continue to bring up talent overseas within the weight class along with Strikeforce.

HT: WatchKalibRun

Star-divide

The welterweights are similar story with Strikeforce being the culprit in having no champion. Nick Diaz and Jay Hieron are in the mix along with prospect Tyron Woodley after a few more performances, so they don't have a completely useless ensemble of talent. Mariusz Zaromskis could easily fight in an unification bout once Diaz/Hieron fight each other, or Strikeforce signs some talent and creates a championship bout.

The light heavyweight division in DREAM is nearly non-existent. There isn't any real match-ups that progress toward a title, but Strikeforce's light heavyweight division continues to grow. While we'd love to see some unification bouts in the heavier weight classes, it just isn't going to come to fruition in either the light heavyweight or heavyweight division. As I mentioned yesterday, Lawal, Sobral, and Mousasi are the only top dogs within the organization, and Lawal will need some time to grow in the promotion. I don't forsee it being a huge issue among hardcore fans that there isn't a title to unify.

Strikeforce already has a heavyweight division in place with Alistair Overeem, Fedor Emelianenko, Brett Rogers, Fabricio Werdum, and possibly Sergei Kharitonov as a crossover fighter from DREAM. While there isn't a DREAM heavyweight champion to unify a belt, Strikeforce doesn't necessarily need it in order to create some solid match-ups. Most fans are going to complain that Fedor isn't fighting the best competition, but an Overeem victory at the K-1 World Grand Prix can go a long way toward selling that fight as an even more legitimate threat to the "Last Emperor" than previously thought.

Add in hot prospect Shane Del Rosario, who will make his Strikeforce debut against undefeated Brandon Cash on November 6th, and potentially Roger Gracie, and you have the makings of a fairly legitimate division of heavyweights that can, at the very least, give these fighters some work along with progressing their skills. Most of these guys will eventually move on to the UFC unless Strikeforce sees some major ratings from their CBS shows, but for now -- it isn't a bad division to be involved in even though the names aren't those of UFC fighters. After all, the heavyweight division worldwide remains fairly sparse. I suppose you could call Overeem a product of DREAM as well, so the best fight possible is Overeem vs. Fedor.

Strikeforce obviously has some work to do, but I don't think it's warranted to say that this is a horrible idea on Strikeforce's part. While they don't have every division on lockdown with a clear cut champion, time is on their side. With the Challengers series filling in the gaps and bringing up talent and their regular shows creating some divisional match-ups, divisions lacking champions will probably gain champions within the next year.

Is it a bad idea? I certainly don't think it is. Obviously, an alliance between the two organizations is a great idea for both promotions, and unifying the belts is only another logical step if both promotions intend on helping each other out in the long haul. Right now, all the pieces aren't in place, but they'll create some interesting match-ups when they do.

Poll
Do the unification bouts make you any more interested?
Yes, I'm more interested than I was before.
480 votes
Nope, I'm still interested in the bouts regardless.
394 votes
Not interested in Strikeforce at all.
183 votes

1057 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 53 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

unifying what exactly?

Strikeforce’s HW champ has yet to defend a title he won over a year ago… same for their middle weight champ and same for their light weight champ. And they dont even have a welterweight champ yet.

They just crowned a Light Heavy weight champ but guess what? his next fight is a non title affair.

How about having your champs defend their belts in your org first before thinking about “unifying” with some other phantom title.

Titles in these second tier orgs are useless… They have plenty of interesting fights to make but crowning titles is inconsequential except for the matches being 5 rounds.

by mmalogic on Oct 15, 2009 10:27 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I have a pretty different stance on title fights in Strikeforce than most people. My view is that the titles within the promotion really have no bearing at all if we look at the divisions in totality throughout the world. Obviously, the UFC champions are the true champions.

I couldn’t care less if they actually unify belts. They are simply unifying the DREAM and Strikeforce belts, but it won’t make those belts any more meaningful than what they already are, secondary championship titles to the UFC.

As for the divisions, the heavyweight belt doesn’t need to be “unified” with some sort of DREAM counterpart. They have a respectable enough division to give tests to most of their fighters, and they’ll likely move on to the UFC after that with the exception of maybe Fedor. The Welterweight division in Strikeforce will likely have a belt if Diaz cuts the weed and takes on Hieron.

Mousasi’s fight with Sokoudjou is a bit strange indeed. You’re correct in that aspect.

But I agree. Titles in the second tier organizations are useless. I feel that the quality of the fights is ultimately what I’m looking for. I couldn’t care less about the actual labels.

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

by Leland Roling on Oct 15, 2009 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah its more of a “merger” than a unification really.

by mmalogic on Oct 15, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

5 year ago in the UFC the HW title was vacant because the champ tested positive for steroids, and the mw, ww, and lw were all vacant because all of the champs left to fight in other organizations. And never mind that the year before that the LHW Champ refused to fight the #1 contender. Strikeforce has just entered the national scene and can claim they are going through the same growing pains. If a year from now they are still having troubles then we can start complaining.

by nottheface on Oct 15, 2009 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Make a bunch of paper champs and mash’ em together, sounds like fun.

for all intents and purposes, just consider all my posts as works of satire.

by Bandaka on Oct 15, 2009 10:31 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I am still a little blown

That Mousasi’s next fight after winning the LHW title is a non-title match… I just don’t that logic… Sure Anderson Silva didn’t defend his title a couple times but that’s because he was fighting in a division where he was already the champion.

How often does that happen? A champion fighting in his division but not for the title? It has to happen sometimes… right?

I'm the kind of girl who loves to watch a GOOD fight!
--------
Join the DC Area UFC Meetup Group
http://www.meetup.com/DCUFCGroup

by funnytiger on Oct 15, 2009 10:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

*get

I just don’t get that logic…

I'm the kind of girl who loves to watch a GOOD fight!
--------
Join the DC Area UFC Meetup Group
http://www.meetup.com/DCUFCGroup

by funnytiger on Oct 15, 2009 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree. Non-title fights for champions is one of the short-comings Pride had in the past. Obviously, if the match were inside a tourney or at another weight then it would make sense but this is not the case. Really, Strikeforce should concentrate on LEGITIMIZING their own champions before being concerned w/unifying belts w/Dream.

The thing seems like Coker trying to drum up publicity. While it sounds intriguing from a cross-pollination stand-point, I agree w/whoever said it would not be logistically preferable for Japanese/Dream fighters to go back to Japan holding Strikeforce belts, possibly never to return or end in another Overeem-type situation.

"It would appear that the strain was more than he could bear".- Doc Holliday

by MyFistYourFace on Oct 15, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Other than the challenger missing weight, I can’t think of anything off the top of my head. it’s pretty ridiculous.

Though I’d rather see Gegard fight rather than pull an Overeem and not even fight for SF.

"That feeling after you win and they raise your hand... it's like you have this energy that releases from your body, and it's like you mingle with the cosmos, and you feel omnipotent"

by woomikee on Oct 15, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

my assumption is they're afraid to have two potentially 5 round fights

on the CBS card. They’ve got the Middleweight title fight already, another one could easily put them over time.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Kid Nate on Oct 15, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m still puzzled about moussassi’s non title fight.

You don't look like a Tanaka.

by spectaa on Oct 15, 2009 10:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I honestly don’t get the point of unifying the belts. Besides the fact that neither org has all of the required champions to do any unifying, the rule differences are problematic.

If they are going to merge they should just merge, but if they aren’t going to merge, they should keep the belts separate. When they get all their own belts sorted out, if they want to have the champions fight, let them fight, but don’t unify the belts.
Belts bring an extra importance to a fight , fighting for a belt is one thing that dream and Strikeforce can use to try to lure some mid-level fighters and prospects away from the UFC. Cutting the number of belts in half doesn’t seem smart in terms of fighter recruitment, or promoting the fights. You can argue the relative worth of the various titles, but putting a belt on the line brings something extra to the promotion, and lord knows Dream and Strikeforce need all the help they can get in that area.

by Phildo on Oct 15, 2009 10:45 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Cutting the number of belts in half doesn’t seem smart in terms of fighter recruitment, or promoting the fights.

It sounds like a good way for Strikeforce to get F’d in the A. If the Strikeforce LW champ loses to Aoki, and Dream decides it’s in their best interest for Aoki to only fight in Japan, where does that leave Strikeforce? They either try to move their promotion forward minus a champion or they promote lightweight title fights and deal with hardcore fans (the very ones they were trying to please) bitching about how Aoki is the real champion.

by Jahbulon on Oct 15, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It depends. If DREAM 12 is successful, they may try to pad those events yearly with those unification bouts so that the rules are similar.

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

by Leland Roling on Oct 15, 2009 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t mind champion v champion, I think it’s dumb to cut the number of belts in half for the 2 orgs. Unless they are going to completely merge (and cut the number of shows in half) each org should have their own belts. The champs can fight each other once a year with one of the belts on the line, but if each org tries to have a full year’s worth of cards but they only have 1 set of belts it’s going to lead to more issues down the road.

I think the whole “alliance” is silly. If they’re going to merge, merge. But if they’re going to act as 2 separate orgs cooperating, they might as well embrace the differences in the 2 orgs and take advantage of the things that come from having an alliance. 1 set of belts for 2 orgs just seems like a bad idea.

by Phildo on Oct 15, 2009 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. I think they should look into setting up a champion vs. champion bout ever other year (as soon as they have champions) for each weight class. Give them a trophy or plaque or something to signify the victory but keep the belts separate if only for promotional reasons.

by nottheface on Oct 15, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good idea

by who me on Oct 15, 2009 2:34 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

That would be cool, but I don’t have a problem with one belt being on the line, SF belt in the US, Dream belt in Japan. It’s not a non title match, you just put one belt on the line based on what set of rules you’re following. If you have two belts, you can alternate defending them, and you get to walk around with two belts, which is badass.

If the “visiting” champ wins, it will just give more reasons to hurry up and do the rematch using the other set of rules.

You’re idea works well too, because I don’t think the rule differences are so severe that the belts would stay separated all of the time, but I really just don’t get the point of 2 orgs and 1 set of belts. It seems like it will make a few good matches during the “unification” process, but then it leaves each org without all of the tools they could use to properly exist.

by Phildo on Oct 15, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The logistics, finances and politics of having meaningful unified titles are prohibitive. Like a fighter’s union, it’s fun for the hardcore fans to speculate about, but it’s never going to happen and nobody who talks about how good it would be will ever put forth a plausible explanation of how it would actually work.

by Jahbulon on Oct 15, 2009 10:45 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I’m with this.

Just BE.

by mattman73 on Oct 15, 2009 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the theory behind what they are trying to do but the practicality of it all is sort of lacking. It would be closer to just naming one sides champion as champion for both as opposed to an actual unification fight. I guess it fills a need for both sides but there just wont be many must see match ups coming out of this.

by who me on Oct 15, 2009 10:56 AM EDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

I believe

It’s a non-title fight because they couldn’t fit another possible 5 rounder on the card time-wise.

Having a unified belt between 2 relatively sparse organisations is a great way of making UFC look like it’s not the only show in town.

by Andy Peyton on Oct 15, 2009 11:53 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

then they should find a way to make it fit, or they should put it on a different card.

by Phildo on Oct 15, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nearly 100 people are not fans of Strikeforce at all?

Wow I see there are a lot of die hard MMA fans voting.

by scrambledeggs on Oct 15, 2009 11:55 AM EDT reply actions   2 recs

Are you saying that if a basketball fan doesn’t watch college ball and prefers the NBA then he’s not a real fan?

by AfroSamurai on Oct 15, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who doesn’t like March Madness? I love March madness more than the NBA regular season.

by MMASuPreMaCy on Oct 15, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t care for the NBA but I follow college basketball. Oddly enough it is just the opposite for football, I love the NFL but don’t like NCAA football. Does that mean that I’m not a true fan of either sport?

by who me on Oct 15, 2009 2:33 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

No, you’re not a true fan because you didn’t watch the the Locomotives play last night.

by Phildo on Oct 15, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really?

I love college football. Who doesn’t enjoy wathing USC, LSU, Florida, Oklahoma, Texas, etc play.

I actually think the college sports are more entertaining because its not about the money and all that. Who can resist March Madness and filling out the brackets. Wonderful stuff. College football should have playoffs though, that’s all I am waiting for.

by MMASuPreMaCy on Oct 15, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s the 2nd time you’ve said “who doesn’t…”. Lots of people don’t, Sup. I understand the point of what you’re trying to say, but you sound sort of ignorant when you imply that the way you think is the way that everyone thinks.

http://www.fourouncestofreedom.com

by Beer Monster on Oct 15, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not doing that at all. Just a big fan of college sports. College Basketball’s March Madness is pretty much the equivalent of an MMA GP of 64 every year.
=)

by MMASuPreMaCy on Oct 15, 2009 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

People that didn’t go to big football colleges?

I’ve been a big sports fan for my entire life, but I didn’t care about college football till I went to a game. i didn’t know college hockey existed, I still don’t give a shit about college baseball, does that make me less of a fan of those sports?

by Phildo on Oct 15, 2009 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I live in Kentucky where college basketball is king and college football season tends to not be very exciting.

by who me on Oct 15, 2009 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea, that’s why I think it’s a good comparison at all, or even relevant. You can be a fan of a sport and not love every single aspect of it.

I grew up in NYC, St. John’s Basketball is the closest thing to college sports there is. Sports fans have enough big league teams to keep track of. Not every fan of every sport has to follow every little bit.

by Phildo on Oct 15, 2009 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Since when is college sports not all about the money?

I think college football and basketball are huge money sports.

Just BE.

by mattman73 on Oct 15, 2009 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep even in college it’s all about the money for the schools and the coaches and for a lot of players they are thinking about trying to make it to the pro level to get into that money. If it wasn’t about money for them then so many of them wouldn’t leave school early for the drafts.

by who me on Oct 15, 2009 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Even those who are not thinking about making the pros are thinking about money. People never believe me when I tell them that one of players favorite activities is to complain about not getting paid. Sure the players love the sport, but they also know the school and the coaches are making a fortune off of their playing abilities. It’s not the “pure” sport people think it is.

And I used to be a hardcore football fan. Now I am an on and off again NFL fan with no interest in any college sports.

by nottheface on Oct 15, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

that’s not what I’m saying.

A better comparison would be if someone stated I love Football, but only if a team from the AFC East is playing. Does that make any sense? I don’t think so.

by scrambledeggs on Oct 15, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bill Simmons gets paid more than almost anyone else on the planet to write about sports and he has said numerous times that he doesn’t care at all about the national league because it’s “quadruple a.”

If you are a diehard fan of a specific team, I could see why you wouldn’t care about anyone else.

by Phildo on Oct 15, 2009 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just curious

…but do you say that to the people that don’t like Dream? Or UFC? Or WarGods? Honest question, because I don’t see how not liking a certain company calls into question one’s fandom unless it’s the “if it’s not company A, it doesn’t matter.” You can not be a fan of Strikeforce and still like the fighters.

by black dragon on Oct 15, 2009 11:59 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes absolutely. I don’t get the whole allegiance to one fight promotion and bashing all others.
Makes no sense to me at all.

by scrambledeggs on Oct 15, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know it could just mean that some people just don’t keep up with strikeforce, voting that way isn’t bashing the company. The idea that you have to be a fan of every organization equally in order to be considered a true fan is a moronic notion. You don’t have to follow and support every single organization to be a fan of the sport.

What really gets me is that a lot of the people who go on about “true hardcore fans” turn around a bash the UFC which seems to put them in the same boat.

by who me on Oct 15, 2009 1:31 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

My comment you replied to wasn’t a cheap shot at the UFC so I don’t know why you’re trying to make it out to be. Relax.

by scrambledeggs on Oct 15, 2009 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why this won't happen:

Drug-testing.

http://www.vancouversun.com/mma

by Ozzz on Oct 15, 2009 12:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Honestly, this would be a good test to see if anyoen actually cares about drug testing.

That could be one of the benefits of the alliance. If a SF champ is fighting on a Dream card I would think that SF would want to make sure there is drug testing.

by Phildo on Oct 15, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would be intrested in these bouts, but I don’t give a damn about the Dream or Strikeforce titles.

A reason that Mousasi/Sokoudjou is a non-title fight would be time considerations so they can fit it into the CBS broadcast.

Keep firing Assholes!

Never trust a man with no shirt on.

by Ubernoober on Oct 15, 2009 12:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

aoiko

i would like to see some of the jap lightweights come and test themselves,i hope gomi comes to the ufc, i rekon he will do better than most think he will

by sexyama on Oct 15, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think people are blowing up these comments more than needed (though it keeps people talking). Coker said that he would love to see that in the future. Sure, everyone would, if both promotions established their champs by then. It is silly to criticize them at this point of their promotional stage. Second, for those that say it doesn’t matter anyways because only the UFC belts matter. Guess what, a few years ago, only the PRIDE belts mattered. Things can change over time. Not only that, but because Fedor is in Strikeforce, does that make the UFC HW belt worthless?

They didn’t say they were going to unify the titles by the end of the year, just that it was something they wanted to do in the future. Strikeforce should have a champ for every division, except FW by the end of the year as well. DREAM has longer to go, but they will be hosting GP’s or having championship fights to close those gaps.

Strikeforce Champs:

HW: Alistair Overeem
LHW: Gegard Mousasi
MW: VACANT (Shields vs Mayhem) Nov. 7th
WW: VACANT (Hieron vs Diaz) December Possible
LW: Thomson [vs Melendez (Interim)]
FW: VACANT

DREAM Champs:

HW: VACANT
LHW: VACANT
MW: VACANT (Mousasi dropped belt)
WW: Marius "Whitemare" Zaromskis
LW: Shinya Aoki
FW: Bibiano Fernandes

I think we can all see what the intent here is, even of some of the divisions don’t have a belt at the moment.

Personally, I don’t care whether they create new belts, or unify the belts, or no belts, etc. I would love to see the champs of multiple promotions square off in a NYE type of show. I would be all for that.

by MMASuPreMaCy on Oct 15, 2009 1:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The argument about Mousasi not defending his belt against Soko seems a little lame to me. Sure, the UFC doesn’t have non-title matches for their champs unless it’s in another division. But Pride used to have non-title matches all the time, and it wasn’t a big deal. How many times did Wanderlei Silva fight when his MW belt wasn’t on the line? Or Gomi and his LW belt? I think this is being blown out of proportion a bit.

http://www.fourouncestofreedom.com

by Beer Monster on Oct 15, 2009 1:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It was stupid for pride to do it also. I really just don’t see the point of having a non-title match. You’re the champion, you’re fighting in the right weight class with the right rules, defend the belt.

by Phildo on Oct 15, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trying to get the fighters to fight who, when, and where will be too big a problem.

You need to look no further than these comments by Shinya Aoki to figure out why unifying the DREAM and Strikeforce titles won’t work.

I think Kawajiri is a good fighter, so I can see myself fighting him; however, I do not know for sure yet. If I feel like fighting him, I will. But that’s something I decide — unfortunately, Kawajiri won’t have any say in the matter."

From here: http://mmamania.com/2009/10/15/shinya-aoki-tatsuya-kawajiris-title-challenge-was-yawn-predictable/

Shinya Aoki appears to already be balking about fighting Kawajiri and seems to believe the decision to do so is all his. Getting the fighters from both organizations to fight who, when, and where they need them to for this to work will never work out.

Just BE.

by mattman73 on Oct 15, 2009 6:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

LOL, you are thinking way too short term. None of this will probably happen till next year.

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

by Leland Roling on Oct 16, 2009 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it." -- H.L. Mencken
Start posting on Bloody Elbow »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Nav-logo-hover_small
UFC 106: Pro's Pick Forrest Griffin and Tito Ortiz fights
Awesomeness_small
Antonio Rogerio Nogueira: "Rodrigo Will Return to Training in a Few Weeks"
Venum2_small
Painkiller Addiction to Blame for Karo Pulling Out
Awesomeness_small
UFC 106 Preview: A Statistical Breakdown of Tito Ortiz vs Forrest Griffin 2
Img_8375_small
Heavyweight Tournament Kills Two Birds with One Stone

Recent FanPosts

Small
Article about Ontario MMA Sanctioning
Mirkneebaraim640_small
Georges St Pierre vs. Dan Hardy to Headline UFC 109 in February?
Images_small
Was "Karo Parisyan vs. Nick Diaz" a cursed fight?
Tailings_small
UFC 106 Pay Per View Prediction: Tito Brings Attention
Small
Behind the Fighters
Grizzly_bear-larry_small
Shooto Brazil 14 Fight Card
Img_0641_small
Dan Hardy A Bad Challenger at a Good Time

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings