Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bracketology 2012: Duke Finally Steps Up To The No. 1 Line

2008 Bloody Elbow Reader Awards: Card of the Year

Ufc92-poster_medium

CARD OF THE YEAR: UFC 92

Zuffa historically pulls out all the stops for their year-end show, and UFC 92 proved no exception. The event featured three huge fights capable of carrying a card on their own - Quinton Jackson and Wanderlei Silva in a rubber match to add to their legendary feud, the conclusion of TUF season 9 pitting Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira and Frank Mir, and a light heavyweight title bout featuring former TUF winners Forrest Griffin and Rashad Evans.

High profile fights bring with them the risk of a letdown whether it be poor performances from the fighters, controversial referee decisions, or puzzling scorecards from the judges. So it's quite a feat that all three fights met the high expectations set before them.

Quinton Jackson led off the night with a bang when he knocked out Wanderlei Silva a mere three minutes into round one. The finish erased two brutal losses Jackson suffered to Silva in Pride. In addition, Jackson can now boast of putting down two legends of the sport with his right - when he beat Chuck Liddell at UFC 71 - and left hands.

The story of redemption continued when Frank Mir met interim heavyweight champion "Minotauro" Nogueira. Nogueira came in as a heavy seven-to-two favorite, and even Mir himself struggled to articulate his avenues to victory. Those doubts vanished as soon as the fight started. Mir battered the sluggish Nogueira with vastly improved striking and dropped the Brazilian twice in the first period. Mir, who had refused to engage Nogueira on the ground during the first five minutes, didn't hesitate to finish when he dropped him for a third time in the second stanza. Mir overwhelmed a shaken Nogueira and stopped him for the first time in his illustrious career.

In the final bout of the evening, the original Ultimate Fighter winner, Forrest Griffin, met the winner of season two, Rashad Evans, in a contest for the light heavyweight championship. Griffin controlled the first two rounds using his length and volume to his advantage. Evans, who later blamed his slow start to the lack of nipple tweaking, warmed up in the third. He knocked down the champion and followed up with strikes from guard. Griffin looked slow and ineffective off his back despite a reputation of having some of the best defensive jiu-jitsu in the division. The end came after Evans landed a bomb of a right hand and followed up with strikes. The final moments were reminiscent of Griffin's loss to Evans' teammate Keith Jardine just 24 months prior.

Despite worries about the effects of the economy, the holiday season, and being sandwiched between UFC 91 and 93, UFC 92 did tremendous business. Exact numbers are not available, but buyrate numbers appear close to the business UFC 91 did, if not better. The year produced many contenders for Card of the Year, but with the combination of financial success, star power, and exciting fights, the UFC's year-end bonanza wins in a landslide.

2nd PLACE: UFC 84
3rd PLACE: WEC 34

Comment 27 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Question:

When discussing “Card of the Year”, are we only examining the lineup of fights, or how they actually played out? I assumed the former, but the writeup discusses the fights themselves. I remember the discussions over UFC 73, how the planned fights were great but it didn’t live up to the promise, which would imply the action itself is irrelevant when discussing the card.

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Jan 26, 2009 11:15 PM EST reply actions  

I think it was basically, “What was your favourite card of the year?”

by Sam Cupitt on Jan 26, 2009 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Basically I’m asking for a definition of “card”. Is it just the schedule of fights, or is the action included? (I use the former meaning)

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Jan 26, 2009 11:23 PM EST up reply actions  

It would be ludicrous to award “card of the year” based only on scheduled fights. It would be like giving movie of the year to a movie based only on the quality of the script.

by Jahbulon on Jan 26, 2009 11:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Quality of the script has its own award – “Best Writing”. That is what “Card OTY” is – the lineup is the script. If you include the actual fights in the award, then you have “Event of the Year.” For example, Arlovski/Sylvia III was a great booking – they each won decisively over the other once, and a tiebreaker fight seemed like a guaranteed success. There was no way to know ahead of time how craptacular it would turn out, but the horrible fight does not negate the strength of the booking.

UFC 94 is a monster of a card, but what if every fight is boring, or injury-ridden, or reffed poorly? Would 94 still be considered a strong card, or is it retroactively demoted?

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Jan 27, 2009 12:20 AM EST up reply actions  

If UFC 94 sucks, I’m blaming you.

"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito on Belfort at Affliction:DOR

by Rundownloser on Jan 27, 2009 12:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Card of the Year = Movie of the Year, not Best Script

by Jahbulon on Jan 27, 2009 12:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Why? What’s your reasoning, and what are the flaws in mine? You’re using your conclusion as an a priori argument. If “card” refers to the entire event, what would you call just the planned list of fights?

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Jan 27, 2009 1:04 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think there are any flaws in your reasoning, other than the conclusion sucks balls.

by Michaelthebox on Jan 27, 2009 1:07 AM EST up reply actions  

+1 on using a priori in a common parlance. Kant doesn’t get enough love.

"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito on Belfort at Affliction:DOR

by Rundownloser on Jan 27, 2009 1:11 AM EST up reply actions  

What’s your background, mate? You name-checked Spinoza & Leibniz in the WEC Live thread, now Kant – you seem to know your way around the proverbial Dead White Males.

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Jan 27, 2009 1:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Whatever. Sartre figured everything out.

by Derek Suboticki on Jan 27, 2009 1:29 AM EST up reply actions  

I majored in Philosophy, Religion, and Classics in undergrad, so all I really know is dead white folk.

What about your background? You’ve been dropping some arcane esoterica recently too. Hell, you referenced Wittgenstein in your post in that WEC 38 wrap-up post. Which by the way was awesome.

"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito on Belfort at Affliction:DOR

by Rundownloser on Jan 27, 2009 1:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Film and literature are my best fields, but I’m currently moving into hardcore philosophy (I’m studying History of Modern Philosophy right now as an undergrad, Descartes through Kant. The program is small, so we study what we can). I love the way Wittgenstein writes except it’s so damn difficult to understand at times. First time I read TLP, it gave me migraines, but that last line is incredible.

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Jan 27, 2009 2:21 AM EST up reply actions  

you two need to get a room.

"Stop smiling you are about to be punched in the face !"

by Warhand on Jan 27, 2009 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Words can mean whatever we want them to mean, especially when you start putting them together. If you want Card of the Year to equal best line up with out consideration for what actually took place, that is fine with me. But, I’m more interested in communication, so I’m going to respect the consensus of the on-line MMA community by taking Card of the Year to mean what the author of this article intended it to mean. I have no interest in discussing “Best Card” divorced from what actually occurred.

by Jahbulon on Jan 27, 2009 1:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Ah. Prescriptivism vs Descriptivism. Gotcha.

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Jan 27, 2009 2:07 AM EST up reply actions  

When I did my masters of science degree, I also did a minor in philosophy of science, so I’ve got love for anyone who knows logic and can name drop Wittgenstein in an MMA thread. I’m just perplexed that you would chose here and now to start an argument about semantics. Do you post in threads about “Fighter of the Year” arguing that it should be called “Mixed Martial Artist of the Year”, since the term “fighter” encompasses all combat sports as well as warfare?

by Jahbulon on Jan 27, 2009 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t mean to start anything major, I was curious and got a bit carried away. I’ve just always thought “Card” referred to the schedule and didn’t get why they were discussing the fights themselves. I got a bit combative, I guess. Oops.

And “Mixed Martial Artist of the Year” is “Fighter of the Year”! (Take that boxing! Hey-O!)

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Jan 27, 2009 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m sure honorable mention can be attributed to Fields Dynamite! despite being a hybrid MMA/K-1 card. The lineup was comparable to UFC 92 and so were the fights. I can’t help but think there is some snub action there. I’d put it above WEC 34 at least. However, I do agree with 92 being #1. 91 had better action, and arguably better drama. But top to bottom the excitement that came with 92 was nearly insurmountable by anything else in ’08.

by bonez2799 on Jan 26, 2009 11:17 PM EST reply actions  

This card was #1 on the ‘oh shit, did that just happen?’ list, too.

by Derek Suboticki on Jan 27, 2009 1:30 AM EST reply actions  

I personally thought UFC 81 was the best event

Not because of Brock, but overall the card was very exciting aside from the first bout with Nakamura which sucked.

Tim the Barabarian debuts front kicking the shirt out of David Heath, awesum stuff.

by Pandanus on Jan 27, 2009 5:30 AM EST reply actions  

How can it be the best event if it had a fight that sucked on it?

"Stop smiling you are about to be punched in the face !"

by Warhand on Jan 27, 2009 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL @ 92

Being the best card of the year. It was good but it wasn’t even the best card from ZUFFA this year. Nor was it better than the WEC’s best card.

And it damn sure wasn’t in the same ballpark as DREAM 5 or DREAM 3

Gimme 1 Round!

by skwirrl on Jan 27, 2009 3:22 PM EST reply actions  

You must be experiencing life from an alternate reality.

"Stop smiling you are about to be punched in the face !"

by Warhand on Jan 27, 2009 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

The world viewed through the “Zuffa is the devil and I hates them” glasses.

by iiowyn on Jan 27, 2009 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

What did you have as the best Zuffa card last year?

by Derek Suboticki on Jan 27, 2009 5:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Predicting A Collegiate Wrestler’s Development
Shogun_logo_small
UFC’s Hopes For A Stadium Show In Sao Paulo Appear To Be Dead
Small
The Downfall of Diego Sanchez
Small
The time is right for a superfight, and it doesn't involve Anderson
391807_10150399618817701_750257700_8470850_1424416169_n_small
1 in about 7 billion!  :D

Recent FanPosts

Skittles_small
Off topic- watch me sing!
26759_511613730864_104300343_30384429_7437048_n_small
UFC Undisputed 3: BE Fight Camp?
Small
Yuki Kondo
Img_0019_small
Training Progress
Small
Muay Thai camps in Thailand
Blav_small
OT: Help out my short film
Badr_hari3_small
War Machine explains what happenned and asks for support

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings