Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

Politicians Eye Tax Increases on MMA in New York

In an odd lesson of "be careful what you wish for," it looks like politicians in New York are taking the UFC's talking points about revenue very seriously.  The AP report on the UFC's legalization effort also has an interesting note on tax plans of certain politicians:

Englebright said he was looking at revenue implications for New York during these dire economic times. He said he made changes to last year's bill, including increasing the state's share of gate revenue from 3 percent to 10 percent. The bill will have a three-year sunset clause, giving the state a chance to study the sport.

For the UFC, it's not a huge amount of money.  If they do a 4.5 million dollar gate, it's the difference between $450,000 and $135,000 in taxes.  It's a significant amount of money, but not enough to dissuade them from coming to New York.  As usual, however, the UFC will likely only bear a small portion of the tax increase, and will likely pass it along through lower discretionary bonuses.  

The pain here will be for smaller MMA companies trying to run in New York, already facing losses, and barely able to survive.  The likely outcome in my view is that few companies will be able to pay a 10% gate fee in addition to their state and federal obligations.  

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Which state?

Which state was it that Dana avoided because the costs were too high? It came up on this site awhile back?

by rainmaker6 on Jan 21, 2009 3:14 AM EST reply actions  

Hawaii

And this isn’t as bad, but still not great.

by Derek Suboticki on Jan 21, 2009 3:27 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m not sure what Hawaii wants for taxes, but there are a ton of added benefits that come from fighting in NY. It’d almost be worth putting a show in MSG as long as they could make a dollar off of it because of the media exposure that it would get.

by Phildo on Jan 21, 2009 7:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Hawaii’s tax system is ridiculous; it’s too steep for small shows, but adds extra penalties for large shows…

They’d still do shows at MSG, for certain, but likely not anywhere else in the state, and as Rome says, small shows are screwed.

"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."

by AJB on Jan 21, 2009 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Dumbass politicians strike again. facepalm

by Dexerion on Jan 21, 2009 7:13 AM EST reply actions  

“Bite the nose to spite the face” as my Grandma always said.

by Benicio on Jan 21, 2009 7:19 AM EST reply actions  

This is always a bad idea, whether the tax burden is relatively high or not. People besides the “rich” guys that run the UFC will end up sharing in the consequences of such action.

by Cannon Jacques on Jan 21, 2009 10:37 AM EST reply actions  

This is just another Michigan.

by RoyalB on Jan 21, 2009 12:40 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Predicting A Collegiate Wrestler’s Development
Shogun_logo_small
UFC’s Hopes For A Stadium Show In Sao Paulo Appear To Be Dead
Small
The Downfall of Diego Sanchez
Small
The time is right for a superfight, and it doesn't involve Anderson
391807_10150399618817701_750257700_8470850_1424416169_n_small
1 in about 7 billion!  :D

Recent FanPosts

Skittles_small
Off topic- watch me sing!
26759_511613730864_104300343_30384429_7437048_n_small
UFC Undisputed 3: BE Fight Camp?
Small
Yuki Kondo
Img_0019_small
Training Progress
Small
Muay Thai camps in Thailand
Blav_small
OT: Help out my short film
Badr_hari3_small
War Machine explains what happenned and asks for support

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings