Mainstream Journalism on MMA At Its Finest
Alan Campbell, writer for The Vancouver Sun, has one the most spectacularly moronic articles involving MMA that I've seen in some time. In fact, if I ever ran into Campbell or the primate editor who approved this screed, it's not out of the question that I'd blast them both in the face with a snow shovel.
The good news is that the article is eminently dismissable. It's essentially about Joe Rogan being in Richmond, British Columbia on his stand-up comedy tour and that he plans to talk to local public officials to get the bans on MMA in Vancouver lifted. The bad news is that Campbell utterly butchers MMA in trying to articulate the sport to readers. Por ejemplo:
In 2007, Vancouver City Council, after allowing seven UFC events, banned the sport from being hosted anywhere in its municipality, declaring it was too violent and could be a legal liability.
Here we have the confusion (or is it conflation) of "UFC" with "MMA". This isn't the worst crime in the world, but certainly far from acceptable for a writer at a paper the caliber of The Vancouver Sun. The gaffe that really gets me, however, is the following:
UFC events are usually watched live by a large audience at a venue, such as a casino, and also beamed live via pay-per-view to homes and packed bars across North America.
Rogan is regarded as the voice of UFC and that's why Blank is happy to let him do all the talking when it comes to canvassing city hall.
"That's why Rogan is exploring this on our behalf as he knows more about it than anyone," Blank added.
"If and when he approaches the city we'll talk more about it then."
UFC fighters don't wear any form of protection, aside from fingerless padded gloves, and compete inside a caged ring until one of them submits, much like they do in professional wrestling.
Emphasis mine. Now, let's be candid: this is neither the first nor the last mainstream journalist to get the details about regulation completely and utterly wrong. Why all the fuss? MMA is banned in Vancouver. We cannot ask the newspapers and mainstream outlets to take a favorable stance on our accord. But we can ask them to be truthful. That is their responsibility any and every time. Instead, in the banned territory where the UFC is working to have the ban overturned, we have a writer who can't be bothered to do 30 seconds of a homework and a rubber stamp editor either too lazy or too incompetent to fulfill the obligations of his/her job. The errors they commit - in an article about a very serious issue within MMA - is beyond amateurish and into appalling territory. And it also has the distinct honor of inadvertently positioning itself as complete misinformation.
I don't like to police the ranks of other bloggers and mainstream journalists and I've encountered a slew of awful articles, but the combination of the sensitive issue in a city grappling with that sensitive issue in one of the leading papers is too much for me to pass up. So, take a bow Vancouver Sun. You really outdid yourself this time.
0 recs |
28 comments
|
Comments
That is rather awful.
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Jan 11, 2009 12:35 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Here’s a nice article about the UFC possibly coming to San Antonio (props to Jesse Holland). And yes, the UFC should come back to Texas.
I’m just trying to balance out a bad article with one that I believe is pretty well done. It appears that research was done, and there are direct quotes from Marc Ratner. This is my positive contribution for the day…back to being negative and cynical.
by Cannon Jacques on Jan 11, 2009 12:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
You know, if mainstream media outlets/reporters, spewed as much misinformation and false facts about politics or the like, there would be a shitstorm for them to deal with. I can’t stand that these people can pretty much say whatever they want and not be held accountable for it.
Eliot Marshall: Bader won. Like I said in the episode, I'm not going to make any excuses. It's my job to be able to deal with when somebody's doing that. It's not his job to change up his tactics.
http://eliotmarshall.com/
by BJJDenver on Jan 11, 2009 12:55 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Actually, I don’t see it as anything unique to MMA. Reporters, and many other people for that matter, fail to research properly and play fast and loose with the facts when the group they are misrepresenting can provide only a minimal backlash – or at least a backlash that’s perceived to be “minimal.” That’s just what I see.
by Cannon Jacques on Jan 11, 2009 1:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Appalling journalism
This writer obviously did no fact checking. Luke why don’t you write the editor and post the conversation?
by banter on Jan 11, 2009 12:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Seriously…for once I would like to see what happens when one of these writers are corrected…
by banter on Jan 11, 2009 1:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ah, the Vancouver Sun...
Being from Vancouver, let me tell you, it’s not just MMA that’s covered poorly. It’s pretty much a wash across the board. The two major papers in Vancouver, the Sun and the Province, are both pretty bad. It’s like going from bad to worse. Pick your poison.
by pud333 on Jan 11, 2009 1:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Hear, hear.
And you can add in the Victoria Times Colonist (for those on the island) in terms of terrible coverage of… well… everything.
"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."
by AJB on Jan 11, 2009 6:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow.
Fingerless gloves, no cups, and every fight is an ‘I Quit’ match?
How am I unemployed while these clowns have jobs?
by subo on Jan 11, 2009 1:35 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
This is really nothing new. There are several reasons that the print media industry is dying and poor research and editing is a major one. There is just as much poor reporting in politics and business. That’s why despite every major newspaper having a business section, most intelligent, informed people only read the WSJ and FT. Stuff like this is going to keep coming out, and it sucks, but I really don’t think it hurts the sport. People who think like this aren’t going to be swayed, and people who are casual fans or might become casual fans would see through the poor reporting of this article. Dana White explained it perfectly, saying there are two types of people who aren’t fans; those who aren’t fans because they haven’t been exposed to the sport and those who will never be fans no matter what.
by fly1180 on Jan 11, 2009 2:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t expect any journalist from here to have an objective, impartial view of the sport I’m passionate about. That way when one does come along I can be pleasantly surprised. However, being from the valley(just outside Van), it doesn’t help that the only guy promoting MMA matches within 100 miles was just shot and killed in his gym stairwell, probably for his drug and gang connections. Add to that the ignorant, obtuse views of the politicians who originally banned it in Vancouver municipality, NYC will get MMA back before we do. Shit.
by bubbafat on Jan 11, 2009 2:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
And yet, Marcus Soares has been training people in Van for years, Dennis Kang still comes back to train there, and none of the positives are reported on AT ALL. I agree – NY before VAN.
"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."
by AJB on Jan 11, 2009 7:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You know, as someone who covers MMA for The Sun...
It would be great if those people slamming the paper for not doing their research did anything close to their own.
I’ve written two articles specifically about Kang in The Sun – most recently on the day of his UFC debut. I’ve also written an abundance of stories complaining about the lack of city regulation of the sport, and more still about a guy who promotes MMA shows in Chilliwack (certainly within 100 miles of Joe Krantz, the dead gangster and supposed ‘only guy promoting matches’ – he never promoted MMA in actual fact – he promoted pro wrestling, and not too well by all reports).
Regarding the article mentioned above, it wasn’t a Sun-created piece. It was from the Richmond News, a local paper that doesn’t have the same resources The Sun does.
Personally, I didn’t like the piece either, and chose not to run it on The Sun site, partly because it is incorrect about MMA essentials, but mostly because it never quotes Rogan or his people once in making its grand proclamation that he’ll be the saviour of MMA.
It also ignores the fact that there isn’t a room large enough to hold a UFC show in Richmond, but i digress…
I chose not to put the article on the Sun site, but I’m not the final arbiter of such things, so eventually the article got on the website – not in the paper – mostly because the editors realize that MMA is a topic that many are interested in.
I work damn hard promoting the sport of MMA at The Sun, and anything I’ve ever published on the topic has been something written on spec and pushed at editors who are all too often not asking for it.
The pity is that, rather than noticing such things and backing them with support, people prefer to highlight the occasional negative, make a bunch of assumptions, and in doing so make it harder for those working for their cause to continue doing so.
PS: Expect a rather large piece about the fight for Vancouver regulation to appear this weekend.
Notes From The Nat has a new home: http://www.natnotes.com
by Ozzz on Jan 26, 2009 5:36 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Print media is in a death spiral. Less customers = lower salaries = less qualified reporters = shitty reporting = less customers, etc. This problem is ubiquitous. I’d actually say that sports journalists are on average more knowledgeable about the sport they specialize in than journalists in other areas. If you think this is bad, talk to someone who understands statistics about the media’s use of them.
In a way, this is good news for MMA. There would be a big problem if people were fully informed about the sport, yet still opposed its legalization. This shows that the UFC (who else is reinvesting money into the sport?) can make headway through education.
by Jahbulon on Jan 11, 2009 2:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’m ashamed of the journalism in my city after reading that.
by Beer Monster on Jan 11, 2009 4:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Not a Big Deal....
aside from the fact that the writer himself looks like an idiot. There was clearly no malicious intent to make MMA sound like the barbaric, human cockfighting, etc sport that many people who truly oppose it regularly do. He likened it to Pro Wrestling and, in a sense downplayed the violent nature of the sport.
by nitro on Jan 11, 2009 5:35 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don't agree...
Subject matter aside the fact that a journalist bothered to publish an article with zero research is a big deal.
This statement
UFC fighters don’t wear any form of protection, aside from fingerless padded gloves, and compete inside a caged ring until one of them submits, much like they do in professional wrestling.
Could have easily been corrected gy going to google and typing “UFC RULES” look what comes up as the first link. Took me 1 second.
by banter on Jan 11, 2009 5:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How was the description malicious towards MMA?
by bignerd on Jan 11, 2009 11:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It still paints MMA as fairly lawless….a simple mistake that could have been corrected, as I have already pointed out, with a few moments of research.
I could not care less if someone doesn’t like MMA and trashes it….but at least do some basic fact checking.
by banter on Jan 12, 2009 12:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Like I Said...
the writer looks more like an idiot than anything else. People who know MMA come away knowing that this guy is a tool, and those who know nothing about MMA have a basic, although not a thorough understanding of MMA.
by nitro on Jan 12, 2009 11:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll be writing to the paper on this one.
I plan on taking the time to put together an extensive and thought-out response. I’ll let you know how it goes.
"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."
by AJB on Jan 11, 2009 7:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Save it.
Or send it to the Richmond News, who actually wrote it.
Writing to The Sun encouraging them to do more coverage of MMA might help me get it off the back page of the sports section and closer to the front. Writing to complain makes it harder to get anything in there at all.
Notes From The Nat has a new home: http://www.natnotes.com
by Ozzz on Jan 26, 2009 5:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Sun is for people who can't read good.
Don’t get too upset about this. Any newspaper from Canada that is called The XXXXXXXX Sun is just a 1/2 step up from a tabloid. The Sun media corp is not exactly known for hard hitting journalism, they are only read for tits, crime, and hockey. There could be an alien invasion and their front page would be; MAPLE LEAFS LOST 8TH IN A ROW TO FLORIDA. Their yearly investigative journalism effort is picking apart city council members’ expense reports, and organising the data into a colourful, shiny chart.
There is no point in trying to argue a point with any of the Sun newspapers, you would have more success debating an eggplant.
MMA gets a much more evenhanded treatment in more respectable Canadian newspapers. The Toronto Star had the front page of its sports section devoted to GSP once. The National Post and the Globe and Mail also have much higher standards than and of the Sun newspapers.
by Ubernoober on Jan 11, 2009 10:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
higher standards than and of the Sun newspapers.
higher standards than any of the Sun newspapers.
by Ubernoober on Jan 11, 2009 10:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Vancouver Sun isn't part of the Sun Media chain.
When complaining of lack of research, it’s best to do some.
Notes From The Nat has a new home: http://www.natnotes.com
by Ozzz on Jan 26, 2009 5:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I see the article as ignorant towards MMA rather than negative. Better than the ‘human cockfighting’ dribble we see too often.
by Benicio on Jan 11, 2009 11:30 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
agree 100%. That’s my entire problem with it.
by banter on Jan 12, 2009 12:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 














