The $100 Experiment: UFC 88 Results

by Carl P on Sep 7, 2008 12:03 PM EDT

Ugh, I got slammed here by a combination of bad lucks and bad picks. Here's how the night went:

Liddell vs. Evans, $9 on Liddell @ -260. Lost $9. This was the killer. I was so sure Liddell would win this fight, and I was absolutely shocked to see him get KTFO'd. Is Chuck getting old? Is Rashad getting better? Either way, it sucks, and it lost me nine bucks.

Marquardt vs. Kampmann, $5 Marquardt @ -125. Won $4. I felt pretty good here, as I wasn't that impressed with Kampmann, even in his wins against McFedries and Rivera. I felt Marquardt deserved to be more of a favorite, and the bet here paid off.

MacDonald vs. Lambert, $2 on Lambert @ +155. Lost $2. This was a stupid bet. I thought Lambert would perform better at 185, and he sure as hell looked a lot better at these weigh-ins than he has in the past. I also thought maybe MacDonald hadn't had enough time to prepare, since he fought Maia so recently. For whatever reason, I neglected the simple fact that MacDonald is just the better fighter.

2-way parlay on Kim and Boetsch, $4 to win $1.98. Won $1.98. Thought they were both in a different league than their opponents. True of Boetsch, not as true of Kim.

Another huge disappointment here was the cancellation of Parisyan vs. Yoshida. I had money on Yoshida at +190, and thought he had at LEAST a 50% chance to win there.

Overall, I ended the night down $5.02. Rather disappointing, but there will be plenty of opportunities to recuperate, with UFC 89 and 90 so close around the corner.

The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.

Tweet Comment 3 comments | 3 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

I think

loading 80 percent of your total card budget on Chuck was a bit strange. I also picked Chuck to win, however not for that much at those odds. I like the parlay you put on Kim and Boetsch. Kim showed some holes but I put money straight on both those fights as well. I agree 1000 that Yoshida had at least a 50/50 shot. Jukodas tend to cancel each other out and Yoshiyuki seems like he might have a slight edge in stand up. Hopefully they make this fight for a future card. For the record I had $15 on Yoshida at +210.

And I must hand it to you, I had Martin out pointing Nate and taking him to a decesion. I was dead wrong. Good pick.

by B Money on Sep 7, 2008 3:04 PM EDT reply actions

I made a similar play on Chuck annd got burned. I got in on him at -225, and was happy about it…till the lights went out.

I also bought into Lambert being better at 185…and bet on Marquardt and Yoshida as well. A small play on Franklin got a tiny bit of my money back…but it was a rough night.

by Tim Burke on Sep 7, 2008 10:39 PM EDT reply actions