You've been Mazza-GOT-ti'd!
There has been a lot talk about bad calls being made in MMA bouts, and with no great surprise, one refs name seems to come up more than others -- Steve Mazzagatti.
Referee Steve Mazzagatti has had to fend off criticism from fighters, fans, and officials concerning some of the calls he's made. Most recently, his call in the Anthony Johnson vs. Kevin Burns bout at UFN 14 where Burns repeatedly poked Johnson in the eye and eventually shoved his finger so far into his eye that Johnson threw himself on the ground writhing in pain. Mazzagatti, claiming he didn't see the eye poke, called it a TKO making Burns the winner by... eye poke?
With a crticial fight on Saturday, UFC Heavyweight fighter Brock Lesnar has vocally said he is still upset with the call Mazzagatti made during his UFC debut bout with Frank Mir. The ex-professional wrestler was raining down hammer fists on Mir moments into the first round when Mazzagatti stopped the action, deducted 1-point from Lesnar for shots to the back of the head and then stood both fighters back up. Mir was eventually able to recover and submitted Lesnar for the win.
Mazzagatti claims to have given Lesnar two verbal warnings for the strikes to the back of the head. Lesnar still claims he was given no warning, which is the source of a lot of debate between fans some who some claim to have heard the warnings when looking at a play of the fight via Tivo. Others claim that there were no warnings at all and that Mazzagatti was playing favorites by stopping the action to give Mir time to recover.
Whether you can hear the warnings on a playback are far from the point of contention which is, did Lesnar hear the warnings IF Mazzagatti did in fact give them like he claims? Muttered warnings can easily be washed out by all the yelling and commotion from the audience and any referee worth his weight would know that. The second point of contention is, why did Mazzagatti stop the fight and then stand it back up? Was that necessary? I can not recall any fight where the action was stopped within a few moments of the first round and then started again because of shots to the back of the head.
Steve Cofield from MMA Sports Blog (A Yahoo! Sports Blog) breaks down the most notable "Mazza-GOT-ti" reffing mistakes:
- Jamie Varner v. Rob McCullough @ WEC 32
Varner loses his mouthpiece and actually stops fighting then signals his own timeout. Varner, who looked wobbly, is actually granted a stoppage by Mazzagatti. - Kevin Burns v. Anthony Johnson @ UFN 14
Burns clearly poked Johnson in the right eye. Johnson went down in a heap. Mazzagatti stopped the fight awarding a TKO victory to Burns. - Gray Maynard v. Rob Emerson @ TUF 5 Finale
Maynard slammed Emerson but in the process knocked himself out. The win is initially given to Maynard before ringside officials cleared things up for Mazzagatti and the fight was ruled a no-contest. - Jamie Varner v. Marcus Hicks @ WEC 35
This is the type of fight where Mazzagatti scares some people. Hicks was knocked down and out with 3:12 left in the first round. He then took 19 additional punches and three knees to the face before the fight is stopped 20 seconds later. - Mike Whitehead v. Vernon White at IFL - Las Vegas
Whitehead had White's back and rained down punches. He then told Mazzagatti that White had tapped. Mazzagatti clearly didn't see it but honored Whitehead's 'official' call and stopped it. Coach Ken Shamrock is seen on the ring apron screaming at Mazzagatti, "that was a horrible f**kin call!" - Shayna Baszler v. Cristiane Santos @ Elite XC
Santos knocked down Baszler with 1:31 left in the first then prematurely celebrated her victory by jumping on the top of the cage. Santos carried on for 13 seconds while Mazzagatti stood in the middle of the ring and screamed "hey" in Santos' direction to keep fighting. The Portuguese-speaking Santos had no idea what Mazzagatti was saying. Instead of a disqualification, Santos was allowed to come back down from the cage and the action was restarted around 1:08. Santos went on to finish Baszler. - Babalu v. David Heath @ UFC 74
The pre-fight included a war of words between the fighters. Babalu got in position for an anaconda choke finish. Mazzagatti stopped he fight and Heath held onto the choke for an extra three seconds. Some think Mazzagatti didn't do all he could to force Babalu to stop. - Thiago Alves v. Karo Parisyan @ UFN 13
Alves stopped Parisyan with one big knee and then two punches on his arm. Parisyan was beside himself and actually pushed UFC fight booker Joe Silva several times in the cage as he protested the Mazzagatti stoppage.
In any sport there will always be calls from officials that the fans will question. It happens in football, basketball and baseball all the time. So what makes this any different? For me, it is the sheer number of instances where the momemtum of the fight (and possible the outcome) can be attributted to Steve Mazzagatti's reffing.
I am sure the number of bouts Mazzagatti has fairly and legitimately reffed far outweighs the handful of bouts listed above. I hope that Steve is aware of the spotlight that is on him right now and will be mindful of the decisions he makes as a referee. I know that as a fan of MMA, I will be paying close attention to any bout being referreed by Steve Mazzagatti in the future.
The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don’t think he did anything wrong in that fight. As I recall when Frank went back to his corner, he noticed that he was cut on the back of his head and in fact bleeding. When a fighter is hitting his opponent to the back of the head, the fight should be stopped and restarted just like when a downed fighter takes a knee.
I don’t recall anyone pleading for Jens Pulver when Urijah Faber hit him like 10 times to the back of his head.
The only time I have had a problem with Mazz was with the Jaime Varner fight and Kevin “Eye Poker” Burns.
It’s not about being the right call. It’s about consistancy. In all his other fights he presides over, he issues multiple warnings about the back of the head, grabbing the cage, poking the eyes, etc. Watching the replay of Lesnar v. Mir, he did not issue a warning. The ring is miked up like an interrogation room and if I could not hear it on the broadcast than I sure Brock could not either. At a minimum he needs to issue a clear warning to a fighter that he is striking within the illegal portion of the back of the head, BEFORE stopping the action. An accidental strike to the back of the head is not the same a deliberate one. When a fighter turns away while his opponent is striking than there needs to be at least one warning, preferably two or three as is typical.
"I have opinions of my own --strong opinions-- but I don't always agree with them."
-George Bush
Truly
A dirt squirrel for the ages. And Mazz is a terrible ref. He gets so caught up in the fight that he cannot step outside of himself to realize what is happening. The Mccullough Varner fight is a good example. Varner decided to call his own TO but Mazz could not separate himself from the action to inform him that he can not do that. The Burns TKO is by far his worst call. I’ve heard people say that he couldn’t see the poke from him positioning. That is not an excuse. The referee is the person who must make judgement calls on the ongoings of a fight and it’s litterally his job to be in the right spot. If he is not positioned he COULD HAVE LOOKED AT THE GIANT SCREEN behind him replaying the poke 15 times.
"I have opinions of my own --strong opinions-- but I don't always agree with them."
-George Bush
the Cyborg fight wasn't a Mazz mistake
I don’t think Ms. Cyborg should have been disqualified, which is what’s implied here as a failing by The Mazz. If anything, it gave her opponent time to recover when she was clearly on the verge of being knocked out.
Seriously that’s one of the weirdest complaints against reffing in a fight I’ve ever heard. I wonder what Cofield would like Cyborg to have been DQ’ed for? “Premature celebration?”
by Chris Nelson on Aug 10, 2008 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Copy and Paste Job
Before I continue, let me say that I’m trying really hard not to be an ass here, but I feel compelled to mention this. So, please don’t freak out.
Having said that . . .
I appreciate your contribution, but this fan post offers very little new content and is essentially a copy-paste of Cofield’s original blog from August 5th.
Most of what you have here is either a direct copy or is simply paraphrasing Cofield’s analysis. Furthermore, the way you pasted this list of fights makes it unclear (intentionally?) who’s commentary on each fight is being offered. (It’s Cofield’s.)
There’s nothing wrong with pointing out a good post on another blog. But in this case, your post offered very little that a simple link wouldn’t have accomplished. (BTW, you didn’t even include a link to his blog, though you did mention it.)
I’m not trying to be a dick, but as a blogger, I would be pissed if someone copied my content like this. Frankly, I suspect you would be, too.
Correction
Sorry, I see you did post the link in the “related” section. My bad.
Still, I stand by the rest of my commentary.
I was just stating my opinion on the matter. If you don’t like what I’ve done, don’t read it. Simple. Easy.
MMA Fan-Addicts Mailing List
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mmafanaddicts/
On second thought...
josemonkey, I’m insulted by your remarks. I simply posted a blog post that echoed the same sentiment as another blog I read. I CLEARLY linked to the one Cofield wrote (which you later apologized for. Lame.) I noted which section was copied from his (because what was the point in reinventing the wheel) and other than that NONE of it is copied. You are a dick sir, and a little one at that.
MMA Fan-Addicts Mailing List
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mmafanaddicts/
Ugh
I’m not interested in getting into a silly flame war with you, so I’m going to ignore all of your ad hominem attacks.
I stand by what I said.

by 














