Rampage Jackson Victim Has Miscarriage
From Newport Beach and Costa Mesa, California's Daily Pilot:
A Huntington Beach woman who was more than 16 weeks pregnant and who police said was injured in a hit-and-run crash with mixed martial artist Quinton "Rampage" Jackson on the 55 Freeway two weeks ago has had a miscarriage, her fiance said Friday.
The article goes on to explain what happened to the woman during the accident.
With all the confusion and mystery surrounding the situation, this development doesn't make Quinton's position any easier. A potential civil suit, if not a criminal trial, could destroy Jackson financially.
1 recs |
52
comments
Read Related
Comments
Ouch
No matter which way you slice it, this is bad news for Jackson; if true, Rampage certainly will be faced with a civil suit at the very least if expert medical opinion is found that the incident even partially contributed to her miscarriage. I feel heart sorry for the woman and her fiance.
by VikingPhotography on Aug 2, 2008 5:51 PM EDT 0 recs
I am a cynical bastard
I will wait for the official word rather than rely on the words of the boyfriend who already has an attorney under is belt (no offense Day).
by mythbuster on Aug 2, 2008 6:06 PM EDT 0 recs
Definitely agree that everyone should read the article with a lot of skepticism. It’s definitely plausible though.
by Mike Fagan on
Aug 2, 2008 6:27 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Sweet shit, this just gets worse and worse… Even if the two events are completely disconnected, a civil trial would only have to show that there’s a possible reasonable connection. Rampage is in some serious hot water.
by AJB on Aug 2, 2008 6:11 PM EDT 0 recs
so what
big deal rampage can get better attorneys than these other con artists.rampage didn’t even make any contact with her car.he should counter sue for negligence.what was that dumb bitch doing driving her fat ass in that gas guzzling escalade anyway when she was that far along in her pregnancy.
by Airipsus on Aug 2, 2008 6:50 PM EDT 0 recs
She
was only 4 months pregnant. What do you want her to do go on bedrest for the next 5 months? keep your ignorant comments to yourself.
by asmiley420 on
Aug 2, 2008 6:57 PM EDT
up
0 recs
With
this happening in california. I’m about 95% sure if they file a civil suit they will win. The California Court system almost always sides with the victim, even if there’s minimal evidence. That really sucks for rampage.
by asmiley420 on Aug 2, 2008 6:55 PM EDT 0 recs
Cali even lets house burglars sue if they hurt themselves while they’re robbing a home.
by IHateMMA on
Aug 2, 2008 7:43 PM EDT
up
0 recs
It’s written by a random person on a blog. It must be true.
by mythbuster on
Aug 2, 2008 8:56 PM EDT
up
0 recs
It’s true. It’s documented, along with other crazy suits.
by IHateMMA on
Aug 2, 2008 10:15 PM EDT
up
0 recs
there is no question Rampage will be paying them some cash…just because he has some…
by Rob Dib on Aug 2, 2008 7:00 PM EDT 0 recs
Horrible news. The woman was 38… it’s going to be hard for her to try again.
by Nick Thomas on Aug 2, 2008 7:19 PM EDT 0 recs
The #1 cause of miscarriages is Trama to the Womb. I would not be surprised at all if it was the accident that caused her miscarriage. And if that is the case Rampage should be made to pay Millions and possibly be brought up on Manslaughter charges ? But it would also not surprise me a t all if the accident had nothing what so ever do do with it and they are just looking to make $$$$$. Who knows all I know is it does not look good for rampage win or loose he is going to be paying out Millions in lawyer Bills. I dout we will see him back fighting any time soon if Ever ?
by Shocbomb on Aug 2, 2008 7:43 PM EDT 0 recs
Its certainly a shame for the plaintiffs that he doesn’t have millions. Probably not even million: singular. Most of his money goes to taking care of family and training.
by asa on
Aug 3, 2008 10:57 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I’d like to feel bad for the woman but it’s also very hard to ignore the money grubbing factor. ...To be honest, I’ll probably sue him too; miscarriage or not. Opportunity knockin’.
by Gong on Aug 2, 2008 7:59 PM EDT 0 recs
True
there are alot of Oppurtunistic people here in Cali. I’m not sure but i think stress can also cause somebody to have a miscarriage. I think the Manslaughter charges are going a little too far but anythings possible especially in California
by asmiley420 on
Aug 2, 2008 8:04 PM EDT
up
0 recs
The only winners in this situation is going to be the attorneys, regardless of the outcome. Other than that, it is a loss for everyone.
by Heenan on Aug 2, 2008 8:24 PM EDT 0 recs
I don’t understand the sentiment in some of these comments.
The woman lost her baby. How could money been a motivating factor in that?
She was involved in an accident where injuries occurred. Having a lawyer isn’t something people do solely for screwing those at fault out of money. They also get lawyers to make sure the insurance companies don’t screw them. Rampage’s insurance would have to pay for her car damage and her medical bills. Getting a lawyer to deal with that isn’t a money grubbing tactic it’s a smart move because she needs to make sure she doesn’t miss anything and to make sure everything gets handled properly.
So she probably already had a lawyer to make sure the insurance company takes care of everything from when Rampage crashed into her car on the freeway.
To start accusing that woman of money grubbing because she lost her child is stupid.
by mattman73 on Aug 2, 2008 8:58 PM EDT 1 recs
I agree with mattman
If this is true, and right now we have no reason to doubt this, then many of you should be ashamed of yourself. Who in their right minds wants to lose their unborn child just to get a payday? For God sakes, the woman just lost your child and everyone here is saying they FEEL SORRY FOR RAMPAGE? Are you kidding me? Yeah Rampage is in deep doo-doo, and we all liked him, but let’s be honest here. This pregnant woman driving on the highway just lost her unborn child, possibly b/c of Rampage’s careless actions or partial psychosis. The victim here is the woman, and if the loss of her unborn child can be linked to this hit and run caused by Rampage, then I’m sorry I liked Rampage as a fighter and a person, but he deserves some jail time and big dent in his wallot.
by filipinomix2oo0 on Aug 2, 2008 9:11 PM EDT 1 recs
A tragedy for her, and a disaster for Quinton. Obviously we have to wait and see what can be linked and how, but this complicates things and makes them a lot worse.
by Michael Rome on Aug 2, 2008 9:14 PM EDT 0 recs
I hate to say it...
...but he made his bed. I’m a little disappointed by the reactions of “she must just be scamming him” considering that she WAS pregnant and DID miscarry. Judging by the car she was driving she probably isn’t desperate for money to where the first thought when she lost her baby was “Sweet! I’m gonna make some bank off this!” I understand that Rampage is a high profile person in this sport and everyone is attempting to protect him a bit because it could cast a negative light on MMA, but still…it’s a bit unreasonable to act like he is devoid of all blame and feel no remorse for a woman who lost her baby.
Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
"The reason a lot of people do not recognize opportunity is because it usually goes around wearing overalls and looking like hard work." -- Thomas Edison
by brentbrookhouse on
Aug 2, 2008 9:54 PM EDT
up
1 recs
considering that she WAS pregnant and DID miscarry.
If you have sources other than her boyfriend, please post them. Otherwise, as I said, I’ll wait for some official word on whether she was pregnant, and whether she miscarried.
In the end, I agree with Heenen.
by mythbuster on
Aug 2, 2008 10:10 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I don't think...
that if she wasn’t really pregnant we’d be hearing about it as you’d have to back up the claim with doctor visits…etc (especially since she says she was 4 months along). If she was not pregnant then whatever…I hope she doesn’t get a cent and is punished for it.
However, articles came out right afterward talking about how he hit a pregnant woman, articles were ran in local newspapers talking about the pregnant woman who was taken to the hospital…etc.
All I’m saying is that it’s always a little disappointing to see people siding with the guy who lost his shit rather than someone who very possibly was cost her last chance at having a child.
Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
"The reason a lot of people do not recognize opportunity is because it usually goes around wearing overalls and looking like hard work." -- Thomas Edison
by brentbrookhouse on
Aug 3, 2008 10:08 AM EDT
up
0 recs
This is what I don’t get about the people that frequent mma message boards and blogs.
Any random website with mma in the title posts something in their rumor section, it’s a fact.
An actual newspaper reports something, but it isn’t a good thing for an mma fighter, and everyone decides they need a “better source.”
by Phildo on
Aug 3, 2008 11:05 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Actually...
the “actual” newspaper reported what the boyfriend said, not what happened. I know, people like me who want facts before we hang anyone.. we’re dicks.
by mythbuster on
Aug 3, 2008 4:20 PM EDT
up
0 recs
That’s the thing, actual newspapers do a thing called fact checking.
I’m sure they are going on more than the boyfriend’s word before printing a story, that’s how newspapers work.
It’s going to take time for an official source to come out and say anything on this due to privacy issues dealing with medical situations.
This article is probably all that’s going to come out until if/when a lawsuit is filed, which can take some time.
I think it’s safe to take the newspaper at their word, they have editors, fact checkers, and a reputation to back them up.
by Phildo on
Aug 3, 2008 6:33 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Um .. you might want to research the idea that every article in a newspaper is fact checked. That doesn’t happen. Its unfortunate but a harsh reality of the news world that not every thing is thoroughly checked. Most editors and staff wirters have to produce on incredible short deadlines to report things as they’re happening to maintain their outlet’s relevance in their market. I’ve heard stories of people going with rumors as long they’re being reported by other news outlets. They try their best, but they can’t always have absolute certainty of the facts/info they report. That’s what follow-ups are for :) Especially something like this.
For a more familiar example: How many articles on MMA are meticulously researched and fact-checked with multiple sources? How many seem to have grossly misleading “facts” and details omitted?
As for this particular instance, I’m not suggesting that the woman is a fraud or that Rampage lost his contact or anything for that matter -I’m actually waiting to hear more out of the ongoing investigation- I’m just weighing in on the paper’s automatic legitimacy.
by asa on
Aug 3, 2008 9:08 PM EDT
up
0 recs
All I’m saying is that it’s always a little disappointing to see people siding with the guy who lost his shit rather than someone who very possibly was cost her last chance at having a child.
I’d have to agree. While I will reserve judgment for an official announcement or charge against Rampage, I tend to agree that it is disappointing some have immediately turned against the potential victim. I know the United States has a tendency for ridiculous lawsuits, but not everyone is immediately out to scam money. No matter how you look at it, it’s not a good situation, and ultimately, Rampage will have to answer for what went down.
by pud333 on
Aug 3, 2008 11:25 AM EDT
up
0 recs
You certainly read a lot into “I’ll wait for the official word.” It would be nice to live in your world where scams never happen, but in the real world, every day, people claim things that aren’t true for the sake of scamming someone out of money.
This doesn’t mean that they are lying, it also doesn’t mean they are telling the truth. What it means is, “I will wait for official sources rather than rely on the words of the boyfriend who already has his attorney.” Feel free to read that any way you want.
Actually, on second reading, I see you agree with me.
if she wasn’t really pregnant we’d be hearing about it as you’d have to back up the claim with doctor visits…etc (especially since she says she was 4 months along). If she was not pregnant then whatever…I hope she doesn’t get a cent and is punished for it.
If .. if.
by mythbuster on
Aug 3, 2008 4:17 PM EDT
up
0 recs
For sure...
I wasn’t directing anything at you specifically as you seem to have your head on straight. You’re not claiming the woman IS or IS NOT doing anything. You’re waiting for the facts. I am talking more specifically about the people who immediately were writing the woman off as a scam artist and acting like Jackson couldn’t possibly be at fault.
Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
"The reason a lot of people do not recognize opportunity is because it usually goes around wearing overalls and looking like hard work." -- Thomas Edison
by brentbrookhouse on
Aug 3, 2008 5:41 PM EDT
up
0 recs
He better have a pretty good lawyer for temp. insanity. If he actually did have a complete breakdown and had no idea what was going on, then no he legally is not blameworthy, but otherwise he definitely is.
by Michael Rome on Aug 2, 2008 10:22 PM EDT 0 recs
That’s going to be a tough road to hoe. I can’t speak for California law, but under North Carolina law, that is not a very likely defense considering the circumstances. The biggest hurdle he would have would be the fact that he, supposedly, was acting crazy because he had fasted for several days and not slept. That is similar to trying to claim incapacity due to involuntary intoxication. That is not a very strong defense. Not to mention, in civil cases for negligence, that is typically not even a defense.
Once again, this is from North Carolina law’s perspective not California so it’s just a guess.
(formerly TheFightJournal)
by Lucas2 on
Aug 2, 2008 10:28 PM EDT
up
0 recs
A post from the UG:
I used to work bodily injury insurance claims. I handled a minor rear-end accident where the claimant vehicle had sustained $1600 worth of damage (not much in the world of car repair). At the time the claimant was 2 months pregnant and claimed back injuries as a result of the accident. For treatment she began to see a chiropractor. She treated 6 times in the span of a month, which is not a lot of treatment- maybe $600.00 worth of bills.A few months later the woman got around to looking to settle her claim and responded to one of my follow-up calls with a letter asking for $10,000.00. If you don’t think this is an outrageous amount for the circumstances I laid out than you don’t understand fair compensation and are probably a greedy person. Her claim was worth at most $1800.00 (this does not include the damage to the vehicle, they are handled sepereately).
So I was surprised and tried to get her to understand the reality of what her claim is worth and in response she let me know she had had a miscarriage and should get paid more. I told her I would need medical documentation that showed a link to the minor accident and a miscarriage which had occurred 2 months later. She let me know she had no documentation but knew they were linked because of all she had to deal with as a result of the stressful claim.
I was stunned because all that had happened was a minor loss, a dubious (probably fake) injury, her car was taken care of immediately, and then two months later she lost her baby at what would have been about 16 months. So what happened? The woman threatened to get an attorney if she didn’t get $10k but a few days later she called with no attorney and asked for $3k. What happened is no attorney would take her case because they knew there was no money in it and her miscarriage was obviously not linked.
She eventually settled for like $2k.Do I believe she used her miscarriage to try and get money? Yes. And this was not some broke, crack head, this was a successful, normal woman who just wanted some extra cash and wasn’t above using a miscarriage to try and get it.
So how does this relate to Rampage? Don’t know. I just rather wait to see if the doctors say the two events are related. The one thing that really jumps out at me is the time between the events, the lack of info about how he “injured” her, no attorney involvement, and the woman’s age (38). If there is a link you are looking at a million dollar + claim that can easily be obtained in a settlement. You have Rampage to get money from, his insurance, and possibly Toyo Tires, yet the couple are the ones talking to the press, not an attorney on their behalf. Something doesn’t smell right and it is the mechanism of her injury. How did he injure her? Sideswiped her car and then the baby was lost a few weeks later? I obviously am not a doctor but miscarriages don’t often happen as a result of a car accident and a sideswipe? I’d have to see the damage. I just need more info before I start acting like a fucking spaz on a message board.
by Nick Thomas on Aug 2, 2008 10:24 PM EDT 0 recs
I am an insurance adjuster for one of the major carriers. I can tell you that Rampage’s liability carrier will more than likely defer liability to him if he is proven guilty for his traffic charges. These acts WILL be considered intentional, and therefore no negligence ( failure to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in like circumstances) would have been involved.
I have also been assigned a similar claim, sans the hit and run. Policy limits of 300k were issued immediately (all though the child was 3rd trimester and made it).
It is my thought that Rampage will be personally responsible for any damages unless he can avoid the municipal charges with some sort of “insanity” plea.
by Heenan on
Aug 2, 2008 10:37 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I think it’s all going to depend on whether they can medically link the car accident and then the depletion of fluid.
by Michael Rome on
Aug 2, 2008 10:43 PM EDT
up
0 recs
By the way, the scariest potential charge by far is felony murder. I do not believe the prosecutor will bring it, and I’m not gonna do a front page post on it because it would be the kind of post that would cause all sorts of maddening speculation, but it’s a scary possibility.
by Michael Rome on Aug 2, 2008 11:00 PM EDT 0 recs
If Michael Moore can link poorly construed facts to a government conspiracy theory to torch the towers, a good attorney won’t have any problem making a link between the accident and her miscarriage. I doubt there is a doctor in Cali that would say “there is absolutely no relation between the 2 events”. I imagine we will not hear a thing about it as they will settle if she does make a civil complaint.
I think the worst charge he could receive would be involuntary man-slaughter. Also, I think that the child would have been close to the threshold between being considered inanimate, and human. I wouldn’t rule out the possibility, Rome.
by Heenan on Aug 2, 2008 11:11 PM EDT 0 recs
California manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter law does not include fetuses. There are direct and recent court decisions on it. Only murder does, and since he quite clearly does not fit the bill for that, the only way to get him is felony murder (felony evasion would be the one). I do not think they will bring it though, prosecutorial discretion is a big factor.
by Michael Rome on
Aug 2, 2008 11:15 PM EDT
up
0 recs
At what point are they no longer considered “fetus’”. Remember Scott Peterson got convicted for a 2nd murder.
by Heenan on Aug 2, 2008 11:18 PM EDT 0 recs
I just read a similar article on mmamania, and broke out in a sweat after reading the comments.
by Heenan on Aug 3, 2008 9:59 AM EDT 0 recs
Another post from the UG:
I’ve done a little research on the California laws concerning how developed a fetus has to be to be considered a viable life and whether or not causing a death while committing a felony means you’ll be charged with murder. Granted I’m no lawyer, but this is the info I’ve gathered.First and foremost, Rampage hasn’t been charged yet. It’s all going to depend on what the medical evidence says caused the miscarraige.
In California, the 38 year-old fetal homicide law says, “murder to include the ’’unlawful killing’’ of a fetus beyond seven or eight weeks development.” She was 16 weeks pregnant. If found to be the cause of her miscarriage, it will be considered killing a human being.
In California, “If a person kills while committing a felony that is inherently dangerous to human life other than arson, burglary, etc. the person will be found guilty of second degree murder. For example, if the defendant furnishes heroin to someone who uses it and dies of an overdose, the defendant probably will be charged with murder in the second degree. Under the law it is assumed that if the defendant had the specific intention to furnish the heroin, he or she had malice enough to be charged with murder.”
“California lists some 20 different special circumstances that can boost a murder from second to first degree, including murder carried out for financial gain; murder committed with an explosive; MURDER COMMITTED TO AVOID OR PREVENT A LAWFUL ARREST; MURDER TO PERFECT OR ATTEMPT AN ESCAPE FROM LAWFUL CUSTODY; murder of a law enforcement officer, prosecutor, judge, or elected, appointed, or former government official; murder committed in an especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel fashion where the killer lay in wait for, or hid from, the victim; murder where the victim was tortured by the killer; murder where the killer used poison; or murder where the killing occurred during the commission of, aid of, or flight from certain felonies. These felonies include rape, robbery, kidnapping, burglary, arson, train wrecking, sodomy, the performance of a lewd or lascivious act upon a child under age 14, and oral copulation with a child under age 14 (Cal. Penal Code § 190.2 [West 1996]).”
Ok, so if the accident is found to be the cause of the miscarriage, Rampage could face first-degree murder charges, second-degree murder charges, and at the very least vehicular manslaughter.
Regarding vehicular manslaughter, “Vehicular manslaughter may be charged when a driver causes an accident (either by violating a traffic law or by exercising negligence or “gross negligence”) and the accident causes the death of another person.”
“If the vehicular manslaughter does not involve gross negligence, the prosecutor may charge it as a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the circumstances. Vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence can only be charged as a felony.”
That gets us to what is gross negligence? “Gross negligence is defined as driving without caution and without concern for the safety of others. It means a high level of recklessness. But a charge of “vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence” may not be based merely upon driving under the influence of alcohol. Other facts must be present, for example speeding, racing, running traffic lights, and/or ignoring the advice of others not to drive.”
What are the penalties for vehicular manslaughter in Cali? “If the offense is a misdemeanor, up to one year in the county jail. If felony DUI vehicular manslaughter (but without gross negligence) is found, the sentence can be up to four years in state prison. If felony DUI vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence is found, the court can impose up to 10 years state prison. Substantial drivers license suspensions may also be imposed.”
If charged with second degree murder, “Sentencing for murder varies from state to state, and according to degrees in the states that have them. Second-degree murder usually is punished with more than 20 years in prison. A person convicted of second-degree murder in Minnesota, for example, may be sentenced to prison for not more than 40 years. Some states, such as California, allow a sentence up to life in prison for second-degree murder.”
*Info derived from legal-dictionary.com and an article titled “California Law on Killing Fetus Is Strengthened” by Dean E. Murphy published April 6, 2004.
by Nick Thomas on Aug 3, 2008 11:26 AM EDT 0 recs
This is literally almost all incorrect. I saw this and got very frustrated earlier, the guy does not know what he’s talking about.
Two key facts:
Murder in CA needs malice as an element of the crime. That knocks down almost everything he has there.
Second, manslaughter laws absolutely, positively do not apply to fetuses.
I did a whole post on this, but I deleted it because as much as I can find out, it can’t be 100% accurate as I don’t know every CA crim statute. It just frustrates me seeing some of the stuff going on elsewhere. When he sites the murder while in custody stuff, that is something it takes to move a 2nd degree to a 1st degree. Degrees are an entirely different subject.
The only, I repeat only way Rampage could face murder charges is if they tried to make some sort of implied malice argument, arguing that he should have known doing that kind of driving could injure people and therefore it was malicious. I just don’t see this happening given his mental state.
This will be more trouble for him civilly than criminally, I think.
by Michael Rome on
Aug 3, 2008 2:49 PM EDT
up
0 recs
First off, it is sad that they lost their unborn child, end of discussion on that.
Second, I still have no facts surrounding Rampage’s behavior or what caused it, so i can’t determine if or how much he was at fault for this. What if he was on painkillers prescribed by UFC doctors and had an adverse reaction? Couldn’t the UFC then be on the hook as well? Just to many questions for me to form an opinion.
However, the one thing that bothers me, is, I have read that the woman was in no way struck or involved in the traffic collisions. Not sure if that is accurate, but it what I have been reading in several places. If her stress from the incident caused the miscarriage, then she probably shouldn’t have been on the road in the first place and I don’t think they could blame Rampage. I don’t think she is money grubbing, but when people experience traumatic events, they usually look for a place to put the blame, thus making it easier for them to recover emotionally.
"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"
by BJJDenver on Aug 3, 2008 2:19 PM EDT 0 recs
I read that his truck sideswiped her truck (a 2007 Cadillac Escalade) and caused minor damage. I just find it hard to believe that she would have had any injury being that she was in such a large vehicle as well. Given that she is 38 years old, maybe she was already in a high risk pregnancy. Whatever the case, I do hope that justice is served for both parties involved.
by lovingmma25 on
Aug 4, 2008 2:03 PM EDT
up
0 recs




