Bloody Elbow: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


spread the word

Fedor vs. Couture: Super Fight or Mismatch?

Fronted by Luke Thomas.

It had been just about two years since Fedor Emelianenko fought a legitimate opponent.  That is, until he destroyed former UFC HW champ Tim Sylvia in 36 seconds this past Saturday night.  During the post fight interview, Fedor was asked who he would like to face next and of course he named Randy Couture.

Couture is a legend in this sport, he first man to become a champion in two different weight classes.  At 44 years of age he came out of retirement to defeat the same Tim Sylvia via unanimous decison.  Couture has always seemed to defy the odds in terms of age and ability, but that will not be the case against Fedor. 

I don’t even think Couture has earned the right to face Fedor. Most people have Couture ranked #3 at HW and I have a problem with that.  Considering that Couture decisioned Sylvia and stopped a Gabriel Gonzaga who proved to be overhyped after his win over Cro Cop.  I don’t see how Couture can be ranked at #3 when he only has one win against a top 10 HW since his first retirement.  Whereas, he was stopped in 2 of his last three fights at LHW prior to those fights.

Read the rest of the article here.

Poll
Fedor vs. Couture?
Super Fight
564 votes
Mis-Match
641 votes

1205 votes | Poll has closed

The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.

7 recs | Comment 181 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good points

You’re right on with Couture.

As I watched Fedor destroy Sylvia, I was thinking to myself, it took Couture 5 rounds. There is no way he is gonna take Fedor out.

I hope Couture’s “promoting” of his fight with Fedor does not add to the delay of the fight taking place via UFC’s lawsuit that is being held up in court.

by lovingmma25 on Jul 21, 2008 2:23 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hmm..

I think the UFC will sue Affliction and Couture for that.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 21, 2008 2:30 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

hmmm...

Well…it helps to remember that different fight styles result in different fights. Couture took longer to take out Sylvia because his gameplan wasn’t to destroy immediately. He was looking to punish him for a five round fight. Fedor is much of of a “finisher.” Couture dropped Sylvia early in the fight also.

I’d pick Fedor pretty easily were it to happen. I’m just saying…

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

"The reason a lot of people do not recognize opportunity is because it usually goes around wearing overalls and looking like hard work." -- Thomas Edison

by Brent Brookhouse on Jul 21, 2008 2:42 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Added a poll. =)

by Nick Thomas on Jul 21, 2008 2:27 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thanks Nick :)

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 21, 2008 2:30 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m going to take the easy way out and say…both.

It is a superfight, because it matches the 2 biggest name heavyweights in the world and is a fight people have been clamoring for, for quite a while.

It is also a mismatch, because Fedor is a far more complete fighter than randy.

Randy may be the most over rated fighter around. Don’t get me wrong, i am a fan and I think he may be the most cerebral fighter in mma. He certainly is great and a hall of famer, but he is not a great striker, submission artist or boxer. he obviously has great wrestling and uses his brain to make good game plans and follow them. But outside of wrestling, I don’t think he has anything on Fedor and if they fight in a ring, it will be a distinct disadvantage for Randy.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 21, 2008 2:34 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Are they necessarily mutually exclusive? There’s no dispute that Couture and Fedor are both legends in the sport. If you match them up, isn’t that a super-fight inasmuch as they are both legends? Couture walked away from the UFC relatively recently as the HW champion. Fedor is Fedor. It’s not like we’re talking about a washed up legend who has lost a number of fights in a row against an up and coming legend. It’s two legends—it’s a superfight.

At the same time, I can’t imagine that Fedor would have much difficulty in handling Randy. I think the fight itself would end up being a mismatch.

EDIT ON PREVIEW: Or, yeah, some of what BJJD said.

by Kierkegaard on Jul 21, 2008 2:36 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My vote was mismatch (and it hurt me to do so), but age is a huge factor here. A lot of what makes Randy so effective even at an age when most fighters had retired a decade prior, he is able to use all of the knowledge he has gained to his advantage over less skilled opponents. The problem is that I don’t see his experience as an edge against Fedor, in fact I think Fedor is probably the more experienced fighter and in his prime (and despite Randy’s amazing conditioning he is clearly not in his physical prime).

Don’t get me wrong, I’d defeinitely buy whatever pay-per-view the fight was on and root hard for Randy, but I’d be rooting for a pretty big underdog (Im guessing Fedor wins that fight 85-90% of the time).

by Day Man on Jul 21, 2008 2:39 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A super fight to me is a fight that’s competitive between two legends or well known fighter’s.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 21, 2008 2:40 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That is a "great fight"...

...a superfight is all in the matchmaking. You book superfights to draw the crowd in…but you can’t promise that they’ll be competitive fights. Chuck/Rampage II was a superfight in terms of appeal. But it was a quick non-competitive fight.

I’m just saying…most people think of matchmaking when they talk about “superfights” and what you were talking about is more of mis-match vs. great fight.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

"The reason a lot of people do not recognize opportunity is because it usually goes around wearing overalls and looking like hard work." -- Thomas Edison

by Brent Brookhouse on Jul 21, 2008 2:49 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well…the first fight between Rampage/Chuck was a war…so you could book that as such because on paper it was a good matchup as well…however, I just don’t see how that can be done with Fedor/Couture if people look at this fight realistically….

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 21, 2008 2:52 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

because...

...people want to see it.

It may be an overly simple answer. But it’s the truth.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

"The reason a lot of people do not recognize opportunity is because it usually goes around wearing overalls and looking like hard work." -- Thomas Edison

by Brent Brookhouse on Jul 21, 2008 2:57 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Exactly

Like Anderson Silva fighting Chuck Liddell – that is a superfight

by lovingmma25 on Jul 21, 2008 2:50 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't see...

how you can have possibly the most popular fighter vs. possibly the best fighter in a division fight and not call it a superfight.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

"The reason a lot of people do not recognize opportunity is because it usually goes around wearing overalls and looking like hard work." -- Thomas Edison

by Brent Brookhouse on Jul 21, 2008 2:58 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You know...

I’d love to see BJ Penn and Machida fight again. They are both 100% better all around than their first fight. Could that be a superfight?

by lovingmma25 on Jul 21, 2008 3:00 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

BJ will someday hold ALL the UFC belts!!

(I like BJ, lol)

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 21, 2008 3:03 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

...And the key to my heart.

Oh, sorry. got swept up in the BJJ nut-hugging fever. :-)

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones

by jemaleddin on Jul 22, 2008 8:55 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Simple

The more popular fighter is 45 years old…hasn’t fought for over a year…and has one win against a top 10 opponent…and has nothing in his arsenal that indicates he can beat the best fighter in the division IMO.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 21, 2008 3:02 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Again...

we’re sharing different definitions of superfight. The generally acknowledged definition of a superfight is one that is a major fight for a sport which captures the public imagination. Fedor/Couture is arguably the most anticipated fight in the history of MMA.

You are basing your definition on how competitive the fight would be. But I don’t think how competitive it is has anything to do with it’s success or importance to the MMA landscape nor with it’s importance in the majority of MMA fan’s eyes. And I think that is also something that you can’t predict ahead of time. Sure it will probably be over within a round, but if it goes 4 hard fought rounds then it suddenly gets an “upgrade” in what kind of matchmaking it is? It’s still the same two guys…

Man, I gotta stop taking time away from the site for vacations. I come back and start arguing over definitions….

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

"The reason a lot of people do not recognize opportunity is because it usually goes around wearing overalls and looking like hard work." -- Thomas Edison

by Brent Brookhouse on Jul 21, 2008 3:09 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If you define super fight like that then sure, its a super fight. However I think its a pretty fair assumption that given the fact that the only other option was “mismatch” that in this case super fight means a great competitive fight.

I may be mistaken as to the original poster’s intent, but the way the question was phrased, with only two options, implies that those options should be opposed to one another. So defining one option as how anticipated the matchup would be when the other option clearly is in regards to how competitive the fight would be doesn’t seem right.

It is, however, open to interpretation and it seems like the majority of the discussion is based on the different interpretations of the terms and not on people differing opinions of the actual fight. So maybe some clarity from tha Realness would help things get back on the MMA discussion track.

by Day Man on Jul 21, 2008 4:51 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

one win against a top 10 opponent? The only fight he’s had in the last seven years that hasn’t been against a top 10 opponent was Van Arsdale.

by George Lucas on Jul 21, 2008 5:47 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Uhh…clearly I’m talking about his fight’s at HW dude…where in he’s fought Sylvia(top 10) and Gonzaga who was not top ten…which give him one win against a top ten guy in the HW division.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 21, 2008 6:51 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

lol

Why do I anticipate Velasquez or Mir somehow being ahead of Gonzaga in your rankings?

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 7:51 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Gonzaga was widely considered top ten at the time of their fight (perhaps wrongly, but such is the nature of top ten lists).

by Richard Wade on Jul 22, 2008 3:10 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

lol@ brent…no worries man…the intent of the article was to get some discussion going…nothing more nothing less…

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 21, 2008 3:13 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Great discussion you got going here Realness.

by lovingmma25 on Jul 22, 2008 3:14 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So does anyone here think that A. Silva’s fight against J. Irvin was a mismatch?

by lovingmma25 on Jul 21, 2008 3:19 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No

Because Irvin actually had a puncher’s chance..

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 21, 2008 3:48 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That and the unknown of how Silva would handle facing a larger opponent than he was used to.

by Richard Wade on Jul 21, 2008 4:24 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This article stinks. Couture is very solidly ranked as the #3 heavyweight in the world, #2 being a guy Fedor’s already beaten twice. Fightmatrix only has Nogueira leading Couture by one point.

Randy is coming off of two (not sure why you think it’s just one) dominating consecutive wins against top 10 heavyweights, which is more than can be said for anyone else in the sport besides Nogueira.

Of course he’s the best possible opponent for Fedor at this time. Better now than later.

by George Lucas on Jul 21, 2008 5:55 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

First of all…the article is sound…secondly, i suppose you were one of the many bandwagon riders to have Gonzaga ranked in the top ten off of his 15 mins of fame against Cro Cop?

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 21, 2008 6:49 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If by “bandwagon” you mean every single sane MMA fan or website that ranks fighters, then yes. Your opinion that Gonzaga isn’t a top 10 heavyweight puts you in an insignificant minority.

by George Lucas on Jul 28, 2008 5:34 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Randy will be pretty old by the time him and Fedor fight. Age is the only factor that concerns me, when it comes to Randy. Skill wise, Fedor has the submission advantage. Everything else is equal.

by Cmad77 on Jul 21, 2008 7:13 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm a huge Couture fan

and I have to disagree. Fedor is a superior striker and submission expert. I’d give the wrestling advantage to Randy, but it’s close enough to probably keep it from being decisive.

Conditioning shouldn’t be an issue. Wrestlers really do age well, and Randy is in phenomenal shape. Of course he’s not at his peak, physically, but he’s got plenty for a full-length fight.

Advantage Fedor, no question. But I don’t think it’s 10:1 or 7:1. More like 5:2.

by misterjonez on Jul 21, 2008 8:39 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Randy only has a slight wrestling advantage?

He’s got a incredible pedigree and has taken down every single fighter he has ever faced. He has the disadvantage elsewhere, especially in a ring.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 10:33 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So you are saying that Couture’s standup is equal to Fedor’s? LOL…Couture doesn’t have KO power either…nor is he as quick/agile.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 21, 2008 9:00 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agreed.

Power: Fedor
Wrestling: Couture
Submission: Fedor
Youth: Fedor
Aura of motherfucking fear: Fedor

by cyph on Jul 22, 2008 10:35 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Logical rankings

I use a fairly linear system that privileges recent fights over old fights. By my reckoning, Barnett is not even a Top 10 Fighter. Mir isn’t even on the radar. I wipe out avenged losses, fights in other weight classes and steroid-tainted victories (eg. Barnett vs Couture). Here goes.

1. Emilianenko. He is virtually undefeated (he even avenged that cut-stoppage “loss”) and has beaten Nogueira twice and destroyed Sylvia.
2. Nogueira: Has beaten Sylvia, Herring, Werdum and CroCop. He has avenged a loss to Barnett, leaving only 2 losses to Emilianenko unavenged.
3. Couture: He’s also beaten Sylvia, but Emilianenko and Nogueira have far superior records. They also beat Sylvia more decisively.
4. Sylvia: His only defeats are to the 3 men above, a 4-year old loss to Mir and a twice avenged submission at the hands of Arlovski.
5. Arlovski: He beat Werdum and O’Brien. His only losses in 6 years are to Sylvia.
6. Werdum: In 3 years, he’s only lost to Nogueira and Arlovski. He’s beaten Gonzaga twice.

And this brings us to the league of Those Who’ve Beaten CroCop, who was until recently considered a Top 5 Heavyweight. Those are Emilianenko, Nogueira, Gonzaga and Kongo. For knocking out CroCop and putting up a fight with Couture, Gonzaga beats out Kongo.

7. Gonzaga
8. Velasquez: For beating O’Brien, who beat Herring, who beat Kongo.
9. O’Brien
10. Herring
11. Kongo
12. CroCop
13. Barnett: He has beaten NONE of the above except Couture 6 years in ago with Barnett failing a drug test. He has lost decisively on THREE occasions to the man at the bottom of the above rankings: CroCop.

by klown on Jul 21, 2008 11:58 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dude

You seriously need to do your homework…not only did Barnett smash Couture before in 02’(even though he did use steroids prior to)...he beat Nogueira, Jeff Monson, Mark Hunt, and Alexander Emelianenko all within the past 2 years…all of which were top 10 except Monson…and he’s probably a top 15 HW. Guess what…if Barnett fought Couture right now…he would smash him again.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 8:03 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Clearly Barnett needs to step up the comp.

If only he had been fighting the Brad Morrises of the world, we’d know so much more.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 8:25 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Even if Barnett wasn’t roiding, that Couture fight was 6 years ago. Barnett’s defeat of Nogueira was swiftly avenged. Monson, Hunt and A.Emilianenko are not Top 10 fighters – Top 20 maybe. Monson has lost to Barnett and even Rizzo recently, not to mention Sylvia. A.Emilianenko has lost to Barnett, Werdum and brutally to CroCop. Hunt has lost to F.Emilianenko, Barnett and embarassingly, Yoshida and Overeem. Here’s my stab at rankings 11-21. The insertion of Vera and Mir is subjective since they have not fought the same people as the fighters around them, but I think their records are superior to Hunt’s 9-4.

11. Kongo
12. CroCop
13. Barnett
14. A. Emilianenko
15. Kharitanov
16. Overeem
17. Rizzo
18. Monson
19. Vera
20. Mir
21. Hunt

by klown on Jul 22, 2008 9:41 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So, let's get this straight.

A guy with a 4-0 record and one questionably top 10 fighter (who is there for beating Herring because Herring beat Kongo who beat Cro Cop) on his resume beats a guy who has defeated the #2, #3, #14, #15, #17, #18, and #21 fighters. Wow. Keep digging.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 10:05 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Couture: He’s also beaten Sylvia, but Emilianenko and Nogueira have far superior records. They also beat Sylvia more decisively.

Not to pile on, but I wouldn’t call Nog’s win over Sylvia more decisive than Couture’s—I’d say they’re roughly equal (losing, followed up by a nice sub v. 5 rounds of control).

Though I can’t say I agree with your rankings as they stand, but others have already voiced those opinions.

by Estrada on Jul 22, 2008 12:29 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Purre Marketing

Realistically this is more marketing then a fight. If Affliction can get Randy to fight Fedor in their ring it will provide big PPV buys. Plus the added benifit of Fedor destroying a UFC hall of famer, will just solidify Affiction’s claim of being the ‘New Future’ of the sport. I agree completely with the section here stating Randy doesn’t even deserve the honor. There are far more deserveing HW’s who would also be a bigger challenge for the Champ. Now I do want to see the fight, if just to shut Couture and his lil Kim up already. Couture has never been a dominate champion of either weight class and his record reflects just such a lack of dominace. How he retires after losing 4 of 8 fights to come back and win two, and be considered best in the world is just too much for me to wrap my head around. (Then doesn’t even honor his contract..Don’t hear Fedor crying & refusing to fight till he fights Randy) I don’t think Randy can beat Anderson Silva myself.

by Tommy7 on Jul 22, 2008 1:37 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

brentbrookhouse

I understand they had different gameplans. Yet both of them dropped Tim right away and took his back. Randy stalled out and did nothing while Fedor capitalized and closed the show. That difference is the difference between the two and will glare obvious if/when the two collide.

by Tommy7 on Jul 22, 2008 1:42 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It is a Superfight!

We all want to see it so I think that it is a superfight. Fedor has more skills and is more well-rounded, but Randy is great. His losses do not negate some of his great performances even before he beat Sylvia. The fact that it will have the biggest PPV ever makes it a superfight. These are my two favourite fighters so I am sad that Randy will probably lose. JMO

I'll be back to add more in the next twenty-four...unless, by some mishap, someone K.O s FEDOR.

by prideUFCfan on Jul 22, 2008 1:47 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not all of us

I’d much rather see Fedor fight Barnett than Randy. Hell, I might prefer a fight against Arlovski at this point.

by FRANKIE on Jul 22, 2008 10:25 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Same here. I don’t see Couture/Emelianenko being as good of a fight as either of those other possible match ups.

by Richard Wade on Jul 22, 2008 3:12 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's a Super-Fight that has Mis-Match written all over it!

It will draw the money, but the fight itself won’t be anything special, it will be Fedor knocking Couture out in one minute.

by IHateMMA on Jul 22, 2008 1:52 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

One More Thing

How do we even entertain Randy and all his crying after he turned down the chance to fight Fedor for 3 million dollars???

by Tommy7 on Jul 22, 2008 1:53 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Silvia ahead of Arlovski?

How do people keep Tim ranked ahead of Andrei? I know about their 3 fights but still, just because you beat someone doesn’t lock you into a higher ranked position forever. Bottom line is Tim has dropped 3 out of his last four fights. Arlovski has won all four of his last four. Seems to me rankings need to be reconsidered across the board.

by Tommy7 on Jul 22, 2008 2:09 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It’s simple. For Arlovski to overtake Sylvia in the rankings, he must beat one of Emilianenko, Nogueira, Couture, or Sylvia. It doesn’t matter how many wins you get if they’re against lower-ranked opponents than yourself. Sylvia has fought the 3 top heavyweights in the world – losing to them is no shame whatsoever.

by klown on Jul 22, 2008 2:48 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

there’s a little shame in barely lasting longer than Zulu.

by Michael Rome on Jul 22, 2008 2:55 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That’s a ridiculous way of maintaining rankings.

by FRANKIE on Jul 22, 2008 10:26 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So, what happens when fighters split a pair of close fights, like Barnett and Noguiera? Where would Sam Greco end up in the rankings were he to come back tommorrow?

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 10:28 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Every Fedor fight is a mismatch. This one is stylistically interesting, because we saw Lindland get inside on Fedor pretty easily, and Fedor can cut. Obviously Fedor would be the huge favorite, but this is easily the best fight for Fedor right now. The idea that somehow Andrei Arlovski could put up a better fight is ridiculous. Couture would destroy him.

by Michael Rome on Jul 22, 2008 2:54 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hell to the no!

Arlovski 2.0 would dismantle “Old Snake.”

by cyph on Jul 22, 2008 1:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well said

I don’t know Fedor well enough to know that all his fights are mismatched…but couldn’t agree more with the rest of yoru comment.

by ufcFANatic on Jul 30, 2008 12:08 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Arlovski might not put up a better fight than Randy, but Barnett would.

by FRANKIE on Aug 1, 2008 5:14 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Fedor would murder Randy

And Couture knows it. You can see it in his eyes. After witnessing that destruction in person, he wants no part of Fedor.

Fedor, Nogueira, Barnett, Werdum, and Randy. That’s your top five in order.

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill

by FlyByKnight on Jul 22, 2008 5:37 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How do you justify ranking Barnett #3?

For beating Rizzo? Scroll up to my rankings and tell me what I’m missing.

by klown on Jul 22, 2008 9:45 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You are missing ALOT

Barnett is ranked #3 because the only losses he has are to Cro Cop 3 times(when CC was ranked top 3 in the world I might add..and one of the 3 being to suffering an injury)...Nogueira…who he has also beaten…and Pedro Rizzo…whom he destroyed this past weekend….Now, tell me how you can justify Couture being ranked #3

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 10:29 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Also, why does nobody ever remember that Barnett’s third loss to Cro Cop was due to eye poke?

by FRANKIE on Jul 22, 2008 10:53 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

#3

Simple: Couture is ranked #3 for dominating Sylvia, which puts him on par with Nogueira and Emiliananko. Since he hasn’t fought either of them, we can’t know how he matches up against them, so we look at other factors, like their records, and his is not as impressive. That’s how he ends up #3.

For Barnett to be Top 3 he must beat a Top 3 fighter – is that so complicated? It seems like you’re counting his roid-victory over Couture, which also took place 6 years ago.

For Afflication’s next card, it would make most sense for Arlovski to get a shot at Fedor while Barnett is pitted against Sylvia. If Barnett wins, he gets the next title shot, if he loses, hopefully people will lose their illusion that he is a Top 5 fighter.

by klown on Jul 22, 2008 2:22 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"For Barnett to be Top 3 he must beat a Top 3 fighter"

Then Couture can’t be top three. Sorry. He hasn’t beaten a top three fighter. He’s lost to a top three fighter, though, in Barnett.

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill

by FlyByKnight on Jul 22, 2008 4:43 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes he has beaten a Top 3 fighter – Sylvia.

And for God’s sake, stop bringing up the Couture fight. It was SIX YEARS ago plus Barnett tested positive for ROIDS!

by klown on Jul 22, 2008 8:39 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You know Barnett beat Couture, right?

by FRANKIE on Jul 23, 2008 12:14 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Since when is Sylvia a top three fighter?

When? I’d like to hear your argument on Sylvia being top three.

And I don’t care if he tested positive for steroids. Tell me, is it still a win on his record or does it say “No Contest” next to it?

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill

by FlyByKnight on Jul 23, 2008 5:08 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

All this talk about wins over top 10 heavyweights seems to ignore the fact that Fedor isn’t exactly a true heavyweight – he’s an inch shorter and maybe a pound heavier than Randy, and could make 205 just as easily. And pretending that heavyweights are necessarily harder to beat than LHW fighters seems a little simplistic. I’d love to see Fedor vs. Chuck or Fedor vs. Machida. Wouldn’t everyone?

(Okay, I admit it: that second fight is just to see Machida get his face broken open.)

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones

by jemaleddin on Jul 22, 2008 8:58 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’d love to see Fedor vs. Tito

by lovingmma25 on Jul 22, 2008 10:39 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There’s a poll that needs to happen: Who do you want to see Fedor destroy next?

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones

by jemaleddin on Jul 22, 2008 2:58 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Never count out the natural. Tim Sylvia was taylor made for Fedor. Sylvia can’t defend a submission to save his life.

by Josh H. on Jul 22, 2008 10:30 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Seriously. I am reading some of this stuff in disbelief. I stopped betting against the natural a loooong time ago.

by Nellieball on Jul 23, 2008 3:11 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

DAMN@ the poll having over 400 votes.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 10:40 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Damn as in good and surprised?

by lovingmma25 on Jul 22, 2008 10:44 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Both

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 10:54 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

what?!?!

Ok so you guys want to do MMA math huh?

How can you question Randy’s legitimacy at the top of the ranking and not question Fedors? Its asinine. Randy has fought nothing but top guys his entire career, held a title in 2 weight classes and total of 5 times! Fedor has a superb record but his only real test were Tim, Nog, and Cro Cop…..which this guy says an overrated Gonzaga destroyed, so by default Cro Cop is even more overrated because he was the #2 HW in the world at that time, so that now subtracts one of Fedor’s 3 real fights and leaves him with only 2…….way to go buddy…..you really thought that one through

I dont doubt Feor’s skills, but unlike so many of you I am not willing to crown him king yet, again he has really only face 3 real opponents his entire carreer, and he picks and chooses who he fights. Randy deserves the spot he has, he will fight anyone, and most of the time he beats anyone. That is a true champion. Sorry Fedor lovers, he just has not proven himself on the big stage yet.

by Cbingham1 on Jul 22, 2008 11:13 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Huh?

He’s not proven himself on the big stage? He’s fought in front of larger crowds than any major promotion in the US has drawn and in front of way more eyeballs on TV than anyone in the sport’s history in the Western Hemisphere.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 11:20 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Further...

How has Noguiera proven himself? By giving Heath Herring a new lease on life when he was about to be released to IFL Hell? Heath’s hardly some top notch UFC vet. Then he struggled with the guy that Fedor just annhilated to win his silly “interim” crown.

If Fedor isn’t established, no one is.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 11:21 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Randy Will Fight Anyone?

LMAO…he’s been ducking Nogueira since last August.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 11:29 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Excellent point

Randy could have fought Nogueira to get an idea of where he’d stand with Fedor since Nogueira fought Fedor 3 times. That would have hyped up the fight with Fedor even more.

by lovingmma25 on Jul 22, 2008 11:31 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Randy’s 45. Why bother fighting a consolation prize?

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 11:55 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Simple

To further legitimize himself as the best….I mean if my miracle he were to beat Fedor…that doesn’t automatically grant him #1 status…given the fact that he in fact has not beaten Nogueira nor Barnett.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 12:00 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Randy doesn’t need to legitimize himself to anyone at this point, historically or otherwise. If by miracle he does beat Fedor, you bet your ass he’s #1.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 12:37 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So..

By your logic…Matt Serra was #1 at WW after beating GSP? lol…there is no way Couture can leap frog Nogueira unless he beats him.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 12:44 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He beat the champ. As for Couture not being able to leap frog Noguiera, why not? You telling me that for anyone to be #1, they have to beat everyone else in the division? Too bad that’s impossible.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 1:20 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yep..here's

Not only has he not beaten Nogueira…he hasn’t beaten Barnett…if he has just honored the contract that HE signed…he would have had the opportunity to fight Nogueira..No way in hell he can be called the #1 fighter at HW when he only has 2 wins at HW in the past what…5 years or so…

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 1:34 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We went over this in a previous thread. If he did honor the contract and fought Noguiera, he’d probably still be in a legal battle if he had won. He has the opportunity to fight Noguiera, who wasn’t the #2 heavyweight until Couture’s demotion due to inaction, and assumed the role of interim UFC champion, something he will hold until its determined whether or not Randy has a valid contract with the company into the future. If he beats Fedor, he’s beating a guy who is clearly the best heavyweight in the world without peer whilst having been a top 5 heavyweight during virtually the entire wait.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 2:34 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hold On

So you are trying to tell me that you had Couture at #2 after his win over Gonzaga? LOL

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 2:57 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I did indeed. So did most observers. Its tough not to have given that Noguiera wasn’t fighting, Barnett was pro wrestling, Cro Cop was laying crumpled on top of his own leg, and Couture just knocked off two top 5 heavyweights in a row.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 3:24 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

To show that much more of why he should have a fight with Fedor. He is proving that this sport defies a so called age limit.

by lovingmma25 on Jul 22, 2008 12:00 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He doesn’t need to prove why he should have a fight with Fedor. He’s still the UFC Heavyweight Champ, currently in his third reign as such. He’s still a top 5 heavyweight. He still beat Sylvia and Gonzaga last two times out. Beating a guy who’s been perennially second place for the last 5 years does nothing great for Randy’s legacy.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 12:38 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The only reason Couture is still the UFC HW Champ is because he hasn’t fought anyone in the last year and a half!

by cyph on Jul 22, 2008 1:19 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Year and a half?

I like the new history where Gonzaga wasn’t considered a threat, or we just forget that he was ever there.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 1:21 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Excuse me, one year. My point stands. You can’t lose your belt if you don’t defend it.

Couture beat Sylvia who has been terribly exposed. And he beat Gonzaga who has been terribly exposed as well.

What’s Couture’s claim to fame again? Oh yeah, he got knocked into retirement by Chuck Liddell.

by cyph on Jul 22, 2008 1:27 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sylvia has been terribly exposed by being beaten by the best heavyweight in the world? Gonzaga “terribly exposed”? Man, oh man. Couture would have defended if they brought him the best fighter in the world. They didn’t, so given his advanced age, he didn’t bother. Can’t say I blame him.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 2:27 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That’s like Couture refusing to fight anyone in Affliction because the “best” fighter in the world is in the UFC. You fight who you have available. You fight what’s on your contract. You don’t walk away from a fight because you fear a loss will diminish your earning power.

I think Forrest Griffin should refuse to defend the belt until the UFC bring Tito Ortiz back. Do you see how ludicrous that sounds when put Randy Couture’s name is not attached to it?

by cyph on Jul 22, 2008 2:47 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Blah blah blah. Randy wants to fight the best fighter in the world (along with probably making more money than any other fight has made him), and it ain’t Noguiera who provides either. And if he ends up out of his contract and in a ring with Fedor, then I guess its hard to say he didn’t fufill his end.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 3:23 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He hasn’t been “ducking” anyone.

by Luke Thomas on Jul 22, 2008 4:24 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If Randy had just fought his contract out

and risk his record, he would have been able to fight on Affliction right now. But he knew that Nogueira was a bad match up for him and would ruin the potential windfall payday from Affliction if he lost the belt. Randy is a coward.

By the time he’s released from his legal troubles, Affliction would be no more. Good job, Randy!

by cyph on Jul 22, 2008 11:37 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We should have more polls, that thing looks awesome.

by Chris Nelson on Jul 22, 2008 12:56 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If Randy would have just manned up and fought his last two fights we wouldn’t have to argue this moot point. We would know where he stood against Big Nog or Werdum or Arlovski and he would be free to fight whomever he choose. As it was he broke his contract and spit on Big Nog basically saying he doesn’t deserve to fight for the real championship belt. I wish some bad roots on Couture.

by Tommy7 on Jul 22, 2008 1:13 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ugh. If he beats Fedor he is so clearly the number 1 in the world that it’s not even close. Beating Fedor is not like beating GSP. It probably won’t happen, but he would be a consensus number 1 both across all rankings and among all the fighters.

by Michael Rome on Jul 22, 2008 1:52 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's not happening

But if he did beat Fedor..I disagree in that he would be #1 at HW…just no way he leaps Barnett AND Nogueira.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 2:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Who has Randy beat?

He didn’t beat Barnett, he hasn’t beat Arlovski, he hasn’t beat Werdum, he hasn’t beat Big Nog, heck he hasn’t even beat CroCop or Antonio Silva. That’s at least five in the top ten he’s never fought. Yeah that Couture is a world class dominate champ.

by Tommy7 on Jul 22, 2008 2:08 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ranking theory

To rise in the rankings you don’t have to beat every single guy ranked above you – you just have to beat one. Conversely, you cannot rise in the rankings without beating someone ranked above you. Someone in a different promotion might be utterly dominant and well-rounded, but if he never fights one of the Top 20 fighters, he can’t be ranked in the Top 20. It doesn’t mean he sucks – it just means we can’t know where he stands.

by klown on Jul 22, 2008 2:17 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

But Barnett has wins over two top 5 fighters.

One of which in the last 2 years. Do they simply not count?

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 2:36 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The win over Couture DOES NOT COUNT. For 2 reasons – Barnett tested positive for steroids, and the fight took place 6 years ago. Either of these reasons alone makes that fight irrelevant to the rankings.

I agree that it’s tougher when 2 fighters are 1-1 against each other. In my opinion they cancel each other out. The determinant factor becomes other fights and mutual opponents. On the mutual opponents front, Nogueira submitted CroCop, who beat Barnett 3 times (2 times if you want to discount the eye poke.) It also matters which victory is more recent (Nogueira’s) and which was more decisive (Nogueira’s). So Nogueira must be ranked above Barnett.

The other factor is that Nogueira has beaten Sylvia, so he must be ranked above him. Barnett has lost to CroCop and so must be ranked below him.

by klown on Jul 22, 2008 2:42 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Fight was never changed to a NC, and bringing up Couture’s record being mediocre requires you going back to RINGS.

The idea that they cancel each other out seems preposterous to me. They happened. He won once, he lost once, both ridiculously close fights. I have no problem ranking him below Noguiera, but I do have a problem ranking him well outside the top 10.

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 3:18 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What about the CroCop angle? Barnett surely must be ranked lower than CroCop!

by klown on Jul 22, 2008 8:41 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No he must not

Barnett is winning. Cro Cop is losing and not fighting. By your logic, Ricco Rodriguez MUST be ranked ahead of Randy Couture.

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill

by FlyByKnight on Jul 22, 2008 9:52 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Right

However, you can’t jump from #4 to #1…not in Couture’s case anyways.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 2:32 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If Barnett beat Fedor, he’d be #1.

by klown on Jul 22, 2008 2:36 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I would agree with you on that. I’m asking the other gentleman here. After all, Barnett lost the last time he fought Noguiera. Hell, on that note, is there anyone that could beat Fedor and ascend to #1 other than ARN?

by D.Capitated on Jul 22, 2008 2:38 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

All this exposed shit is meaningless. We’re not going to discount Fedor’s win over Cro Cop because Gonzaga murdered him, and there’s no need to pretend Gonzaga wasn’t high on most rankings across the board before Couture smashed him.

This rankings purist nonsense is insane. Whoever beats Fedor is the best heavyweight in the world unless it’s a fluke.

by Michael Rome on Jul 22, 2008 2:36 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree

Unlike the farce that was Matt Serra beating GSP to become #1, Randy is legit enough to earn #1 if he beats Fedor.

Too bad he will never fight Fedor because of his handling of the UFC contract.

Too bad he won’t win. It’s a moot point.

by cyph on Jul 22, 2008 2:50 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So where does Tim Sylvia stand now that he has fought Fedor? Would he rank above Nog and Couture since he did compete against the #1 HW?

by lovingmma25 on Jul 22, 2008 3:09 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He can’t be above Couture..since he’s lost 3 outta 4…and Couture was one of those losses.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 3:59 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Here's how you rank HW

1. Fedor Emelianenko
Not 1. Everybody else

If somebody beats Fedor it becomes:
1. Guy who beat Fedor
2. Fedor
Not 1 or 2. Everybody else

by FRANKIE on Jul 22, 2008 4:10 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So had Choi been able to continue pounding Fedor and win the fight he would be the number one heavyweight in the world?

Anything can happen in MMA so I don’t think one victory, even over the number one fighter in the world, automatically makes you the number one fighter in the world.

by Day Man on Jul 22, 2008 4:19 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

But he wouldn’t. That’s the point. He never had a chance to. There’s always the possibility of a fluke win, but it will take the best heavyweight performance ever to defeat Fedor decisively.

by Michael Rome on Jul 22, 2008 4:23 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This discussion is pretty much dead…maybe we should have a discussion on what criteria goes into legitimate rankings?

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 4:35 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A lot of hardcores never tire of debating rankings :) Anything rank-related would make for a controversial post with a lot of comments, for sure. A related topic is future match-ups. It’s fun to play match-maker.

by klown on Jul 22, 2008 9:34 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I would bet my left nut...

We will be watching Randy Vs. Fedor on a UFC PPV within 6 months. Randy is under contract, Fedor is not. Fedor just wants $$. At this point Dana should be willing to put it up. Especially after letting Affliction incur the loss of bringing a relatively unknown Fedor to the US and letting him wipe his ass with the Maineiac. Dana is much smarter than most give him credit for.

by nitro on Jul 22, 2008 4:43 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"Dana is much smarter than most give him credit for."

And he’s also much more stubborn than most give him credit for. You think he’s going to sign Fedor after he destroyed Sylvia? Dana will spin this and say that Sylvia was overrated, hence why an aging Randy Couture defeated him and why Sylvia couldn’t finish fights anymore. Dana will spin this to make the UFC look like kings.

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill

by FlyByKnight on Jul 22, 2008 4:46 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dana already said he was impressed with Fedor’s win over Tim.

by lovingmma25 on Jul 22, 2008 5:13 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh I know he said that

But at the same time, you just know he’s going to downplay it a little bit later on with some excuses like Tim never fought in a ring, Tim hasn’t finished anyone lately, and Randy dominated Tim too but was older.

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill

by FlyByKnight on Jul 22, 2008 5:30 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Actually, I believe he said that Tim Sylvia was a “real” opponent. To discredit Sylvia would be discrediting the UFC HW belt.

by nitro on Jul 22, 2008 8:11 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not really

Dana could simply say that a 40+ Couture beat Sylvia for the title. That wouldn’t discredit the title. It’d do more to discredit Tim himself.

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill

by FlyByKnight on Jul 22, 2008 8:37 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It also puts out the message that the UFC HW champ is not the best in all of MMA, and thats exactly what Dana would have you believe.

by nitro on Jul 22, 2008 9:53 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, after WAMMA put the ...

.. Undisputed Heavyweight Championship on Fedor on Saturday evening, the best Heavyweight Champion is clearly not in the UFC.

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill

by FlyByKnight on Jul 22, 2008 10:49 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What with the WAMMA belt being the final word on such matters…

by Richard Wade on Jul 23, 2008 1:54 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So you're saying ..

.. that Fedor is not the best Heavyweight in the world right now?

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill

by FlyByKnight on Jul 23, 2008 6:55 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That’s not what I’m saying. Fedor is almost certainly the best in the world right now, but the fact that he holds the WAMMA belt means nothing.

by Richard Wade on Jul 23, 2008 8:25 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

They had to give him some kind of belt though

That much is certain.

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill

by FlyByKnight on Jul 24, 2008 1:23 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m not taking issue with the claim that Fedor is #1 or with Affliction putting a belt on him. I was taking issue with the idea that wearing the WAMMA title means a fighter is the undisputed champion at that weight class.

by Richard Wade on Jul 24, 2008 3:43 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You’re right. With or without WAMMA’s belt, Fedor will still be considered the #1 heavywieght.

But, I do think that strapping a belt on Fedor would give them some kind of prestige and that, it, being given by a third party (WAMMA, not Affliction) lends some credibility to their claim that he’s the #1 HW..

by Johann on Jul 24, 2008 4:58 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He also once said that Fedor was the best heavyweight in the world. About 4 months later, Fedor was a fraud in his opinion.

by D.Capitated on Jul 23, 2008 7:59 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah I remember that

I got quite the chuckle out of that. Dana would try to sell a polar bear a coat if he could, only problem is halfway through he’d have his head swatted off.

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill

by FlyByKnight on Jul 23, 2008 5:09 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I want to know if Dana still thinks Couture would smash Fedor.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 22, 2008 4:50 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Randy's chances

In a ring, Randy has about a 3% chance of winning. That’s if he cuts Fedor early.

In a cage, Randy has about a 10% chance of winning. That’s if he cuts Fedor early and uses the clinch against the cage.

Randy has nothing for Fedor really.

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill

by FlyByKnight on Jul 22, 2008 6:07 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well

The poll has spoken….it’s a mis-match :)

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 24, 2008 9:06 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don’t know why people aren’t recommending this post to the moon, BTW.

by Luke Thomas on Jul 25, 2008 10:33 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Probably because of this

Considering that Couture decisioned Sylvia and stopped a Gabriel Gonzaga who proved to be overhyped after his win over Cro Cop. I don’t see how Couture can be ranked at #3 when he only has one win against a top 10 HW since his first retirement.

Which is factually wrong going by just about every single respectable ranking system on the internet.

It’s one thing to think Fedor/Couture will be one-sided, but it’s another entirely to say that Couture doesn’t even deserve the shot.

by George Lucas on Jul 28, 2008 5:44 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dude…the only legit win Gonzaga has is against CroCop….how that all of a sudden made him a top 10 fighter is beyond me…and that’s the facts.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 28, 2008 10:48 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Still the fact that he was a consensus top ten heavyweight isn’t really debatable. Whether his status was merited obviously is, but his status itself is not.

by Richard Wade on Jul 29, 2008 1:50 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Gonzaga’s win over CC did not solidfy him as a top ten HW…especially considering what Couture and Werdum did afterwards…futhermore in regards to Couture being the #3 ranked HW…Sokoudjou KO’ed BOTH Arona and LiL Nog(both legit top 10 LHW at the time)...in the first round…and nobody was calling him the #3 LHW in the world..

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 29, 2008 8:18 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That’s because Light Heavyweight is a much deeper division than Heavyweight. Sok may not have catapulted into 3rd place but he went from obscurity to top 10 almost overnight.

The reason you’re flat out wrong is that even after his loss to Couture, Gonzaga is still a consensus top 10 heavyweight.

by George Lucas on Jul 29, 2008 3:23 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How am I wrong…you make it seem as if their are some official rankings of some sort…lol…The fact of the matter is…

1. Gonzaga has beaten ONE legit contender in his entire career
#2. There’s no way Couture can go from getting KTFO by Liddell…retiring for a year…decisioning Sylvia…and beating a overhyped Gonzaga to be ranked #3 at HW in the world.

Hell..he hasn’t fought in almost a year and nuthuggers STILL have him ranked #3…smh…

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 29, 2008 3:48 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don’t think you understand what is meant by consensus top ten.

by Richard Wade on Jul 29, 2008 4:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m well aware of what it means….there’s simply no way to dispute what I mentioned above.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 29, 2008 4:28 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m not arguing with you over whether he ought to have been top ten. I’m just making the point that virtually everyone who put out a public ranking had him in their top ten.

by Richard Wade on Jul 29, 2008 6:53 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m simply stating why he shouldn’t have been…

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 29, 2008 10:27 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And yet virtually every site that ranks fighters has Randy in the top 5 and Gonzaga in the top 10. I’m sure “tha realness” knows better than fightmatrix, Sherdog, MMA Weekly, the voters at MMA Playground, the Bloodyelbow metarankings and fightlines.

How am I wrong…you make it seem as if their are some official rankings of some sort

You’re the one who brought up rankings in the first place in your article. If you can find a single reputable top 10 ranking anywhere on the internet that has Randy ranked below 5 or Gonzaga ranked below 10, I’ll concede the point. Until then take your “nuthugger” crap back to Sherdog.

by George Lucas on Jul 29, 2008 4:24 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I suppose because you moved it to the frontpage earlier this week?

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 25, 2008 1:26 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Are you crazy?

This is nothing BUT a superfight. Granted, when I saw how fast Fedor ended Tim I was a little worried about how Randy would match up against him, but give me a break….Randy is a completely different fighter than Tim. Randy has a wrestling background, as did Matt Lindland…and anyone who saw that fight knows…if Fedor hadn’t cheated by grabbing the ropes…well, not sure how that might have ended….and Matt i(a freakin Middleweight) had Fedor up in the air ready to slam him. What do you think Randy (a heavy weight) would do w/that? I believe 100% Fedor could NOT walk through Randy like he did Tim. And now they have Fedor lined up to fight Arvloski??? He lost to Tim twice!!

How can you not have Randy listed in the top 10…if Fedor can be ranked #1 w/out fighting any real competition in the last few years (besides Tim). Randy got KO’d twice….might want to mention that was by Chuck…at the time the #1 ranked LHW. All this Randy hate is just ridiculous. How many times does he need to prove you all wrong before you realize what an amazing fight he STILL is?

by ufcFANatic on Jul 30, 2008 11:39 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I do appreciate you reading my material…

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 30, 2008 11:51 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

1. Stop using MMA math
#2. Where did I say Couture was not a top ten HW(he’s not #3 though)
#3. Fedor dismantled the #2 HW in the world twice…that’s how he was ranked #1 while doing the freakshows
#4. Stop using if/would’ve/could’ve/should’ve in your arguments…
#5. Actually Shogun was ranked #1(by most) at LHW when Liddell was ripping Couture’s face off

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 30, 2008 11:50 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Shogun @#1?......you may have an advantage in arguments here since I was not a big Pride fan. But it seems that most Pride fighters coming into the cage, being tested for steroids, elbows added, soccer kicks taken away….haven’t had much luck! I understand what you are saying w/Randy’s lack of wins over HW in recent history, but you would have to consider his fights at LHW, espeically if you’ll consider his losses at LHW. It’s not like he was sitting around and NOT fighting top competition. Serious question, where was Fedor the last few years? The only fights I’ve heard about was Lindland and that insanely tall Asian guy. Also, how long ago did Fedor beat Nog? Seriously not being a smartass, just curious.

Sorry re: #4, I do that to show it’s just my opinion and not some fact set in stone! I’m not saying Randy would beat Fedor …..I’d sure hope he would cuz I love the guy, but I’m not stupid, anything can happen in MMA. After betting against Randy in his last 2 fights, I promised myself I’d never count him out again (not saying I’d bet on him either…just I wouldn’t go in thinking there’s no way he’ll win….cuz there is a chance!!).

by ufcFANatic on Jul 30, 2008 12:06 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yeah I never understood how Pride did not allow elbows but allowed soccer kicks to a downed opponent

by lovingmma25 on Jul 30, 2008 2:15 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

True indeed that PRIDE fighters haven’t faired well in the cage…but the facts are that Shogun was rated as the #1 LHW in the world by most back in 2006…

Yea, Couture fight quality competition at LHW…but that’s not what I’m speaking on here…you can’t justify his ranking as a HW just because he fought quality competition at LHW.

Fedor bested Nog in 2004…sure that was 4 years ago…and I agree the quality of competition he faced was asswipes(as I initially indicated)...however, his dismantling of Tim Syliva solidified that his #1 ranking was well deserved regardless.

In regards to betting against him…you have to remember that he hasn’t fought in almost a year right now…is a year older physically…and if this fight even occurs…it will have been at least a year and a half since he last fought…and he’ll be that much older…

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 30, 2008 12:21 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

but the facts are that Shogun was rated as the #1 LHW in the world by most back in 2006…

How can you make a statement like this and then refuse to merit any argument that Gonzaga was (and still is) rated as a top ten heavyweight by most?

by George Lucas on Jul 30, 2008 2:45 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dude

Because unlike Gonzaga who has one credible win in his entire career…Shogun at the time demolished everyone he had faced(except Babalu)...Rampage, Arona, Overeem(2X), Antonio Rogerio Nogueira…all of those guys are were upper tier fighters at the time.

That’s how.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 30, 2008 3:15 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Because unlike Gonzaga who has one credible win in his entire career

And yet that doesn’t change the fact that Gonzaga is rated as a top 10 Heavyweight “by most” now and when Couture beat him.

by George Lucas on Jul 30, 2008 4:48 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That says alot about their rankings then…I guess I could go out and beat Tim Sylvia and be a top ten HW.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 30, 2008 6:26 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If you could go out and beat Tim Sylvia you’d likely be a top ten HW.

by Richard Wade on Jul 30, 2008 7:00 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Which is pathetic….just because you beat one legitimate guy doesn’t make you a top tier fighter.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 30, 2008 8:48 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Absolutely dominating a top ten heavyweight is a good way to get into the top ten. It seems reasonable enough.

by Richard Wade on Jul 31, 2008 3:30 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nah

You have to do it continously IMO…one win isn’t enough…back to back wins against two top ten guys warrants the tenth spot or so…depending on who you beat…and 3 wins in a row solidify’s that you are indeed a top ten or even top 5 caliber fighter…again all depending on who you beat.

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 31, 2008 8:05 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I love how this thing is still going.

by Luke Thomas on Jul 31, 2008 3:00 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

They are going for the record…whatever that is…lol

http://tharealness.wordpress.com/

by Tha Realness on Jul 31, 2008 3:07 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it." -- H.L. Mencken
Start posting on Bloody Elbow »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bob_sapp__potato_head_small
A Message For Our Troops
Weo_animation2_small
Exclusive: An Interview With "The Veteran Voice of the Octagon" Bruce Buffer
Stpierre_472917a_small
The Official UFC 100 Bloody Elbow Meet-up Thread
Chainlink_small
Quiet Before the Storm: St. Pierre-Alves
Tapout-girl_small
Unofficial BE Welterweight Grand Prix (Updated) Second Round

Recent FanPosts

Ebola_small
Next MMA Fighter To Die?
Picture_010_small
Brock Lesnar vs. Bobby Lashley
Mirkneebaraim640_small
Dan Miller vs. Aaron Simpson Possible for UFN 19 in September
Weo_animation2_small
Mixed Martial Artwork: Bruce Buffer
Weo_animation2_small
UFC 100 Preview: Striking Coach Ken Hahn Talks Frank Mir vs. Brock Lesnar
Nielson_small
Rampage vs. Rashad Evans to Headline UFC 107; UFC 108 Scheduled for January 2nd in Las Vegas
Rampage_eyesfront_small
The Nod - who from BE is heading to UFC 100 & the Fan Expo?
S33103564_30985519_9332_small
Will we see the "Buffer 360" at UFC 100?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings