Bloody Elbow: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


UFC, Affliction Results and Afterthoughts

I'll discuss more tomorrow. It's very late where I am and I'm very tired. What I will say is that Affliction is absolutely dreaming if they believe they can rival the UFC. Their PPV was horrendous to the point of unwatchability at times. The inclusion of Megadeth was beyond bizarre and the epitome of the word perfunctory. By contrast, the UFC product was tight, sound, crisp and cogent all the way through. A little repetitive? Yes. A little unoriginal at certain intervals? Yes. But by far the more professional product that cared more about the sport? Unequivocally, yes. The Affliction show was a metal concert with MMA fights in between. The UFC show was a showcase of high-end fighters battling their hearts out. The contrast couldn't be more clear.

0 recs | Comment 127 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Holy overreaction, Batman!

by smoogy on Jul 20, 2008 2:56 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Holy simplification, robin!

by Luke Thomas on Jul 20, 2008 3:18 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

High End fighters

Like i said in the other post i don’t think that the UFC showcased higher end fighters overall, (no disrespect to anderson silva) Affliction had the better card on paper but the production and the way things were done made the UFC seem like it had the bigger fights/names.

It was there first PPV and i’m sure they’ll learn from their mistakes on how to make things better.

Ohh and does anyone really think that Matt Lindland would stand a chance against Anderson Silva. That’s laughable after his performance tonight. I understand he was off for a year but theres Anderson doesn’t stop him in the first round.

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:04 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m seeing a lot of people grasping at straws defending the Affliction event. What was so great about it? One good fight and bunch of duds? A dominant performance by Fedor to cap things off nicely. That wasn’t even close enough to merit all of this “best heavyweight card ever assembled” rhetoric.

by Popetastic on Jul 20, 2008 3:06 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

*close to enough.
It’s late.

by Popetastic on Jul 20, 2008 3:07 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m not sure what you were watching, but I saw a very admirable effort from a first time promotion that put on an unbelievable card.

Did we need Megadeth? Of course not. But I’m sorry, I watched the rebroadcast of UFN after the Affliction PPV and the 2 were incomparable. Affliction had the clearly superior product, and despite the obvious flaws that should be expected in any first broadcast, enjoyed Affliction more than any UFC event this year.

I hope they put on a second show, and learn from their mistakes and feedback.

by iki on Jul 20, 2008 3:07 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Jesus

I really wonder what you people were watching. It is like people get scared of something that is even a twinge different. What exactly are UFC’s great production values? UFC has had the same stale image for quite a while now. People always say, “oh, but it is like BOXING.” Clearly, these people have never seen a boxing card on Showtime or HBO and probably just like to shoot their mouth off to sound bright on the internet.

I think a thing that a lot of people are missing the point on is that Affliction was fun, UFC was business as usual. It is a sport and sports are supposed to be entertaining. Just because you, personally, didn’t want to see Megadeth or see a bunch of the top heavyweights in the world fight and would rather watch UFC’s business as usual doesn’t mean that everybody wants that.

I caught UFN after and honestly, I was still amped up from Affliction and it was near unwatchable. This isn’t pro wrestling, nobody cares about “the business” or “the product” or any of that, this is mixed martial arts, what matters is promoters putting on exciting, entertaining cards.

So many internet fans have tunnel vision and seemingly just want UFC to be the only game in town and trample the rest. You really have to wonder sometimes.

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 3:09 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Inevitably, people are going to compare the 2 shows, because they were directly competing. However, if you look at Banned on its own, it was not good. I don’t know about some people, but I would prefer a show with unknown but capable announcers and PA guys. I would prefer silence to bad metal. And mostly, I would prefer good fights or potentially good fights, rather than obvious mismatches. I think I picked every fight correctly on this card, and I am terrible at picking fights, lol.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:16 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Stale Image

Actually they changed that up quie a bit, i thought it looked good. ESPN/Sports Center like

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:16 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

UFC is the Major League of MMA

On paper, Affliction had the better card going into the night.

In reality, UFC managed to turn a mid-level card into a winner. They had the better fights and the better product tonight - not even close. I watched the fights at a sports bar and mid-way through the Affliction event, people started chanting for the UFC card to be shown with sound. It wasnt even close - UFC has the better fights, the better fighters in general and everyone else is simply grasping.

Affliction sells good clothing, UFC sells one amazing MMA product—both should stick to what they know best.

by HoustonRaven on Jul 20, 2008 3:11 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Maybe they were just chanting to have the Affliction sound turned off, lol.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:18 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Or something. They had the PPV up on the huge screen and the UFC on the of the smaller TV’s in the bar. Everyone was cramming their necks to see the UFC fight after the 2nd Affliction fight.

I do agree that UFC’s look is getting old, but it was still the winner tonight.

by HoustonRaven on Jul 20, 2008 3:25 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I enjoyed the Affliction card as a whole, but they definitely need to fix a lot of their production problems. I don’t mind giving them a pass on show #1 as I assume that’s one of the harder things to get right from the onset.

Plus, the UFC gets negative points for Mike Goldberg saying, “His precision is…precise.”

by Mike Fagan on Jul 20, 2008 3:11 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Affliction was some weak sauce.

Megadeth was horrible.

The fights were predictable and one sided.

Buffer was terrible.

The announcing was amateurish.

If that was a UFC show, everyone would be bitching about it.

UFN was just as bad, but free.

Goldberg is really annoying me. “His precision is very…precise”. What the Hell was that??

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:12 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What was wrong with Buffer?

by Mike Fagan on Jul 20, 2008 3:20 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

“Stone” Steve Austin??

I guess i expect more from him, as he is probably the best ring announcer ever.

I know that is fairly petty, but like I said, I set the bar a little higher for M. Buffer.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:22 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

lol

I like how Dave Meltzer, a guy who has been reporting and analyzing the sport since it first spawned sees Affliction as a real threat, while BloodyElbow.com and pockets of the internet are so quick to say, “NO IT WAS STUPID AND UFC IS THE BEST DID YOU SEE ALL OF THOSE EVEN MATCHUPS?!” I for one know that James Irvin vs. Anderson Silva is an incredibly well-matched fight. I’m glad they can bombard us with such a top flight card while Affliction can just give us crap like Rothwell/Arlovski, Barnett/Rizzo and Fedor/Sylvia. Ugh. Disgrace.

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 3:16 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wow

Way to totally miss the point. No one is discussing the quality of fighters or fights per se. What we are discussing in this post is how they are showcased, which is arguably more important. On that level, Affliction failed hard.

by Luke Thomas on Jul 20, 2008 3:18 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No, I am!! lol.

Affliction had some great fighters and some interesting fighters, it was their matchups that stunk. Locust listed 3 one sided fights, but if you rework the matches, you could have had better fights, Fedor/barnett the obvious one. Hopefully that will be on Affliction 2.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:20 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hopefully there is an Affliction 2. :)

Thinking on it though, the second card has the potential to get quite a few buys, since they’ll be able to market it using footage of this first card.

Fedor vs. Barnett is much more appealing to me than Randy vs. Fedor anyway.

by iki on Jul 20, 2008 3:22 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Who honestly thought that Sylvia/Fedor was going to be so onesided.

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:23 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I expected it to end in rd 1 or maybe 2, but not in 30 secs or so.

Barnett was the far better matchup, but Sylvia may have more drawing power, which in itself is a sad statement.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:25 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think Arlovski would have been the better draw if that was the case. I think more people tend to like him than Tim not that either are a huge draw. I’m just saying i don’t think that should be consider a lopsided match up even though the in the end it was one.

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:29 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The problem is, they had the 2 best HWs in the world on the card, and they weren’t fighting each other.

I would have preferred something like

Fedor/Josh
AA/Aleks
Sylvia/Rizzo
Rothwell/Buentello

I know that’s asking a lot, but if you want to make a dent in the UFC, you have to bring it. Assuming they are going to have Randy at some point, there are still compelling matches after that. You only get one shot at the first impression.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:36 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think with the Arlovski/Rothwell and Sylvia/Fedor fight they left a good impression. I think regardless of what happens they’re going to run atleast 2 or 3 shows. I think they had to kind of set themselves up to have a decent second show as well.

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:39 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, and don’t get me wrong, I am a fan of mma, not promotions. Sometimes I like a cage, other times a ring.

I hope they succeed, and if they put together a compelling card, I will buy it. However, if I was a casual fan, I may not.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:41 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don’t think many casual fans bought this at all. Maybe a few people that are REALLY into the clothing line.

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:49 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agreed. i watched it with 2 casual fans, and neither were impressed by it.

They also were not that impressed by teh UFN, but they know the UFC and that it is normally more impressive.

I see this like UFC is the champ, and you have to beat the champ. Affliction threw some big punches, but few landed, imo.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:52 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why would you put on a potentially huge fight in Barnett/Fedor when neither of them have any reliable pull in the states? Both of them need to be built up. Tonight was a good step for both.

by Mike Fagan on Jul 20, 2008 3:40 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

“Barnett was the far better matchup, but Sylvia may have more drawing power, which in itself is a sad statement.”

Right up above you a bit.

How many ppvs more do you think they sold by having Fedor/Sylvia?

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:42 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I have no idea. But there’s a lot more potential money to be made in Fedor/Barnett if built properly. There isn’t much big money potential in Sylvia for obvious reasons.

by Mike Fagan on Jul 20, 2008 3:45 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree with that, but I think they may have lost some viewers with tonights show. they need to get Randy asap, even though there are a few fights I would prefer to see, like Fedor/Josh or Fedor/AA.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:46 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

wow, you're funny

did you really just wrote that the way that a fight is presented is more important than the fighters and the actual fight? that is too funy in a very sad kind of way.

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 3:22 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You didn't understand

To the people that are new, the casual fan, tho whom these people are trying to sell the PPV the UFC is going to come across as a better product for some people. Most of these people have know idea who Fedor is. So most people aren’t buying it on whether or not Fedor is fighting or Arlovski rather than the package they see as a whole. the fights, the production, the commentating, the flow. etc…

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:25 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

sorry to double post

My dad watches the UFC with us and he knows some but he’s more of a casual fan. I relate his opinion to what i would perceive to be a casual fan. And the first thing he said about Affliction was this looks like the EliteXC show.

On that note as Anderson Silva as a draw, He thinks he’s a bad mother fucker because everytime he’s seen him fight he destroys someone and thats what he remebers.

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:28 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

further lolification

Apologies, I am summarizing here from the overall tone of posts on the site as well as comments on said posts. I am not saying that you, Luke Thomas, in this very post, went out and said “Affliction had bad fights.”

Presentation is important, but how important is it? You are really overestimating the importance of it, I think. UFC’s production is tired, and adding new graphics is what it is, but it is also incredibly long overdue. UFC has been using the same stat-run-down music for how long now? They’ve been using that silly gladiator intro and really bad nu-metal for ages as well. While it is one thing to say that Megadeth are dated, I’m pretty sure at this point they have (or still have, I guess you could say) a bigger fan base than some failed band signed to Zuffa Records playing Linkin Park-esque music.

I watched Affliction with a bunch of fans that had no clue as to an sort of industry-wide struggle for power or jockeying for position. Hell, they thought Affliction was a UFC event, just with different branding like WEC. Why? Because they aren’t like us, they aren’t reading and writing about MMA daily. Nobody I watched it with was complaining about the event looking or feeling cheap, they were watching the fights.

UFC, like WWE, is a Leviathan. Unbending, unforgiving, just overall stubborn that their way is the right way. Affliction tried something different, they presented their show as “edgy” and “darker.” It was a “heavy metal” presentation as opposed to UFC’s attempt to distance itself with such displays in lieu of being seen as legit. Obviously, there will be a market for both. At least Affliction had a vision and an idea, the execution wasn’t perfect, but it was something different, which I believe that we, as fight fans, really needed. If you, yourself didn’t need that, fine, you can have the same UFC show monthly or even a few times a month.

A disaster, something completely awful looking in presentation is YAMMA. As usual, hyperbole rules the world.

I don’t think I missed any point, do you?

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 3:32 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

nah

I agree with what you’re saying

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:34 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

just had to say, props for “lolification”. Well done.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:43 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

But, Locust...

C’mon now. UFC is state of the art with their production and hype methods. They invented the hype show several years after HBO and a few decades after ABC. Plus, they know all the popular bands to use for background music. Stemm is a big deal.

by D.Capitated on Jul 20, 2008 9:54 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hah

So, basically, you’re saying you watch MMA for promo pieces instead of fights. Hey, you know, Affliction could have kept the PPV 3 hours, had no hour preshow, and just picked whichever “prelim” would have worked after the 3 heavyweight bouts were over. Would it have been “tighter” to not show the entire card? Would that have made it a better show for the fan?

by D.Capitated on Jul 20, 2008 9:52 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That’s not what he said. Read it again.

by Richard Wade on Jul 20, 2008 12:34 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I get exactly what he said.

He’s basically saying the packaging is more important for him than the bouts. Who cares that Affliction showed 5 hours of high end MMA last night? Luke doesn’t. That they had 6 of the 20 best heavyweights in the world fighting, but he glosses over that to make a point about Megadeth, who played for what must have been a whopping 15 or so minutes combined over the course of 4 hours in 3 short segments. “The announcing was mediocre! The backstage segments not incredible! Food so bad, portions so small!”

by D.Capitated on Jul 20, 2008 12:44 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You're so right Locust

This is what happens when ufc fan boys like Luke Thomas get to pretend they’re reporters. We get this UFC nuthugging parade. I just can’t stop laughing. What a joke.

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 3:32 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well..

I don’t know, people are of course allowed to have their opinions, but just like when you have a guy like Sean Sherk swearing up and down and being overly defensive about him NOT using steroids, it makes him look all the more suspect, it is the same when you have people immediately after two shows decrying one and praising the other. Really, even if you watched both at the same time, or one after the other, do you really think that you are going to have an objective point of view?

We all have our favorites, and that is cool, but c’mon. I know I’ll actually watch UFN a bit closer tomorrow as opposed to just shouting out about how much it sucked and how the fights were just “ok” compared to Affliction. Why? Because I was completely abuzz after Affliction, it was a really fun event as a whole with a lot of energy and good fights. UFC presents something different and I really wasn’t up for it tonight. I’ll watch it tomorrow and it’ll probably seem a lot different than it did replayed tonight on Spike. No?

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 3:43 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am not applauding the UFN, outside of the fact it was free.

For instance…Goldy is sometimes terrible, Joe gets tiresome on occasion (though he was fine tonight), Bruce and his annoying “surprise, spin and point”, all the mishmash between fights (even on the ppvs), some poor match making on par with Affliction…

i would compare them similarly fight wise, which is what truly matters, but UFC already has the viewers, so Affliction must do something big to take them away.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:50 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

oh come on... bit harsh of buffer.

buffer – ‘the surprise, spin and point.’
what’s he supposed to do (not do it now?) and it’s his one moment to shine. :)
that said – we were all imitating him by the silva fight.

by Ronnie Liddle on Jul 20, 2008 4:46 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yeah, we were all doing it as well, lol.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 1:07 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You clearly don't read this site

I criticize the UFC and Dana White on a DAILY basis. So which is it, I am a UFC nut hugger or just a UFC hater?

by Luke Thomas on Jul 20, 2008 11:04 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Luke Thomas as a UFC fan boy? Holy crap, you’re new. Seriously, maybe some of you new guys should sit back and just read the site for a little while before you start commenting.

by Richard Wade on Jul 20, 2008 12:34 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I completely disagree. It was new, and fresh, and besides Megadeth, (ugh) it was infinitely more enjoyable than the UFC’s tired, stale formula and horrible commentating.

by iki on Jul 20, 2008 3:19 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Id love for you to send me whatever it is you’re smoking this evening.

by HoustonRaven on Jul 20, 2008 3:27 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m not saying I agree or disagree with your opinion, but could you tell me what you found new and fresh about it? Not being condescending, I truly am interested to see your viewpoint.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:27 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I would however, like to thank Atencio for providing AA the opportunity to show how overrated Rothwell is.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:30 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

me too

I sounded like such a hater talking about Rothwell to people but he was way overhyped (by himself and his manager) about beating up some guys in the IFL. There’s no way he should be making 200k a fight.

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:32 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

man..

I thought he looked pretty tough out there, taking all of that damage. Sure, he was sloppy, nowhere near as accurate as Andrei was. Didn’t have the head movement, the timing, accuracy, etc., but he at least made a decent showing against a top heavyweight. He is well on his way to being a better fighter, and at least we know actually know where he stands, right?

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 3:34 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You sir are correct

Again i’ll agree there. He’s a tough guy and I think he’s a good fighter. I just don’t think that he’s one of the big dogs yet and he and Monte Cox seemed to think he was

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:36 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well..

I think it is his job to say that he is. Honestly, his IFL run was impressive, but I think most of us realized that he wasn’t fighting top competition. The Ricco fight was his first litmus test, and this was his second. He showed that he can give a top fighter trouble, but that he himself isn’t that top fighter. Hell, he could be some day if he dropped some weight, tightened up his cardio and worked on improving his stand up. He relies on being a big dude with heavy hands, and that only goes so far. Maybe he’d do OK against a guy like Buentello, but against a guy like AA that wasn’t going to cut it.

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 3:39 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Right, and I know these guys kinda got bloated paydays from affliction but i could see why some people would pass when the dude thought he should be making Rampage Jackson money.

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:42 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agreed. Props to him for taking a beating. That sounds funny, but i mean it sincerely. he withstood some nasty shots that other fighters have not.

That said, I was tired of hearing how this was going to be the upset of the night and I think it also showed Dana that he was wrong in his treatment of AA, though I think he realized that towards the end.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 3:39 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree with Luke here. It was, like he said, at times almost unwatchable. Do I care that Big John is in Andrei Arlovski’s locker room and giving us an update that Freddie Roach is…gasp...taping Andrei’s hands? Wow, that’s hard hitting. Michael Buffer failed miserably at MMA announcing, Megadeth was ridiculously awful, and the announce team was absolutely terrible.

Trigg, at one point, was talking about he and Jay Glazer in the showers at the gym. At one point Trigg was giving Mike Whitehead, a training partner, advice on the fight from the announce table. How unprofessional does it get? The sound kept cutting out in the beginning and for an extended period of time we were listening to the Spanish announcers. It was clear that Affliction didn’t have all their shit together tonight and in terms of presenting the sport as a sport, the UFC was heads and shoulders above them in that regard.

by Adam Morgan on Jul 20, 2008 3:34 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Spanish?

I never, ever heard any Spanish. Maybe you should take this up with your local cable provider as opposed to simply implying that it was a production flaw. But then again, maybe Comcast just got it right for once and everybody else got it wrong?

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 3:36 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes, forget that we had some of the more memorable fights and great finishes involving some of the greatest fighters in the sports history. Instead, let’s talk about how pretty everything wasn’t in between, and how, on their very first show, there were some technical difficulties and awkward commenting moments.

Let’s also completely gloss over how lackluster the UFC’s card was, and talk about their production.

Sounds good.

by iki on Jul 20, 2008 3:42 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

like luke said up there ^

Wow

Way to totally miss the point. No one is discussing the quality of fighters or fights per se. What we are discussing in this post is how they are showcased, which is arguably more important. On that level, Affliction failed hard.

by Luke Thomas on Jul 20, 2008 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:44 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The question is, why ARENT they talking about the “quality of fighters or fights per se.”

Isn’t that what, you know, we paid to see?

by iki on Jul 20, 2008 3:45 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yeah

But i think that discussion was in the post before this but everyone is replying here.

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:46 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That has been discussed previously and I believe in another post currently.

by Richard Wade on Jul 20, 2008 12:38 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The point is a joke

”...What we are discussing in this post is how they are showcased, which is arguably more important.”

Putting production values ahead of the quality of fighters and fights is stupid. The fights are the product.

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 3:48 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Right

It depends on whom you’re marketing it to. Hardcore fans aren’t going to give two shits when its a good fight. Casual fans may.

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 3:50 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sure

But who expected that Affliction could surpass UFC’s production values in their first show? UFC has been doing this for years, it’s to be expected that they’re better at their packaging. Making a big deal out of this is not a serious argument.

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 3:56 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

re:

Affliction wasn’t being marketed solely to concert roadies and TV editors. It was being marketed to fight fans.

by D.Capitated on Jul 20, 2008 12:45 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's right...

Fight fans, not UFC fans, those don’t give a shit about any other organization.

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 12:47 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, UFC fans are who they’re going to need to convert if they want to continue to exist.

by Richard Wade on Jul 20, 2008 1:49 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not really, I believe that there’s lot more MMA fans that strictly UFC fans. Most of those transitioned from the WWE, so they are all about brand fidelity.
Fight fans will at least have an apreciatiation for the Affliction card and if they didn’t bomb in ppv buys and are able to do a second show they’ll do much better.

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 1:59 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the rest is packaging

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 3:50 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, here is the thing..

It just comes across as rather crass and like there might be masked intentions that Affliction put on what was a pretty fun night of fights, and UFC put on their show, and that the talk is going to production values and how UFC was spanking them. Not trying to put words in anybody’s mouth, but what? Since when do we, the fight fans, get a weekend like this? It is a freaking gift, wrapped with a bow on top with a little card with each of our names on it. SHOOTO kicked it off, then we got Affliction, UFC and DREAM tomorrow.

Instead of sparking discussion about the fact that we are amidst an awesome fight weekend, we are talking production values and who is winning? Like I said way up, Dave Meltzer has an article up on Yahoo! Sports right now about the threat Affliction poses to UFC, and I trust Meltzer for silly stuff like this above anybody else, just because of his experience and knowledge.

Seriously, it is typical internet to create an “us vs. them” atmosphere for no reason at all. Regardless of intentions, that is what this post, on top of the other posts from the evening and ensuing discussions led to. There is a big picture here, and most people refuse to see it.

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 3:50 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Actually..

I just re-read the original post from Luke. This stands out to me.

“The Affliction show was a metal concert with MMA fights in between. The UFC show was a showcase of high-end fighters battling their hearts out. The contrast couldn’t be more clear.”

This, to me, is what disproves that. The implication was that UFC had high-end fighters in a legit sporting event while Affliction did not. Maybe just bad phrasing? .. But it does come off as basically condemning Affliction as a whole while painting a flowery picture of Dana White & Co.’s show and their amazing fighters.

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 4:12 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Basically..

This is me saying Mr. Luke Thomas owes me an apology.

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 4:16 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

and then some...

I think he owes and apology to everyone that had the displesure of reading such a retarded article.

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 4:19 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Are you out of your fucking mind?

No one is talking about the quality of the fighters on the Affliction card, so once again thanks for missing the point. We’re talking about how their showcased. Simple example: Affliction didn’t put a mic in the ring. You couldn’t hear shots land, feet shuffle, fighters breathing, etc. All the intangibles that bring the fight to life. The UFC used to commit this error and doesn’t anymore. So, yes, this is just ONE example and it’s one they can fix, but it’s amateurish mistakes like that separate the wheat from the chaff.

You’ve already exposed yourself as someone who doesn’t know a thing about the viewpoints of the writers on this site by calling me a UFC nuthugger (very original, btw). Now you’re just being ugly to be ugly. It’s not like I can take anything you say seriously.

by Luke Thomas on Jul 20, 2008 11:10 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

so

Is that for marcio, if so, hmm.

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 11:19 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

wow, you're a hater Luke!

Whatever man, you can say what you want now. You’re “arcticle” and subsquent posts are all that anyone needs to see where you’re coming from.
Pearls of Wisdom I managed to extract from your rant:

C.B., Taylor, Burns, Johnson, Franca, Edgar, Reese, Vera, Irvin and Silva are all high-end fighters battling their hearts out.
Paul Buentello, Gary Goodridge, Matt Lindland, Fabio Nascimento, Babalu, Whitehead, Rizzo, Barnett, Arlovski, Rothwell, Sylvia and Fedor are just something to watch between Megadeth songs.

Production values are “arguably” more important than the fighters and fights themselves. That was a doozy.

And knowing that you chose to play the victim instead of trying to defend your points, just tell us everything we need to know.

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 12:23 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Reading comprehension is at an all-time low around here.

by Richard Wade on Jul 20, 2008 12:41 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Your brain function...

... it’s at an all-time low in the history of humanity

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 12:43 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

re:

No one is talking about the fights or fighters because in your analysis of the event, you have decided to, you know, not talk about them at all, and blame Affliction for having been on at the same time as UFN when you were in a bar.

by D.Capitated on Jul 20, 2008 12:50 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Bad phrasing and then some! I don’t know, maybe he was so offended by the poor sound levels and less than optimal lighting and forgot to watch the fights

by smoogy on Jul 20, 2008 1:49 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The lighting was downright odd. Like how the lights would be dim for the staredowns and introductions and then sort of just come up when the fight begins. That was the only production thing that really stood out to me as just weird.

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 3:00 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Which fights were “some of the more memorable…in the sports history”?

by Richard Wade on Jul 20, 2008 12:37 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

are you really...

...going down the entire thread cheering for Luke at every chance you get? That’s funny.

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 12:40 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How is that question cheering for Luke? I asked a question because I don’t recall any of those fights being especially memorable. Perhaps you could answer it.

by Richard Wade on Jul 20, 2008 12:43 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You first..

Are you going down the entire thread cheering for Luke at every chance you get?

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 12:45 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I didn’t get any Spanish.

by Mike Fagan on Jul 20, 2008 3:42 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am a (relative) newcomer to the sport of MMA and watched both events tonight with a few (complete) newcomers to the sport.

And while, yes, I thought that UFC was probably the better produced event (we rolled our eyes at Megadeath, for sure), I think this post oversells the importance of that. I can tell you that everyone I was with was absolutely drooling for more after the Arlovski and and Fedor fights. I will buy another Affliction event in a heartbeat. In the end, the fights seemed to outweigh more than the silliness of John McCarthy whispering in the locker room.

by TonyH on Jul 20, 2008 3:54 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

eh, sorry about the grammar problems in that last sentence. i re-phrased it and forgot to edit.

by TonyH on Jul 20, 2008 3:56 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Also, Megadeth..

Seriously, the whole “Megadeth are rednecky” point as well as any other complaints about them has me wondering like where you dudes came from. Is the internet full of thoroughbred posters? I mean, I don’t know about you, but I grew up listening to stuff like Megadeth. I remember blasting Megadeth at 3am in the morning in the middle of binge drinking and lighting stuff on fire with my now Ph.D in Astrophysics friend and having fun.

Did you all grow up listening to Beethoven, Wagner and Bach?

I’m not defending Megadeth, exactly, as much as asking why this is such a slap in the face to most people. I mean, the Superbowl has its halftime show (yes, I understand they are different, but there are similarities), Rock Bands, Rappers and Blues musicians have performed at sporting events before, this isn’t unprecedented. Megadeth fit the certain aesthetic they were shooting for. I don’t think that is hard to grasp.

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 3:58 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I had no problem with them putting Megadeth on the show.

I had a problem with Megadeth sucking on the show.

Seriously, they sounded awful, especially the last 2 songs.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 4:00 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well..

Mustaine’s voice is really shot now, being an alcoholic for that long will do that, I guess. I was just stoked they played Tornado of Souls and Holy Wars (esp. that). The only album by them I can still sort of listen to is Rust in Peace, so it was a pleasant surprise. I mean, I wasn’t expecting a Neurosis level, cathartic experience from 2008 Megadeth.

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 4:03 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I wasn’t expecting much either, but when my friend started laughing at them, it made it worse, lol.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 4:04 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No doubt it was sort of uncomfortable that I knew all the words to both of those songs and by force of habit was fretting along with it… It was one of those, “ooh, uh, yeah, in another life I was down with this stuff.. Yeah.”

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 4:06 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

They should have had Spinal Tap.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 4:01 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't like Megadeth...

But it was to be expected that Affliction tried something different. What were they suposed to do, copy the UFC? If they continue to make fight cards, they’ll get better at it.

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 4:01 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

One more bitch about Affliction, lol.

Thanks for having your free undercard show on a network that tape delays it until the middle of the night, then show the winners on the ppv. Freakin’ Rockies game!!

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 4:02 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

uhhh

They really don’t have control over this, do they? It was their first show, they weren’t going to leverage a deal with a basic cable sports network to play it as they should. That is why we have the internet. But for real, I could care less about the Diamondbacks playing, I would have liked to have watched the pre show on my TV, but my laptop was fine until people started showing up.

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 4:05 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, I just figured since I was already bitching, lol.

The only real problem I have was showing highlights of the fights, when they had to be aware that it was being delayed in several markets.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 4:08 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

haha

Same thing happened here, it wasn’t on until 2am. They showed the pittsburg game, which i think was against colorado.

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 4:12 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good points everyone. My bottom line is, they have a lot of improving to do very quickly, in a market where there isn’t much room for mediocrity.

I was somewhat disappointed, but I am willing to give ‘em another shot.

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

by BJJDenver on Jul 20, 2008 4:10 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m rooting for Affliction. Whatever gets more quality MMA out there. I just think UFC was able to really hurt Affliction with its card. Had the UFC not run a show tonight, I think many of the less crisp aspects of Affliction’s production would have gone unnoticed.

Also, the UFC card got bailed out by an amazing under card finish that was shown after the scheduled televised card and the Spider teaching everyone a lesson by dispatching Irvin in almost a cavalier fashion (and leaving the most vicious cut I have seen from a straight right, ever).

Before that you had

1) A very sloppy yet entertaining TUF level fight between C.B. and Jesse
2) One of the worst decisions ever (Johnson losing via eyepoke of doom)
3) An impressive but one sided beating delivered by big Cain
3) A solid but unspectacular Edgar-Franca fight
4) And an AWFUL Vera-Andy snooze fest

So if Affliction does end up going down due to financial viability you can point to Anderson Silva as the reason the UFC didn’t leave the door wide open for Affliction to grab a big fan base.

by Day Man on Jul 20, 2008 4:19 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

1, 2, 3, 3, 4. So what, I went to public school

by Day Man on Jul 20, 2008 4:20 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I enjoyed the affliction show. don’t get me wrong but i was watching on two screens so it was all about the fights for me of course.

by TannerMatthews on Jul 20, 2008 4:25 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ultimate MMA Weekend

I watched both cards simultaneously, and was proud of the effort that Affliction put up. I thought the card lived up to the hype—the performances of Fedor and Arlovski were well worth the price of the PPV.

He may be swinging on the UFC’s nuts pretty hard, but Luke Thomas makes a great point about the production quality. Affliction looked like ‘Bum Fights’ compared to the UFC.

by steak_knife on Jul 20, 2008 11:28 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ufc going down the toilet.

i got the ppv last night and i thought affliction rocked. some fights were boring but you get that on ufc also. the reason ive been getting further away from ufc is because alot of the fights have been guys from tuff enough. the guys that didnt make it. woop de do. if they couldnt make it in the show i dont want to watch them for 39.95. it seems ufc is more into reality t.v now and in it for the cash instead of the sport. maybe affliction will be the same way? who knows. hope not. i cant wait to see the next elite xc this month. sorry ufc your starting to loose a ppv customer.

by meatheadgymrat on Jul 20, 2008 12:36 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Watched both and preferred the Affliction show

I can see Luke Thomas’s point about production quality; it would have been nice to have the Affliction ring miked and get that extra layer of coverage. I enjoyed more fights on the Affliction card than the UFN card, but they both had some fights that could be considered less-than-entertaining. That is, however, a possibility with any card. No one can completely predict how fights will proceed and that’s one of the great things about MMA.

I expect that like the UFC in its earlier days, Affliction will have to bumble before they get a solid, consistent product. I hope they do it before they run out of money. Regardless, as an MMA fan, I had a fun night.

by Cori on Jul 20, 2008 1:20 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Luke,

I finally agree with you!

by MrNiceGuyMMA on Jul 20, 2008 1:26 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

High end fighters at UFN?

Which high-end UFC fighters are you talking about exactly?
Jake O’Brien?
Jesse Taylor?
CB Dollaway?
Anthony Johnson?

Battling their hearts out? Finger poking by Kevin Burns? Gassing out by Brandon Vera?

That is utterly ridiculous.

What about the Arlovski and Rothwell fight- that’s what I call battling their hearts out.
How about high end fighters like Fedor, Barnett, Arlovski?

by fedograce on Jul 20, 2008 2:21 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You didn't get it

“Way to totally miss the point. No one is discussing the quality of fighters or fights per se. What we are discussing in this post is how they are showcased, which is arguably more important. On that level, Affliction failed hard.

by Luke Thomas on Jul 20, 2008 3:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs”

The fights don’t matter, sound quality and pretty graphics… that’s what MMA is all about, just ask Luke ;)

by marcio on Jul 20, 2008 2:35 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

affliction show blew away ufc show...

Anyone who know mma knows that the affliction show was way better. First of all ufc headlines silva vs irwin…irwin isnt even a top ten 205 and so what silva went up, he has fought that weight before so not new to him. Ufc already hs a black eye with Griffin being the chamipion….He shoulnt of won nor should he even had a title shot. What was he ranked 9 at the time in the 205 division….Forrest is a joke of a champion and im sure Tito could kick his butt and take that title so when Tito joins affliction they will have the better champion at 205 and heavyweight and the best fighter in the world, plus couture fighting too..That is if ufc stops being babies about the sitiuation..U have to admit for a first show that was damn good and will only get better each time and they will get better fighters, just watch people will start leaving ufc, maybe w. silva, Rampage, St. pierre…thank about it rampage and st. pierre are sponsored by affliction…only time will tell but i vote for affliction for one it will be better for mma fans in the long run…look we already got a free show out of it, that would of never happened if it werent for affliction. Better fights and i like the idea of one champion…Think about it, in boxing u have numerous titles and yet they fight each other for different belts why not mma….So Ufc u are on notice….SO PAY ATTENTION>>>>AFFLICTION is here to STAY

by philly Phreak on Jul 20, 2008 3:07 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Re: A Word About Decorum and Comments

Luke,

I would have responded to that post, except comments were disabled -
hence posting this here

Firstly, I agree that personal insults are way off base.

But, and this is a big but, I think you rather lost the plot on
yesterday’s MMA action. I think that sometimes, you try to over-analyse
this sport from a business perspective. Trying to decide what you think
the “average sports fan” is looking for.

The honest truth is, you don’t know. Because you can’t. No-one can.

Try looking at it from a sporting perspective. Sure, the Affliction
“production quality” was poor. That was obvious. Then again – the
commentary (Trigg apart) was surprisingly better than I had expected.
Particularly Big John. Some interesting insights, not just your usual
shtick.

Are you seriously saying that you’d prefer Goldberg over them? They guy
who just waffles on and on with his pre-arranged phrases, repeated 100
times per fight (eg: “I alluded to earlier”)

But production qualities aside – how can you – AS A FAN AND SOMEONE WHO
APPRECIATES MMA AS A SPORT – not have been just a little excited by the
Affliction card?

There were some quality fights (not all, but some). And the whole event
really started to get some momentum from the halfway point on.

Instead, all we get are your repeated complaints about how incompetent
some production director was. Who gives a **? I didn’t pay the PPV fee
for him. I paid to watch THOSE fighters. And by the end, I was getting
the old, fuzzy warm Pride feeling again.

Large ring. Big crowd. Big fighters. Fight after fight after fight. THIS
IS WHAT THIS SPORT IS SUPPOSED TO BE LIKE.

Do you think people whined about “production values” after the Rumble in
the Jungle? And please, stop telling me that this is what “average fans”
are looking for. Hell no. Put together a top notch sporting contest.
Everything else will take care of itself, over time.

Your whole “scrooge” mentality about the event has really soured your
reputation in many peoples eyes – and uncouth insults aside (which you
are right, are uncalled for) – in all honesty, its deserved. You need to
take a step back, and start commenting on this as a SPORT (which you are
somewhat qualified to do, not so sure after this), and not as a BUSINESS
(which, I’m sorry, even I, MBA and all, am rather more qualified to do
than you)

by isr on Jul 20, 2008 4:31 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree with that. And as far as “off-base accusations” go, I wonder where labelling Big Dan “The Fixer” fits in?

BE is certainly becoming the destination for knee-jerk reactions

by smoogy on Jul 20, 2008 8:11 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Clearly..

Clearly, you just “missed the point” and can’t “see the big picture.”

I too have been really confused as to why most blogs and smaller sites are ripping this apart for stupid things while most of the actual press is talking about the fights. Do the hardcore fans feel dejected that more people ‘get’ their sport, so they have to go out of their way to act like they don’t?

by Locust Star on Jul 20, 2008 11:08 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

kind of funny...

How Luke’s only responde to all the cricticism this “article” got was playing the victim and then post about decorum. No actual debate on the content of the post. I guess he doesn’t feel that strongly about it now as he did then.

by marcio on Jul 21, 2008 9:28 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it." -- H.L. Mencken
Start posting on Bloody Elbow »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

N46600342_991_small
The Real UFC 100
Bob_sapp__potato_head_small
A Message For Our Troops
Weo_animation2_small
Exclusive: An Interview With "The Veteran Voice of the Octagon" Bruce Buffer
Stpierre_472917a_small
The Official UFC 100 Bloody Elbow Meet-up Thread
Chainlink_small
Quiet Before the Storm: St. Pierre-Alves

Recent FanPosts

Small
UFC 100 to Air in Korea; Akiyama and Kim Leading the Way
Yes__small
REMINDER: UFC's 100 Greatest Fights on Spike Tonight!
Weo_animation2_small
Gesias JZ Cavalcante to Compete at DREAM.11 But Not Against Eddie Alvarez
Weo_animation2_small
UFC 100 Preview: Paulo Thiago Talks Jon Fitch and Josh Koscheck
Ebola_small
Next MMA Fighter To Die?
Picture_010_small
Brock Lesnar vs. Bobby Lashley
Mirkneebaraim640_small
Dan Miller vs. Aaron Simpson Possible for UFN 19 in September

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings