Keep Congress Out of Mixed Martial Arts
In the past day or so of emailing with boxing bloggers and journalists, I am yet to find one that believes the Muhammed Ali Act was any kind of success. Instead, like almost all attempts at "government reform," it was a ruse disguised as reform rather than anything meaningful. A discussion of why it failed could go on for days, but the single most important reason is that it was designed by people that knew nothing about the boxing business, and influenced by people that had an interest in maintaining the status quo.
If the issue of MMA regulation is brought to Congress, the result will not be good. Whatever nonsense reform comes out will likely be heavily influenced by the UFC, and they might be able to get Congress to put in provisions that make it even harder to compete with them, rather than the other way around. The art of lobbying is the art of tricking legislators into making things harder for your competition in the name of something that sounds wonderful. I can just see it now, the "Fair Fighter Compensation Act of 2010" would probably result in killing a bunch of small companies by requiring certain things that only the UFC could afford, and not making any exceptions. Do any of us want these kind of unintended consequences? People should be very careful of what they wish for. There's no reason to believe Nancy Pelosi or John Boehner are going to come save the day for fighters.
Further, why should they? Fightlinker asks why the government should even be involved here at all, which is a very good question:
My main issue with the Ali act is it’s government interference where it doesn’t belong. Why the hell should the government be setting up laws on who gets to fight who in the goddamn Ultimate Fighting Championships? What ever happened to letting the free market decide what happens and what doesn’t? Hey, I’m all down for making sure fighters don’t get fucked - but I’m more down for making sure people in general don’t get fucked.
Of course, he's absolutely right. MMA is almost the perfect situation for the market to work without interference. Everybody who gets into it is fully aware of what they are doing, the relatively low pay is made public for everyone to know, and nobody can train for more than a week without becoming very aware of the risks involved.
Congress should stay away from Mixed Martial Arts. Congress doesn't have the expertise necessary to draft complex regulation, and anything they do will likely have more bad consequences than good.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Amen.
The government usually damages what it touches. If government involvement is an absolute must, that’s one thing. Don’t get them involved unless there is no other choice. Besides not understanding the complexities of MMA, they don’t have any real incentive to make the sport better over the long-term. They’re mainly just concerned with 2, 4, and 6 year blocks of time. Face it; politicians have never been able to outwit intelligent lobbyists and business groups. Maybe, they don’t have the skill and resources. Maybe, they simply just don’t have enough incentive to put in the effort that’s required to craft a sensible solution that will actually make the targeted situation better. Either way, the result is usually bad for the affected parties.
Congress will get involved..maybe...hopefully not
I agree with you that Congress should not get involved. But recent history with sports should tell us that the Federal government gets involved in sports when the ‘public trust’ is eroded or threatened in some way. The Baseball steroids hearings is a great example as well as Senator Specter’s response to the NFL about Spygate.
One significant difference is that these sports had significantly more money involved as well as federal laws regulating them. Baseball has the anti-trust exemption, football has a soft T.V. regulations (can’t remember specifics).The government does have the right to call the owners, players and league officers i.e. the commissioner to answer for their actions or inactions.
It is highly likely that Congress will get involved at some point. Whether a fighter union forms and a dispute occurs with a promotion, or due to some federal ruling about the legality of the UFC’s new merchandising deal. But far more likely will be a call to ban/regulate ‘cage fighting’. MMA is still seen as barbaric and as it gets further exposure (especially on network T.V.) some congressperson or FCC employee will try to take advantage of the situation to score points with social conservatives by demanding regulation or banishment. Don’t forget that ‘cage fighting’ was banned and the push was largely federal (I am looking at you John McCain).
I know part of the Football thing...
...is their deal to only provide the Sunday Ticket programming on DirecTV. Which MLB attempted to do with Extra Innings and was then prevented from doing. Among other less interesting aspects of their deals.
Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
"The reason a lot of people do not recognize opportunity is because it usually goes around wearing overalls and looking like hard work." -- Thomas Edison
by Brent Brookhouse on Jul 10, 2008 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t know all the details of the NFL thing, but it comes from when the USFL sued them. I don’t think it has anything to do with the DirectTV thing, which is complete bullshit, but a totally separate thing.
Maybe if Affliction fails Trump can sue the UFC claiming anti-trust and get $3.76 to go with the 3.76 they got from the USFL lawsuit.
True...
I hate the stupid directv thing. Mostly because my wife thinks the dish is too ugly and won’t let me get one. Yeah…I’m THAT guy.
Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
"The reason a lot of people do not recognize opportunity is because it usually goes around wearing overalls and looking like hard work." -- Thomas Edison
by Brent Brookhouse on Jul 10, 2008 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I just think it’s stupid because there are people that can’t get directv (for reasons other than being whipped, and I don’t mean to be offensive, I’m the guy that has to go to my friends house to watch MMA because my fiancee doesn’t think it’s worth ordering the PPV)
Living in the woods, apartment buildings in a city, etc. I know DirecTv pays NFL 700 million to not put it on cable, but couldn’t they make up that 700 million by letting everyone have access to the product? I just don’t get it.
Directv is muuuulney.
Love HDNET and all the free fights.
Wrong about McCain
McCain was calling for the regulation of MMA
Right about McCain
He was pretty down with the banning of what he called ‘human cockfighting’
link right here http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/1998-02-12/news/john-mccain-breaks-up-a-fight/
Great post Michael!
First off, this site has always had great writers, so thanks for keeping up the good work Mr. Rome! Just playing devils advocate here but the art of lobbying is not wielded specifically to negate or limit competition, but to advance the agenda of said special interest group, while this may indirectly put pressure on competition, it is not directly targeted at doing so, and malicious attempts to do this are rarely passed. Congress banning MMA? no way. This country is all about successful business and violence, and HOT DAMN mma is a perfect marriage of the two!

by 














