Zuffa's Ban on BooYaa Fightwear
King of the Cage executive, Peter Lamy, was a bit critical of Zuffa and Dana White in a response to MMA Payout regarding Zuffa's BooYaa Fightwear ban:
Dana White and ZUFFA have every reason to be concerned with KOTC regardless of EliteXC. No one has as much Knowledge or experience in the sport as Terry Trebilcock and Dana knows that. Things are moving forward and we are very excited of what the future holds for KOTC and the MMA world.
As far as BOOYAA goes you can’t find a better group of guys dedicated to helping fighters and it is the likes of BOOYAA and other clothing companies that allows fighters to stay in the game in the early days while climbing the ranks and also reap the benefits beyond a fight purse. But I guess ZUFFA would not understand that part of the industry.
The story goes that BooYaa wanted to sponsor Mike Budnik in his fight at WEC 37 against Shane Roller. Because BooYaa is closely associated with a competing promotion, KOTC, the request was rejected, and a ban on the apparel company was instituted. I say the association between KOTC and BooYaa is close, because BooYaa sponsored a KOTC event, and a link to the KOTC website is prominently displayed at the top of BooYaa's homepage. Likewise, KOTC displays a link to the apparel company's site at the top of their homepage.
Reasonable individuals can argue about whether or not these bans issued by Zuffa are over-the-top or unnecessary. The idea that Zuffa doesn't understand the importance of sponsorship dollars to young fighters, or that they don't care enough about the fighters to allow them this income stream is absurd in my view. These actions are standard operating procedure for Dana White and company. Zuffa is simply not going to allow other promotions to advertise via UFC or WEC events. That's the long and the short of it as I see it.
Zuffa isn't unlike most other firms that aspire to stay in business and increase their income. I suppose one could interpret Zuffa's shrewd practices as evidence that they care only about the company's profitability and not their fighters. However, the growth of Zuffa and the financial well-being of the promotion's fighters aren't mutually exclusive propositions. In fact, a healthy and growing UFC (or WEC) provides more income opportunities for its fighters than a promotion that struggles to stay in business due to unwise business practices. It's pretty difficult to score new sponsors when your employer can't put on an event.
I hope that King of the Cage and its parent company, ProElite, have the fighters in mind as they continue to deny many of them free agency. There's been a lot of talk that KOTC may take the spot of EliteXC. Thus far, nothing tangible has emerged from the wreckage of ProElite and the sales negotiations that have ensued since the promotion ceased operations. In the meantime, their fighters are left without an income stream from the company that holds their contracts.
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
The ban against MMA Authentics is a little sketchy at this point. I’m not sure about Zuffa’s motivation there. But in the case of BooYaa, the company is clearly closely associated with KOTC. If KOTC weren’t bidding to take the place of EliteXC there wouldn’t be as much motivation for Zuffa to ban BooYaa. In light of the above comments by Lamy, KOTC wants to be a big time player and direct competitor to the UFC and WEC. Certainly, there are some negative consequences for some fighters as a result of the bans, but everyone can’t be satisfied all of the time.
I’d like to know what’s going to become of the ProElite fighter contracts. It’s hard for me to ignore the fact that those fighters are having their careers put on hold while these mysterious negotiations take place. Then, some involved in said negotiations are criticizing Zuffa for putting the screws to their fighters?
by Cannon Jacques on Dec 6, 2008 12:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The ban on MMA Authentics is very sketchy and it has a lot more impact of UFC, WEC and young fighters looking to get into a Zufaa org than BooYaa. I’m more angry at that banning than BooYaa being banned.
Realistically KOTC has always been a regional promotion and they will probably never get higher than that or even close to the level of the UFC or even the WEC. If this ban were because of KOTC trying to take EliteXC’s place than I can somewhat understand that. It’s almost comparable to Affliction being banned in the UFC, they only difference is Affliction started their own org whereas BooYaa is just a (major?) sponsor of KOTC. From my perspective I just don’t see KOTC trying to replace EliteXC. If they do, it’d be a really bad move on their part. Everyone should know at this point that if they try and compete with the UFC they are going to have a rough time at it and they’d better have the financial backing, as well as a good stable of fighters to compete with the UFC or even WEC. KOTC has had a lot of success being a regional promotion akin to Strikeforce(maybe a bad example with the way Strikeforce is coming out now trying to be a big player in the MMA world) or MFC. And if anyone should try t take the place of EliteXC is should be Strikeforce. They have an overall better product right now and they are gaining attention because of the NBC deal they got going for them.
by Discman2 on Dec 6, 2008 1:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's the money quote
Zuffa is simply not going to allow other promotions to advertise via UFC or WEC events. That’s the long and the short of it as I see it.
Yep.
And may I respectfully add no shit?
by subo on Dec 5, 2008 11:55 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Some people don’t seem to get it.
by Richard Wade on Dec 6, 2008 12:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And how much more exposure would they get in UFC events compared to KOTC??
Note to clothing companies, etc: stick to the fighters and leave the promoters alone.
Eliot Marshall: Bader won. Like I said in the episode, I'm not going to make any excuses. It's my job to be able to deal with when somebody's doing that. It's not his job to change up his tactics.
http://eliotmarshall.com/
by BJJDenver on Dec 6, 2008 10:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Of course UFC must be shrewd and self-interested in order to be successful, and their success benefits their fighters, but as a company gets bigger sometimes the shrewdness starts to cloud their own realities. I’m not saying that the UFC is doing that, but sometimes it seems like they’re beginning to push the line. I’m thinking of Sony back in during the Beta/VHS war. Sony refused to let go of the licensing for Beta, and even though their product was better, the open attitude of VHS ultimately beat them out. Sony’s delusions of grandeur has aided that company in losing hundreds of millions over the last couple of years and it seems that the lesson is still being hard learned. Once upon a time they were the star, now they’re struggling.
So it could happen with the UFC. Quickly becoming the brand name of the sport, delusions of grandeur could become their downfall, and very often has from businesses that displayed similar attitudes. They aren’t the sport of MMA, they’re simply one of the hosts. There are plenty of entities that are waiting to profit from its’ wealth if UFC becomes too full of itself. Like I say, I’m not making any judgements yet, I only think that it’s a challenge that they’ll face, or are already facing.
by Dooda on Dec 6, 2008 2:05 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think you make a good point. Zuffa does have to be careful about burning bridges so to speak. It’s hard for me to discern where the line is, but they do need to be wary of pushing too hard in certain situations. In regard to the BooYaa situation, I see Zuffa’s response as predictable and consistent with previous actions (i.e. Affliction).
What really irritates me is that a KOTC spokesman is implying that Zuffa is mistreating its fighters while the company he’s associated with is involved in holding up fighter contracts. Now, maybe this isn’t KOTC’s fault, but the promotion claims to be in the running to take EXC’s place. Not to mention the fact that KOTC is under the umbrella of ProElite, itself. It just seems hypocritical to engage in this type of mudslinging while your company is involved in a messy situation of this nature. No one knows what will come of the proposed ProElite sale, if anything at all.
by Cannon Jacques on Dec 6, 2008 1:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
For any sponsor that gets banned a decent manager can find at least 5 more to pay as much or more…
At least Zuffa actually pays it’s fighters.
by mmalogic on Dec 6, 2008 8:53 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
These guys never learn…
right out of the gate they are picking a fight with Dana – their fate has already been sealed.
by mmalogic on Dec 6, 2008 8:56 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 
























