Booyaa Fightwear Banned by Zuffa
Zuffa's banned list just keeps getting bigger. MMApayout has learned that Zuffa has banned yet another sponsor and this time the victim is Booyaa Fightwear. While Booyaa is not the biggest sponsor out there this is still terrible news for up and coming fighters. It seems to me eventually that there will only be two or three sponsors that fighters can use that have not been banned by Zuffa. The biggest sponsor, Tapout, will most likely never be banned and Sprawl will probably never land on the **** list either. This is great for the sponsors, as they will have less competition, but what does that mean for the up and coming fighters? To get signed on to a major sponsor is very difficult and thats why smaller companies are great because they will pick up small time fighters looking to move up in the MMA world in exchange for possible exposure on a big time show.
Take Booyaa for example. They are sponsors of WEC fighter Mike Budnik(and Donkey lips too) who is fighting at WEC 37on December 3rd. From being sponsors of the local California based King of the Cage to a major promotion such as the WEC is big for Booyaa and could bring in a lot of potential customers. Exposure like that is great for the company but now it just won't happen because of the Zuffa's stiff arm tactics. With a company like Affliction the stiff arm tactics are understandable because Afflicition has their own promotion now and having Affliction as a sponsor for fighters would be like free advertising. Then came MMA Authentics, a major sponsor of UFC and WEC fighters. They were stiff armed out of the UFC over Wal-Mart shelf space... Not because of something major as being a competing MMA promotor, no... It was over Wal-Mart space. To me that is just ridiculous and to fighters like MMA Authentics has a impressive list of fighters who will be adversely affected BJ Penn, Michael Bisping, Forrest Griffin, Marcus Davis, Brandon Vera, Urijah Faber, Sam Stout, Roger Huerta, and Chuck Liddell it is probably even more ridiculous. All those fighters listed are sponsored by MMA Authentics and they all have signature tees available. Now though they are out of a major sponsor. For big name guys like Liddell and Griffin it shouldn't be too hard to get money elsewhere but for guys sponsored buy Booyaa Fightwear it is much more difficult to find money. Cage Potato sums it up perfectly:
Perhaps the message here is: don't do business with any other MMA org if you hope to one day do business with the WEC or UFC. If so, that's Zuffa's prerogative, but it sure sucks for guys like Budnik, who just lost a little much-needed cash as collateral damage in this war for ultimate supremacy. At least there's always Condom Depot. Just go ahead and put the decal right on your ass, there.
Booyaa sponsors fighters mainly in the California based King of the Cage promotion, a (former) ProElite asset. This move to ban Booyaa seems more like a move to prevent exposure to anything related to the zombie ProElite. King of the Cage has always been a sucessful regional promotion and they have never really tried to compete per say with industry giants like the UFC. But I want to really know, is this move even really necessary?
The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.
2 recs |
13 comments
Comments
I don’t know if it true, but Dana hinted at banning Cagefighter for another reason beyond Wal-Mart’s shelf space.
I don’t understand why people feel it is Zuffa’s duty to allow these companies to sponsor their fighters. All these companies are doing is slapping their images all over Zuffa’s product. These companies for the most part expect (in clear contractual terms, ask Hendo) to get their logo on UFC TV shows and PPVs.
The only reason many of these companies have gained a decent foothold is because of the industry created by Zuffa (who sees not one cent of this). But once Zuffa infringes upon the companies who owe their existence to Zuffa, people are suddenly up in arms. Like it or not, they don’t run a public service to the MMA community, they are running a business on the global stage. Everything they do now has more exposure – the production of shows and images they display are more important than ever.
by bigweeze on
Dec 1, 2008 3:53 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
They are within their rights...
but taking money out of fighter’s pockets is never going to be seen as a good thing. Affliction made a lot of sense, once you attempt to become a direct competitor then yes…it is fair game. But to ban sponsors over shelf space is bogus and harms your fighters more than it benefits you.
Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on
Dec 1, 2008 4:28 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If the UFC can get some bigtime sponsors on board and set up a “menu” of sorts, this could be a good situation for all (especially the unknowns). The level of loyalty between fighters and sponsors could affect this idea though.
by bigweeze on
Dec 1, 2008 7:11 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
While Zuffa doesn’t “see a cent” of the sponsorship money, they are immediately and directly impacted by whether or not a fighter has the funds to train professionally and the quality of the training he can afford.
by Simco on
Dec 1, 2008 10:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
List of Brands that areBanned by Zuffa
1) Affliction
2) MMA Authentics
3) Booyaa
Coming Up:
1) Cage Fighter
2) Sprawl
Who Is Left?
Tapout (which Zuffa invests in) and CondomDepot (who should sponsor Dana).
by MMASuPreMaCy on
Dec 1, 2008 5:11 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
*Correction* Cage Fighter is already Banned!
1) Affliction
2) MMA Authentics (Cage Fighter)
3) Booyaa
Coming Up:
1) Sprawl
Who Is Left?
Tapout (which Zuffa invests in) and CondomDepot (who should sponsor Dana).
by MMASuPreMaCy on
Dec 1, 2008 5:27 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sprawl is too big of a company and Zuffa has no legit reason to ban them, but they do sponsor fighters in just about every promotion. Here are some other brands:
-Sinister- I think this company is owned by Ed Soares, manager of Anderson Silva. Atleast thats what I remember hearing.
-Warrior Wear
-Hostility
-Punishment-Tito’s brand. I’m shocked Punishment hasn’t already be banned.
-Combat Sports International
-Fairtex
-Throwdown
-Triumph United-Sponsors Kimbo Slice. Again, surprised this hasn’t been banned
-Clinch Gear
-On The Mat
-Full Contact Fighter
These are just the big name guys.
by Discman2 on
Dec 1, 2008 6:26 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tapout sponsors Kimbo now.
:)
So it looks like Warrior Wear, Sprawl, and Full Contact Fighter are my three nominees for being banned next. I am sure Punishment will be banned soon. That is a given, unless Zuffa invested in them or something.
by MMASuPreMaCy on
Dec 1, 2008 7:18 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Looks like they are pretty tied into other orgs
by banter on
Dec 1, 2008 9:51 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
From that website…it looks like they are sponsored by elitexc and showtime. Zuffa will do their best to not allow anything they do bring more exposure to competitors. Zuffa and those affiliated with them shall be the only benefits of Zuffa’s hard work.
by iiowyn on
Dec 2, 2008 1:15 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Can anyone even name a Zuffa fighter sponsored by Booya?
by Simco on
Dec 1, 2008 10:21 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Mike Budnik
I can’t believe no one got the Salute Your Shorts reference in the piece I wrote. Thats a damn shame…
by Discman2 on
Dec 1, 2008 10:39 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs












