Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Affliction: Round Two

Promoted to the front page from the FanPosts by Luke Thomas.

Arlovski_punch

Any new business venture is going to initially be in the red. Startup costs are invested in order to produce a profit over the long haul. This was certainly the case with Affliction's first foray into hosting a MMA event but there was still no doubt that that certain expenses could have been avoided. There's no arguing that the salaries given to Ben Rothwell ($250,000), Tim Sylvia ($800,000), and Matt Lindland ($375,000) were unnecessary.

When the news broke as to the astronomical dollar amounts paid to fighters, every critic out there cited it as the quick end to Affliction's promotion. Then it was revealed in no certain terms that the broadcast may or may not have done 100,000 buys. Even if that number was accurate, there was no conceivable way the promotion could have broken even on the event.

This entire event was a start up cost to a potential long term venture. The payroll was undoubtedly high and unnecessarily so in many cases but it was for a reason: to make an immediate statement to the MMA community that the company was capable of putting on supercards with high level competitors with name recognition. The next step is to get those not in the hardcore community to buy the PPV.

It is no secret that this second event could very well make or break the promotion. As it looks right now, show number two should become a moderate success and at least make a profit.

For argument's sake, let's say that Banned did 100,000 buys at $40 a pop, totaling $4 million dollars. Take out 50% for the cable company and Affliction received $2 million from PPV and reportedly took in $2 million at the gate. Subtracting the fighter salaries, advertising, and miscellaneous costs to run a show there is practically no chance Banned pulled in a profit.

Now, the landscape has changed slightly. MMA has gotten even bigger since the first show in July. The coverage of UFC 91 alone displays that. Fedor has received more exposure with the commercials on CBS. Arlovski fought on network television and is arguably a bigger draw than Tim Sylvia ever was. The negative attention former Affliction VP has received through the MMA media isn't all bad; it has at the least kept Affliction in the headlines and they have since cut ties with Beard, supposedly.

If Affliction is able to refocus their advertising efforts and cut down on the cost of salaries, we could see a very profitable show. It is within reason that this show could break 200,000 buys which would have to be considered a massive success considering it is not being rub by Zuffa. From a matchmaking perspective, Josh Barnett will likely face the Arlovski/Fedor winner. Should Barnett fight on the upcoming card and look impressive, that will only increase the buyrate for Affliction's third show.

The fact is that Affliction made a few rookie mistakes on their first outing. As long as they are able to learn from those mistakes and put on an entertaining, competitive, and profitable card, we may very well have a dominant number two to the UFC'sclear number one spot in North American MMA.

The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.

Comment 151 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

So Fedor/Former UFC HW Champ 1 gets 100,000 buys, and you think Fedor/Former UFC HW Champ 2 (Who Is 1-2 Versus The Last Former UFC HW Champ Fedor Just Beat) will double it.

If that happens, I will eat my foot. Oh, and there will be no third Affliction show.

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 6:27 PM EST reply actions  

I’ll mail you a bottle of Frank’s Red Hot Sauce. I hear it really adds flavor to a foot.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed...

Arlovski is generally still a well liked guy in the casual community. Sylvia…not so much. Add to that the fact that now Fedor has a bit more “US hype” after beating Sylvia. This is going to absolutely draw more buys. It won’t be enough to turn a big profit…but it will be an imporvement

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

by Brent Brookhouse on Nov 24, 2008 6:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Regardless

This is Affliction’s money shot and it absolutely will not gross enough to keep them alive. Fedor/Arlovski is the biggest fight they can book and when it’s over, where do you go next? I heard they’re training to sign the guy that beat Fedor in Sambo; obviously with a bout against Fedor in mind. How desperate and pathetic would that be?

Fedor/Arlovski will do decent numbers, but it is still the death knell of Affliction.

by Blackout612 on Nov 24, 2008 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

This will be Affliction's "Heat"... Fedor vs Arlovski is Kimbo vs Petruzelli

I think its safe to say that the Kimbo fiasco was the nail in the coffin for Elite XC. Fedor is carrying Affliction at this point…. anyone who wants to try and argue that is dillusional. Kimbo didn’t have this much pressure on him, he had Gina Carano among a few other small players to carry a light load. I’m sorry, but Affliction’s heavyweight division is carrying their promotion right now with no real fighters to build other weight divisions on. Affliction is on serious thin ice… people are gonna buy this PPV for Fedor… if Arlovski pulls off the upset….Affliction is done.

Fedor wins…. then Barnett beats whatever can they set him up with… that could lead up to enough interest to sell a 3rd Affliction PPV but bottom line is that unless they get some other talent outside of the Heavyweight division, they are just delaying the inevitable.

Mike Pyle and Jay Hieron…. didn’t care about them before, still don’t. Affliction needs to take any profits made from this PPV and invest in a welterweight and middleweight division. PAY FOR FILHO’S REHAB…

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 24, 2008 7:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you’re wrong. Petruzelli was a last minute replacement off of the undercard. Who was fighting above his weight class. Who has pink hair. Who KOed the flagship of the company in 14 seconds in shitty fashion.

People know who Andrei Arlovski is. Even if there is some under-a-rock casual fan out there who doesn’t, upon watching the show they will at least know that Arlovski is a top contender and a former UFC champion. If Arlovski wins, you have a completely credible champion and flagship and a match with Barnett will be pretty big. Fedor will still be considered a viable entity for the promotion even with a loss but he wiol have to renegotiate that price tag.

Also, Affliction is doing the right thing by pumping a lot of money into one division at first and neglecting the others. The UFC has been criticized for years for alackluster HW division, which to some extent has been remedied. Even so, Affliction has taken care of that criticism and attempted to build a formidable roster. It’s better to have one big flagship division of top fighters than have a mess of top fighters spread out over different weights that can’t fight each other. The HW’s Affliction has invested in can all face each other.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 7:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry but I disagree...

The degree to which people recognize Seth Petruzelli and Andrei Arlovski doesn’t really matter at this point. The fact is that Slice vs Shamrock was going to be the fight that carried Elite XC out of the gutter and hopefully into an organization that would make money.

People are paying to see Day of Reckogning to see Fedor win…. the casual North American fan is paying to see what the big deal is about this “Fedor guy”. He loses to Arlovski… Affliction is done because the mysterious Fedor would have lost. To the hardcore fans, Fedor will still be the number one heavyweight fighter in MMA…. but the casual fan will move on and think Brock Lesnar is the best fighter in MMA, form your own opinion about that one…

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 24, 2008 7:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I kinda agree with dropkick on this one. Arlovski is a popular fighter. Affliction can build him as a star and promote cards with him as the headliner.

If Arlovski wins I think most hardcore fans will view him as the number one heavyweight, and it certainly sets up a compelling rematch. Keep in mind Arlovski is a former UFC heavyweight champ and is regarded as a top 10 if not top 5 figher. Kimbo Slice got knocked out in 14 seconds by some guy who got pulled off the under card at the last minute who couldn’t make it in the UFC. There’s a big difference there.

by Andy R on Nov 24, 2008 8:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not knocking Arlovski

Due to the marketing route that Affliction is taking by making Fedor the poster child for Affliction MMA, him losing to Arlovski could be a death blow.

They could definitely market Arlovski and keep on rolling but it would be an uphill battle… you gotta admit that at least.

All I’m saying is that Fedor losing to Arlovski could be disastrous to Affliction and their ability to put together a “profitable” business. If Arlovski wins, will probably be forced to see Arlovski vs Sylvia 4 so that Affliction could further legitimize Arlovski as the top heavyweight in the world. Then that sets up Fedor vs Barnett for whoever gets the winner of that. Thats two more PPV’s maybe… so that would probably take them to July or August.

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 24, 2008 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I still think the boat keeps coming back up to the dock and you just keep missing it every time.

First off, if Arlovski pulls off the win against Fedor, that is going to set up Arlovski/Barnett – not Sylvia/Arlovski. Sylvia just got destroyed by Fedor and before that was dominated by Couture. He will not be in a main event title fight for a while.

Secondly, you’re hinging the long haul success of this company on any combination of Fedor/Arlovski/Barnett. That is going to determine success over the next few events, should they make it that far which I think they will barring any huge marketing mistakes – or another member of management turning out to be a violent convicted felon. You are forgetting the wealth of talent like Babalu, Belfort, Lindland, Lil Nog, Rizzo, Rothwell, Matyushenko, and Horodecki that populates Affliction’s roster. These guys might not be headlining right now but being featured on the main card will develop them as stars. Hypothetically, if Babalu wins in dominant fashion in January and calls out Tito Ortiz – Ortiz v. Babalu could very well headline an Affliction PPV.

Third, I don’t think you’re grasping the fundamental differences between this fight and Kimbo/Petruzelli. Hell, there are no similarities. Fedor is being billed as the number one heavyweight because he is. For casual fan Joe Sixpack to find out what the deal is with this Fedor guy, all Affliction has to do is play the Sylvia fight 63 times throughout the broadcast like they no doubt will. If Arlovski wins, Arlovski becomes a superstar and they build off of his success for a future event and put Fedor in a big fight to build him up for a HUGE rematch with Arlovski. This is not like Kimbo/Petruzelli. At all.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Settle down man

You wrote a good piece and I’m not dogging what you wrote… don’t go off the deep end..

I’m just putting out my opinion and not discrediting yours.

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 24, 2008 9:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry if I’m coming off riled up or anything. I’m just trying to drive the point home that this is a different situation than the one experienced by EliteXC.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 9:04 PM EST up reply actions  

The day after...

I’m definitely going to be watching to see if you’re right man..

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 24, 2008 9:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Time will tell...

I guess we’ll see what happens after Day of Reckogning..

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 24, 2008 9:05 PM EST up reply actions  

You mean when Affliction announces a deal with the UFC to sell shirts and stop promoting fights.

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 9:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Is eleven guys really a “wealth of talent”?

by Richard Wade on Nov 25, 2008 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

If Anderson Silva in the UFC isn’t much of a draw, what do you think Andre Arlovski is? He doesn’t even have the fangs anymore which was somewhat marketable. Despite drawing a 500k paycheck on Elite XC’s card, the # of viewers DROPPED heading into Arlovski’s match (following Carano).

Andre Arlovski is not a headliner, it’s merely wishful thinking from the more knowledgable MMA fans.

by bigweeze on Nov 24, 2008 8:57 PM EST up reply actions  

By you, I was referring to the collective, not you gunslinger.

by bigweeze on Nov 24, 2008 8:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Its cool man

This was a good article and its raising some good arguments… i’m liking seeing everyone’s opinions on it.

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 24, 2008 9:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not so sure about that. We are used to two polarizing MMA entities in the UFC an EliteXC, with the former making huge financial gains and the latter creating huge financial losses. You can sit somewhere inbetween and still be able to have a viable business.

With the amount of money Affliction is dealing with, I doubt they have monkeys crunching the numbers for them. For arguments sake, let’s say the event is able to pull in 200,000 buys at $40 a pop. That would mean probably $4 million for Affliction plus an estimated $2 million more in gate receipts. Withpotentially $6 million in gross revenue for the company, it would be hard for me to see how they would sustain a loss here.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 7:23 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s less than that.

The UFC gets 50% from PPV companies because of their proven track record, WWE might get more, I’m pretty sure everyone else gets a smaller cut.

You’re also not taking into account true salaries. They’re definitely going to pay Fedor more than is reported on any piece of paper, and I’m sure that M-1 is going to get a chunk of money for the “co-promotion.”

Even with all of that 200k was going to be a stretch under ideal conditions, with the economy the way it is, and it being surrounded by UFC PPVs, there’s no chance in this breaking 150k buys.

by Phildo on Nov 24, 2008 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Marketing costs

Marketing costs could be 40-50% of the event cost. I wouldn’t be surprised if the UFC spend that much for their UFC’s. Considering that Affliction had a NY Times Square banner and a NASCAR deal for a defunct show, the cost probably exceed the 50% mark. There is absolutely no way Affliction will be able to break even.

by cyph on Nov 24, 2008 7:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm sorry dude....

..but you are making it faaaaaar too broad. There are lots of individual costs that go into putting on an event of this nature. You can’t just got “six million, four million” and clap your hands. Also, you should note that I never said they couldn’t turn a profit (they won’t), but even if they should, it’s absolutely not going to be enough to justify future risks.

They already know they’re in the shit. That’s public knowledge.

by Blackout612 on Nov 24, 2008 8:11 PM EST up reply actions  

You’ve got a valid point but I used general round-about numbers because that’s really all we have to go on. They’re also bound to have some sponsor income and things of that nature. Companies will pay pretty big money to have a few hundred thousand sets of eyes see their product. Each PPV buy accounts for more than one person watching the show.

And the whole future risks thing is a moot point. I start off the article talking about up-start costs. Talk to any small business owner and find out how much they were making profit-wise initially. Hell, read an interview with Dana White where he talks about how much the Fertittas invested before they started seeing a profit.

Do I think Affliction2 will garner huge profits? No. Do I think they have a legitimate opportunity to actually make a profit this time as opposed to their first attempt? Yes. In any case, show number two isn’t going to put them out of business.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 9:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Well.. You’re talking to a small business owner, so that may have back fired. Future risk is a huge consideration. In the state of Minnesota, 67% of small business owners who were surveyed after closing claimed they were profitable when closing down or more wealthy than when they began their small business. There’s a reason for the addage “get out while you’re ahead” and it has everything to do with knowing when to cut your losses. Affliction need to know when to cut their losses (and again, they’ve already indicated as much with some of their recent actions).

Well.. You’re talking to a small business owner, so that may have back fired. Future risk is a huge consideration. In the state of Minnesota, 67% of small business owners who were surveyed after closing claimed they were profitable when closing down or more wealthy than when they began their small business. There’s a reason for the addage “get out while you’re ahead” and it has everything to do with knowing when to cut your losses. Affliction need to know when to cut their losses (and again, they’ve already indicated as much with some of their recent actions).PS; You’ve got it backwards with sponsor revenue. It’s not based on projections, it’s based on past, tangible numbers. The money they receive for any such sponsorships will be based on the dreary numbers of Affliction: Banned, not your (or anyone elses) calculations that Affliction 2 will do upwards of 200k.

by Blackout612 on Nov 24, 2008 9:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I hope y’all elected Al Franken. I’ll leave it at that.

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 9:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Good man. It ain’t over yet.

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 9:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I worry that it is, but it’s a narrow gap. Fingers crossed..

by Blackout612 on Nov 24, 2008 9:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Annnnnnd

There’s my weekly editor fuck up. Very nice…

(Read the second one)

by Blackout612 on Nov 24, 2008 9:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Well it’s good to have someone that knows more about the business side of things in on the conversation. I think you’re right and there’s no doubting that in any business venture, you cut your losses. My only point is that I think it’s too soon to declare them dead after that first show and I think this second show could be successful.

Also, I know sponsorships and advertising is based off of potential projections. What I’m saying is we don’t have access to specific numbers because even if we did know how many buys the PPV did, we don’t know how much certain companies would be charged for an ad sport on the ring canvas or wherever they put them.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 9:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry

Not when you have one show in the books. WWE can sell by forecast, because their time tested product is valuable real estate for sponsors. Affliction doesn’t have that liberty based on one poorly performing show.

by Blackout612 on Nov 24, 2008 10:19 PM EST up reply actions  

But the sponsorship is still worth something. If the first show did 100k buys and they are able to make convincing projections to advertisers for X amount of buys than they can still sell their advertising based on whatever that number is. I’m not sure what you’re getting at exactly.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Not sure what I'm getting at?

It’s self explanatory. I’ve said all I have to say.

by Blackout612 on Nov 24, 2008 10:58 PM EST up reply actions  

No,it’ not. I ended my post saying that we, as in the fans or anyone else not directly involved in the company, do not have access to specifics of the event, numbers wise, concerning buys or cost to buy advertising. You responded with “Not when you have one show in the books” and I am trying to figure out how that applies as a response to what I said or if I’m just reading it wrong.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 11:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe you’re reading Spanish. I don’t need a manual to type a retort.

by Blackout612 on Nov 25, 2008 12:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Did they actually do 100k buys? We honestly don’t know and it’s not like an advertiser or sponsor would just take their word on that.

Of course even if they did 100k that’s not overly impressive to try and sell to advertisers or sponsors to expect much at all in return. Their past history of having to cancel a event is also going to work against them, what sponsor is going to want to commit to a event they aren’t sure will even happen? They have no leverage with sponsors (other than themselves), can give absolutely no guarantees and potential sponsors will want to wait until they are sure the event will even happen before they commit to it. So yea sponsorship/advertising may be worth something but it probably won’t be overly significant.

by who me on Nov 24, 2008 11:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Afflictions sponsors are probably Affliction itself…

by iiowyn on Nov 24, 2008 9:45 PM EST up reply actions  

You betray your own smugness.

by smoogy on Nov 24, 2008 8:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Personally...

I would buy any pay per view with Fedor fighting in the main event. I don’t care if it’s Affliction, UFC or a gay porno with a Fedor fight at the end!!!!

by ANance on Nov 24, 2008 7:02 PM EST reply actions  

Good post...

I Rec’d this…. you’re number crunching just drives the point home that Fedor alone can’t save this promotion.

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 24, 2008 7:19 PM EST reply actions  

I really don’t think that an “Edor is Coming” every commercial break at Heat does PPV with 200,000 buys make. Worse for Affliction, if the UFC 90 buyrate (and possibly the UFC 91 one, too) was effected so greatly by the market crisis and economic downturn, then how in the world is this going to do 200,000 buys? I’m with Subo, if this does 200,000 buys, I’ll eat his other foot.

by Rundownloser on Nov 24, 2008 7:25 PM EST reply actions  

The 300,000 buys for UFC 90 had to consist mostly of hardcore fans – those who will buy a PPV without names like Couture, Liddell, Lesnar, Ortiz, or Hughes attached to it. Those are the same people who will be buying the Fedor-Arlovski fight.

This card needs to garner only 2/3 or 66% of the UFC 90 audience to hit 200k. The promoters just need to make sure that they spend advertising money in the right spots – meaning on SpikeTV, during commercial for pro wrestling, maybe during NFL broadcasts, and billboards and the like in big cities (see: Times Square). Even if Affliction2 doesn’t break 200k, which I think it will, it will be a big improvement over the first show – at least in the 170k – 180k range. I’m still sticking with 200k, though.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

If they do all that, I can see it doing better than Banned, but I’m with Baudelaire on GSP/Penn really taking the wind out of Affliction’s buyrate. I’d go as much as 125,000 or 130,000, but I wonder if GSP/Penn won’t completely drown out that “victory.”

by Rundownloser on Nov 24, 2008 9:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I bet they’re researching the perfect counterprogramming as we speak. Maybe a Couture-Lesnar, GSP-Penn II sandwich

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 10:02 PM EST up reply actions  

It's here waiting for you, my friend

But frankly, I think I’ll be skipping the day after this fight (which I plan on buying :-)

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 9:59 PM EST up reply actions  

It is within reason that this show could break 200,000 buys which would have to be considered a massive success considering it is not being rub by Zuffa.

I do not see how this does 200k.

UFC 61 – 775,000 buys (Ortiz vs Shamrock 2 and Sylvia/Arlovski) 7/8/2006
UFC 59 – 415,000 buys (Ortiz vs Forrest and Sylvia/Arlovski) 4/15/2006

The major cause for those buy rates is Ortiz, not Sylvia or Arlovski.

If Affliction 1 did 100k ppv buys with both Fedor and Arlovski on the card, how does Affliction 2 get 200k with Fedor vs Arlovski?

I do not think 100,000 more people exist who know about Affliction and would buy the PPV because Arlovski and Fedor are now facing each other. The fans who liked Fedor bought Affliction 1. The fans who liked Arlovski bought Affliction 1.

At least 775,000 telivision sets saw both Arlovski and Sylvia in 2006. Where were they for Affliction 1? The same place they will be for Affliction 2.

And I do not see how the fight on CBS or the commercials on CBS will be enough to double the ppv buys.

People know who Andrei Arlovski is. Even if there is some under-a-rock casual fan out there who doesn’t, upon watching the show they will at least know that Arlovski is a top contender and a former UFC champion.

People knew who he was before Affliction 1.
 But they did not buy Affliction 1 because he did not fight Fedor?

by Eugene Schelfaut on Nov 24, 2008 7:34 PM EST reply actions  

PPV’s sell based on the main events. People dislike Tim Sylvia but not in a I-hate-Tito-and-will-pay-to-see-him-get-beat way but more of a I-dislike-Tim-and-don’t-care-to-watch-him-fight type way. Also, the overall audience for MMA is much bigger now than it was in 2006. The exposure the sport has received on CBS, ESPN, and by word of mouth has grown since the numbers you’re citing in 2006. That was more than two years ago.

And yes, the CBS advertising will help, as long as Affliction is able to follow it up with smart advertising the second go around. We live in a viral marketing world. People who tuned in to watch Kimbo on CBS and saw 30 second clips of this guy utterly destroying somebody they recognized from the UFC could very easily type “Fedor” in google and find out that this guy is the type of dominant Heavyweight they are used to seeing in boxing – you know, the type of heavyweight that becomes mythical and destroys at the box office.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Who is this Fedor character? The only commercial I saw was of this “edor” dude

by dbcb on Nov 24, 2008 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Don’t forget the fact that the only people who will remember the edor commercials when it comes time to buy the PPV will be people that already know who it is, so i doubt those will do anything.

by Phildo on Nov 24, 2008 7:47 PM EST up reply actions  

So 100,000 people did not buy A1 because Fedor and Arlovski fought different opponents?

by Eugene Schelfaut on Nov 24, 2008 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

As for marketing:

A2 is January 24th.
Penn vs Pierre 2 is January 31st.

A2 will be swallowed by the hype for Penn vs Pierre 2.

by Eugene Schelfaut on Nov 24, 2008 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

But, regardless of the ppv buys, nice write up.

by Eugene Schelfaut on Nov 24, 2008 7:56 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s actually one point I didn’t really think about. We’ll see how much it affects the buys of Affliction2.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 9:14 PM EST up reply actions  

and UFC will counter program

you know they will….with perhaps a best of GSP & Penn show at the very least

by RipeTide on Nov 24, 2008 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

How about the first fight on ESPN? With Fightmetric.com scoring?

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 9:58 PM EST up reply actions  

That would be too awesome to actually happen.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 10:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, NOW you wanna be realistic. Damnit. You’re probably right on that, though. But fuck it, let’s both dream.

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 10:09 PM EST up reply actions  

im thinking they will counter with the ufc 91 lesnar vs couture replay.

by bdw on Nov 25, 2008 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Too soon

Something tells me, it will only take a replay of UFC 90 to put the necessary dent in the Affliction PPV. Quite frankly, if people have the money to pay for this PPV, they are gonna get it… unfortunately for Affliction, considering how busy the UFC is in December and January and the holidays wrapping up..no one will have the money to see this.

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 25, 2008 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

This is the most optimistic Affliction future I have read haha.

by dbcb on Nov 24, 2008 7:41 PM EST reply actions  

Affliction is toast.

Six months since the last show + dependent one one superstar + slow economy + main compeditor has 10x the resources and is spoiling for blood + sandwiched in between 2 UFC PPVs + inexperiences promoters + overspending = dead company.

The only way things could get worse for Affliction would be if their press confrence for Day of Reckoning is hit by a meteor shower.

by Ubernoober on Nov 24, 2008 7:42 PM EST reply actions  

yeah don’t discount that… super bowl weekend is the NEXT weekend, with a gsp vs penn card to boot.

People don’t have the money to spend on ppv’s back to back.

They will always choose super bowl + gsp vs penn >>>>>>>>>> edor

by dbcb on Nov 24, 2008 7:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I also think that they have no hope in getting the ESPN type coverage that 91 did. The UFC marketing machine will be swamping the airwaves and making enough noise about 94 to completely drown out anything that Affliction tries to do.

If you were making the decisions at ESPN on what MMA to cover, would you choose to cover a match between two champions from the established organization, or a chamionship promoted by a soon to be dead organization?

by Ubernoober on Nov 24, 2008 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

There’s very little chance Affliction gets any ESPN coverage. I doubt most casual fans have heard of any of the guys on the card. Most people are UFC fans not mma fans.

Affliction’s one saving grace is that the card is appealing to hardcore fans. I would imagine most hardcore fans would buy Affliction for Fedor-Arlovski alone. The numbers won’t be great but they should get at least 100k buys.

by Andy R on Nov 24, 2008 8:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Their payroll will sink them when it’s all said and done. Unless the investors don’t mind being in the red for the next 2 years until they can build a brand name that can compete with the UFC…

by lbk on Nov 24, 2008 8:08 PM EST reply actions  

You hit the nail right on the head..

They need to cut down the payroll big time… plus they need to drop the music… that is a completely unnecessary expense and it really doesn’t add too much to the PPV.

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 24, 2008 8:29 PM EST up reply actions  

It's going to be hard to cut down the payroll...

How do you tell a fighter that has already fought for you to take a pay deduction especially if he won his last fight? It’s like being penalized for being successful. I do agree though, the payroll is whats going to bury them. You can cut the pay down on the newly signed fighters, but those fights is not what’s going to bring in the PPV numbers.

by steveoc24 on Nov 24, 2008 10:21 PM EST up reply actions  

You say “Listen, we made a bad business decision and can’t afford to pay you that much. I know it sucks, but honestly try getting that amount of money somewhere else. Seriously, let us know. Look at it this way (1) you fought one fight and made more than you’ve ever made previously for a single fight and (2) if we are able to minimize our costs now as a company than you’ll have a place to work in the future, giving you stability. If no one wants to renegotiate, we’ll have to contract lower level, more affordable fighters and the product will suffer making the company and your job security suffer. Be a team guy.”

Give or take a few words.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Hmm..

I have a problem with the fact that you’re regarding Affliction as a veteran of the industry. They don’t have any established precedent to march around making proclamations about buyrates and job security. They’ve had one show and have had to cancel another. You’re in a backpedal..

by Blackout612 on Nov 24, 2008 11:02 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s not a backpedal. That type of statement in no way indicates Affliction as a veteran. Also, it’s in no way entirely truthful as to the “stability” but simply an answer to the previous post of “What to tell a fighter to induce him to re-negotiate.” You have to bullshit a little when it comes to negotiating, on both sides. They don’t have established precedent to go off of, but at the same time it makes sense to anyone that if a business made financial mistakes and continues to make them in the future, they are bound to fail. Recognizing those mistakes and attempting to correct them is one step in the right direction. If they keep paying huge, inflated salaries they will not last. Any chance at “job security” lies in cutting costs, if at all.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 11:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Affliction had to sign contracts with fighters for more money to make up for their lack a solid future and the questions about whether they will even be able to fulfill those contracts in the end. Because the guys have contracts they don’t have to take less if they don’t want to and because Affliction’s future is in question it tends to lead to wanting to make as much as you can as quick as you can instead of taking a huge paycut in hopes they will stay around with their current track record.

by who me on Nov 24, 2008 11:34 PM EST up reply actions  

When a ship is sinking, you grab a life boat not a bucket

If they show they’re wounded, you think a fighter is gonna go “Sure, ok boss! EXC just took a dump, but I want you to pay me less, especially given the possibility that my contract gets tied up in legal limbo like those dudes over there! Where do I sign?”

They have the money. Fighters won’t do them any favors, nor should they.

by Blackout612 on Nov 25, 2008 12:23 AM EST up reply actions  

The biggest question in my mind is actually how the apparel company is doing. The reason they didn’t mind taking losses on the MMA cards was because they are essentially grand commercials for the clothing brand. Just not sure how the overpriced t-shirt business will fair.

by iiowyn on Nov 24, 2008 8:21 PM EST reply actions  

Check out the latest Maxim

If they keep getting reviews like they did in Maxim… their clothing line is gonna go down the toilet since Maxim called anyone who buys Affliction to be a douche bag that isn’t too fond of getting laid.

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 24, 2008 8:30 PM EST up reply actions  

We both know a guy that wears a lot of Affliction.

Sumbitch didn’t train me how to dress, that’s for damn sure.

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 9:43 PM EST up reply actions  

lol...

and I won’t tell you where that guy got his Affliction stuff!!!

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 25, 2008 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t know Maxim magazine actually wrote any copy for their magazine.

by bignerd on Nov 24, 2008 10:49 PM EST up reply actions  

What did Metzer say the ppv numbers were for the first affliction anyway?

I don’t care what t-shirt guy says. I just Metzer more than him

by dbcb on Nov 24, 2008 8:24 PM EST reply actions  

I think the best estimate he ever got was 85k-100k

by Phildo on Nov 24, 2008 8:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Meltzer’s estimate was between 50k and 85k which is quite a bit short of what Attencio was saying and for some reason Attencio never released any official numbers to prove what the show did, which can’t be a good sign.

by who me on Nov 24, 2008 9:24 PM EST up reply actions  

The first ppv got less than 100k, perhaps 75k at best.

Will this do as well as the first? Maybe, but I doubt it.

AA/Fedor certainly is a bigger bout, but I don’t see it connecting with more than the hard-core fans. The card itself is not as strong, but the price tag will still be high. Fedor/AA will cost them somewhere between 1.2 and 2 million alone.

With the current economy, folks are looking to cut back spending. I am a huge MMA fan, but will likely not be buying this or UFC 93. 92 and 94 are must buys, but I need to watch my spending and Affliction will almsot certainly suffer because of it.

The CBS commericals may help, but they ran months prior to the event. Had they been running 2-3 weeks before the event, it could have had some impact. Ideally, they should have signed a deal that included CBS commecials in Jan.

You did a nice job writing the peice, but it is way too optimistic.

by Lynchman on Nov 24, 2008 8:38 PM EST reply actions  

Probably likely for me too

I won’t have the money for any of these PPV’s either… financial responsiblities suck… I’ll just have to rely on all of you and hope you’re really good at writing about what happens..lol

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 24, 2008 8:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep. Short of someone ELSE willing to throw millions into the works, this is their last PPV.

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Dropkick, you should ask about becoming an equity partner in this promising business. I’m sure they can use all of the support they can get.

by bigweeze on Nov 24, 2008 9:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I forgot to tell you guys. My real name is Todd Beard.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 9:19 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

LOL

All is forgiven for that quote, sir.

Now if you’ll excuse me, Lorenzo wants to give me another lecture about ‘people skills.’ Fuck!

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 9:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Give the man his own column please...

For coming up with that one…. Mr. Dropkick has earned a column, that was awesome sir…. I actually laughed out loud on that.

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 25, 2008 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks. Now only if the Blog Gods (Blods? Glogs?) will answer my prayers.

by dropkick101 on Nov 25, 2008 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Arlovski also has a “Fedor” bonus in his contract from what I remember. It is a significant pay bump. I believe the cost of that fight is about 3 million or a little over in purses

by Michael Rome on Nov 24, 2008 9:05 PM EST reply actions  

Is there any successful startup in history that went 5m in the hole on their initial expenditures and then went radio silent for 3 months before 1 night of advertising, and then radio silent again for 6 weeks before starting ads for another show?

The whole point of starting expenditures is to raise awareness and then follow up. With no television or shows, it became impossible. They basically lost as much there as UFC did promoting their UK expansion at first, except the UFC followed up on it and had the infrastructure to make it back.

Here’s my guess for financials: The break even point for this show will be around 7 million dollars all things being equal, possibly 8.

I expect they’ll pull in the following revenue: 1m (legit) gate, 75k buys (1.5m), 1m or so in sponsorship money. I think all this is pretty optimistic right now, but they still are in the same trap.

by Michael Rome on Nov 24, 2008 9:16 PM EST reply actions  

So A2 will do under the 2.1 mil gate of A1?

by Eugene Schelfaut on Nov 24, 2008 9:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Or was that 2.1 inflated.

by Eugene Schelfaut on Nov 24, 2008 9:21 PM EST up reply actions  

First, it was not a legitimate gate, they bought hundreds of thousands worth of tickets.

Second, yes, they’re doing the same city and live gates are down across the board (except DLH) in this economy.

by Michael Rome on Nov 24, 2008 9:21 PM EST up reply actions  

GSP v Penn II might (really!) sell a million buys with the proper promotion – oh, and reairing the entire first fight on ESPN for free (my idea, no need to thank me). Will that, at long last, finally kill the myth that there will be a mainstream American MMA promotion to rival the UFC? Or, at the VERY FUCKING LEAST, that said competitor will not be primarily a t-shirt company?

No. But I can hope.

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 9:20 PM EST reply actions  

GSP v. Penn II is a huge fight but it will not do over a million buys.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 9:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Nothing in MMA is doing over a million right now. Tito-Chuck was just one of those circumstances where the stars aligned. The only fight I see doing that kind of business is Chuck-Lesnar.

Maybe Randy-Lesnar 2 could do it. Don’t know. First estimate I got, which was very very preliminary and nowhere near set in stone was 840k, which is pretty close to their internal estimate. It’s a very good number if true.

by Michael Rome on Nov 24, 2008 9:26 PM EST reply actions  

Good news that one of the best fight cards in a while got so many eyes.

by Rundownloser on Nov 24, 2008 9:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I really think a few more monthly cycles of heavy ESPN coverage will really ramp these numbers up next year. Ordering the fights could replace obscenely expensive NBA/NFL tickets as a once-a-month expense for sports fans.

Think big, man!

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 9:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I have to agree with Michael Rome and say this PPV looks to do the same numbers as the previous PPV at this point. Probably less live gate and 25 – 50k more PPV buys.

However, the perception of the economy is it’s in the absolute toilet right now. In two months people probably won’t have the sky is falling attitude after the holidays, new president and super bowl. This PPV may get a bump in optimism.

by bignerd on Nov 24, 2008 9:40 PM EST reply actions  

let me rephrase because I don’t think optimism is the right word . . . I think maybe the current embargo on PPV over the last 6 weeks could be at an end come January just in time for this show.

by bignerd on Nov 24, 2008 9:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I will admit I didn’t exactly factor the abundance of January cards in when putting this together. You got me there.

I will say that based on the idea of a “second show going down, not up” I think we have a slightly different situation here. Affliction1 was built primarily around the mystique of Fedor and the man more than delivered. He destroyed a guy who CasualFanJoeSixpack knew was legitimate from the UFC and did it within 36 seconds. There’s no doubt that people were talking after that and the only question is whether the time that has elapsed since then has been too long. Anyway, based on Fedor’s performance in show one people are going to want to see what he does in show two.

Also, we don’t have the contracts in front of us. Based on the language of the contracts, they may very well be able to be re-negotiated.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 9:42 PM EST reply actions  

The second show might, might, might hit 100, 120k. But to think it will a)double, b)be profitable, c)give Affliction enough juice to hit a third show or d)any of the above is a little farfetched to me.

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 9:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Just looking at what was said about the first Affliction show, Atencio said it broke 100k but never backed it up, Meltzer said it was between 50k and 85k and most other estimates I saw put it around 80k too. I believe Atencio also said that the break even point for the first show was 250k buys so if that was correct the first show didn’t even make half it’s money back (even by Atencio’s buyrate estimate). The 100k mark was important because no MMA event outside of the UFC has ever sold 100k or more of ppvs in the US, you would think that Atencio would of officially anounced those numbers and backed it up if they’d broken that huge accomplishment(even though that wasn’t even the halfway point for them breaking even).

For the second Affliction card to sell 200k in ppvs would be earthshakingly monumental (heck for them to even sell a proven 100k would be a huge accomplishment) but even at that point we don’t know if they would be breaking even or not and lets not forget that this show is already starting in the hole on money due to it being cancelled once, all that money spent for promotion was not only wasted it made them look bad to the casual fans. Their path to profitability just seems like a real mystery to me (although it might sound familiar to the guys at Pro Elite and the IFL and the AFL) and the numbers tossed out in the article are closer to wishful thinking than any kind of serious estimates of what their buyrate may look like. Affliction made it’s big mistake right at the very start when they came up with the business plan for all of this and so far I haven’t seen anything that leads me to believe they have any long term lasting power at all.

by who me on Nov 24, 2008 9:45 PM EST reply actions  

International PPV Buys

One factor missed about Affliction PPV buys is I was told International viewers could not purchase Affliction I because it was put together so late, without all cable details worked out. Now that Affliction has partnered with Showtime PPV fans from Canada, Europe and etc should be able to order the next card.

by bignerd on Nov 24, 2008 9:46 PM EST reply actions  

That’s some good information right there.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 9:51 PM EST up reply actions  

That would of been a good point except that Affliction Banned was available on PPV in Canada (it was on Bravo in England)

by who me on Nov 24, 2008 10:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I did say I was told . . . at least some Canadians I talked to said they could not order it.

by bignerd on Nov 24, 2008 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

“I was told” trumped by 30 seconds on google :D

by who me on Nov 24, 2008 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

what was google search? I need to go beat a source in the head.

by bignerd on Nov 24, 2008 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Googled Affliction Banned and went to the event’s web page(first link) then clicked on “how to watch”. Affliction still has the old event website up which made it easy to check.

http://www.afflictionclothing.com/banned_july19/how_to_watch.php

by who me on Nov 24, 2008 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

All good and true but they still wont break much over 100k buys. What they need to do is focus on keeping their core viewers and budgeting from there. After awhile you grow and make news, then some more news. Maybe then there’s chance. I hope they make it but they need to smarten up. There isn’t a big curve with millions on the line.

by Tommy7 on Nov 24, 2008 9:51 PM EST reply actions  

200k buys? Did you start working for Affliction recently, dropkick? Cause they’re the only ones crazy enough to throw out such ridiculous projections.

I fully expect this card to do fewer buys than the first.

by Michaelthebox on Nov 24, 2008 10:23 PM EST reply actions  

Honestly I think everybody is harping too much on my assertion of 200k buys. What I said was:

If Affliction is able to refocus their advertising efforts and cut down on the cost of salaries, we could see a very profitable show. It is within reason that this show could break 200,000 buys which would have to be considered a massive success considering it is not being rubbed by Zuffa.

Basically, if the stars aligned and they managed their money and advertising efforts better, it is not beyond the realm of possibility. It’s a far reaching number that probably won’t happen but it was just a number I threw out there to indicate I think this show will be a big improvement over the first show. Whether that turns out to be 130k, 150k, or 200k remains to be seen. Based on some of the factors others have brought into the conversation thus far – namely the abundance of PPV’s during January that would hurt buys and the possibility that Affliction will be in more countries this time around that could help buys – I think the number will be considerably lower than 200k but higher than 100k.

Either way, the point is that this event has the potential to be more successful than the first if this company can improve upon what worked the first time (Fedor, Big name opponent, Times Square advertising) and diminish what didn’t (Unnecessary salaries, Todd Beard).

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Potential to be more successful.

I think dropkick may be right. But they would need to use some sort of catch to raise PPV buys. Maybe (since they already make them) they could give a free t-shirt with each PPV buy and slide a doobie in the sleeve to ease the pain of getting ripped off by another shit show.

by Wookalarman on Nov 24, 2008 11:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Free douche t-shirt and a joint? Where do I sign up?

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 11:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Beard was President of Affliction Apparal, his salary shouldn’t of had anything to do with Affliction entertainment. Of course it can only help their public image that he is gone now.

by who me on Nov 24, 2008 11:45 PM EST up reply actions  

it’s not he predicted 1.2 million buys

by bignerd on Nov 24, 2008 11:00 PM EST up reply actions  

1.2 million is what White predicted for UFC 91. What does that have to do with this?

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 11:20 PM EST up reply actions  

because someone suggested 200k was a crazy number

by bignerd on Nov 25, 2008 12:25 AM EST up reply actions  

1.2 million for the UFC with all the coverage they were getting was more likely than Affliction pulling 200k at this point. Of course anything is possible but things are shaping up against Affliction hitting anything close to that number at this point. Heck even the guy who made the original post is backing off of that number now.

by who me on Nov 25, 2008 12:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Why would you say things are not shaping up? It’s freaking Fedor vs Arlovski, a fight fans have been waiting 4 years to see. Heavyweight showdown, 1st round TKO, either Fedor loses some teeth or Andrei never gets off the mat.

by bignerd on Nov 25, 2008 1:25 AM EST up reply actions  

It’s a fight that hardcore fans have an interest in but that wasn’t enough for the loaded first Affliction show so why should anyone assume that it will be enough for the second? You don’t have to sell any of us on a Fedor fight but then we aren’t the guys who are paying the bills for any of these organizations the casual fans are.

by who me on Nov 25, 2008 1:43 AM EST up reply actions  

First off the first show didn’t do 100k, Meltzer numbers came in around 75k the idea that the second show is gonna do any better is simply delusional. The first show had all the hype/marketing and stacked card and it still felt incredibly short of the number that they needed to break even with was 250k. Fedor isn’t a draw, he’s never going to be a draw unless he joins the UFC and as the ratings showed for Arlovski he is no where near as popular as he was when he was in the UFC. The fact that Affliction’s show is in the middle of 2 UFC ppv’s will pretty much be the nail in the coffin for that company, because it’s gonna get buried by the Zuffa machine and you know they will counter program agains them so that makes it all but impossible for this show to succeed. I know there is a lot of wishfull thinking by anti-UFC people but facts are facts and Aflliction will be lucky if they can break 50k in this economy with no marketable stars, they will soon join WFA, IFL, Pride, and Elite as dead mma orgs that never had a chance to compete with the UFC.

by Raker on Nov 24, 2008 11:24 PM EST reply actions  

Again, this is based on Affliction’s potential for success. That means they have to change certain things up in order to be more succesful. Only time will tell if they are able to do this.

Fedor isn’t a draw, he’s never going to be a draw unless he joins the UFC

Fedor has never been able to draw on PPV because he has never had the correct marketing machine behind him. The UFC would be that marketing machine so you are, in a sense, correct. But, if another entity came along that was able to successfully market MMA on a profitable basis, it could be a different story. My point here is that every person is writing off Affliction after this second show – no matter what. The fat lady hasn’t sung yet so we need to look at the other factors.

the ratings showed for Arlovski he is no where near as popular as he was when he was in the UFC.

Those ratings are entirely misleading and I’m glad you brought that up. That showed nothing for Arlovski’s drawing power but moreso of Gina Carano’s huge star power. Gina is a beautiful women and she can fight. Before the October card she had already established herself with the base of casual fans who were tuning in – many of whom did not know who Andrei Arlovski was. There is no doubt that Arlovski gained from that show. He’s a marketable, explosive fighter who was put on network TV and displayed to hundreds of thousands more people than have seen him – and he won decisively.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 11:33 PM EST up reply actions  

The casual fans that did watch the Arlovski fight saw him have trouble with a fat guy they had never heard of too. Yea the hardcore fans know that Roy Nelson is a tough fight but it just wasn’t the kind of fight to try and use for a CBS show to draw in new fans. It also doesn’t help that they actually had people turn the channel instead of watching the fight too.

by who me on Nov 24, 2008 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Counter program

The UFC should counter program with a free showing of the Couture/Lesner PPV. Wonder how much the Affliction top brass will spend on ulcer meds in January.

by Wookalarman on Nov 24, 2008 11:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we would see a mass suicide in the “I spend more money on t-shirts than I do on higher education” demographic. Hmmm …. maybe we should encourage the UFC to go with that counter program.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 11:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Arlovski being a draw is a myth…

First off Arlovski v Barnett sold less than 700 tickets and had to be cancelled.

Secondly Arlovski lost CBS 1 million viewers with his fight.

Next 200k buys for affliction is a pipe dream.

The fatal assumption at the moment is that this show will actually occur.

We will know by mid to end of december because they will have a clear indication on the gate.

Affliction clothing sales are dropping and will continue to drop.

My guess is if they even sniff the reality of this show losing anywhere near the money the first show lost they will pull out and affliction entertainment will file bankruptcy.

Remember the second show was canceled before the economic 911.

Now lets consider this…

which type of fans stream ppv’s for free? yup – its the hardcore.

That’s pretty much the entire fan base for affliction.

how many more of the hardcores are inclined to stream in this economic time?

Even though it’s not the preferred method of viewing an event and Im sure most hardcores usually don’t consider it – but you now have a UFC ppv 1 week before and a major UFC ppv one week after.

They are looking at a ceiling of 75-80k and a reality of 50-60k.

The bottom line is IF this show even transpires it will be their last.

by mmalogic on Nov 24, 2008 11:38 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

Wow, you’re even more pessimistic than me. Awesome. I think the show will happen, hit maybe 110-115 buys, and Affliction will settle with the UFC.

by Derek Suboticki on Nov 24, 2008 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you have some points but, yeah, you’re being as pessimistic as I would like to be. I think the guys running Affliction are douche bags and all they have done is keep Fedor out of the UFC for longer, lure Arlovski away from the company, and give Tito another place to say he might be signing with.

Hypothetically, I would like to see Affliction get through their third show and turn Fedor, Arlovski, Barnett, Babalu, and Lindland into bigger stars then they were beforehand. At which point they fold and the aforementioned names get sucked back into the UFC so I can bear witness to the MMA monopoly.

My point in the article is that there is the possibility that ::gasp:: this show could be successful if they tweak a few things. Teh scenario you’re bringing up is entirely possible as well but I think both sides need to be looked at before we all decide exactly what will happen. The thing about MMA is that this shit is unpredictable.

by dropkick101 on Nov 24, 2008 11:46 PM EST up reply actions  

The thing I think your article misses is that the situation for Affliction going into this upcoming card is a LOT worse than it was going into Banned.

Going into Banned, Affliction had a ton of positive PR from the MMA websites, as well as a huge push from the anti-Zuffa fandom that desperately wanted a real rival, and who wanted Fedor to be famous in the US. Zuffa’s anti-Affliction program was not designed to prevent buys from hardcores, it was to prevent the hardcore interest from spilling over into the casuals.

But Affliction has no other avenue to getting the casuals than getting the hardcores to drive interest. And the interest from the hardcores will be way down this upcoming card. Affliction is no longer the ‘savior of MMA’, its just another bum promotion with a future that looks bad. They don’t look like they’re going to make Fedor a superstar. And with two PPV alternatives, a lot of the hardcores will neglect buying the Affliction card, seeing no need to support a failing promotion. Further, a lot of bars will pass on showing Affliction and save their money to show the UFC shows.

Without hardcores driving the buys, they still aren’t getting any casuals. With no casuals, their ceiling remains 100k buys. And with interest and enthusiasm among the hardcores dropping like a rock, realistically their PPV expectations should be around 50k.

Affliction was done the moment they cancelled their second show, and maybe before. The body just doesn’t yet realize its dead.

by Michaelthebox on Nov 25, 2008 12:03 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

The disconnect is that you think tweaking this or that will solve the problem…

In business everything is contingent on “the buy”.

If you overpaid for a house or built a house with a radiation plant right next door you can tweak a million things but will never make out.

If you do well on “the buy” you can fuck tons of stuff up and still come out whole…

Not only is affliction trying to compete with the UFC they are overpaying fighters.

Orgs went under with alot more money, alot more TV just trying to match the “market” price on talent.

They didn’t get it right on “the buy”.

My point is there is no “2ND ROUND”… there was a KO in round 1 and affliction is trying to contest the decision with the NSAC.

Wish full thinking at best.

by mmalogic on Nov 25, 2008 12:17 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

MMA the sport is unpredictable but we are talking about MMA the industry.

by who me on Nov 25, 2008 12:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Arlovski lost a million viewers? LOL. The inital claim is that he lost 100,000, and when MMAPayout did a quarterly look at the show, it ended up being 17,000.

by D.Capitated on Nov 25, 2008 8:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Your right that it wasn’t 1 million, it was 110,000, but when did MMAPayout do a quarterly breakdown of Heat? I searched their site and couldn’t find anything.

by who me on Nov 25, 2008 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Further, a lot of bars will pass on showing Affliction and save their money to show the UFC shows.

That seems realistic, especially with GSP vs. Penn 2 the next week.

by Eugene Schelfaut on Nov 25, 2008 12:06 AM EST reply actions  

Hears the thing there is no Buzz with the casual mma fan about Affliction most don’t even know they do PPV’s or even know who the hell half of there fighters are like Fedor,Barnett,etc. My 2 Brothers 17 and the other 20 and all there friends who are causual MMA fans only go buy name name recognition when they buy there MMA and that name is the UFC and thats all they care and talk about and pretty much know of. They don’t care about other shows at all no matter how many times I have tried explaning to them how good the fighters are on the Affliction show and why they should watch. When it comes to the casual fans who are in there late teens early 20’s they don’t care about any other MMA org other then the UFC and I don’t see how Affliction or any other org can brake that trend.

by Shocbomb on Nov 25, 2008 12:26 AM EST reply actions  

The way for Affliction to survive is obvious

Sign Kimbo and put him up against Ken Shamrock. That’ll draw PPV buys…

Then hype the sh1t out of Fedor and Arlovski during the PPV so by the time the main event comes along everyone who’s watching think’s Arlovski and Fedor are the two greatest fighters in the world (which isn’t that far from the truth – Arlovski is maybe top 5, definitely top 10).

Have Kimbo fight just before the main event but make it clear to people watching that the main event is the shiznit.

by rainmaker6 on Nov 25, 2008 12:45 AM EST reply actions  

A few weeks ago I’d have said drop Arlovski, do Barnett-Fedor and a Kimbo match, but now they cant even get Kimbo due to contract stuff.

I hope the show happens for the fighters sake, and I’d also like to go see Fedor fight again. But yeah, I have my doubts the second show will happen.

by Michael Rome on Nov 25, 2008 5:33 AM EST reply actions  

The reason that Affliction can take losses on MMA PPV events is....

That their real profit driver is those stupid T-shirts they sell. The events are just very expensive advertising. The unfortunate thing is that they do such a piss poor job of promoting. I mean, where are the ads? Who is Barnett fighting? Where are the TV spots on HDnet? I would love there to be a viable competitor to the UFC, but, sadly, I don’t think a bunch of pricks making over priced super spooky T-shirts for the douche bags of America (see Maxim) to buy with their parents credit cards are the guys to do it.

by Drewplata on Nov 25, 2008 2:11 PM EST reply actions  

In 2006 Affliction apparel’s revenue was $7 million, even if they have tripled that since then they are still not going to be able to support the kind of losses they are taking on these events. They are a small boutique clothing company they just don’t have that kind of extra cash floating around for these kinds of expenses, that’s why Trump’s and Golden Boy’s supposed involvement was so important to them.

by who me on Nov 25, 2008 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Affliction really wants to sell this PPV?

Drop the PPV price down to 24.99…… bet they’ll hit their supposed “numbers” then..

For me personally, I wouldn’t pay more than that to see this PPV and the casual fan’s curiousity more than likely has a price tag and 45 bucks for a non UFC PPV is asking too much.

by Gunslinger20 on Nov 25, 2008 3:22 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Favritegotevj9_small
An Open Letter to Nick Diaz
Tatum_small
Aristotle Knows Nick Diaz Didn't Cheat
Walshrun_small
5 Reasons I Hate MMA
Royce_09_small
Call To Nominate New Bloody Elbow Moderators
Obp_small
The Official BE UFC Drinking Game

Recent FanPosts

Logo_d__small
Roll a phat one for Nick Diaz
Cg_small
Perceptions Regarding Diaz v. Condit Decision Distorted by the Judging Chameleon
Cf_small
George Rush St. Pierre BJJ Coach Renzon Gracie Black belt John Danaher
Jules-winfield-7_small
In Defense of Nick Diaz
208730_10150164903466743_503301742_7348043_3232767_n_small
Top Five: Fights To Look Forward To
Bruce-lee-lats_small
Calling for Nick Diaz to be released makes no sense.
Afro_small
The UFC Has Been Spared Once Again...This Time by Carlos Condit

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings