Bloody Elbow: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

A New Weightclass: Super Heavy Weight

After watching UFC 91 I remember thinking how much I admired Randy Couture. How he deserves to be in the Hall of Fame, and how much I appreciate his style. I also was filled with a sense of loss. The notion that Randy Couture was extinct, that I would never be able to witness his greatness again. I don't see him fighting anymore. And if he does fight again it won't be the same. What made Captain America so great was The Quest. The quest for the light heavyweight championship, then heavyweight championship, and then the quest to fight Fedor. This fight against Lesnar was, in my opinion, the continuation in his quest to fight Fedor. But now, the quest has to be over. I don't believe there could be mass interest to see that fight now. I mean, Randy will no longer be considered the #1 or #2 heavyweight. Could Randy beat fedor, could he beat Nogueira, is he in the top two for heavyweights? I believe the answer is yes -- but these questions are irrelevant. All we as fans care about now, is Brock Lesnar. How could this tragedy happen? How could a relative new comer beat the Champion?

Couture looked great in his fight with Lesnar. All of the things that made him so great in the past, were displayed in his fight with Lesnar, except one thing.  Instead of implementing that classic DIRTY BOXING, Couture had to devote everything he had into pinning Lesnar against the fence -- Lesnar was just too damn big. Lesnar is very big, he is very good at using that size, and he seems to actually be learning how to fight.  For these reasons, I think he would have to be a significant favorite in any fight I can think of right now.  A guy like Noguiera, or Mir, or someone with exceptional Jiu-Jitsu, definitely has the best chance at beating Lesnar. But he seems to be learning so quickly, and his wrestling is so good, that I don't see Nog winning that fight (Brock doesn't need to learn Jiu Jitsu, he just needs to learn how to defend against it).

The thought that Lesnar is gonna be champion for quite some time doesn't particularly bother me. I could care less about who the champion is in any weight class. I enjoy stylistic match-ups that produce great technical fights, and because Lesnar is champion, I'm afraid that I will be seeing less of these in the upcoming future. Why would I be seeing less interesting stylistic match-ups in the HW division? For two reasons:

1) Lesnar is not just an aberation, an anomaly, a once in a lifetime occurence! He is the future of the Heavy Weight Division. Let me sum up this arguement philosophically, rather than factually:  the best fighter in every weight class, cuts weight before a fight.  They do this because it gives them the highest level of strength possible in that division.  Why should the heavyweight division be any different? Brock has shown us that it isn't different -- being the strongest guy in the octagon, is a huge advantage.  My prediction, not based on any data, is that we will see big wrestlers start making their way into MMA.  As the UFC becomes more mainstream, more popular, and more lucrative, why wouldn't we see this transition of big athletes into the sport?

2) All of the guys who would currently make for good match-ups are kind of irrelevant now. If you can't beat Lesnar no one is gonna take interest. I wanna see Couture fight Fedor, or see Nog defend his HW title, or see how the WEC guys stack up in the division. Now all I'm gonna be presented, is a serious of Brock-style ass whoopings -- not that interested.

So what about all the awesome fighters that CAN'T cut to 205 and DON'T cut to 265. I have a solution: THE SUPER HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION! This is not a new idea. The SHOOTO promotion currently has a heavyweight cut off at 225 and the Association of Boxing Commissions has proposed, as early as July of this year, a Heavyweight division that cuts off at 225. 

Of course I'm not suggesting that we do this immediately. The UFC still has plenty of money to be made off Lesnar -- I wouldn't suggest that we prevent that. Brock has plenty of people left to crush before the UFC can definitively declare that they have the absolute, best heavyweight in the world. But the day will come, when every ex-collegiate super heavyweight wrestler makes his way to the UFC. And, if that day doesn't come, lets draw the line at 225 anyway. Won't we all be sick of watching Lesnar win by then?

The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.

2 recs  |  Comment 187 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

/signed

I love Randy but watching the fight this past Saturday, it really looked like a kid wrestling around with his father. The size difference was so obvious, and had such an obvious effect on the outcome.

by mythbuster on Nov 17, 2008 10:14 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

This is complete bullshit

Randy was outweighed by the same amount by Tim, and by just 10-15 pounds by Gonzaga. Randy picked up Gonzaga, dropped his head on Big Nose’s big nose and won the fight – and we all know the things he did to Timmy.

Frank Mir’s over 225 – hell, so is Nog. Does that make them super-heavyweights?

Look, I get you hate Brock. But to change the rules like this is fucking clownshoes.

by subo on Nov 18, 2008 2:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I like 235 more than 225.

I am for splitting the division, and I like the point of the future of the HW division being guys 250+ that move like lighter weights.

Sylvia and Brock are not physically similar. Weight wise yes, otherwise noooo.

http://eliotmarshall.com/

by BJJDenver on Nov 18, 2008 3:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You made a big point that I don’t think you or anyone else actually caught. Sylvia and Lesnar have similar weights but aren’t similar in other areas. No one thought Tim Sylvia was too big to be a heavyweight and they only think it about Brock because he is a powerhouse. Brock didn’t beat Randy because he is so much heavier he beat Randy because his arms are longer and he hits hard. People are judging weight class here based on something that actually has very little to do with a fighter’s weight and more to do with Brock’s individual genetics.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 5:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s just Brock hatred manifesting itself in other places – in this case, destroying a weight class everyone was JUST FINE with until Brock came along.

Cry me a fucking river.

by subo on Nov 18, 2008 6:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There have been people saying it before Brock came along and there is an arguement for it but there are a lot of people who are getting into it now just because Brock Lesnar is so darn big. Randy was looking good against Brock in the first round and was keeping up with him wrestling, heck Randy almost took him down at the end of the first round. It was Brock’s long arms that won him the fight not his hefty torso. Judging a whole weight class on Brock’s unique genetics isn’t very fair. People are missing the point that it’s not the weight of the fighter that matters it’s athleticism and skill that win fights.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 6:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Mir is also over 235

And Nog is listed at 241.

Even moving it to 235 solves nothing. Name all the awesome fighters between 205 and 235.

by subo on Nov 18, 2008 6:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A lot of guys could cut to 235 who currently come in above it. The real issue would be that the 236+ class would be near empty.

by Richard Wade on Nov 18, 2008 7:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yea Herring and Mir could probably even cut to 235lbs if they wanted to, you would be left with Lesnar and Carwin as the whole over 235 division. I guess they could sign Ron Waterman, Bob Sapp, Zuluzinho, Jan Nortje, HMC and maybe Mark Hunt but would that make for a credible division?

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 7:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Correct on the main point.

But don’t forget that this is all in reaction to one man, which in my mind makes it an automatic overreaction. Sure there is Carwin out there, but he hasn’t proven himself at the same levels Brock has, so it’s not a fair comparison.

Brock can be beaten – just like Fedor can be beaten. It’s possible if you match up well and carry out a proper gameplan.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 7:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Besides which

this would completely erase one of the main points of martial arts in general – how to use skill to overcome size and strength. Nobody here actually thinks Brock’s invincible, because he isn’t. Is he tough? Hell yes he’s tough! But I’m guessing Nog will take him down a notch.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 7:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure there is Carwin out there, but he hasn’t proven himself at the same levels Brock has, so it’s not a fair comparison.

Thanks for the unintentional laugh. One guy is 10-0 and virtually unknown, the other guy main evented at 1-0. and 1-1, and at 2-1 got a title shot. Can’t understand how Carwin hasn’t proven himself yet… what a slacker!

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 7:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You’re usually quick to point out who guys have fought. Maybe that’s what he meant..

by Blackout612 on Nov 18, 2008 7:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You got it, Blackout.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 7:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I've addressed the issue of all W/L's not being equal

in a previous thread. The position stands.

Brock dominated “Murr” before submitting to a total, class-A rookie mistake. He dominated Herring for fifteen minutes both on the feet and ground. He beat Couture, no questions asked, via stoppage in the 2nd round.

I honestly didn’t know who Carwin fought before I looked up his fighter profile today on UFC.com. Safe to say it’s two nobodies in the last year, at least from what I found on his page.

My point was that using physicality as the inclusive factor for discussion, there’s only one guy who really matches Brock and that’s Carwin. At least, currently fighting in the UFC. Everyone else is spotting Brock 30+lbs.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 7:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I understand

My point was to blame the UFC for not giving other big guys a real shot, while given an unproven a big shot. 10-0, all wins via first round stoppage. My “what a slacker” was towards the UFC, and what else can the guy do to prove he deserves a real shot. Wasn’t against you.

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 7:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, I'm not saying Carwin definitely DOESN'T belong

in the conversation, I’m just saying that he hasn’t proven he does, whereas Lesnar has. I’m with you regarding the UFC, it’s not a strict skills/performance meritocracy – the other huge factor you must observe is entertainment value. Brock’s got that over pretty much every other UFC fighter right now, am I wrong?

But sure, the injustice of it is no good. And I don’t take much of anything you say as directly against me, unless you stipulate such.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 9:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Um, the 3-1 guy has wins over Heath Herring and Randy Couture. His one loss is to Frank Mir. Who has Carwin beat?

by Richard Wade on Nov 20, 2008 4:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

um, who has Carwin had the chance to fight?

by mythbuster on Nov 21, 2008 8:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The weight class wouldn’t necessarily be empty, even if the new class was implemented tomorrow, because a 250 pound fighter would be able to cut to 235 or fight at his natural weight depending on what he wanted.

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 18, 2008 7:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In the same way that almost every light heavyweight and a good number of middleweights could choose to fight at heavyweight if they decided to stop cutting weight? If guys can cut to make a smaller class they almost always do. There are very few heavyweights under 230lb now because they all cut to light heavyweight. Cutting heavyweight into two classes is going to pretty much put everyone who can cut to make it in one class and everyone who can’t into another.

Randy cut to light heavyweight back in 2002 because he was having problems dealing with big guys like Josh Barnett and Ricco Rodriguez and only came out of retirement and went back to heavyweight because he thought he could beat Tim Sylvia. Randy vs Lesnar is an abberation in heavyweight as it is now and that isn’t because of Brock it’s because of Randy.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 8:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wanna see Couture fight Fedor, or see Nog defend his HW title, or see how the WEC guys stack up in the division. Now all I’m gonna be presented, is a serious of Brock-style ass whoopings — not that interested.

You can see Nog defend his title next month. And if he does that, you can see him defend it again…

WEC did not have heavy weight.

by Eugene Schelfaut on Nov 17, 2008 10:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

They did once upon a time, and a super heavyweight division too.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WEC_champions

by mythbuster on Nov 17, 2008 10:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Point taken.

However, James Irvin (2004) and Brandon Vera (2005) were the only WEC Heavyweight champions.
And Ron Watermen (2003) was the only Super Heavyweight.

by Eugene Schelfaut on Nov 17, 2008 10:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

1. Research the weights of past heavyweight champions both in MMA and in wrestling.

2. Name three good fighters besides Mark Hunt who are restricted by 265lbs.

by Simco on Nov 17, 2008 10:24 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Just curious

why you limited it to MMA and wrestling? Why not add boxing, ju jitsu, karate, etc?

by mythbuster on Nov 17, 2008 10:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure what your point is?

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 17, 2008 10:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

1. " My prediction, not based on any data, is that we will see big wrestlers start making their way into MMA."

2. “So what about all the awesome fighters that CAN’T cut to 205 and DON’T cut to 265.”

While you admittedly contrived the idea and made the post without any sort of knowledge of what you were predicting, perhaps you could do some research and discover if your ideas are based in fact. It will benefit your argument and also benefit the post to make it more than groundless whimsy.

by Simco on Nov 17, 2008 10:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Do I need data to back up common sense, and economic precedence? When the UFC becomes mainstream and more lucrative [think that’s pretty likely], ex-collegiate athletes will view the UFC as a viable career path. What data would you like for this assertion?

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 17, 2008 10:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sorry... I get you point.

To answer your question: There does exist quite a few athletes in various sports that weigh 265, although it is unimportant if they are “champions” or not. I don’t feel like listing them off by name but I will say that they exist in Collegiate Football, Professional Football, Collegiate Free-style wrestling, Collegiate Greco-wresting, boxing, olympic wrestling, and yes… professional wrestling — maybe a few others.

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 17, 2008 11:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

there are very few...

…talented fighters over 265. It would be an awful, awful division.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

by Brent Brookhouse on Nov 18, 2008 10:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Give it time

When an NFL third-string lineman can make more money fighting than he can doing that, we’ll start to see the exodus.

But over 265 is the answer – not shrinking an already lacking HW division.

by subo on Nov 18, 2008 2:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That is assuming that a third-string lineman will be able to actually fight at a high level. The NFL minimum salary for 2008 is $310,000 and it goes up every year, you would have to be a top level fighter to get close to that. Saying there are big guys in various sports is irrelevant because what should be looked at is athletes in amateur combat sports and those aren’t all that common. The NCAA amateur wrestling heavyweight class is from 183lbs to 285lbs, there are some big guys there but big doesn’t neccessarily equate to talented. The average male weight in the US is around 190 lbs, guys as big as Brock Lesnar are rare and guys with that kind of athletic ability at that size are even more rare.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 6:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, but the economics of the sport are evolving

A unique 265+ division would garner huge numbers, especially if you got some kind of Giants v Redskins or some other huge media market rivalry to hype the fight. I see a future in 10 years where a guy who would rather fight than play football/baseball/basketball is taking, like, a 90% paycut instead of 99% – and that sponsorship dollars help make up the difference in base salary.

I have big dreams for this sport.

by subo on Nov 18, 2008 6:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If Brock was the only man fighting at the weight limit, I’d understand.

But I know Shane Carwin fights at 265, and Cain Velasquez is damn close. Basically, Brock is no “Anomaly” as you say…he’s just a big man who can fight, which is something the heavyweight division has lacked…forever.

Guys who come in at 265 shouldn’t be punished with lack of competition at a Super Heavy class…

I love how everyone says Brandon Vera was too small, and all the trash talk up until he went down…but when Randy loses because of size, we get a lynch mob screaming for a new weight class.

Get. Over. It.

by kyfm621 on Nov 17, 2008 10:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Because I think Randy could beat everyone else in the division, Vera couldn’t. And I don’t think we should make a new class until 1 of 2 things happen: we get bored of brock (I’m not bored quite yet), or we get more 265ers.

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 17, 2008 10:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If we get more 265’ers then whats the problem with that just being heavy weight? Sure there are a few small HW’s but realistically, Randy is who I consider the last small HW that can be effective. Off the top of my head, I can’t think of any small HW’s besides him. All of those who were in the middle are going up.

Nog and Mir are both decently sized as well, not Brock’s stature, but not exactly small at heavyweight.

And I agree, I’m definately not bored of brock. Realistically, I think Nog will sub him (I don’t believe Mir would win a rematch), and everything will just balance out.

I also believe Cain could beat Brock, but he’s still coming up alongside Carwin.

Not to mention, that truthfully, where size mattered most in saturday’s main event, wrestling, Randy was doing perfectly fine, not dominating, but definately not getting ragdolled. I think Brocks size is an overrated advantage. If a 220 (probably 225-230 at fight time) could hold Brock against the cage, I see no reason to view 265 as a big deal for HW.

by kyfm621 on Nov 17, 2008 10:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Both nog and mir are significantly smaller than lesnar. I could be wrong (that’s why I’m not bored with him yet), but lesnar will be able to beat nog in the same fashion he’s beaten everyone else. If he was dumb and cocky, refused to learn, or just wanted a quick buck, I wouldn’t think that he had the ability to learn adequate submission defense.

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 17, 2008 11:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Frank Mir was 255lbs for his last fight with Lesnar, on one of Dana’s last blogs Lesnar said his weight was 276lbs. Big Nog is listed at the bottom of this thread at 237lbs, the difference between Mir and Nog is about the same as between Lesnar and Mir, are people complaining about Mir’s huge size advantage over Nog?

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 10:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

They will if Mir wins.

by iiowyn on Nov 21, 2008 1:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sorry.... I get your point.

To answer your question: There does exist quite a few athletes in various sports that weigh 265, although it is unimportant if they are “champions” or not. I don’t feel like listing them off by name but I will say that they exist in Collegiate Football, Professional Football, Collegiate Free-style wrestling, Collegiate Greco-wresting, boxing, olympic wrestling, and yes… professional wrestling — maybe a few others.

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 17, 2008 11:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How does playing collegiate football prepare a guy for a career as a MMA fighter? It’s not even remotely the same skillset involved and a lot of those guys don’t have the training or the pure atheleticism that it would take to make the move to MMA. Just because a guy is over 95% percentile in weight doesn’t mean that they have what it takes to be a top level MMA fighter.

As far as collegate wrestling goes the heavyweight division goes from 183lbs to 285lbs (a huge difference)and freestyle/greco-roman heaviest weight class is 120kg (265lbs). These correspond pretty well with what MMA already has for heavyweight.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 6:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Football doesn't prepare a guy to fight mma, obviously...

But athleticism is a prerequisite for MMA competiion, and a football player has that box checked. The point is, that football linebackers, for example, present a pool of large, athletic, guys. Guys, who in the future, could possibly make a relatively easy transition to MMA.

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 18, 2008 7:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know how anyone can miss the likes of Michael Westbrook, Marcus Jones, Carlton haselrig and others transitioning to mma??? There have been articles on BE about Santana Moss and others getting into BJJ. MMA is exploding, as are the individual arts such as BJJ, MT, Judo, wrestling, boxing, etc…. People are just into this, why should future athletes be any different?

As the money and popularity involved grows, you can expect more and more top level athletes to take up the sport/arts on different levels. Perhaps a guy that would have been an NCAA linebacker, instead focuses on mma? We are just beginning to see the influx of national champion or olympic level wrestlers on a major level. Where as there were a few of those types around since the beginning, it seems a lot are now all-americans or olympic hopefuls.

Yes, the ranks may be somewhat thin now, but remember, the average career of an NFL player is 4-5 years. That leaves a pretty young competitor looking for a way to keep competing at something.

http://eliotmarshall.com/

by BJJDenver on Nov 18, 2008 8:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Michael Westbrook is 36 and weighs 225lbs, Marcus Jones is 35 and 260lbs, Carlton Haselrig is 42 year old and one of the most decorated Amateur collegiate wresters in NCAA history. You’ve named three aging guys who have got into MMA after their NFL careers were over and none of them are as big as Lesnar or going to cause any of the problems this whole thread is supposed to be about. Yes there will be the occasional Johnnie Morton that decides to try MMA instead of Pro Wrestling after their football careers are over but the NFL isn’t going to flood MMA with elite level athletes who have to cut to make 265lbs any time soon (if ever) and the guys coming out of college aren’t going to be the elite level athletes they are going to be the guys who couldn’t make the NFL.

Yes the average NFL career is only like 3 years but a lot of that is guys that barely make the team and then get replaced by someone better or guys who’s injuries take them out. These aren’t the elite level guys that NCAA wrestling is going to feed into MMA it’s the guys who weren’t athletic/skilled enough for the NFL and aging guys who are looking for something to do after the NFL. For this discussion you also have to take into account how many of those guys will be huge linemen as opposed to just being football players (the average weight for a NFL player is 245lbs, which isn’t a issue for this discussion).

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 9:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

All good points. I think you may have missed the big point that I’m trying to make… The sport of mma and its components are growing in popularity, even amongst elite athletes from other sports. I’m not saying any of the guys I named are going to make an impact, but just using them as examples of the sports popularity. Now, I’m not saying Albert Haynesworth is going to walk away from the Titans after this season and try to be an “Ultimate Fighter”, lol. I’m simply saying that some guys that could have average careers in major sports, may in the future, opt of trying to be a mma star.

It has been speculated, that part of the decline in the depth of top boxers, is that the kids that once grew up training and wanting to be boxers, now see the money and fame of the NBA or NFL and are going there instead. The same can be said about MLB. This is all I’m saying. That as the popularity and money in MMA grow, it will attract even more top athletes, and from a younger age.

http://eliotmarshall.com/

by BJJDenver on Nov 19, 2008 11:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Perfect example:

http://mma.fanhouse.com/2008/11/19/patriots-stephen-neal-recalls-wrestling-ufc-heavyweight-champ-b/

If MMA had been as lucrative as football, this guy probably woudl be a super heavyweight. And by the same token, if Brock had been better at football, we wouldn’t even be having this discussion.

I agree BJJ, the notion that there just aren’t enough big guys who can fight to fil a division is wrong – they just haven’t had the incentive, and I believe that now is the time to start working on it.

by mythbuster on Nov 19, 2008 12:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent find.

This is exactly what I am talking about. If the timing had been different, perhaps he also would have leaned towards a mma career rather than football.

I mean really, if you are 6’4" and 300 pounds, football is really the only big time sport for you. I think mma could change that in time.

http://eliotmarshall.com/

by BJJDenver on Nov 19, 2008 3:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes maybe in a decade or so MMA will be close enough to the NFL that giant sized guys might think of it as an option if they can’t make third string on a team but that isn’t any kind of guarantee. Of course guys with the stature and athleticism of Brock Lesnar are extremely rare to start with, even if the flood gates of all sports opened up on MMA you won’t see many guys like that.

by who me on Nov 24, 2008 5:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No they don’t. Most of those guys play football from Elementary School on and that isn’t likely to change in the future, MMA isn’t something you can just pick up with a couple of lessons if they aren’t growing up with some kind of martial art it’s unlikely they are going to just pick one up and change to a completly unrelated sport out of the blue. Amateur wrestlers will flock to MMA but football players are going to dream about the NFL and concentrate on their football skills. Any bleed over from football to MMA would be rare and it would be the guys that couldn’t make it in football not the elite level atheletes.

It should also be noted that a lot of those giant sized guys in the NFL bulk up to be that size, it is a size they worked to get to because that is what is neccessary to play pro football at that position. The average size for a pro linebacker is 220lbs to 260lbs those guys aren’t the Lesnar sized guys anyway it’s the linemen that are the big guys and they don’t have to be as atheletically mobile but they block and push on each other. It won’t be those giant sized guys moving to MMA.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 8:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

just on a side note, I was reading somewhere about an mma program in a Boston area school.

http://eliotmarshall.com/

by BJJDenver on Nov 19, 2008 11:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Same

I thought of making a fan post on it, but was one school. But it is telling about where the sport is going, and the acceptance it’s getting.

by mythbuster on Nov 19, 2008 12:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think I saw that, and it was pretty interesting read.

So are we all bored at work?

by iiowyn on Nov 19, 2008 12:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

shhhh…

http://eliotmarshall.com/

by BJJDenver on Nov 19, 2008 3:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cain is not “damn close” to 265. If I recall correctly, he weighed in under 240 for his fight with Jake O’Brien.

by Carl P on Nov 18, 2008 1:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Brandon is too small for HW....

& become cocky after 1 year out of the octagon….

by Lewzer on Nov 18, 2008 7:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cain Velazquez is 240lbs.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 5:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

weeee a 10 person division… very interesting……

or, you know what… these 230ish guys who cant cut to 205 and are too small for lesnar can…

a) try cleaning up their diet, drop 10lbs, and cut to 205

b) try eating better, lift some damn weights and gain GOOD weight (don’t pull a werdum)

c) deal with it.

by dbcb on Nov 17, 2008 10:36 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Just because we have another division doesn’t mean that a 230ish guy couldn’t fight in a 230 and above weight class, if he wanted.

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 17, 2008 10:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We’ll need to add some rebar to the octagon.

by Ubernoober on Nov 17, 2008 11:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Nice article.

I think I agree with pretty much all of that.

There is no point creating a super heavyweight division right now but when the sport grows and the heavyweight division gets big enough and deep enough I think there will be a right time to split up the now heavyweight division into two weight classes. That would make sense to me.

I still think they need to do something now though about guys putting back on 20 to 30 pounds after the weigh-in and before the fight. I mean Alves said he fights at almost 200 and he weighs in at 170. That shouldn’t be happening. I think they need a rule that a fighter has to be within 5 or 10 pounds of their stated weight class come fight time.

by mattman73 on Nov 18, 2008 12:11 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd

Beautiful in its simplicity.

by subo on Nov 18, 2008 2:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I fundamentally disagree with your assessment of why Couture lost. It wasn’t the size advantage: when Brock took him down, Randy got back up without taking any appreciable damage and I believe scored a takedown, though not a very solid one. Randy lost because he got punched, standing, in the exact wrong place at the exact wrong time. That is not to say that Lesnar was out-boxing him, rather he landed one good, solid punch where he needed to. He got caught. He said so himself. I understand your concern but, I don’t feel that this fight is very supportive of your overall point and I certainly disagree with your argument. It blatantly impugns Brock’s victory and Randy’s ability.

by Rundownloser on Nov 18, 2008 1:40 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Brock feinted a left jab, Randy moved to slip outside it and was in the perfect position to get hit by a right cross from a man with a very long reach.

by iiowyn on Nov 18, 2008 7:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It wasn’t the size advantage

So, even tho Brock said before the fight that his plan was to be bigger than Randy, and after the fight Randy said, ’he’s just too big’, and even tho he as pushing Randy around like a small teenager, you still say that size had nothing to do with it. Noted.

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 9:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, Randy did note how big the guy is, but as to what actually lost him the fight, the punch, he said that he got caught. He didn’t slip the punch well enough and he got caught. He was doing well in the first round, though he clearly lost it. On top of that Brock had seeming started to tire a bit and had a well placed cut above his right eye, i.e. Randy was very capable of winning that fight without the creation of a new weightclass or any of this talk.

The point being: It wasn’t the size (if by size, you mean weight; otherwise we’re in a completely different argument) advantage that got Couture knocked out.

Additionally, I agree with Simco that there is just nowhere near the depth in the heavyweight division universally, let alone the UFC, to institute a new weightclass.

by Rundownloser on Nov 18, 2008 12:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

but as to what actually lost him the fight, the punch, he said that he got caught.

Granted, the punch was what ended the fight. However, before the punch Randy was being manhandled with ease. I didn’t download the fight, so can’t make ani-gifs of anything, but there were many spots it could be seen – Brock all but carrying Randy across the ring when Randy tried to force him against the cage, moving Randys arms around like twigs while he flailed around trying desperately not to get his arm trapped, Randy taking Brocks back only to get shrugged off. So while I agree that the punch was what ended the fight, there was no way Randy could have overcome the size difference. His punches didn’t faze Brock, and he couldn’t do a thing on the ground against him.

As for Brock tiring and the cut, nonsense. Him being tired has been thoroughly debunked, and the cut only made him pick up the pace. One didn’t exist and the other only effected him in a positive way.

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 12:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The punch that floored Randy was pretty damn good as well, Brock seemed to have timed Coutures head movement perfectly. He faked the left jab then followed with a right hand to where Randy’s new head position was. Brock has a hell of a long reach.

by iiowyn on Nov 18, 2008 1:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe. Maybe Randys age, and slowed reflexes, played a role as well. Randy zigged, but not enough, and got hit behind the ear.

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 1:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He slipped the left jab, not the right. Since the jab ended up being a feint and Brock was looking directly at Couture’s head as he threw the right I am assuming the combination was set up after getting used to Couture’s timing and head movement.

I also think people are underestimating Brock’s reach, I seem to remember Herring being surprised by that huge punch because he thought he was outside Brock’s range.

by iiowyn on Nov 18, 2008 1:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I can’t find the gif. I could be wrong, but when I initially saw it, it looked like he dodged the shot but not enough, and got grazed because he didn’t dodge enough (again, in the right spot. I’m not doing the “dive” thing).

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 2:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It appeared to me as well that is was a grazing blow.

"My job is a decision-making job, and as a result, I make a lot of decisions." --George W. Bush, The Decider, Lancaster, Pa., Oct. 3, 2007

by lovingmma25 on Nov 18, 2008 2:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here is the gif

To me it looks like he is slipping outside of the left jab, which ended up looking like a feint to me, but I am not an expert.

by iiowyn on Nov 18, 2008 2:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ok you’re right. That’s on Randy tho, he got caught with the old 1-2 lol. As Misterjonez points out, the reach got him more than anything else but I saw it wrong initially, my mistake.

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 4:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Randy did slip the correct way,

I watched the fight like six times on Yahoo, and he did slip it – as he said – just not enough. It was the extra 2-3 inches of reach that Brock has that made contact possible.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 2:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

After seeing the .gif below

I think I was mistaken. The other angle made it look like he reacted better to the incoming right, but whatever happened, it still looks to me like it was possible because of his reach.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 2:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Also it looked like he reacted quickly to Randy’s head movement. The punch seemed to just be an arm and shoulder, not much hip rotation if at all, and he still looked like he could extend more. The man has a really long reach. Does anyone outside of freakshows beat his 81" reach?

I am really enjoying this discussion, I have pretty much no experience with fight technique past the the shows I have been watching in the last few months.

by iiowyn on Nov 18, 2008 2:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think Randy said similar, that he underestimated the reach and thats how it got him. In the gif it sure looks that way.

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 4:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, you’re probably right about Brock getting tired, however, the cut made him pick up the pace because the fight could have been stopped. If Brock didn’t try to finish it, he might have ended up losing, so he went for broke and it worked. Still the cut could have ended the fight in the later rounds.

Also, I don’t remember Brock manhandling Randy. Sure he took him down a couple of times and was effective in executing his gameplan. But Brock’s technique was solid. For example, while he had Randy up against the fence, he used Randy’s defensive posture against him and pulled Randy’s right ankle out from under him while stepping past him to get the takedown. It wasn’t brute force that got that takedown. As to Randy getting shrugged off, Brock has an increasingly technical jiu-jitsu game and I would cite that incident as an example.

Essentially, I wonder if you and I don’t fundamentally disagree about the nature of the fight. I just don’t remember the fight the way that you describe it.

by Rundownloser on Nov 18, 2008 1:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Heres one of the gifs

(thanks again to iiowyn)

While this is only one of the spots I mentioned, it is clear here. And I think you may be right – we did view the same fight through different eyes. While you see the very end, where Brock swings his leg back for the reversal/sweep/whatever, which is nice, I saw the rest of it. I saw how he stood up from an awkward position with a 220 lb man on his back, and he did it easily. I saw how he had no fear of swinging one leg out, no fear that the small guy clinging to him might be able to do anything to capitalize on his being unbalanced for a second.

As for the cut, if you believe Brock then you have to believe that the fight mad him mad, not scared. He said (paraphrased) ‘it made me nervous for a second, then I got pissed because I wanted to get first blood.’

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 2:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

“believe that the fight mad him mad” = “believe that the cut made him mad”

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 2:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In wrestling

this is a pretty simple series of movements. Watch how Brock grabs his ankle, immobilizes Randy’s left hip with it, forcing Couture to post his right leg to the mat for stability, then Brock steps past Randy’s hips for dominant position. I’ve actually done this tons in competition, almost exactly like this.

It usually starts when I’m wrestling a leg-riding dickwad who just wants to ride out the round on top. Immobilize the ankle on my far hip, force him to post his other leg (if he doesn’t post, he slides around my body and I’ve got him where I want him anyways) and then once he’s providing the stability for both of us (remember, we’re connected through his left leg, since I’m holding it tightly to my right hip) with his right leg, I step around with my now free left leg to establish squarely dominant position and pull the left foot through for the takedown and score.

I was almost ridiculously strong when I wrestled (bench 310, box-squats 450, 25 chin-ups, 150 pushups, etc..) but I wasn’t very big. I just knew how to apply leverage, and that’s what this really is. It looks like a big man just tossing a little man around, but it isn’t. It’s really solid technique.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 2:33 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Thanks for that reply, I have been trying to learn more about the techniques used in MMA.

by iiowyn on Nov 18, 2008 2:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm actually surprised

that we don’t see more of this when a guy’s getting his back taken during a transition or scramble. It’s so easy to perform this that it’s kind of silly that we don’t at least see it attempted more often.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 3:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s likely because of how difficult it is to determine how far behind you your opponent actually is. If he’s in transition, you could be assisting him in putting a hook in. This is a situation where I think Brock realized Randy was still out to the side and that suspending his ankle would prevent him from taking his back completely.

by Blackout612 on Nov 18, 2008 3:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Looking at it again, Brock grabs Randy’s upper thigh to prevent him from getting the center of his back and keep him to the side.

by iiowyn on Nov 18, 2008 3:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It was a pretty savvy move, he should get a lot of credit for that.

by Blackout612 on Nov 18, 2008 4:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

this is a pretty simple series of movements. Watch how Brock grabs his ankle (etc)

The move itself I give credit, whether its easy or difficult. My point was more the rest of it, as I said.

Standing up with a grown man on your back, from an awkward angle, with what seems to be one leg. And, I’m sure you know but I remind you, Randy is no wrestling slouch either. So it isn’t like he was taking on some barroom brawler who doesn’t understand leverage.

And then, performing this move (again, easy or hard) while an accomplished wrestler is climbing on your back, presumable trying to defend against the take down. Clearly, he didn’t have much worry about Randy’s offense, but more to get his own. A nice size advantage can do this.

Since you know wrestling better than I do, I will ask you – if both of them were the same size, how do you see the fight having gone? Or do you admit that size made a big difference (which I repeat, both Brock and Randy have said).

(I just got out of hell traffic and hungry, so I hope this made as much sense as I want it to…)

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 4:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If we're talking pure wrestling, and no BJJ,

then size doesn’t have as much to do with this maneuver as you might think. The trick is timing. With a ‘single hook,’ otherwise referred to in wrestling as a ‘leg-ride,’ the trick is to control the body.

The guy trying to set the hook is at his most vulnerable while he’s trying to sink it in all the way. Also, after it’s sunk in, a wrestler doesn’t want to run his body parallel to his opponents’ body. You actually want to hang your torso across his body so you can place as much weight as possible on your opponents’ hips. Once this is established, it’s pretty hard to get out of a leg-ride, which is why they’re tried-and-true moves for ‘riding’ out a points lead for a victory. Proper leverage and pressure is far more important than simple weight. Maintaining position is the most important part. There were 135lb guys who could keep me locked down when I weighed 170lbs – if I let them get the leg in.

Now for the fight in general, it’s pretty obvious that the big guy has the athletic advantage, so if all other factors are equal then this big guy wins. In wrestling, like BJJ, position, leverage and balance are far more important than simple weight. Strength plays a part during transitions and scrambles, absolutely, but weight isn’t that big of a deal. I threw our 275lb’er twice in practice using picture-perfect fireman’s carries, and he placed 8th in state that year (cut 5-10lbs to make weight, btw).

But obviously the point remains that if all, or even most other factors are even, the big guy wins. I just don’t see this particular exchange being about size, it’s more about anticipation, position and leverage.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 5:07 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

But obviously the point remains that if all, or even most other factors are even, the big guy wins. I just don’t see this particular exchange being about size, it’s more about anticipation, position and leverage.

Thank you for admitting what I’ve been saying. Since both men are accomplished wrestlers, we can safely say that the size was a major player.

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 7:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well of course the size was a major player, myth.

But that doesn’t change the fact that it was actually his speed which leveled the field in all other aspects of the fight. If he’d been Hong Man Choi out there, the fight would have gone similarly to how Fedor vs. Choi went.

It’s Brock’s freakish athleticism, as a total package, which makes him so dominating. After they disallowed headbutts, Mark Coleman became second-tier. His size didn’t win him much of anything after Smith was allowed to stand him up and pepper him outside for an entire fight until he wore down.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 7:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

...
Well of course the size was a major player, myth.

go back to the beginning of this thread. This has been my point all along. I even gave Brock credit for that leg swingie move. If you agree with me, I can’t figure out why you’re arguing with me.

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 7:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You can't seem to admit that size

isn’t the be-all, end-all of physical/athletic attributes. If you can’t match a guy physically or athletically, you’re going to have to figure out a path to victory that requires skill.

Are you suggesting there is no such path against Brock?

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 7:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Brock won the fight with a punch to the head, the deciding factor in the fight was his long arms and how hard he hits. The wrestling part of it was pretty much a wash between the two as Brock only took him down once and wasn’t able to keep him down and Randy almost had Brock taken down when Brock grabbed the cage.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 9:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hate to think what kind of outrage there would be over a decision like the Herring fight. Brock could have RNC’d Couture and people would still be losing their minds.

by Blackout612 on Nov 18, 2008 9:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, that’s the takedown I was refering to. Sorry about the confusion, I thought he grabbed the right ankle. I think it got mirrored up in my mind :) Also, and please refer to misterjonez’s comment below for a better description of what I was trying to say.

But yes, that gif is a perfect example of what I’m talking about.

by Rundownloser on Nov 18, 2008 2:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Crap, misterjonez’s comment is actually above mine, not below. Damn, it would be nice to have an edit function.

by Rundownloser on Nov 18, 2008 2:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I know, one of my comments

was ‘moved’ as well. Weird.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 3:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It is how the posting works, things are sorted by posting time, not by when you started the post.

by iiowyn on Nov 18, 2008 3:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The “Preview” feature is your friend. And my friend. And everyone’s friend.

by Kierkegaard on Nov 18, 2008 3:31 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

The Preview feature has no friends. It’s a loner, a rebel.

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 4:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, that’s the takedown I was refering to. Sorry about the confusion, I thought he grabbed the right ankle. I think it got mirrored up in my mind :) Also, and please refer to misterjonez’s comment below for a better description of what I was trying to say.

But yes, that gif is a perfect example of what I’m talking about.

I would take this comment more seriously if you got the placement of Misterjonez comment correct. Since you didn’t, I have no choice but to ignore you.

Ok done. And then I suppose we’ll just disagree then. I’ll continue to agree with both Brock and Randy, you keep agreeing with yourself :)

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 4:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jordan Breen covered what I have been trying to say quite well on today’s show. On top of if being a good episode on its own merits, I would recommend a listen.

by Rundownloser on Nov 18, 2008 7:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know who Jordon Breen is.

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 7:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He has a show on Sherdog radio.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 9:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here’s the link to today’s radio show:

http://www.sherdog.com/radio/Radio-Jordan-Breen-Show-827

Enjoy, it’s a pretty good one.

by Rundownloser on Nov 19, 2008 1:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I just went back and listened to it, he pretty much lays it all out and breaks down most of the arguements for adding a weight class into why they are wrong. He really has a handle on this one.

by who me on Nov 19, 2008 4:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, thanks anyway. I prefer to form my own opinions, not get them from others. Have fun with that tho!

by mythbuster on Nov 19, 2008 8:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I like to form my own opinion as well, taking into account the research and opinions of other people in addition to my own so I can make my opinion as well researched and supported as I can.

by iiowyn on Nov 19, 2008 10:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yea Breen’s arguments on this subject weren’t just his opinions on it he really had his facts and research together on what he was talking about.

by who me on Nov 24, 2008 5:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I prefer to form my own opinions, not get them from others.

…and hold them no matter the amount of evidence to the contrary, I see.

by Rundownloser on Nov 19, 2008 12:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Really?

You felt the need to add that last shot to a dead horse?

Not to be rude, but not everyone is going to agree with you. Once you understand that, and accept it, you’ll be a much happier person.

by mythbuster on Nov 19, 2008 1:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Dude, I was just joking around, like I though you did above about the not forming my own opinions. Thought we were just making jokes, didn’t mean to offend.

by Rundownloser on Nov 19, 2008 4:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

oh lol

Yeah I was joking, but I thought you were getting all defensive. Sorry if I misunderstood :)

by mythbuster on Nov 19, 2008 5:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cool. I got worried there. I always forget that sarcasm and tongue in cheek sort of humor is not easily deciphered in the midst of a debate. Next time, I’ll make sure that that I include a :)

by Rundownloser on Nov 19, 2008 5:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That punch is the same punch he decked Mir with and smashed Herrings face with. Randy had an opportunity to mount his style of offense, but brock was just too damn big. He’s just big son of a bitch, that’s all there is to it.

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 18, 2008 9:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Randy also caught him with good, solid punches. The fact that Brock also isn’t glass jawed has to piss people off. The kryptonite is (probably?) submission defense – and if Mir/Nog wins this unified belt, this entire notion goes in the dustbin of history.

Or the shitter, if you think as poorly of this idea as I do.

by subo on Nov 18, 2008 2:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Since UFC 85, 17 heavyweights have competed in the UFC. One of them weighed in at under 225 pounds. Another that did not has since dropped to light heavyweight. Just thought that was worth mentioning.

by Richard Wade on Nov 18, 2008 1:59 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

walking around, uh, wait?

Does anyone know what the WWE listed as Brock’s weight when he was wrastlin’? Usually they would use as big a number as they could get away with – and somehow I don’t think that he was cutting for those ‘fights’. Just wondered what his walking around is.

by JAMSmusic on Nov 18, 2008 2:19 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

He was 276 during the fight, probably walks around 280-285ish when not in camp.

by iiowyn on Nov 18, 2008 7:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The weight classes are fine just how they are right now IMO.

http://mma4real.net/

by Tha Realness on Nov 18, 2008 8:14 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I get your point mma_dude – I think over time mma fans will become bored with Brock if all he is – is just a big guy bullying his opponents. If the heavyweight division gets more larger guys like Carwin, Velasquez, and Kongo – Brock would have better competition and more exciting fights.

I love to watch Randy fight, and I personally thought he did excellent up against Lesnar. I felt Randy did more than Mir and Herring given his size. Randy definitely exposed Brock as well. I’d like to see Randy stay at heavyweight but that’s just me.

"My job is a decision-making job, and as a result, I make a lot of decisions." --George W. Bush, The Decider, Lancaster, Pa., Oct. 3, 2007

by lovingmma25 on Nov 18, 2008 10:55 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

How did he expose Brock?

http://mma4real.net/

by Tha Realness on Nov 18, 2008 1:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The way Randy handled Brock up against the cage I would consider exposed. The way Randy was able to get up from the takedowns would be considered exposed as well.

What do you consider exposed?

"My job is a decision-making job, and as a result, I make a lot of decisions." --George W. Bush, The Decider, Lancaster, Pa., Oct. 3, 2007

by lovingmma25 on Nov 18, 2008 2:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

God this thread makes me vomit. couture “exposed” lesnar.. WTF? he got knocked the fuck out and din’t do a damn thing to Lesnar but gets praised for “getting up” and “holding him against the cage”

Couture could take a shit and people would say his great game plan led to him taking a rather smooth dookie.

by dbcb on Nov 18, 2008 2:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

Exposed? Randy is an Olympic level wrestler. The fact that Randy got up once or twice doesn’t “expose” Brock. That’s stupid. You’re hurting my brain.

So if anyone mounts any type of possible offense against Brock in clinch or ground situations, then he’s exposed. This is so flawed. I’m literally bashing my head against the table. The fact that you have a Bush quote on your thing in an attempt to make fun of the guy while your logic is similarly nonsensical is ironic.

by dropkick101 on Nov 18, 2008 2:19 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Rec'd

Comparing a man’s logic to GWB’s… brutal.

by subo on Nov 18, 2008 2:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

Randy should always have fought at Light Heavyweight. The guy wrestled at around 190 in college and then put on muscle after the fact. The reason he took fights at heavyweight was because he was winning. He stopped winning and then cut the weight. When he started losing at 205, he saw a style match up he thought he could take advantage of at heavyweight.

Randy was always an undersized heavyweight. Brock Lesnar is a huge man but he’s not going to have such a massive size advantage over anyone else in the division. Nog, Mir, Carwin, Velasquez, Herring, Gonzaga, Kongo – those are all some pretty big dudes.

My prediction, not based on any data, is that we will see big wrestlers start making their way into MMA. As the UFC becomes more mainstream, more popular, and more lucrative, why wouldn’t we see this transition of big athletes into the sport?

This has already happened. A large amount of succesful wrestlers who want to continue their athletic career are getting into MMA. Yeah, the bigger the sport gets the more this will happen but you’re assertion fails to see one major: generally speaking, people Brock Lesnar’s size are not that quick and agile. That is the key to Brock’s success – not just his size, but that size coupled with the speed and agility – not even counting his quick ability to learn.

by dropkick101 on Nov 18, 2008 2:16 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

All he’s going to do is get better, gang.

And if he can finish fights, who can say it won’t be exciting? I’m sorry – was that fight boring???

by subo on Nov 18, 2008 2:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think we agree -- except...

None of the guys you mentioned are even close in weight to Lesnar. They walk around at under 265 — Lesnar walks around at 280. I think all the guys you mentioned could make a cut to 225.

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 18, 2008 3:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We know for certain that even Big Nog

could make the cut to 205, since his identical twin brother fights LHW.

The fact is that Brock Lesnar is a freak of nature. Can they find other freaks of nature? Sure they can. I do think this is overreaction, though. He’s obviously got holes in his game still, and there are plenty of opportunities in the near future for guys to expose those holes.

Brock’s not invincible, but he does have the perfect athletic base from which to build a stellar MMA career. All indications are that he’s doing everything correctly to maximize his fight life.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 3:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly...

The perfect base for him to capitalize on an error in weight classes.

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 18, 2008 3:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You are really good at ignoring opposing viewpoints. The weight difference is entirely due to the available pool of competitors. There is no “error”.

by iiowyn on Nov 18, 2008 3:08 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Rec'd

Brilliantly stated. Sadly, it’s likely to fall on deaf ears.

by Blackout612 on Nov 18, 2008 3:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Indeed, good sir

I hope the Brock hatred will wear off.

I also hope for a chocolate factory run by big-tittied hookers hires me.

I think they’re equally likely.

Sigh.

by subo on Nov 18, 2008 6:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Lol @ chocolate hookers ;)

I’d eat those. So long as they passed their physicals.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 7:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't hate brock, did you read the post...

I don’t think anything should be done till 1) we get more big fighters or 2) we all agree that Brock’s huge weight advantage is too rediculously hard to overcome for a smaller heavyweight

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 18, 2008 7:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe he should become a genetic engineer...

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 18, 2008 8:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Two wors, guys:

Stud Fees.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 8:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

According to Sherdog:

Nog- 230. Cain – 245. Kongo – 230. Carwin – 255. Herring – 250. Gonzaga – 250. Dos Santos – 240. Mir – 240.

I don’t know about the cut in weight to 225 but the point is not that they are “close in weight to Lesnar” but more so that they are bigger than Couture. The extreme size disadvantage was Randy’s problem and while it may still be something to look out for for some of these other heavyweight in matching Brock, it’s not going to play nearly as big a role as your article would have us believe.

Nog and Kongo are the smallest in the class and I would venture to say that both guys have a distinct size advantage over Randy.

by dropkick101 on Nov 18, 2008 3:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

From their most recent UFC weigh-ins:

Nogueira – 237. Velasquez – 236. Carwin – 264. Herring – 250. Dos Santos – 234. Mir – 255.

by Richard Wade on Nov 18, 2008 4:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+Gonzaga came in at 256 on Friday, if memory serves.

by Blackout612 on Nov 18, 2008 4:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And Gabriel looked fantastic.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 4:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He did. He was up seven pounds from his previous fight.

by Richard Wade on Nov 18, 2008 4:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

so instead of being 60 pounds heavier, brock will only be 45 pounds heavier....

interesting point.

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 18, 2008 7:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry to be picky, but I don’t think Brock adds 35 pounds in 24 hours.

If x – 256 = 45, x = 301. Not exactly.

by subo on Nov 18, 2008 8:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The talent pool is not deep enough and never will be.

I know this because the separate disciplines that make up MMA – wrestling, muay thai, jiu-jitsu, boxing – don’t have anyone at Brock’s size that can do what he does. And if there is, they are few and far between. People that get to that size simply aren’t as quick and agile as Brock Lesnar.

 It’s not a matter of “waiting” until the sport gets even bigger. We could wait 50 years until MMA eclipses the NFL and I still don’t think we would see a massive amount of 280 pounders who could move like Brock Lesnar. He doesn’t make sense.

by dropkick101 on Nov 18, 2008 8:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I argue that there is plenty of high-end athletic talent

available right now, just look at each NFL roster’s O-Line. The starters are going to stick with what they do, but NFL O-lines are made entirely of guys built like Lesnar, so MMA would be a viable alternative to a guy with a bad knee replacement early in his career or a guy who just couldn’t figure out the complexities of an NFL O-line. The problem, as others have pointed out, is that the incentives simply don’t exist to lure those guys over right now.

I’m not saying we’d have 300 Brock Lesnars running around, but we’d definitely have enough for a SHW division. It’s just going to take time for A) mainstream acceptance and B) high enough salaries to lure those guys away from other sports.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 9:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Most of those giant linemen have more in common with Fat Albert than they do with Brock Lesnar(even the best of them). The average weight for a Pro Football player is 245lbs and those guys actually fit in quite well to heavyweight as it is now somehow I doubt we are going to see MMA flooded with giant sized hyperathletic retired NFL linemen in the future, even if it does become a popular alternative for pro football players.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 9:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Two things -

Firstly, O-linemen are the biggest guys on the field. Occasionally the D-linemen are their equal, but those guys are usually the Fat Albert types. There are (or at least were, if I’m remembering correctly from a couple years ago) O-lines that average 300lbs per man. The guards, in particular, have to be quick to create running lanes. Explosive first step is what separates a great run-blocking Guard from a journeyman.

Secondly, I doubt we’ll be seeing many retired NFL O-linemen joining MMA (by retired, I mean having already spent their prime physical years on the gridiron) due to the ridiculous number of injuries those guys endure during their careers. What MMA will more likely receive are the ones who, skills-wise, simply couldn’t fit in. The drool-inducing physical specimens who simply never “get it” at game time. There are plenty of those to be had, and they desperately want an alternative to the AFL, CFL or NFL-Europe.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 9:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Average size for a defensive lineman depends on position, a Defensive Tackle averages 310lbs, a End averages 280 or so. Average size for a offensive lineman is 300lbs also depending on position(there are tackles in the 350lb range). These are huge guys, much larger than any of the other guys on a football team(50+ to 100lbs larger) it’s doubtful any of these guys are going to make the 265lb cut even if they did decide that MMA was the future for them. So now we are talking about a subset of potential top level MMA fighters from a subset of potential MMA wannabees in a subset of guys who can cut to 265lbs but don’t weigh less than say 250lbs in a subset of football players as if they are going to be the future of the heavyweight division in MMA?

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 10:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the super heavyweight division would be 226 to infinity. Even Lesnar would no longer have to cut weight (if he didn’t want to).

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 18, 2008 10:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Adding a 205 to 225 division adds nothing to the sport as that is basically guys who cut to light heavyweight already and if you increase it to 235lbs you are left with a superheavyweight division that is basically the same as the super heavyweight division is now but instead of non-existant it’s non-existant plus Lesnar and Carwin and heavyweights have to cut weight.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 10:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Your second point added in yet another subset here, extremely huge and extremely athletic guys who play and love football but are unable to master the skills needed to be a lineman but are able to master Kickboxing, BJJ, Boxing and Wrestling to make it to a UFC level of MMA competition. For some reason I just don’t think those guys are the future of anything but construction sites and assistant coaches jobs. I would figure it’s more likely that more of the future will come from NCAA wrestling as opposed to NCAA football and guys the size of Brock Lesnar just aren’t that common in amateur wrestling.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 10:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

SUBO...

You have some strong opinions, but I’m not hearing you say anything that attacks my arguement. Other than it’s “clown shoes” (I liked that one by the way).

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 18, 2008 3:04 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think your argument is that it’s unfair for the weight class to be 206-265.

Other than Randy Couture v Brock Lesnar, where is one fight where you can say the bigger fighter beat the better fighter due to his massive size difference? I am drawing a blank other than MAYBE Tim Sylvia v Brandon Vera – and Vera’s the only guy I can think of that would benefit from a 205-225 division. The only other thing I can see such a weight class doing is diluting a very exciting LHW division.

My main question, though, comes back to Brock hatred. This argument was NOWHERE the last time Randy Couture faced a guy that weighed in at 260+. Why? Is it because he won? Because Tim looked so bad? Or is it because Brock Lesnar used to have a job people don’t respect?

by subo on Nov 18, 2008 6:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think another interesting bonus for a new division is...

It will force some of these fat ass heavy weights to get in shape, at least a little bit, as they make the cut to 225. It’s just better for the sport, has nothing to do with my feelings for Brock. Wouldn’t that be cool? A dynamic heavy weight class, instead of the lumbering weight class that exists now?

That's just a big son of a bitch -- that's all there is to it.

by mma_dude on Nov 18, 2008 7:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, I got the light heavys for that right now

Last thing I want to see is fat 225 Chuck because the option exists. I don’t mind the big boys doing whatever they do – I love Roy Nelson’s ground game, and I find Lesnar’s wrestling base absolutely mesmerizing.

I’m not watching for knockouts exclusively. I’m watching to see what style is the most dominant. I draw my excitement from that. Do I want to see decisions all the time? No. Will I respect, laud and buy PPV’s featuring a guy that is simply beating everyone that comes his way, regardless of their strenghs? Hell yes.

by subo on Nov 18, 2008 8:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What do you think you are seeing now? These guys fighting LHW don’t step into the cage at 206.

http://eliotmarshall.com/

by BJJDenver on Nov 18, 2008 8:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pretty sure we’re already seeing 225 Chuck.

by Richard Wade on Nov 20, 2008 4:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The nail has just hit the head.

by dropkick101 on Nov 18, 2008 8:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd.

I don’t know what my opinion on adding a super-heavyweight (or cruiserweight as someone else suggested) class is yet. But a fanpost with over 50 pretty divisive comments deserves some kind of recommendation.

by Kierkegaard on Nov 18, 2008 3:32 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

It’s obviously a topic which deserves some more attention.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 3:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

List of guys from biggest to smallest (UFC 81 - UFC 91)

Brock Lesnar (265)
Shane Carwin (264)
Tim Sylvia (261)
Gabriel Gonzaga (256)
Fabricio Werdum (256)
Frank Mir (255)
Neil Wain (254)
Heath Herring (250)
Antoni Hardonk (247)
Dan Evensen (244)
Eddie Sanchez (244)
Andrei Arlovski (241)
Josh Hendricks (238)
Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira (237)
Cain Velasquez (236)
Jake O’Brien (236)
Justin McCully (236)
Cheick Kongo (235)
Junior Dos Santos (234)
Christian Wellisch (230)
Brandon Vera (228)
Brad Morris (225.5)
Randy Couture (220)

by Richard Wade on Nov 18, 2008 4:41 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Guys who fought more than once are listed at their heaviest weight.

by Richard Wade on Nov 18, 2008 4:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nice list…any chance of doing a reach list? Would be nice to compare Brock’s 81" to.

by iiowyn on Nov 18, 2008 5:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

We need arm reach, leg reach, torso length and neck length measurements. Seriously. These things factor heavily into fight strategies.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 5:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Depends on how readily available that info is.

by Richard Wade on Nov 18, 2008 5:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nice research Richard!

I think there are plenty of fighters to have a 206-240(HW) and 241-275(SHW) split. Expand the top class a little and pick up a few guys out there. It would be easy to have bigger HWs get fights at SHW and bigger LHWs at HW. I don’t see this as a reaction to Brock beating Randy, it just reinforces an argument that has been made repeatedly for years. As I have explained, it doesn’t add a whole division of fighters, it simply gives the UFC another belt to promote. And whenever they have a card without a title fight, there are always people complaining. It could set up LHW vs HW or HW vs SHW superfights, which would be easy to promote in a burgeoning sport.

Again, I don’t view this as a direct reaction to randy’s loss. It is simply the evolution of the sport. As MMA gets bigger, there are going to be more guys like Lesner or NFL lineman types who are going to cross over or make a 2nd career after the NFL. They don’t need to add a huge 265-??? division, simply expand the limit slightly and divide the class.

I just don’t see major drawbacks that would even come close to outweighing the positives of doing this. If you can get past blaming Saturday’s fight for the surge in reactions, I think it could be a good idea.

BTW, I saw carwin fight at 300+, and he was a freakin’ monster!

http://eliotmarshall.com/

by BJJDenver on Nov 18, 2008 5:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I could get behind the idea of a SHW division..

four or five years down the road. There simply isn’t the high-end athletic talent out there right now. I have little doubt that there will be enough talent in the near future to do this, but now isn’t the time.

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

by misterjonez on Nov 18, 2008 5:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Completely agree.

by iiowyn on Nov 18, 2008 5:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely

Because to me, the only reason to ever do it is that there are so many great fighters under contract and the UFC has increased airtime.

There aren’t enough fighters. There isn’t enough airtime.

by Blackout612 on Nov 18, 2008 5:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

End of argument.

by dropkick101 on Nov 18, 2008 8:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If you look at the talent on that list there just isn’t enough for two interesting divisions, heck having them all in the heavyweight division led to a UFC division that was pretty universally seen as very thin. Personally I’d prefer more stacked divisions with high level talent and belts that actually have real value than deluding things down for the sake of a second belt and a Randy sized division.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 5:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You know, strangely, I was worried their wouldn’t be enough talent between 235 and whatever the cap would be, say 275. After looking at the list, it seems that most of the talent is above that line. Of course there are guys that could cut below it, but just for arguments sake, look at it the way it is. The 206-235 range seems to be where the lack of talent would be, but that is where it would get built by guys like Liddell moving up in weight and so forth.

Take AA for instance, and pretend he is still with the UFC. Would he take a fight with Randy and cut below 236, or would he take a fight with Lesner, that would be huge? I think he would go after the big fish, which is now Brock. This is an example of what I am saying, it could be very interesting.

And I’m not saying this needs to happen tomorrow, but i do think at some point, it will have to be addressed. Bigger guys are becoming more athletic, explosive, etc. All things being equal, a 225 pound HW has a huge disadvantage to somebody 40 pounds heavier with equal skills and ability. 60 pounds is a damn big range.

And just to clear up all the Brock hate BS, I don’t care about him one way or the other, same with randy. GG and Nog are my guys at HW. I have nothing against Brock and think he can actually propel the sport. I’m sick of hearing everything about the freakin’ Brock hate. As I’ve stated before, the call for splitting the HW class has been a hot topic for years before Brock even considered mma.

http://eliotmarshall.com/

by BJJDenver on Nov 18, 2008 8:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The 206-235 range seems to be where the lack of talent would be, but that is where it would get built by guys like Liddell moving up in weight and so forth.

This makes me less likely to get on board. I don’t want to dillute the LHW division. Now we aren’t even talking about the same thing anymore. The argument is that Brock is too big, but if everyone goes with him and we water down the 205 division, what is gained?

by Blackout612 on Nov 18, 2008 9:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I definitely can understand that. I guess I may be working off of the fact that the LHW division is so loaded right now, there would definitely be guys to fill both classes.

http://eliotmarshall.com/

by BJJDenver on Nov 19, 2008 11:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Guys almost universally cut to the lowest weight class they can reach, I don’t see where adding a new weight class would change that. If you figure off hand that guys can cut 20 or so lbs then 235lb would end up being viable for even large guys like Frank Mir and becomes a punishment for Brock Lesnar where he has to take on guys that specifically choose to fight him as opposed to actually owning a division. And what happens when Lesnar is gone, even if every giant sized super athlete out there decides to take up MMA it’s going to be a pretty thin division on talent. Lets face it your talking about a division that is basically for 95th percentile males in weight that also happen to be elite athletes too.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 11:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed completely

And the people are out there, the UFC is not signing them (or releasing them), and not going after them. I’ve mention a HW TUF before, and a SHW too — instead of yet another middleweight or LHW or whatever to fill an already bloated division.

by mythbuster on Nov 18, 2008 7:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A superheavyweight TUF would be a real joke and if you look at the last Heavyweight TUF group almost all of them dropped to light heavyweight after it was over, well except for the guys who didn’t make it in the UFC. The biggest heavyweight name to come out of that show was Brad Imes. There is just a real lack of young talent at that weight class to fill out a TUF group.

by who me on Nov 18, 2008 11:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it." -- H.L. Mencken
Start posting on Bloody Elbow »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Mikeeaston_small
A Conundrum About Fedor
Nav-logo-hover_small
Dan Henderson: Enormous Benefit To Strikeforce Has Parallels in World of Wrestling
Mma_spot_logo-1_small
Add Gerald Harris To The List Of Veterans Applying For TUF
Nav-logo-hover_small
Dan Henderson: Suddenly in the driver's seat in UFC negotiations
Alvarezavatar_small
CBS Commercial Ads Sold-Out for Strikeforce Fedor vs Rogers, Plus Targetting Markets and Sponsors (EA Sports, etc)

Recent FanPosts

Small
Omnisport Offering Live Online Stream of Strikeforce: Fedor vs. Rogers
Small
Swick Laughs Hughes Off, "It Wouldn't Even be a Fight"
Small
Thought I had re Strikeforce's marketing of Fedor:
Weo_animation2_small
Fedor Emelianenko vs Brett Rogers Will Be for the WAMMA Heavyweight Belt
Tailings_small
Dustin Hazelett Interview: ACL is good, Ready for Karo
Small
Your chance to hang with top MMA fighters
Small
Fighters should be fighters and not actors but ...
Small
The Roy Nelson Interview Post Elite-XC Loss

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings