Lift the Ban Watch: New York Edition
On the heels of the economic impact study that was presented yesterday, we receive word that New York State Assemblymen and members of the Arts, Tourism and Sports Development Committee will be presented with the findings by Marc Ratner himself. Notable quote:
The fight to legalize MMA in New York State gears up for round two on Wednesday, when legislators, regulators and promoters convene for an informational hearing in Manhattan.
The open-to-the-public session, spearheaded by New York Assemblyman Steven Englebright, will also be attended by members of the State Assembly’s Tourism, Arts, and Sports Development Committee, which voted down a bill last June to amend current legislation that bans the sport in the Empire State.
Englebright authored the bill that would have amended existing verbiage to allow for the New York State Athletic Commission to promulgate MMA regulations. Though the bill was met with both confusion and opposition last June and was ultimately shelved, there is hope a re-introduction of the bill in some form will pass through the committee this time when they begin their next fiscal session in January 2009.
New York is one of eight states remaining that has an athletic commission but does not regulate the sport, according to the UFC. The UFC cites 36 of the 44 states with athletic commissions currently recognize and regulate MMA.
Marc Ratner, vice president of regulatory affairs for the UFC, will be among the keynote speakers on Wednesday. Ratner, who served as executive director for Nevada State Athletic Commission for 14 years and was brought onboard to work exclusively on achieving regulation in the holdout states, will present the findings of an economic impact study solicited by the UFC to the tourism committee.
This is obviously good news, but one point needs to be made clear. I was on the conference call yesterday when Ratner and UFC rep Lawrence Epstein presented the results of the economic impact study to the press. One issue Ratner made clear was not a factor in getting MMA legalized in New York was an alleged dispute between Station Casinos and the UNITE HERE union. According to Ratner, that did not have any impact on the ongoing effort towards legalization and was merely an issue in Las Vegas. Ultimately that has to be good news because it returns the legalization battle to a matter of evidence and information, not political squabbling.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don’t know if it’s to the point that New York needs the UFC more than the UFC needs New York.
While I hope our new president cleans up the piss puddle left by the last guy, if NYC needs a little more suffering in order to see the light, so be it.
by Derek Suboticki on Nov 11, 2008 12:53 PM EST reply actions
The sense I get is that the UFC is preaching a line of how contributory they could be, not how essential they are. There were some figures released about how MSG has seen a 20% decline in combined boxing/pro wrestling events, but that was it and the effort is statewide.
I’m really curious to see where they’ll put UFC 100 if they can’t get MMA licensed in New York. Maybe they’ll go WWF Wrestlemania style and try to fill up a huge venue with 70,000+ fans – the sheer visual would rival the prestige of fighting at MSG. It worked for Obama, right?
I’d just send them a letter that says ‘the Knicks suck’ – that’s probably why I’m not in public relations.
by Derek Suboticki on Nov 11, 2008 3:47 PM EST up reply actions
Unfortunately, NYC is probably off the table regardless. Even if MMA is legalized for the upcoming session, it will take a will before the state has put together a working apparatus to sanction MMA events. It could be quite a while, maybe 9 months. The same thing happened in Maryland. All they did was extend the legal language from boxing and kickboxing to MMA and it’s going to be about a year since the sport was legalized before the first event.

by 


















