Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

UFC Paying Scott Ferrall to Attend Shows Neither Necessarily Unethical nor Illegal

I talked to a lifelong radio insider in a position of high level management about the situation surrounding Scott Ferrall being paid by the UFC to attend shows and ostensibly provide (favorable) comment. According to the FCC and radio ethics, this can be perfectly acceptable provided the arrangement is disclosed on air. To wit:

"It's only unethical if Ferrall didn't disclose it in some way on the air. If he didn't, it's call Plugola and is an FCC violation."

A clear definition of plugola here:

A similar concept is "plugola," in which a radio personality gives on-air promotion to an event, act, or establishment in which he or she has a financial interest without full disclosure.

I can't go back through the years of Ferrall's show, but one has to think Ferrall is knowledgeable enough to know this and not risky enough to invite FCC violations. It's feasible Ferrall committed plugola, but I have serious doubts. Given that it isn't illegal or unethical in radio if the relationship is disclosed, there's zero incentive to hide it.

UPDATE: According to radio insiders, the fact that Ferrall may or may not have been on satellite radio when he was paid by the UFC is irrelevant. If Ferrall committed plugola, the FCC could fine Sirius or refer the matter to the Justice Department.

Comment 28 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

*sigh*

Even if it’s not necessarily illegal, I still think it’s highly unethical for Ferrall to do it. I am sure Ferrall and his attorney read the rules issued by the FCC to make sure they are in the clear in case anyone questions it.

This whole issue of “plugola” and “payola” is so confusing, and it most likely won’t hurt his credibility in the long run.

The rise of Internet journalism has helped confuse things further, as it seems like a new set of rules has been created. People in this “new journalism” don’t abide by many of the rules that “real” journalists have been forced to follow in the past.

The same media everyone loves to hate — i.e. L.A. Times, S.F. Chronicle, etc. etc. — have rules where writers are not allowed to accept free clothing, food, limo rides, or any other perks. In fact, some newspapers will fire you if they catch you accepting this type of stuff.

It’s a complicated issue, even if he didn’t break any laws…

Allowing the media to have press passes to an event is so different than paying a person to attend the event and then write positive things about it!

by Randomus on Oct 30, 2008 4:33 PM EDT reply actions  

This is a common practice in radio. Common. It happens in big stations, small stations, big markets, small markets. Every single day. To compare this to print journalism – and Ferrall is not a journalist – is absurd.

by Luke Thomas on Oct 30, 2008 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

As long as they are disclosing that the paid relationship exists, I don’t see how this is that much different than paying Joe and Mike to commentate at the event.

by Day Man on Oct 30, 2008 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

And Joe covers the event pretty fairly. He toes the company line lightly and speaks his mind on some issues. They could just chaulk it up to the weed talking though.

by szucconi on Oct 30, 2008 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

There. Is. Zero. Motive.

by Derek Suboticki on Oct 30, 2008 4:37 PM EDT reply actions  

there’s an obvious motive: not disclosing the relationship lends the radiohost more credibility because he is assumed to be impartial. note that i’m not suggesting Ferrall didn’t disclose.

by boxingstudent on Oct 30, 2008 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

You shouldn’t assume that he’s impartial.

Radio hosts take money from anyone that will give it to them to speak.

by Phildo on Oct 31, 2008 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Honestly, I didn’t know there was any ethics in Satellite radio or if the FCC had any control over Satellite radio.

by steveoc24 on Oct 30, 2008 4:41 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t think Ferrall went to satellite until 2007.

by Luke Thomas on Oct 30, 2008 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Scott Ferrall isn’t a journalist he’s a radio personality. Would we be having this kind of discussion if the UFC had been paying Howard Stern to attend events? I think the issue that scares me is that people may of been giving this guy any journalistic credibility to start with, just because you give your opinion through a media source doesn’t mean your a journalist.

The “I saw it on tv so it must be true” trend is much more scary than the UFC may of paid a radio knucklehead to talk about them on the air.

by who me on Oct 30, 2008 4:48 PM EDT reply actions  

It may not break FCC communications...

…but it is clearly unethical. Unless you claim daily that you were hired to discuss the event (in a commercial or disclaimer) then it is clearly unethical.

This should be investigated.

Wags

by DocWagner on Oct 30, 2008 4:51 PM EDT reply actions  

seriously..

You want to launch a full investigation? Don’t you think your taking this just a little too far? Life itself is unethical.

by steveoc24 on Oct 30, 2008 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who cares!.. Does this really affect any of us…NO.. unless you buy into everything you hear on the radio or read on the internet … and if you do that would make you a moron.

by Mirjitsu on Oct 30, 2008 4:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Coverage makes you relavent in some peoples mind. The UFC was at a point that they would pay for any coverage and if they were going to pay then it should be good, right?

by szucconi on Oct 30, 2008 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

FARRELL

he never sounded like he had a clue to what he was talking about anyway to me (mma wise) so im with “whats the big deal” mentality. this all really came out in the open when farrell asked dana for more money, claiming Affliction had offered more and he wanted a raise..(this was according to dana himself.)

by bdw on Oct 30, 2008 5:00 PM EDT reply actions  

As long as Ferrall is being discussed, Dave Meltzer reports in his latest issue of the Wrestling Observer that he will replace Jimmy Lennon Jr. for the Januray 24 Affliction event.

No word yet if Fedor is going to be replaced by Butterbean in the night’s main event.

by Brett Jones on Oct 30, 2008 5:00 PM EDT reply actions  

For why this is the worst thing since, well, anything please see clips on youtube or something of Ferrell doing the ring work at YAMMA One (and only).

by szucconi on Oct 30, 2008 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can’t say I’d recommend this to anyone.

by Brett Jones on Oct 30, 2008 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thats true. I forgot a warning.

WARNING: May result in ear bleeding or anal leakage.

by szucconi on Oct 30, 2008 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

For any Aussie's :

John Laws “Cash for Comments” controversy anyone?

by Benicio on Oct 30, 2008 5:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Allen Freed is spinning in his grave as we speak. er Blog

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico loose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Oct 30, 2008 5:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Think of it one of two ways: A form of payola or a form of endorsement, both of which are incredibly common and span every form of entertainment imaginable.

by Simco on Oct 22, 2008 1:28 PM PDT

by Simco on Oct 30, 2008 6:07 PM EDT reply actions  

I have Sirius...

…and recall Scotty saying something to effect of “we are here in Vegas for UFC ## it’s hot, we are drinking, loving life, UFC flew us out here and they are treating us great”.

He put over that UFC was “treating” them.

by RipeTide on Oct 30, 2008 9:39 PM EDT reply actions  

That would qualify if he said that.

by Luke Thomas on Oct 30, 2008 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

also....

The UFC Sirius shows never took place during the normal shift/time slot. It was always the afternoon of the fight with comments like “we are our here FOR UFC, dude vs. guy is tonight, blah blah blah”.

It’s pushing it but it was said.

by RipeTide on Oct 31, 2008 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Plugola-Gate

I demand a full investigation of Plugola-Gate!!!!!

hahaha….just kidding!

by Higgz on Oct 30, 2008 9:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Predicting A Collegiate Wrestler’s Development
Shogun_logo_small
UFC’s Hopes For A Stadium Show In Sao Paulo Appear To Be Dead
Small
The Downfall of Diego Sanchez
Small
The time is right for a superfight, and it doesn't involve Anderson
391807_10150399618817701_750257700_8470850_1424416169_n_small
1 in about 7 billion!  :D

Recent FanPosts

Skittles_small
Off topic- watch me sing!
26759_511613730864_104300343_30384429_7437048_n_small
UFC Undisputed 3: BE Fight Camp?
Small
Yuki Kondo
Img_0019_small
Training Progress
Small
Muay Thai camps in Thailand
Blav_small
OT: Help out my short film
Badr_hari3_small
War Machine explains what happenned and asks for support

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings