Bloody Elbow: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Deadspin Writer Comes Around on Lloyd Irvin

As I stated earlier, I put Deadspin.com writer Rick Chandler in touch with Lloyd Irvin after he took me up on my offer. Chandler doesn't issue an outright apology to this site or Irvin, but realizes he probably could've handled the whole matter far more wisely:

On Wednesday I posted about Lloyd Irvin, the Maryland Mixed Martial Arts instructor who said that he thwarted a home invasion robbery by disarming one of the intruders with a martial arts defensive move. If this were true, I wondered, why had it not been picked up by any news source other than the MMA site Bloody Elbow? Probably not a wise question on my part, seeing that Irvin could possibly break me like a Hummel figurine.

But more importantly, on the chance that it could be true, my snarky attitude in the post was quite probably inappropriate. At any rate, I got my phone number to Irvin — who is in England coaching Brandon Vera in a UFC lightheavyweight nontitle bout with Keith Jardine on Saturday — and he called me Wednesday afternoon. Hilarity did not ensue.

Read the rest of the post where Irvin gives his side of the story.

Critics will still say we are forced to take Irvin's word about the events that happened in his home. Ultimately, that's true, but that doesn't trouble me in the least. In the years I've known him, he's never lied to me and I am perfectly aware of his capabilities. I also imagine once this weekend passes Brandon Vera will be more than willing to share his version of events. And when he does, I'll make sure to post them here.

This is partly why I spend as little amount of time as possible on MMA message boards. To think there are people who believe Irvin would concoct a story like this to sell a few more membership deals is beyond the pale.  And I, for one, want nothing to do with them.

UPDATE: I just received an email from Irvin to me and Chandler. Some of the details in Chandler's new piece are apparently incorrect. Stay tuned.

0 recs  |  Comment 21 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

what a terrible comments section there. one of the reasons I like this site is there is little flack and bullshit accepted here, there it’s like people have nothing better to do than spew shit all over every thread.
Which is better, a community of jackasses and threads that are long in size or small threads with 3-4 posts but every one of them actually pertains to the subject?
Don’t get me wrong, I like a funny comment as much as the next guy but when 90% of the posts are inane drivel it’s time to put in some moderation people.

by pr0cs on Oct 16, 2008 4:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

Someone over there commented that clips don’t eject out of guns like DVD players, which is totally wrong. In fact, most do. That still leaves the possibility of a round remaining in the chamber, but magazines and clips are ejected with release buttons. I played with probably every hand gun known to man in the Marines and you learn that fairly quickly.

by Luke Thomas on Oct 16, 2008 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh

And they referenced Jet Li in their posts to as removing the clip, which is NOT what he did in Lethal Weapon 4. That was removing the upper receiver, not the clip.

by Luke Thomas on Oct 16, 2008 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let’s not discount how badass removing the receiver was in the movie.

All shit in the shade, that’s the next level of being a tough-guy. All hail Lloyd Irvin.

by Heenan on Oct 16, 2008 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Someone over there commented that clips don’t eject out of guns like DVD players, which is totally wrong. In fact, most do.

Seriously that guy/gal must have never held a pistol before. You hit the release clip button while holding a gun and the clip will drop right out if nothing is below it. My only “hmm moment” is that the gun would still be loaded with the bullet in the chamber. That being said if I was a robber and some guy grabbed the gun and dropped the clip out of my gun I’d probably end up running too!!!

by ChillMike on Oct 17, 2008 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If a round was chambered. Given the huge difference in penalty between armed robbery and murder, I wouldn’t chamber around unless things looked to be going south. Would you?

Not that I give a lot of thought to home invasions…

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones

by jemaleddin on Oct 17, 2008 8:40 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

That’s some fine analysis.

by Richard Wade on Oct 17, 2008 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t even understand some of those comments. And I don’t mean that in a sense of them being inappropriate, I mean as in I don’t even know what they mean.

by Simco on Oct 16, 2008 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like how the title is “In Which I Am Yelled At By A Black Belt Jiu-Jitsu Champion”, and the picture is Irvin drinking from a melon like a beach bum and not at all scary. I know it’s Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, but the dissonance in the article is funny.

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by themachiavellian on Oct 16, 2008 4:58 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Everybody realizes that Gawker sites are mostly shit, right? If it weren’t for Jalopnik and Lifehacker, I’d say they were all shit…

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones

by jemaleddin on Oct 16, 2008 8:20 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Why is everyone in the comment threads at Deadspin trying to out-shtick the other guy?

by Luke Thomas on Oct 16, 2008 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Isn’t that what they always do there?

by Richard Wade on Oct 16, 2008 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

because...

they created a culture of “gotta be schticky!” which only got worse after Will left the staff. Where sites like ours push a culture of accountability and reason…they thrive on stupid garbage comments referencing one of 20 standard “inside jokes” or their funny topic of the day.

The site has turned into garbage and lost its early edgy relevance within the sports world.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

by Brent Brookhouse on Oct 16, 2008 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats why I hate the comment section over there. They get the article they are commenting on and try try to come up with some obscure sports reference to seem witty.

by Discman2 on Oct 16, 2008 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s the appeal of Gawker.

And frankly – I like having the choice to go to places like that. In terms of MMA blogs: If I want a serious discussion, I visit BE. If I want a joke-fest, I go to FL. And if I want to read “LOL FAG” and “UR TEH HOMO HOMO” I go to CP.

There’s a place for that snarky shit – just be glad that it’s over there and not over here!

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones

by jemaleddin on Oct 17, 2008 8:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lifehacker is like Gawker?

by Simco on Oct 16, 2008 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

lifehacker...

is part of the Gawker Media Network.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

by Brent Brookhouse on Oct 17, 2008 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’d think the “Gawker Media” links in all of those sidebars would make that explicit, but I guess people have learned to filter anything that looks ad-y.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones

by jemaleddin on Oct 17, 2008 8:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This prompted me to look at the left side and I’ll be damned, gawker media network.
I’ve literally been reading Lifehacker for a couple years and never noticed that.
 
And I think you’re right. Anything that looks remotely ad-like is visually ignored.

by Simco on Oct 17, 2008 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am staying tuned, but my attention span is short and college football is on. What’s the problem with the new story?

by szucconi on Oct 16, 2008 9:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Go back to college football. Unless something of note happens, this issue is basically settled.

by Luke Thomas on Oct 16, 2008 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it." -- H.L. Mencken
Start posting on Bloody Elbow »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Weoweoweodotdeviantartdotcom_by_weoweoweo_small
TUF 10 Contestant, Darrill Schoonover to Return to Active Army Duty
Tracy_lee_martin_mcneil_small
UPDATE: It's (99%) on: Machida / Rua II on May 1st
Small
The REAL Controversy at UFC 106
Mirkneebaraim640_small
Georges St Pierre vs. Dan Hardy to Headline UFC 109 in February?
Nav-logo-hover_small
UFC 106: Pros Pick Forrest Griffin and Tito Ortiz fights

Recent FanPosts

Small
Why do people think UFC has the best Heavyweights?
Just_tiger_small
Kim Couture (10K) top earner at Strikeforce Challengers V
Just_tiger_small
Josh Burkman KO's Brandon Melendez at Throwdown Showdown V
Headkick-lg_small
Judging Change: Reward Flashy Fightres?
Alvarezavatar_small
Update On SRC x DREAM NYE Event
Small
Fantasy match-making in the UFC Light HW Division
Small
Mixed Martial in South Asia

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings